Saturday, November 30, 2019

The liberty-to choose freedom-from oppression


Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.



Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual equality:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my proposal as follows: “Willing citizens collaborate, communicate, and connect to provide 5 public institutions—integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity—so as to encourage responsible human liberty to living people.” I want to collaborate with the other citizens on this paraphrase and theirs yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.



Selected theme from this week

Writers for the press seem to do all they can to replace the U.S. republic with social democracy. But the U.S. Preamble proposes responsible human liberty through establishment and maintenance of 5 public connections for freedom-from tyranny. Only the entity We the People of the United States can effect the U.S. Preamble’s proposition, so writers for the press as well as government officials would do well to voluntarily join We the People of the United States. U.S. citizens can each accept human liberty by connecting for public freedom.

Neither the press nor government can guarantee that fellow citizens will always have the opportunity to consider, communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish and maintain the U.S. Preamble's proposition. Some fellow citizens want the chaos of social democracy and operate Alinsky-Marxist organizations to defeat the U.S. republic. Others would wait an eternity for the mystery of whatever-God-is to make America great.

Few citizens realize that "our Posterity" includes children, grandchildren and subsequent descendants. If they did, they would not load them with $23 trillion federal debt.

Columns

Claiming journalism (Stephanie Grace) (https://www.nola.com/opinions/stephanie_grace/article_22f1aace-0fae-11ea-b50f-1b96ab1023d3.html)

In reliability to the-literal-truth, writers for the press seem at the bottom with members of Congress; https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/01/11/americas-most-least-trusted-professions-infographic/#7b9b371c7e94. But Grace rates herself between clergy and building contractors. So much for self-evaluation.

I voted for Eddie Rispone then got the news that he had not the administrative skill to choose an election team. Gosh! When I thought to run for Mayor-President Roy Fletcher kindly set me straight in one conversation. My friend Hugh had advised the day before, "That's cost $250! First, find a political consultant to advise you." I can’t say I’m glad Edwards won, but I'm not sorry Rispone lost.

President Trump repeatedly proves that while in the swamp, it is difficult to find party integrity. The GOP proved it has not the civic fidelity to help Trump relate to We the People of Louisiana. Once again, the LA GOP forfeit the governorship. Trump skillfully makes humor of infidelity to the-literal-truth, thereby, protecting We the People of the United States from liars.

Grace would do well to hire a grammar checker (not me). After some effort I perhaps interpreted Grace’s thought “[Vitter] repeatedly won despite having alienated natural allies and [having] violated his professed family values proved it.”

But I’d also edit Grace’s recall to “Allies repeatedly supported Vitter despite publicized infidelity to professed family values . . . until he was caught negotiating with a madam when he should have been voting on military veteran’s benefits.” Failed duty to We the People of the United States ended Vitter’s electability, whereas family values did not seem to matter.

Finally, I perceive neither humility nor dignity in the construct “. . . too confident . . . as I was in predicting [the election result].”

Pleading to preserve the swamp (Michael Gerson) (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-spurs-a-wild-west-of-continuously-worsening-political-rhetoric/2019/11/18/59185e5a-0a3a-11ea-97ac-a7ccc8dd1ebc_story.html)

Michael Gerson seems steeped in defense of controversial colonial-English tradition. I’d like to persuade him and other controversial traditionalists to consider the U.S. Preamble.

In my view, the U.S. preamble is a proposition for 5 public disciplines to encourage responsible human liberty. A citizen may order his or her public life by the 5 disciplines so as to privately pursue individual happiness with civic integrity. I express my interpretation almost daily, seeking improvements from fellow citizens.

I both publicly and privately order my actions so as to accept the-literal-truth. I do not know the-literal-truth and must rely on the-objective-truth---the ineluctable evidence which may be better comprehended with new instruments of perception. Under these principles, I speculate neither for nor against the mystery of whatever-God-is. Without objection to anyone’s God, I promote reform from English tradition to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. So far, I do not think the Trump/Pence administration has considered the opportunity to establish the USA 231 years after it was proposed in the U.S. Preamble.

Consider Gerson concerns I noticed.

First, in “the president’s long habit of half-witted ad hominems” Gerson overlooks President Trump’s promise to drain the swamp, hard as the task would be. See Trump’s inaugural address. Trump’s fellow citizens may imagine what it is like to know what his administration plans for liars of the swamp. When a liar approaches Trump, how does he protect the information that is vital to us, his fellow citizens? Note that the liars are also fellow citizens, but some are dissident to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. Perhaps the liar holds the honest opinion that all citizens should attest to the mystery of whatever-God-is. Perhaps Trump intends to distract the liar, accepting any humility of error yet protecting the people’s vital information. It seems the Schiff-impeachment-proposal exposes foreign-service agents in traditional “abuse of power.” The unintended consequence may be financial ruin and professional change for some agents.

Second, “Fox . . . has come up against a variety of honorable, respected professionals, trying to testify honestly about the abuse of power,” seems a misguided indictment of Fox’s Christian community. Some Christians seem so convicted in their spiritual faith that they mistakenly tolerate infidelity to the U.S. Preamble. They erroneously label it “secular” when it is neutral to religion as well as race, gender, and ethnicity. It seems most Christians deny what seems ineluctable: whatever-God-is leaves it to humankind to establish human justice. As a consequence, some Christians imposed “In God We Trust” as a national motto---a motto that represses the march to civic integrity. An unintended consequence of repressing the U.S. Preamble’s proposition is the gradual development of swamp professionals who oppose the rule of the U.S. Constitution, for example, in its assignment of responsibilities to the administrative branch. Gerson seems blind to the swamp, holding honor above integrity, fairness above justice, Gerson-truth above the-literal-truth, and civil respect above civic appreciation. Gerson-values supplant neither the 5 public disciplines of the U.S. Preamble nor Gerson’s duty to responsible human liberty.

Third, Gerson claims “a crisis of missing limiting principles,” without recognizing that the swamp is the crisis. The limiting principles are stated as statutory law according to the U.S. Constitution, which ultimately must conform to the U.S. Preamble. Gerson suggests controversies such as Roe v. Wade override the U.S. Constitution’s rule of law and the U.S. Preamble’s pursuit of statutory justice. Again, Christianity errs by claiming human life begins as a conception when it begins as a viable ovum. Gerson unconstitutionally claims democracy defines the values in this republic.

Fourth, Gerson defends erroneous colonial-English tradition “Self-government requires ethical hierarchy.” The U.S. Preamble replaced self-government with 5 public disciplines so as to encourage responsible human liberty. The U.S. Preamble legally ended the Confederation of States and empowered We the People of the United States, the entity that is comprised of fellow citizens who trust-in and commit-to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. Thereby, ethics may conform to the-literal-truth. The combination of the U.S. Preamble under the-literal-truth may ultimately determine humankind’s civic civilization. Among We the People of the United States there is no hierarchy---only human equity under developing statutory justice. The elected or appointed official or writer for the press who does not strive to be a member of We the People of the United States is among the swamp. The press’s job is to journal Constitutional progress toward meeting the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. “American freedom” is defined in the U.S. Preamble: freedom-from 5 public oppressions so as to secure each citizen’s opportunity to practice the liberty-to responsibly pursue individual happiness rather than the dictates of someone else.

