The comment box below invites readers to comment.
Phil Beaver
seeks to collaborate on the ineluctable truth. Ineluctable means: Not to be assailed, avoided, broken, changed,
escaped, mystified, neglected, obfuscated, rationalized, resisted, revoked, or
voided. Some people erroneously imagine limiting the ineluctable truth, for
example, trying to change it.
"Civic"
refers to citizens who collaborate for individual
happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or
society. Civic citizens neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from
anyone. Civic citizens are reliably responsible to the good rather than the bad
in connections and transactions.
Consider
writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens
mutual appreciation: For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and
paraphrase its proposal as follows: The civic faction, We the People of the United States,
proffer & practice 6 public pursuits —- integrity, justice, safety,
strength, prosperity, and responsibility, “in order to” pursue happiness “to
ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve
my interpretation by listening-to and considering other citizens and their
interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787 text, unless it is
amended by the civic-people.
It seems the
Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one with status has challenged
whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this
independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states
deliberately managed by appreciative fellow citizens convinces me the preamble
is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the faction who
collaborate for statutory justice, We the People of the United States.
Every citizen
has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in
the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try
somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the
goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies
grandchildren to both born Americans and legal immigrants. Congressional
freedom of religion, which fellow citizens have no means to constrain,
oppresses freedom to develop integrity. This can be remedied by changing the
First Amendment from “prohibiting” to “promoting”.
Selected theme from this month
“We Pursue Statutory Justice” -- civic representation of the
United States Constitution.
The “woke” movement, developed during the recent 7 decades
from Liberation Theology, is a blessing to human responsibility. Wokeism
divides humankind over theology, which is the construction of divinity, in
order to explain mystery. Pursuit of mystery can only achieve mystery. Human concurrence
on one mystery would leave humankind in mystery. Democratic accommodation of
every mystery produces chaos. Pursuit of mystery is neither a noble nor an
economically viable cause.
I accept that The God may exist. But no one knows The God,
and many people don’t realize that choosing a doctrinal God does not preserve
humility, which The God might seek. And I do not know of a doctrine that
represents The God. For example, Christian doctrine claims a triune God and has
about 10 canon and 45,000 sects. Other theisms are also sectarian. “In God We
Trust” does not seem a viable motto for the United States republic.
The prior motto was E pluribus unum, 13 letters expressing “out of many states one
nation”. History shows that the civic faction may and can together provide for
fellow citizens who cannot help themselves, reform citizens who won’t help themselves,
constrain criminals, and eliminate evils. The goal of unity is limited by
actual-reality to the civic faction.
Provisions
for the civic faction to amend the Constitution when injustice is discovered,
together with the intentions sentence in the preamble, proffers the pursuit of
statutory justice “to ourselves and our Posterity”. We Pursue Statutory Justice
expresses these four principles.
I
share these ideas hoping a fellow citizen or critic will suggest a better
motto.
#USpreambler, #acivicpeople
News
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/senate-democrat-leaders-hold-press-conference-on-jan-6-pardons-5799986
Civic citizens who look to the Democrat Party cannot expect
improved leadership until they replace all of the elected officers who created/support
the 2024 DNC Platform. Its preamble ends, "History has shown that nothing about
democracy is guaranteed. Every generation has to protect it, preserve it,
choose it. We must stand together to choose what we want America to be."
The DNC cannot "choose what we want America to
be", because the United States Constitution commits to a republican form
of government. United States republicanism pursues the rule of law rather than
preference to a political party, such as the Republican Party. The Constitution
provides the opportunity to vote and intentionally prevents democracy, because
democracy can only produce chaos and ruin.
Citizens who oppose governance from the Republican Party
face dismay as long as they support a platform that wants the chaotic
governance of democracy. And no political party can "choose what we want
America to be".
Republicans like me hope voters who support the Democrat
Party will change its leadership quickly rather than accommodate 100 years of
GOP-unchallenged-power due to DNC incompetence.
#USpreambler, #acivicpeople
Quora
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-saying-the-end-justifies-the-means-considered-logical-but-not-moral?,
Anonymous
I cannot answer for society, so address my personal trust
and commitment. Humility aids achievement.
I am humble to whatever constrains human choices, in order
to give myself and civic citizens opportunity to either act or wait -- for
survival if not success.
In my ninth decade, I accept that I neither know the
ineluctable evidence nor approach whatever constrains humankind. “Ineluctable”
means the combination unavoidable, unchangeable, and irresistible.