Lastly, Gerson does not improve on Trump’s erroneous slogan “great again.” I think there’s better likelihood that Trump will reform to “Make America Great” before either Gerson or Fox News does. What’s missing is reform from opposing views of colonial-English Americanism to an achievable better future under the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. The civic citizens of this nation, We the People of the United States, trusts-in and commits-to the ultimate justice of the people.

Members of the swamp who are honestly misled may become civic citizens rapidly by considering, communicating, collaborating, and connecting so as to promote the entity We the People of the United States as defined in the U.S. Preamble. If they know better purpose, they may propose amendment of the U.S. Preamble. Nine former English colonies, free and independent global states in 1784, established the USA as a global nation as of June 21, 1787. The First Congress erroneously re-established as much colonial-English tradition as they could get away with. Congress has behaved to preserve tradition ever since. President Trump is trying to reform from colonial-English tradition to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. Some members of the swamp honestly work under tradition and may discover integrity in time to help the administration establish the USA after Congressional and press repression since 1788.

Quora

https://www.quora.com/Is-an-absolute-opposition-to-censorship-legitimate-and-reasonable?

No.

Consider treason, for example.

 https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-irony-of-freedom?

The irony of freedom is expressed in my view of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition:  We the People of the United States maintain freedom-from 5 public oppressions in order to secure responsible human liberty-to the continuum of living citizens.

The internal liberty-to develop integrity hinges on freedom-from 5 civic tyrannies.

To Marlene Craig:

Ms. Craig, thank you for the upvote.

Also, thank you for bringing me back to the message this morning.

I realize with new light that my person never lost trust-in and commitment-to the opportunity to develop integrity, despite being born to wonderful Southern Baptist parents. They were wonderful providers with conflicting mysteries of whatever-God-is.

I fell in love with a Louisiana-French Catholic woman, now 1 month from our 50th wedding anniversary. Her serene confidence helped me discover my commitment to the-literal-truth, even though I do not know it in most cases. Whatever her comprehension of God is, it is precious to me for her. I would not dare try spring from appreciation to try to learn it. Each time I ask if she is satisfied with my faith, she says she is but would not change to it. I think she and I practice the U.S. Preamble.

The U.S. Preamble does not suggest that religion is tyranny. It excludes religion from the 5 civic tyrannies that can prevent responsible human liberty. Thus, it proposes that civic citizens trust-in and commit-to the proposition whether they are religious or not.

Separation of church and state (SCS) is a civic opportunity, and in the USA, only when the majority considers and accepts religion as a private practice that ought not lessen the citizens civic, civil, and legal conduct will the intended USA be established.

This explanation expresses appreciation of every person’s view about the mystery of God, including mine: I don’t know and it’s OK that I don’t know.

Now I’m going to turn on the Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade. Happy Day to all.



https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-a-far-left-political-position-is-necessary-to-counter-an-existential-threat-to-humanity?

Perhaps the far left promotes human regression and woe.

Humanoids have been developing for perhaps 3 million years. The species we know as “humans” has developed as humanoid awareness led to language, grammar, and the pursuit of integrity.

The evidence is that the individual human’s freedom-from oppression empowers individual liberty-to discover ineluctable, perceived evidence then develop beneficial use of that understanding. Often, the creative individual invents new instruments by which he or she may better understand the evidence. This process, discovery of the-objective-truth, ultimately approaches the-literal-truth.

Far-left politics lessens if not eliminates freedom-from oppression and thereby prevents the liberty to discover the-literal-truth. Far-left politics has the potential to regress humanity to a prior evolutionary status.

For example, the proponents of human control of the earth’s atmosphere would embark on remedies that would worsen responsible human integrity:  No viable human controls can master the earth’s atmosphere. Even population reduction would not constrain natural cycles in earth temperatures.

The principle works on the far right, too. Abortion restrictors debate the beginning of human life so as to limit the cost of enforcement. Protecting the embryo from the moment of conception makes control seem possible if impractical and unjust, but extending the protection to the ovum would involve challenges on par with controlling the earth’s atmosphere. The right does not open that discussion.

The U.S. Preamble proposes 5 public freedoms from oppression so that the individual citizen may practice responsible human liberty. So far, I do not know of a political party that promotes the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. I work to encourage citizens to develop their own interpretation of the U.S. Preamble with which to order their civic lives with private pursuits of religious beliefs.

To Judi Samjohn Bennett:

Thank you, Ms. Bennett for sharing my message.

I hope personal interpretation of the U.S. Preamble and individual practice becomes typical of fellow citizens and a focus of cheerful discussion at family gatherings.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

To Robert Parker:

I agree and think consideration of the U.S. Preamble and practicing a personal interpretation would position most citizens to pursue personal happiness with civic integrity. In other words, practice responsible human liberty. This goes for elected and appointed government officials, each of whom can choose to be of We the People of the United States as defined in the U.S. Preamble as each of them perceives it.

I would add to your list for the 2019 U.S. Supreme Court’s makeup: I can have Judeo-Christianity, and you cannot trust-in and commit-to whatever-God-is.



https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Is-there-a-distinct-difference-between-freedom-and-licentiousness?

Merriam-Webster online has for “licentious” the adjective “lacking legal or moral restraints” and “marked by disregard for strict rules of correctness.” Both usages seem like taking liberty.

Consider the case when legal restraints or political correctness errs: the civic dissident resists oppression by lobbying for reform. He or she is fighting for freedom.

Greek ideas may be interpreted to distinguish between freedom and liberty. First, humans may develop equity under statutory justice (Pericles); in other words, maintain freedom from public oppression and enjoy responsible human liberty. Second, the equitable citizen neither initiates nor tolerates harm to or from any person or institution (Agathon); in other words, equitable citizens have the freedom to enjoy liberty. Finally, the life of integrity is worth losing to improve statutory law (Socrates).

These Greek ideas are implied in the U.S. Preamble as I comprehend it: We the People of the United States consider, communicate, collaborate, and connect to develop and maintain 5 public freedoms---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to secure responsible human liberty to living citizens.

The American dream according to the U.S. Preamble may be a civic majority with the responsible liberty to maintain the 5 public freedoms from oppression. In other words, the civic citizens develop responsible individual standards rather than conforming to institutional impositions. Dissidents risk statutory law enforcement.

Perhaps licentiousness is internal repression that risks external freedom.

https://www.quora.com/Does-equal-opportunity-lead-to-equal-outcomes?

Every adult has the opportunity to celebrate un-hiding of the sun each morning, but few appreciate the rotation of the earth on its axis. Consequently, many children erroneously believe the sun’ll come out tomorrow.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-we-afraid-of-in-an-attempt-to-preserve-freedom-of-speech?

First, if people were locked into telling the-literal-truth, much of the time people would have to agree, “We don’t know.” Some people have not the humility to admit to themselves they don’t know what they don’t know. Civilizations are slow to admit their ethics is flawed does not conform to the-literal-truth.

Second, without deceitful people’s opportunity to lie, people who practice integrity face more difficulty in defending the-literal-truth. To state this another way, without the opportunity to lie, the deceiver would be forced into less discoverable deceit.

Finally, holding people responsible for lying seems expensive. Consider, for example, freedom of the press. The press should be held responsible for journaling humankind’s progress toward statutory justice. However, statutory justice is perfection, which can only be approached. Therefore, judging the press’s breach of responsibility can be a daunting, leading-edge task.

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-you-begin-to-dismantle-every-societal-concept?

I don’t agree with your premise. My thoughts spring from what I learned in the last moment and before. I use common words in uncommon ways to strive to help establish an achievable better future. I invite improvement of my language by publishing a glossary for improvement by fellow citizens in one of three blogs.

Today, in my 4th quarter century, I learned from a man in his late 2nd decade “hermeneutics is the art of understanding and of making oneself understood.”

I hold told him that I am working on an essay to encourage a 9-year old preserve his freedom-from oppression unto his mid-thirties without writing about negative possibilities. He said that the negative serves to define the positive. I said that society provides enough negatives for any individual to observe and with the right coaching and examples he or she will choose responsible human liberty.

The phrase “responsible human liberty” comes from my interpretation of the U.S. Preamble, which just now is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish and practice 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the continuum of living citizens. Neither my interpretation nor the original U.S. Preamble specifies standards of the 5 disciplines so that the living citizens may continually approach the-objective-truth.

The U.S. Preamble offers an achievable better future in that the human individual has freedom from oppression according to the 5 public disciplines and his or her perception of responsible human happiness. For example, no religion is imposed on him or her.



Even the mystery of whatever-God-is need not be addressed by the individual human being. This standard is not novel in my writing, but does offer recovery from colonial-English tradition of church-state partnership. Widespread membership in We the People of the United States as defined in the U.S. Preamble allows the individual civic citizenship as well as private hopes for everlasting life or whatever the individual perceives best for his or her afterdeath.

I hope the U.S. Preamble will replace the pledge of allegiance to the flag as a fellow-citizen’s trust-in and commitment to responsible human liberty as defined therein.

Please let me know if I responded to your concerns.

Law professors

https://www.lawliberty.org/2019/11/25/reuniting-faith-and-reason/

I propose a future culture of civic integrity.

Judeo-Christianity seems a theological oxymoron but a political identity that is popular among some scholars and politicians. The body of people who commit to a Greek idea---human equity under statutory justice---may not support religious beliefs as civic standards. For example, salvation of a soul for a favorable afterdeath may seem undesirable to people who pursue the-literal-truth. Also, I doubt favorable afterdeath is a Jewish doctrine: the Jewish soul may simply return to whatever-God-is.

There is an alternative, better future for the religious, the non-religious, and the secular fellow-citizens under the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. I encourage readers to do the work to develop their personal interpretation so as to order their civic conduct while maintaining their private religious pursuits. (The U.S. Preamble does not include religion among 5 public disciplines, leaving it as a private pursuit.) The proposal is separation of individual hopes-for-soul from civic integrity for life. Thereby, civic citizens may encourage dissidents to join We the People of the United States, a voluntary entity.

Today, my interpretation of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish and maintain 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to accept responsible human liberty to the continuum of living citizens. The standards of success are unspecified so that We the People of the United States may continually exemplify the leading edge of responsible human liberty.

The U.S. Preamble is unique in the world, in that it proposes human equity under statutory justice---a perfection only the people may approach. It proposes individual human happiness with civic integrity.

Second post

Addressing toleration: Three ideas from the Greeks stand out regarding Rachel Lu’s argument. According to my comprehension, 1) Socrates died to avoid rebuking the rule of law even in injustice; 2) Pericles suggested that humans may develop equity under statutory justice or the perfection of law; and 3) Agathon suggested that appreciative human beings neither initiate nor tolerate harm to or from any person or whatever-God-is.


It seems three Greek ideas as I perceive them put “serious pressure on our American tradition of religious toleration.”


Agathon attributes to human beings the ability to not tolerate harm to whatever-God-is. The humble human has the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to develop integrity perhaps in the image of whatever-God-is.

Socrates was falsely accused of teaching a false God to the youth of Athens. The jury had made up their minds before Socrates presented his defense. In reality, they resented Socrates talent for focusing on the-literal-truth rather than human constructs. He had the nerve to ask on what basis God is good. Perhaps Agathon implied that appreciation and humility tolerated the other gods and thus was whatever-God-is.

Pericles pointed out that HIPEA is sufficient to develop statutory justice if fellow citizens agree to the work. I don’t think he went so far as to claim that God gave humankind that responsibility, but it seems both Agathon and Socrates of my comprehension so insinuate.

These Greek principles impact my interpretation of the U.S. Preamble. It proposes a voluntary civic contract by which living fellow citizens may aid the march to statutory human justice: public freedom-from oppression so that the people may pursue individual happiness with civic integrity. Among civic citizens, a fellow citizen’s religious beliefs are private. That is, religion does not supplant the believer’s opportunity to develop integrity.



Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Restore Louisiana’s 9:3 criminal jury verdicts



Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.



Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual equality:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my proposal as follows: “Willing citizens collaborate, communicate, and connect to provide 5 public institutions—integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity—so as to encourage responsible human liberty to living people.” I want to collaborate with the other citizens on this paraphrase and theirs yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.



Selected theme from this week

Restore Louisiana’s 1880 rule: 9:3 criminal jury verdicts, in order to lessen organized crime’s favor over victims and the entity We the People of the United States.


The Louisiana Legislature’s tyranny in creating a popular vote to undo non-unanimous criminal jury verdicts in non-capital cases is coming to light.

Especially egregious is the possibility that 37,000 prior criminal cases will be reviewed by Louisiana courts.


Letters to The Advocate editors

The Louisiana Legislature’s tyranny regarding 10:2 jury verdicts exposes the temporal folly of public opinion controlling policy and the press controlling public opinion (Clay Latimer) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_efa73248-0bbf-11ea-aa4d-db303b47f954.html)

On unjust unanimous jury-verdicts in response to Clay Latimer’s letter to the editor, The Advocate, November 21, 2019, Page 6B.



I appreciate Latimer’s attention to the tyranny of the Louisiana Legislature’s unconstitutional imposition of a public vote to end Louisiana’s provision of impartial criminal juries using 10:2 (non-unanimous) verdicts. The states that retain the colonial-English unanimous verdicts tolerate injustice that England terminated long after Louisiana’s brilliance.

England and most former subjects of the British empire now have majority verdicts. England allowed 10:2 verdicts in 1967 in order to lessen organized crime’s influence on criminal trials.

It is fitting that 6 of 7 justices on the Louisiana Supreme Court do not express opposition to non-unanimous jury verdicts. And it is unfortunate that one justice taints this former French colony’s 1880 brilliance with the imposition of racial words from 1898. 

Furthermore, the imposition of racial issues is counter to Louisiana’s arguments in a current U.S. Supreme Court case. “. . . the state asserts, ‘all available evidence suggests that the non-unanimity rule was motivated by concerns for judicial efficiency rather than an improper racial purpose.’” See https://www. scotusblog. com/2019/09/argument-preview-court-to-consider-whether-right-to-unanimous-jury-verdict-applies-to-state-criminal-trials/.