#USpreambler, #acivicpeople
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
Feb 8
A repressed, inviolable human right:
The human individual continuously has the undeniable
opportunity to discover and develop integrity to the ineluctable evidence, by
which truth is measured. “Ineluctable” means: the combination unavoidable,
unchangeable, and irresistible. Experience, observation, and civic transparency
facilitate discovery of truth and humility towards undiscovered
actual-realities.
Typically, individuals allow infidelity to distract their
opportunity to perfect their unique pursuits. Many civic persons mistake a
recent infidelity as personal ruin rather than notice to reform – to never
repeat the mistake. Not repeating discovered error is the key to accumulating
fidelity to truth.
Under existing civilizations and cultures, independent
fidelity is unlikely. Civic citizens may reform education systems so as to
encourage and coach the young to use their human power, authority, and
responsibility to develop integrity.
Practicing integrity empowers integrity.
In practice, the individual considers a heartfelt concern;
obtains the ineluctable evidence to discover the concern is justified; studies
the discovery so as to understand how to benefit; orders personal living to
effect the benefit; civically shares the understanding and open-mindedly
responds to public reaction; if new evidence requires change in understanding,
the process is retraced as necessary; if improvement in understanding is
discovered, the adjustments are made and shared: humility is reserved so that
new ways of discovery can and may be considered. In review, the
integrity-process is: concern, discovery, understanding, order, share and
LISTEN, reconsider, improve, and remain humble to new discovery.
With this process or better, humankind’s understanding
approaches truth. Individual incorruptibility accumulates as humankind’s
completeness.
I know of no other inviolable human right. Frequently, small
infidelities to truth negate right to life. Ova, embryos, infants, and children
are especially susceptible to human infidelity.
https://www.facebook.com/gregoryfrey1/posts/10235197687498650,
Feb 8
Thirty-five years as a chemical engineer in service to the
customers (safe supply of needed chemicals) informed me that I am a writer and
gave me the courage to share experiences and observations, low as my verbal
skills may be. I cannot say I wish I had majored in English instead of ChE.
I congratulate you, Greg, on your focus: What Kristin wants and her confidence
going forward.
https://www.facebook.com/dirk.klobucar,
Feb 7
I do not know much ineluctable truth.
Honig illustrates something I learned by taking college courses in my 7th and
8th decades: professors, especially in non-STEM fields, compete with each
other, regarding the adult working-citizen on par with students. That is, the
professor expects the working citizen to yield knowledge/opinion to the
professor, as though the professor can award a pass or fail to the citizen.
When a professor ignores my opinion, I do not express pity, but leave without
wish to return to the dialogue, unless the professor contacts me.
Human beings, unlike the other species, may and can learn this: pursuing
necessary goodness is in their best interest. Just as an infant must be helped
to nourishment, his or her life benefits from example and encouragement to both
comprehend human being (the practice) and intend to pursue the excellence their
life can and may achieve. Each person has the power, authority, and
responsibility to choose human being.
Among history's awesome political philosophers, only one, Yeshua, promoted
personal pursuit of necessary goodness, with the intention and commitment to
perfect (verb) behavior from the moment of awareness and acceptance forward.
When a person encounters and accepts Yeshua's civic influence, humankind --
past, present, and future -- celebrates. Anyone who is unaware of Yeshua's civic
influence may and can accept innate tendency to necessary goodness.
I think Donald R. Trump, more than anyone I ever considered, perceives and
accepts Yeshua's civic influence (aware or not), in Trumpian intentions to
power, authority, and responsibility to necessary goodness. That is, Trump may
not be aware of Yeshua.
I regret that some fellow citizens choose to condemn Trump.
I think Honig mistakes compromise as desirable when collaboration is required
and uses academic trade-terms to bemuse the public. I recall Trump, perhaps
yesterday, saying something like: Peace is a yes or no intention. Peace cannot
be negotiated half-way. In the same speech, Trump showed humanity, I think
erroneously, traditionally urging legislative compromise when collaboration to
statutory justice is required.
I hope Trump's practices will impress Honig and empower Honig to consider
collaboration for necessary goodness to humankind rather than compromise to
split benefits.
https://www.facebook.com/gcleve.wright/posts/4366460926907468,
Feb 6
All seriousness aside, the cartoonist may not have
encountered the secrets Cynthia taught me. My wife gave me my best opportunity
to pursue authentic manhood. Thank Yeshua I knew that 25 years into our 55
years married.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjEILbesQ8
https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10,
Feb 1
Persuading people that necessary goodness is in their
self-interest is difficult. Sumerian law codes made it obvious 5500 years ago.