Louisiana’s recent vote to adopt unanimous jury verdicts was unconstitutional according to both U.S. Amendment VI, which requires impartiality rather than unanimity, and U.S. Amendment XIV.1, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” The Louisiana Legislature had not the 2/3 majority to impose unanimous jury-verdicts after 138 years of non-unanimous jury justice.

The 2018 Louisiana Legislature under Governor John Bel Edwards surmised that they could contort the facts so as to win a 50% popular vote on the false premise “If I was accused I’d want a unanimous jury.” In reality, most fellow citizens in criminal trials occupy the victim’s seat and do not want organized crime to influence the results.

The Louisiana State Bar Association, Governor Edwards, and The Advocate ought to feel shame before We the People of the United States, especially the people of Louisiana including fellow citizens who unfortunately think crime pays.



Somehow, The Advocate seems to have bought into the business plan that polls control public opinion, public opinion controls public policy, and the press controls "social science" polls. Reform is possible.

Grandchildren will manage a future grandparents cannot imagine much less predict (David W. Earle) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/dan_fagan/?9324)

Grandparents have the option to encourage children and grandchildren to practice integrity rather than yield to other people’s dreams, including grandparents' heartfelt concerns. Children learn integrity from examples more than from exhortation.

Show us the viable option for controlling both the earth’s atmosphere and its politics! I prefer to contend with today’s interests (in civics, working to promote responsible human liberty as proposed in the U.S. Preamble).

Humanoids have been contending with the inevitable for over 3 million years, including ice-age cycles. Ice ages that swamp population-contributions to warming may be inevitable.

Human generations managing their survival does not seem new to me.

A concrete vision for the people (Louis Chapoton) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_2ed0992a-0704-11ea-9b4d-e370c4a132d9.html)

“In this time of national crisis, it would do well for all who now govern this nation, and all who desire to govern, to visit and walk among those who courageously laid down their lives defending this nation. One can only hope that they would then come to fully appreciate the value of this great nation, realize their duty, and discover the meaning of patriotism.”

This is a stirring essay until the last word, which imposed doubt to this reader. Patriotism is love for country or “nationalism.”

The proposition that is offered in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble) is public discipline so as to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens. Civic citizens collaborate, communicate, and connect to develop Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defence, and Welfare so as to encourage individual happiness rather than impose national standards. It is a culture that 9 of 13 former English colonies offered on June 21, 1788 but has yet to be established anywhere.

Elected and appointed officials “would do well” to consider themselves first members of We the People of the United States, the civic citizens who by example encourage dissident fellow citizens to reform and by law enforcement constrain criminals and tyrants.





It seems the demographic is 1/3 civic citizens, 1/3 pessimists, and 1/3 dissidents. Citizens may consider the U.S. Preamble's proposition to assess their chosen or default group.

Columns

I wonder if The Advocate wrote the caption (Dan Fagan) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/dan_fagan/?9324)

The Advocate’s egregious print caption reflects Fagan’s first sentence “I was shocked to see the results unfold election night in the governor’s race,” but misrepresents the column.

I connected Fagan’s dots then affirmed my interpretation with the online caption: “Eddie Rispone . . . campaign was 'grossly incompetent'.” Perhaps Fagan feels editor-oppression.

Rispone proved that political incompetence cannot drain the swamp. The candidate must have unusual political skills and friends.

In short, Donald Trump cannot be mimicked: Trump overcomes a paucity of career officials who practice integrity. I often scratch my head about Trump’s persona but wouldn’t impose my opinions: I hope to vote for Trump/Pence a third time then a fourth time and that they win.

After that, I hope, after 231 years of repression most fellow citizens establish We the People of the United States, the factional entity that trusts-in and commits-to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. I hope at least 2/3 of 2024’s fellow citizens celebrate each June 21 as “Responsible Human Liberty Day.”

Each U.S. citizen owes it to himself or herself to do the work to establish his or her interpretation of the U.S. Preamble’s 52 words so as to order his or her civic integrity. The interpretation I have learned from library meetings now entering the seventh year is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, defense, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. Neither this interpretation nor the original denies individual discovery of the necessary standards for the 5 disciplines and human liberty.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana has the prerogative to lead the national celebration since the June 21 proposal was developed in EBRP and other library meetings with communication by over seventy participants.

To Edward Livingston : Your comment reminds me of that egregious invocation before Edwards' acceptance speech.

To Kb Ott:

I don't know what to believe, but I get the impression that many blacks think the Trump/Pence administration is helping them.

Perhaps the nation is at that long awaited pivot from colonial-English tradition to the responsible human liberty that is proposed in the U.S. Preamble and the amendable articles that follow.

A compelling vision for the people (The Advocate) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_c85dfd6e-096e-11ea-a2b2-87f6305047f9.html)

The Advocate misrepresents some fellow citizens in “[Edwards] offers the most compelling vision for fulfilling Louisiana’s promise.”

The narrow victory shows the importance of political skill over civic reliability. (A political consultant told me I think classical liberal and conservative with no intent to herd cats. I somewhat agree.)

I voted for Rispone even though I thought introducing himself as a Trump supporter was a political mistake. Later, Trump failed Rispone by promoting Trump and the mystery of whatever-God-is.

Edwards was elected by 1) social democrats under the influence of Alinsky-Marxist organizations (AMO) and 2) civic subjugation to apathetic registered-voters. I assert that most writers for The Advocate 1) don’t understand my statement and 2) would oppose it if they comprehended it. The Advocate writers and editors don’t seem to comprehend, much less adopt, the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.

If they appreciated the U.S. Preamble’s proposition, The Advocate’s interpretation might be published on the opinion page of every edition, so as to promote the U.S. Preamble.

Here’s my interpretation of the U.S. Preamble today:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to practice 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens.

Not every citizen wants the disciplines and the responsibility. Many think crime or tyranny pays.

The U.S. Preamble does not specify the standards by which the 5 disciplines are judged. The articles that follow the U.S. Preamble define the institutions and statutory laws that may be amended to correct known or undiscovered injustice.

We the People of the United States is the entity that is ineluctably on the march toward statutory justice---the worthy goal of conformance to the-literal-truth. The entity is the collection of civic citizens who, by example, encourage dissident fellow citizens to reform.

I think fellow citizens are divided on the U.S. Preamble’s proposition into civic, passive, and dissident groups. The basis of political dissidence changes with time, but some themes are persistent. Crime and tyranny seem inevitable, but racism seems defeasible through separation of church from state.

No one knows how successful the U.S. could be under the U.S. Preamble’s proposition, because no political regime has ever promoted an interpretation better than mine. Louis Chapoton’s stirring letter today would be enhanced by his interpretation of the U.S. Preamble.

U.S. political regimes have stood on the Chapter XI Machiavellianism of church-state partnership. President Trump disappoints in his support of church. That could change if Louisiana leads in civic integrity.

Governor John Bel Edwards has the opportunity to be the first U.S. governor to create an annual celebration of establishing the USA as a global nation on June 21, 1788 by 9 of 13 former English colonies. I suggest the title “Responsible Human Liberty Day.” Each June 21 Louisiana may promote We the People of the United States as defined by the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. We may celebrate each responsibly-liberal-person’s interpretation and thereby encourage dissident fellow citizens to reform.

 PS: I do not regret my vote for Edwards four years ago.

To Kenneth E. Dorsey:

Your assessment may be correct.

I am concerned about Edwards' pride in the largest state budget ever and his will to balance the budget with sales taxes. Growing government takes money from the people, especially the poor.

I think Rispone erred to start claiming a year ago that he would help Donald Trump. He further erred by not presenting, in clear language, how he would help Louisiana out of its rating of 50th among 50 states. Lastly, President Trump erred by using his time in Louisiana to bash Washington Democrats rather than help Rispone politics. Trump unintentionally hurt both himself and Rispone.

Lastly, there is a solution to the two-party competition that enslaves us:  Fellow citizens may help establish We the People of the United States, as defined in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. It is a proposition each citizen may interpret so as to order his or her civic integrity.

I shared my interpretation in my earlier post and hope your views may improve mine.

To Kermit Hoffpauir: I blame the local GOP. In each cycle, the local leaders should choose the most electable candidate a week after registration is closed.

I thought in 2016 Jay Dardenne was the best candidate and served on his phone-call schedule. However, the local GOP was undecided and let the national leaders impose David Vitter on us. My only option was to vote for John Bel Edwards. When I whispered in his ear to work with Bill Cassidy on Medicaid expansion he responded, “I can’t now. He supports David Vitter.”

Also, Edwards was blinded by his association with trial judges (and lawyers) to support the demise of a Louisiana treasure: the majority-jury verdict in criminal trials. Unanimous juries is an English tradition which England reformed in 1967 in order to lessen organized-crime's influence on criminal trials.

I commend the Louisiana Legislature to undo the harm it did in 2018 by restoring the 1880 approval of 9:3 verdicts in non-capital trials and create 10:2 verdicts in capital trials. Now, Louisiana argues that some 37,000 past verdicts are at risk, representing huge cost to a civic people of Louisiana. Edwards is now in a position to reform the harm he did.

Quora

https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-vote-for-any-candidate-when-you-find-them-all-unacceptable?

I could not articulate it before now, but I have always been influenced by my individual quest to discover the-literal-truth. (I write it with hyphens to encourage the reader not to omit any of the three word phrase.) In that quest, I have discovered these principles:

The-literal-truth is approachable through the-objective-truth, the ineluctable evidence humankind perceives ever more precisely by improving the instruments of discovery.

The human being is evolving as the leading-edge species with the awareness and grammar by which to develop integrity rather than constructs based on reason.

Each human individual has the power, the energy, and the authority (HIPEA) to develop integrity rather than drift into infidelity to the-literal-truth.

The civic citizen develops equity under statutory justice, and dissidents oppose the development of integrity.

Civic citizens are obliged to require an agreement to pursue statutory justice as a condition both for holding political office and for voting.

The U.S. Preamble is the USA’s proposition to develop statutory justice according to standards pursued by We the People of the United States, the voluntary civic faction at any moment on the journey to statutory justice.

Under these principles, I always vote in my best interest.

I’m looking for politicians who assert that he or she is foremost a member of the civic entity We the People of the United States, publish their interpretation of the U.S. Preamble, list personal accomplishments towards the U.S. Preamble’s proposition as he or she interprets it, and states intentions he or she will pursue if elected. Let each voter decide if he or she likes the candidate’s platform.

I think quora moderator disallowed, after “in my best interest” the following:

For example, I voted for Trump/Pence even though Trump seemed like a play-boy in my view, but far better than Hillary, in whose opinion I have always been a deplorable. I cannot imagine me voting for a Clinton. I voted for Edwin Edwards only once---when what’s his name was running. I voted for John Bel Edwards only once---when an apparent sex pervert was running. I hope to vote for Trump/Edwards my third time and fourth time and that they win. Faced with the DNC choice today, I would go with Gabbard, so far.

I never voted for Obama and think I never would vote for an Obama. However, for eight years I hoped for his success, not having proof that he was an American enemy.

His “leadership” since we elected Trump/Pence convinces me that he and all his associates are enemies of We the People of the United States. Therefore, it is unlikely for me to vote for a Democrat. But not impossible: I made an exception in the latest local election, holding the opinion that I was voting in my best interest and knowing I did not know.



https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meaning-of-freedom-that-you-give-it?

Freedom is acceptance of both ineluctable constraints and individual discipline.

The ineluctable constraints derive from physics, the object of study rather than the process for discovery. For example, the earth’s rotation on its axis un-hides the sun each morning. Human life begins with the viable ovum, whose responsible mom protects it from unwanted insemination. The aware human does not lie, knowing that physics facilitates discovery of the-objective-truth, which ultimately approaches the-literal-truth. The opportunity for human integrity depends on beneficial acceptance of external constraints and freedom-from personal opinion. That is, despite hard-earned opinion, the mature person accepts not knowing the-literal-truth.

Individual discipline begins with acceptance that only the human species has the awareness and grammar by which a person may develop equity under statutory justice. Acceptance includes the open-mindedness to follow opinion with the statement:  But I do not know the-literal-truth.

The U.S. citizen who discovers the quest for equity under statutory justice may consider the U.S. Preamble’s proposition and interpret it to order his or her civic life. The articles that follow the U.S. Preamble provide for amendment of discovered injustice so that statutory law and its enforcement may eventually approach justice.

My U.S. Preamble interpretation just now is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish then maintain 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living fellow citizens.

Neither my interpretation nor the original 52 words specify a standard of achievement. That perhaps implies that when the majority of citizens accept and practice the 5 disciplines, responsible human liberty will be the norm. No one knows the standard, but I trust-in and commit-to the-literal-truth rather than the opinions of “the founders”.

The U.S. Preamble proposes civic discipline for freedom-from oppression so that living citizens may individually and perhaps mutually accept the liberty-to pursue individual happiness with civic integrity.

https://www.quora.com/What-morals-would-have-an-instant-impact-if-more-people-lived-by-them?

Through evolution one species is developing the awareness and grammar by which to develop integrity.

Integrity is the practice of addressing a concern so as to confirm that it is not imaginary, discovering how to benefit from the reality, behaving so as to benefit, sharing the understanding with fellow citizens, listening for any improvements in the understanding, and remaining open-minded for new discovery that requires change.

By this process, integrity employs new instruments for perception of the-objective-truth, trusting that the-literal-truth exists and may be perceived.

Some people develop integrity similar to my description or better while some people develop reasonable constructs to oppose the-objective-truth, thereby diffusing humankind’s collective approach to the-literal-truth.

If more people accepted that the-literal-truth exists and may be approached by discovering the ineluctable evidence, the-objective-truth, there would be more fidelity to responsible human liberty. Perhaps that means aiding five public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-diversity-a-good-thing?

I consider diversity an invasion of privacy. Human beings share interest in equity under statutory justice and other wise require the privacy to pursue individual happiness as they see it rather than conform to someone else’s vision for them.

I wrote a more complete opinion in Diversity: an invasion of privacy.

I would appreciate your view on my brief comment and the essay too, if possible.

 https://www.quora.com/If-people-are-counted-to-be-equal-why-are-you-not-the-same?