Genesis 1:26-28 parochially expresses the Sumerian political philosophy:
humankind may and can rule to necessary goodness on earth. The Complete Jewish
Bible (1998) illustrates the consequences of resistance to necessary goodness.
Yeshua, reared in tiny Nazareth 2000 years ago affirmed Genesis 1:26-28 in
Matthew 18:18, Matthew 5:48, Matthew 19:5-6, in the "Sermon on the
Mount", and more. Christianity hid Yeshua's civic influence by projecting
on his person The Divine.
.
The 1791 United States Constitution, in its republican form of government,
amendability, and the intentions sentence in the preamble, proffers the pursuit
of statutory justice; that is, intentional reform when legislated injustice is
discovered.
.
Yet the 2024 Democrat Party platform has a preamble that ends, "History
has shown that nothing about democracy is guaranteed. Every generation has to
protect it, preserve it, choose it. We must stand together to choose what we
want America
to be." What could be better than a republic that pursues statutory
justice to "ourselves and our Posterity"?
.
History has shown that democracy brings chaos. Only the rule of statutory
justice can facilitate necessary goodness to humankind.
.
In its 234-year history, the United States has maintained necessary goodness in
a conflicted world. Her most serious challenge came from Liberation Theology --
the Marxist politics of oppressor vs victim. Like the French Revolution of
1789, a collection of self-styled victims proposes to employ social democracy
to overthrow the United States republic; terminate rather than assist the
pursuit of statutory justice.
.
After 70 years under democratically diffused Liberation Theology, or
competitive Marxist collectivism, there is a chance the Trump-Vance era will,
during the next few decades, save the United States from democracy. Humankind
may and can hope so.
.
I write hoping to receive ideas that improve my opinion.
.
#USpreambler, #acivicpeople
https://www.facebook.com/mick.kassem,
Jan 31
I hope Kristi Noem will correct this burden.
https://www.facebook.com/hampton.peele/posts/10233933974830120,
Feb 6
Thank goodness for Al Green's freedom of speech, too.
I get about 20 "Occupy" messages a day, and this is the first one
I've read. Now I know to find out how to keep them from appearing on my page.
Jan 31
Hampton, that's a fact. And some Democrat States would not
remove Robert Kennedy, Jr. from the ballot after he dropped out. Democrat
judges denied his law suits. His 0.75 million votes added to Trump's 77.3 m
come to 50.2 % of the popular vote.
I regret that some neighbors are not thrilled with the beginning of Trump's
second term. For example, the next day after the helicopter downed a commercial
flight, I heard the Commander-in-Chief lay out the facts about the incident but
withhold conclusion pending proof. I was thrilled with Trump's transparency.
Because Obama’s Democrat Party is so overwhelmed with globalism or something
other than United States republicanism (form of government rather than
opportunity to vote), I think we are in for 70 to 100 years of Republican Party
dominance. That's dreadful, because unchallenged power invites corruption. I
want to encourage democrats who want the United States republic to succeed.
Also,
Hampton, I'm part of a faction of a small minority who would
favor a United States Civil War History Month to replace Black History Month.
In a so-revised forum, my topic might be interesting: The Civil War was an
avoidable white-Christian on white-Christian war that Abraham Lincoln
could-have, should-have clearly-challenged if not stopped.
A review follows:
In 1845, some Protestant churches, e.g., Baptist, split over slavery
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triennial_Convention and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodist_Episcopal_Church,_South).
Frederick Douglass' 1852 speech
(https://www.gilderlehrman.org/sites/default/files/inline-pdfs/douglass_july_4_speech.pdf),
with President Millard Fillmore present, was pivotal to Bleeding Kansas, 1854
to 1861 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Kansas). General R. E. Lee, in
Texas, wrote to his wife about abolitionists' evil attempt to impose on
Christianity (https://www.civilwarcauses.org/Lee-Mary.htm). Lee was smart
enough to have considered and accepted the Genesis 1:26-28 suggestion: On
earth, only humankind can pursue order. Instead he listened to competitive
Church in his home state.
President Lincoln, in his first inaugural address, was well aware that he led a
27 state to 7 state advantage and the United States industrial complex as he
taunted the CSA's February 1861 cession. Lincoln said to the Christian zealots,
"“In our present differences, is either party without faith of being in
the right? . . . justice will surely prevail by the judgment of this great
tribunal of the American people.”