From my perspective, my person is similarly unique. Let me explain.

At a moment, my mom’s ovaries had provided a viable ovum and my dad’s spermatozoon joined the ovum as the single cell that had the genes (and perhaps some memes) that defined my unique person.

By age 10, I perceived psychological conflicts between Mom and Dad, Mom’s family and Dad’s family, and among our neighbors. I also perceived conflicts in the community’s “word of God.” I could not have articulated it then, but I chose a path of trust-in and commitment to the-literal-truth.

During a 35-year career, I came to realize that most people are influenced by their particular mystery of whatever-God-is, and thereby most citizens communicate, collaborate, and connect for comprehensive safety and security; in other words, they are civic citizens. I would not dare introduce doubt in a civic citizen’s source of inspiration and motivation, whether they believe in a mystery or not. I trust that they pursue and practice discernable literal-truth.  I perceive that the-literal-truth is only approachable, and that the path to its comprehension is the-objective-truth or the ineluctable evidence. Ineluctable evidence exists and its perception improves with improving instruments and methods.

I do not object to fellow citizens who hope in the mystery of whatever-God-is and want to encourage their responsible human liberty. Together, we may influence dissident fellow citizens to reform.

In summary, it seems every human started as a unique ovum and has the opportunity to develop responsible human liberty. Some humans choose to develop integrity. Some are influenced-into or choose infidelity. Starting unique and developing according to choices, equality was never possible.



https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Why-do-people-require-the-government?

Humanoids have been developing awareness for some 3 million years. Humankind developed grammar perhaps 150,000 years ago, and civilizations during the last 10s of thousands of years. So far, perhaps 8 trillion person-years of observations and experiences have happened.

Both physics and psychology have had exponentially increasing discoveries during the last century. Only humankind, about 8 billion people, touches all the discoveries. The newborn is totally ignorant and if discouraged and un-coached may never surpass adolescence. Many people in the first 3 decades acquire the basic understanding and intent to live a complete human life. Few develop psychological maturity---the liberty-to responsibly pursue individual happiness rather than conform to someone else’s dream for them. People divide themselves: civic citizens vs dissidents such as criminals and tyrants.

The civic citizens agree to aid the development of statutory justice or human equity. It’s an impossible perfection yet a worthy goal for the living fellow citizens at any moment in the progress of evolution. Their hope is that dissident fellow citizens will reform by observing civic integrity.

In the USA, the agreement to develop human equity is offered in the U.S. Preamble. My interpretation today is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to maintain 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens. Since ultimate justice is undetermined, each individual is responsible to discern and promote the standards for mutually judging the 5 disciplines. Thereby, statutory law may eventually approach statutory justice.


In summary, because some citizens are either too young to agree to human equity under statutory justice or are dissident to responsible human liberty, the civic fellow-citizens maintain statutory law enforcement and other systems to maintain public disciplines like the 5 that are specified in the U.S. Preamble.

https://www.quora.com/Is-tribalism-and-collectivism-ultimately-the-real-answer-in-contrast-to-how-Ayn-Rand-might-have-one-live?

Just as a 30’ wave from a hurricane or tsunami catches people in their defiance of an evacuation order, the consequences of lies or infidelity come with ineluctable woe.

There will always be people who chase “objectivism” or tribalism or collectivism, in order to escape responsible human liberty. Each human has the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to develop integrity rather than drift into infidelity. Some people use HIPEA to practice crime or other dissidence.

In a culture of responsible human liberty, civic people communicate, collaborate, and connect to maintain 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens including dissidents. The standards of performance are defined by the living individuals so as to aid mutual, comprehensive safety and security.

In the world, I know of one proposal for such a culture. The U.S. Preamble proposes responsible human liberty.

So far, the people of the USA have imposed Chapter XI Machiavellianism under the influence of colonial-English tradition. The culture proposed by the U.S. Preamble has yet to be established.

I read, write, and speak to establish the U.S. Preamble’s proposition or better somewhere on earth.


Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/corteeny/posts/10158254733304068?notif_id=1574270269871498&notif_t=nf_share_story

For clarity from my view: The importance of integrity rather than honest unity.

By belonging to the Alinsky-Marxist organization (AMO), the human individual risks woe.

However, civic citizens want mutual, comprehensive safety and security to themselves and to dissident citizens who reform.





Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.

Saturday, November 16, 2019

I'll retire my “Eddie Rispone for governor” sign


Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.



Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual equality:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my proposal as follows: “Willing citizens collaborate, communicate, and connect to provide 5 public institutions—integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity—so as to encourage responsible human liberty to living people.” I want to collaborate with the other citizens on this paraphrase and theirs yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.



Selected theme from this week

I was disappointed that Louisiana voters chose John Bel Edwards as governor for another four years. Nevertheless, I wish Louisiana the best possible future four years.


And after all, I’m to blame, because I voted for Edwards’s in his first runoff. I hold the opinion that my losing choice, Jay Dardenne, had been poorly appreciated by the Louisiana GOP.


I’m still looking for a politician who runs on his or her civic-citizenship as a member of We the People of the United States rather than as a dissident fellow citizen.


The proposition in the U.S. Preamble requires individual interpretation. It proposes 5 public disciplines to encourage responsible human liberty, but does not specify the standards by which fellow citizens measure justice.


News

No DNC supporter for John Bel Edwards (Tyler Bridges) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_adc41408-0742-11ea-80ad-5f487c8ee749.html)

The Advocate ineptly lessens John Bel Edwards’ chances by news captions that invoke “Trump-Rispone, [Biden]-Edwards make final election push” (punctuation changes by me).

Hillary Clinton’s in-electability should not have left the Democrats with no leadership.

And check out Bill Clinton’s latest folly: advising President Trump to continue to get the job done. I guess neither Bill nor Hillary read Trump’s inaugural address or heard his promise to drain the swamp, difficult and exhausting as it will be.

Shame on The Advocate for its support for the swamp, but thank goodness they don’t mind emphasizing the DNC void in fidelity to We the People of the United States.

If you like a culture of communication, collaboration, and connection to aid five public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens, vote Rispone.

So far, President Trump disappoints me in not promoting the civic, civil, and legal power of the U.S. Preamble's proposition. Nevertheless, I will vote for Trump/Pence my third and fourth times, if I may.

I will vote for Eddie Rispone because my wife said she would when I did not like the early-campaign allegiance to Trump instead of Rispone and because I learned of his interest in educating children:   Children are the essential part of the “our Posterity” in the U.S. Preamble.

To United Citizens for Good Morals (fake): That's right. Edwards is interested in the education system's voters and therefore intends to raise salaries without accounting for being last among 50 states in a country that rates 22 in education. That's a global rating of 1100th!


Since children can't vote, it's OK with Edwards to saddle them with $22 trillion federal debt. Since the debt is rising, each American newborn faces $5.6 million in shared debt.

Vote Rispone.

To United Citizens Against Theft: That's what's great about the American republic. Voters can decide which candidate supports responsible human liberty as the voter perceives it. Voters who are moved by someone else’s perception may discover injustice to believers.





Members of We the People of the United States trust each other because they may observe responsible human liberty in daily living. Dissidents divide themselves. For example, criminals believe crime pays and must accept their error before they can reform so as to join the civic fellow-citizens---We the People of the United States.

The guarantee of republican governance rather than democracy assures the voter that his or her view of responsible human liberty will survive if it reflects the-literal-truth, which is approached through continual pursuit of the-objective-truth more than through human reason.



It seems our family in Baton Rouge voted Rispone.

Saint demoralization (Rod Walker) (https://www.nola.com/sports/saints/article_3106d54a-04ae-11ea-b3b9-3320edaa4443.html)

I watch sports because teams individually mirror a people’s quest for civic integrity---the U.S. Constitution’s proposition. The Saints I saw Sunday suffered a failure of discipline both as wholeness and as reliability. I write that as opinion and by no means as the-literal-truth or even the-objective-truth.

Some civic principles were expressed by the Greeks more than 2,400 years ago. First, the individual may aid equity under statutory justice. In other words, he or she may behave so as to help fellow citizens correct unjust laws and acts. Second, the individual neither initiates nor tolerates harm to or from anyone.

For We the People of the United States, the civically dividing proposition seems stated in the U.S. Preamble: communicate, collaborate, and connect to promote five public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. U.S. citizens who oppose this civic proposition may, at any moment, choose to reform.

Athletes, coaches, and administrators who do not understand the U.S. Preamble’s proposition may consider it and interpret it so as to order their team play. Responsible human liberty may be the U.S. dream if not the American dream, and no one knows its limits.

I strive to be of We the People of the United States and thought Teddy Bridgewater should have been included in Sunday’s game---should have played in the first half when the unbelievable became first expectable then demoralizing.

I would feel guilty, neglecting that second Greek rule and the first and moreover the U.S. Preamble, if I hid my opinion.

Columns

Columnist in denial (Michael Gerson) (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-ethical-anarchy-makes-us-forget-what-honor-looks-like/2019/11/07/3db2fbd8-0199-11ea-8bab-0fc209e065a8_story.html)

Gerson’s “Joe Biden” seems exempt from judgement on Joe Biden’s corrupt deeds and words.

Biden recounted in 2015 saying to the president of Ukraine, “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” Biden, discussing his 2018 article “How to Stand Up to the Kremlin,” brags “Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.” (See https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/miriamelder/joe-biden-ukraine-hunter.)

Gerson perhaps says to his mirror, “Don’t pay any attention to Joe Biden’s egocentricity and profanity.”

My mirror says the entity We the People of the United States is ordered by the U.S. Preamble’s proposition rather than writers for either the press or a for political party.

The persistent people’s proposition is: aid integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens. The U.S. Preamble’s civic, civil, and legal power is emerging.

My comment published at the above URL.

The U.S. Preamble has not the hubris to specify Gerson-standards, whatever they are (Michael Gerson) (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-serious-danger-of-politics-as-tribal-conflict/2019/10/10/600d3094-eb92-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html)

Like so many columnists, Gerson expresses a concern but offers no remedy. Moreover, he does not seem to appreciate the U.S. Preamble’s proposition. It suggests 5 disciplines to encourage responsible human liberty without specifying the standards by which performance may be judged. What is Gerson’s interpretation of the U.S. Preamble?

Mine is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the living citizens. Fellow citizens may develop the standards by which they measure responsible human liberty. That is, as injustice is discovered, the people may amend the law so as to ultimately approach statutory justice.

Gerson erroneously imposes Christianity and democracy on the U.S. representative republic under the-literal-truth.

Donald Trump’s “chaotic influence at the center of U.S. politics is now forcing the other players in the system to determine what limits — if any — they will place on their own support.”

The human being who changes character to react to another human being has no integrity. Trump/Pence promised to drain the swamp, which implies a clean sweep of fellow citizens who are dissident to the civic proposition that is offered in the U.S. Preamble.

The republic and capitalism emerged from responsible human liberty (Walter Williams) (https://triblive.com/opinion/walter-williams-disproportionalities-whose-fault/)

Williams’ column invokes a lot of questions about human equity, statutory justice, and “rights”.

Should the human to be born have “the right” to design his or her or its genes and memes?

Is it feasible to develop such designs for living people’s selections?

What is Williams’ view of economic anthropology?





The republic and capitalism emerged from responsible human liberty (The Advocate) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_a923de94-001a-11ea-bfb3-63b2501a3972.html)

The Advocate may consider acceptance of constraints that define responsible human freedom.

Many Democrats have intended, based on opinion held since 2016, to impeach the elected President of the United States (perhaps with his running mate, making it a coup). Most Democrats seem to have accepted this intention.

Has America, in 230 years’ operation established “a representative republic and capitalism”---idea and product marketplaces? If so, how so? Is there freedom of choice? Can fellow citizens expect each other to observe the rule of law rather than pursue personal choice or social directive? How does a person choose to be a civic American citizen---accept membership in the entity We the People of the United States?

Humans may choose to accept that each person has the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to develop either integrity or injustice. He or she may accept HIPEA to develop human equity under statutory justice; to nourish individual happiness with civic responsibility; to secure liberty for children, grandchildren, and beyond.

Humans may choose to accept that statutory justice is founded on the-literal-truth, which does not respond to opinion. The-literal-truth may be approached by accepting the-objective-truth, the ineluctable evidence on which human justice may be continually pursued. The individual who rejects individual responsibility accepts personal peril.

Fellow citizens cannot easily accept and nourish injustice rather than integrity. The liberal left, misled by social democracy, have brought the USA to an abyss. Have they acted alone? No. Fellow citizens who struggle to preserve colonial-English tradition have contributed to the irresponsibility, preventing the establishment of the USA as specified on June 21, 1788. The only worthy conservation is responsible human liberty. Few fellow citizens offer military service to aid crime and other infidelities.

It is time to accept the entity We the People of the United States, the civic fellow citizens for whom some military volunteers sacrifice everything. Each fellow citizen may consider, comprehend, and accept their personal interpretation of this country’s purpose, stated in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble).

Today, my interpretation for my civic order is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to practice five public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to empower responsible human liberty to living citizens.

The U.S. Preamble’s proposition leaves to the-literal-truth the standards on which responsible human liberty is judged, and that may be the American dream that sustains veterans.



I write to express my gratitude to veterans and to learn how to improve my practice of the responsible people's proposition, the U.S. preamble.





I hope Eddie Rispone will improve Louisiana roads (The Advocate) (https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_faa1dc78-eab0-11e9-abb2-cf1e12504cd2.html)

“A Democratic New Orleans group ran an ad linking Rispone to David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader and state representative, based solely on their mutual support of Trump.

Attacks like these are designed to demean and delegitimize their targets, but all they really do is tell us something about the person doing the attacking. And what they tell us is downright embarrassing.”

Why doesn’t The Advocate name that New Orleans group: BOLD (https://www.joplinglobe.com/region/rispone-slams-ad-linking-him-to-david-duke-in-louisiana/article_2ad9410a-6008-552e-ba9b-3b3b3a14c768.html). Why doesn’t The Advocate associate Louisiana Representative Cedric Richmond with BOLD (http://uptownmessenger.com/2016/12/danae-columbus-which-new-orleans-political-groups-will-carry-the-most-weight-in-2017-elections/) and with Nancy-Pelosi-civic-integrity?