The war Lincoln accommodated took some 650,000 United States' lives. The
equivalent at today's population would be 7.2 million lives lost.
Slavery was practiced worldwide from the beginning of recorded history, some
5500 years ago. During the United States' second 100 years, the civic faction
of We the People of the United States ended slavery, which the whole world may
mimic.
I encourage fellow citizens to consider Genesis 1:26-28, which suggests that on
earth only humankind may and can provide safety and security -- constrain harm.
The complete Bible attests to the idea, for example, in Matthew 18:18 -- The
God will not change what humankind chooses.
https://www.facebook.com/jim.robertson.52687,
Jan 27
What we don't know on faith could affect us in
actual-reality.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/,
Feb 6
Dear President Trump:
Thank you. Your excellence aids our
family life.
Your speech at the prayer breakfast
inspired us. I think humankind’s intentions, at an abyss, turn positive on your
persistence to discover the truth and acceptance that you cannot discover the
ineluctable evidence on your own. “Ineluctable” means the combination:
unavoidable, unchangeable, and irresistible.
You changed my prior allegiance to
Thomas Paine’s common sense. Some scholars opine that Paine meant: how a
person’s heart guided their choice to act rather than wait. You choose the
ineluctable evidence rather than belief, in order to pursue necessary goodness
to humankind. Paine also wanted fellow citizens to choose humble action
grounded in experience, observations, and discovery. Thereby, choice may and
can employ ineluctable evidence.
The 13 English colonies, who won
independence from England, could not flourish alone, so negotiated a union.
Willing people of 10 of 14 states ratified the United States of America, in the
Constitution dated 1791. Its provisions for amendment and preamble proffer the
eternal pursuit of statutory justice “to ourselves and our Posterity”. Whenever
injustice is discovered, legislators act to improve the law if not enact just
law. A representative national motto, in humility to ultimate judgment, might
be “We Pursue Statutory Justice”.
Today, you happily recognized
personal and political opponents, inferring to them: You are welcome here. You
described the challenge of good choices as either or; yes or no; peace or
conflict, then hoped to resolve division through compromise. But compromise
cannot establish peace. The work for peace follows intentions rather than
dependency. Please change the United States’ political goal to collaboration to
necessary goodness rather than compromise to power.
You wonderfully share the common
sense and necessary goodness encouraged by the American motto “In God We
Trust”. However, humankind, at the leading edge of 200,000 years as Homo
sapiens, has used mysterious gods to compete in war rather than collaborate for
peace.
Genesis 1:26-28, a 5500 year-old
Mesopotamian political philosophy, asserts that humankind may and can pursue peace
order on earth: “in our likeness, so that they may rule [life on earth]”.
However, competitive pursuits in the Middle East mutually constrained
inhabitants in 3 inner-sectarian conflicts about 3 Abrahamic gods, opposing all
other people.
Today, 7.8 billion people split:
0.2 % sectarian Jews, 24.3 % sectarian Muslims, and 32.3 % sectarian
Christians, at their own mutual expense and oppressing the other 43.2 %. Thus,
3.35 billion people suffer Abrahamic pride to 4.45 billion descendants from
4000 year-ago Near East.
The United States’ excellence --
pursuit of statutory justice, is a unique consequence of humankind’s desire for
necessary goodness. Polytheistic Mesopotamians, primitively observing the laws
of physics, speculated that the gods were busied by their domain, defaulting
order-on-earth to humankind.
Socially, 400 years ago, physics
was labeled “nature”, in order to accommodate
psychological-motivation-and-inspiration, such as peace. Philosophers hoped to
rationalize facts rather than wait for ineluctable discovery. Modern physics
researches psychology as a branch, obsoleting “nature”.
As the United States pursues
colonization on Mars, humility to whatever constrains the consequences of human
choice can be established. Only the United States has the experience and
background to beneficially reform its motto from “In God We Trust” to “We
Pursue Statutory Justice”, or better. Only you could effect such profound
change to humankind.
It has taken most of my lifetime to
pursue these thoughts and additional time to articulate them. I can’t imagine
anyone but you, President Trump, effectuating any reform you may perceive from
them. I appreciate your time to read this and want to help.
Sincerely,
Phillip Beaver
Phil
Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to theineluctabletruth, which
can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it
obviously does not work.
Phil is agent
for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit
corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays
from the latest and going back as far as you like. He uses the hashtag
#USpreambler.