In my opinion, The Advocate “is downright embarrassing” in its opposition to the people of Louisiana, especially our black fellow citizens.

I think the Advocate’s most egregious tyranny against black citizens is helping to undo a Louisiana treasure in use since 1880: majority-jury verdicts in criminal trials. Unanimous jury verdicts are about 900% disproportionately unjust to black victims of black criminals. The Advocate ought to reform from its tyranny against black fellow citizens. The Advocate’s racism is correctable under U.S. Amendments VI (impartial juries) and XIV.1 (protection of U.S. citizens from their state’s tyranny).

Vote Rispone for yourself and fellow Louisiana citizens more than for President Trump and We the People of the United States, a voluntary entity that continually develops integrity.



Letters

Capital punishment (Ron Sammonds) https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_be5f6688-0638-11ea-a234-cbe2bdc5fca3.html

I agree with Sammonds and consider Prejean a dissident to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.

Each citizen may choose to maintain human equity by behaving to develop statutory justice. U.S. citizens are offered, in the U.S. Preamble, the proposition to publically aid integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. Religion, not included in the U.S. Preamble’s goals, is relegated to individual privacy rather than civic, civil, or legal standing.

Citizens who accept the U.S. Preamble’s proposition also accept the responsibility to constrain dissidents. Some fellow citizens live here but want no civic responsibility. The U.S. citizen who grants life to a fellow citizen who committed aggravated murder breaches the civic, civil, and legal proposition in the culture he or she enjoys.

That’s my opinion. I write hoping to learn and perhaps approach the-literal-truth.

To Michael Norris:

Your opinion seems religious to me.

The clergy inculcate limited concepts that may influence people to eternally work to prove the religious doctrine. For example, “human life begins at conception” bemuses the woman’s obligations to her viable ova and the man’s obligations to his spermatozoa. However, the human resources to save threatened children, threatened conceptions, or threatened ova exponentially increase, respectively.

Ultimatums without the necessary resources seems like tyranny to me. 

To JR. Madden:

JR, you cite anecdotal triumph in continual improvement of law enforcement. We the People of the United States pay the bills for continual improvement.

There remains a need for statutory justice that encourages responsible human liberty, and the death sentence is essential to that civic duty.

Quora

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-kinship-provide-the-main-structure-of-social-action-in-many-noncommercial-societies?

While I don’t think of the genealogical family as a “noncommercial society,” I answer to appreciate the civic family.

The members of the living family may communicate, collaborate, and connect to establish and maintain integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity so as to encourage responsible human liberty to themselves and to the possible parent’s grandchildren (future married-children’s children).

In a civic culture, the parent’s grandchildren possibly have kinship through eight grandparents---may be kin to eight living families.

https://www.quora.com/In-which-way-will-political-correctness-do-harm-to-the-US-society?

“Political correctness” does harm by bemusing the people with new expression of an ancient debate: civic integrity as prevention of church-state partnership.

Consider religion, the practice: assuming that a heartfelt concern derives from the-literal-truth, developing a doctrine to support the assumption, and practicing the doctrine regardless of the-objective-truth---the ineluctable evidence that (with gradually better instruments of perception) asymptotically approaches the-literal-truth. Religion is like chasing an oasis and refusing to accept the evidence that it is merely a mirage.

Consider theism, the branch of religion that develops belief in the mystery of whatever-God-is. So far, discovery of the laws that control existence has not disproven a designing intelligence often referred to as “God.” The branches of theism are so numerous none is expected to dominate the world, yet having the correct beliefs is essential in some locations.

When I was a child, my community judged behavior on “the Christian thing to do” rather than human integrity. The Google Ngram shows that use of that political phrase has not peaked as of 2007. Its frequency is dwarfed by “chosen people,” which is doubled with “infidel.” Frequencies for “fidelity” and “integrity” are 3 times and 10 times higher, respectively.

For responsible human liberty, individuals acknowledge integrity and need integrity but many are bemused by voluntary fidelity to a doctrine. In a culture that fosters integrity, religion is reserved to private hope so as to encourage civic integrity.

It seems no known culture encourages the individual citizen to develop integrity. In fact, few people realize that integrity is a practice: pursuing the-literal-truth. Political justice is founded on the-literal-truth.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-justice-and-retribution?

It’s practical to start with selections from a dictionary, and I prefer Merriam-Webster online. Justice means “the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments.” Retribution referred readers to recompense “to give something to by way of compensation (as for a service rendered or damage incurred).” It seems retribution is the consequence of either a agreement or an injustice.

My opinions on this question can best be developed on the question of religion’s harm---initiation, toleration, and possible responsible human liberty.

It seems religion was common in recorded history, as evidenced by ancient cave-art and recorded in the Code of Hammurabi. The Greeks practiced religion but expressed two pivotal ideas I interpret as follows. First, humans may develop equity under statutory justice, a perfection that can be approached by discovering and correcting injustices in statutory law. Second, the just citizen neither initiates nor tolerates harm to or from any person or society. The jury wrongfully convicted Socrates of religious harm, and Socrates accepted punishment so as to uphold statutory law and perhaps to establish the case for correction of the injustice---in other words, make the case for statutory justice.

The English colonies in America rejected the Canterbury-Parliament partnership that is constitutional in England. However, American church-state partnership has been preserved by tradition, perhaps to pose Congress in “divinity” on par with Parliament.

Fortuitously, the U.S. Constitution has a political-power purpose that is stated in the U.S. Preamble: majority public discipline. Each citizen may consider the U.S. Preamble and reject its proposition, but does so at individual risk. And rightly so, because it is a proposition for individual civic discipline: responsible human liberty.

My interpretation of the U.S. Preamble for today is:  We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to maintain 5 public disciplines---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to practice and encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. The U.S. Preamble does not specify the standard by which compliance is measured. Therefore, discipline under the-literal-truth may be approached under the U.S. Preamble.

The-literal-truth exists, and humans have the awareness and grammar with which to discover actual reality. Human power to discover researches the-objective-truth. It improves with new methods of perception, such as increasingly powerful telescopes and microscopes. Psychological power increases with more definitive language and elimination of false assumptions/perceptions. For example, the sun does not come up in the morning. The U.S. is not “our democracy,” but a representative republic under the rule of law that increasingly satisfies the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.

The 5-person Committee of Style created the U.S. Preamble’s proposition early in the month of September, 1787. Representatives of 9 of 13 states ratified it on June 21, 1788, when the USA was established as a global nation of civic people (We the People of the United States). Two more states joined before operations began on March 4, 1789. The first Congress, 1789-1793, established the American church-state partnership that evolved from Protestantism in 1791 to Judeo-Christianity in 2019. Perhaps We the People of the United States is in the process of accepting religion as a private hope rather than a public imposition.

When most of We the People of the United States accept that the US Preamble’s proposition for equity under statutory justice assigns religion to privacy rather than as a public discipline, none of the living people will want retribution for past injustices imposed by religion: the continuum of living citizens will celebrate responsible human liberty.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.