Appreciating the-God

 

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

Appreciating the-God

People take for granted that their personal God is the-God. However, it seems prudent to reserve appreciation to the-God: appreciation that might be acceptable to the-God.

Of course, it is unlikely that anyone will come face to face with the-God. But if they did, they’d suffer chagrin if the-God was not their personal-God.

Just as I have not the faith to assert the-God does not exist, I have not the faith to choose other than the-God.

That’s only my choice for me. Let each person decide for themselves.

However, I think it is essential that each person continuously aid safety& security on earth, regardless of their choice about the-God.

Quora

quora.com/Considering-the-sources-presented-what-is-the-best-way-to-establish-a-civic-nation-inclusion-rights-values-beliefs? by Amal Chehade

About

quora.com/Considering-the-sources-presented-what-is-the-best-way-to-establish-a-civic-nation-inclusion-rights-values-beliefs? by Amal Chehade

About

quora.com/Considering-the-sources-presented-what-is-the-best-way-to-establish-a-civic-nation-inclusion-rights-values-beliefs? by Amal Chehade

About

quora.com/Who-decides-the-characteristics-of-justice? by Ifeanyi Franklin Ibekwe

With 2/3 of society comprehending, intending& practicing as human-beings, the majority could& might characterize justice based on ineluctable-evidence of harm& perpetrator. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.

However, most people “just want to live”. They let others determine necessity& justice. Consequently, elite opportunists develop power, in order to impose corruption rather than justice. Justice is characterized by military power.

The majority accommodates tyranny. Some people pray to their personal God to stop the pain and loss. However, the-God makes it plain that only human-being can& may pursue safety& security on earth. Prayer’s vain substitution for responsibility has rendered the U.S. Constitution impracticable. Only the people can restore the republic. The first necessary change is to amend the First Amendment so as to replace religious freedom to Congress& the Supreme Court with practice, facilitation& encouragement to civic integrity.

Each individual who chooses to constrain chaos in their way of living increases the chance of approaching 2/3 participation in safety& security “to ourselves and our Posterity”.

quora.com/Define-manliness-What-is-it-Is-there-a-one-size-fits-all-of-manliness? by Jac Tzou

Tzou’s request: Define manliness. What is it? Is there a one size fits all of manliness?

I think so.

An idea expressed in Genesis 1:27 seems more ancient than Hebrew scholars: “in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them”. I think the God is whatever constrains the consequences of human-being choice.

From my experiences& observations, the ancient principle is grounded in the physics of procreation. Spouses are faithful to the immediate family during the lifetimes of members and descendants. Thus, fortunate grandparents are faithful to great grandchildren. Since the ova come from the woman, manliness supports her social preferences to the children and maintains his personal inspiration& motivation.

Manliness seeks its opportunity for union with female yet is serenely confident if unrequited. The single person does not seek to procreate, because aid from a person external to the family would be required. The single person who chooses not to apply this principle can& may compensate to the offspring.

In these comments, I express my opinion and do not pretend to know the-ineluctable-truth. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.

quora.com/Why-do-we-need-a-state-What-is-its-significance-in-human-lives? by Haroon Khan

The human being is responsible for safety& security on earth. However, not every person accepts this principle. Call those who do “civic-citizens”.

Of necessity civic-citizens can& may practice, facilitate, and encourage necessity& justice by which to constrain irresponsible persons and fellow-citizens.

So far, the rule of law is the only system that promises human survival. In state institutions, legislators and the judiciary develop necessity& justice, while administrators operate. Law-enforcement requires both domestic police and national military. Civic citizens maintain the institutions.

Just as persons can& may practice civic-integrity, nations can& may develop the rule of law under necessity& justice. Nations who do so can& may constrain nations that oppose necessity& justice.

Humankind will either constrain injustice or end.

quora.com/Is-it-wrong-to-find-it-cowardly-to-find-value-in-status-quos-and-treat-change-like-it-s-a-terrible-thing? by Jonathan Allen

I’ve found that I cannot express to fellow-citizens a policy, insist on my policy, and depart without perception of error. Consequently, I share opinion I earned, work to focus the discussion on the idea, then listen to fellow-citizens for their experiences& observations that might improve my perspective.

For example, imagine I’m invited to a discussion of truth. In the past, I would propose changing the topic to the-objective-truth, asserting that evidence is essential: reason and other human constructs are insufficient. Without ineluctable* evidence, we can say what we perceive then emphasize: “But I don’t know the-objective-truth”. *Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.

Noting that new instruments change perception of the-ineluctable-evidence, I realized that the end discovery may be the-ineluctable-truth. Thus, humankind, intentionally or not, discovers ineluctable-evidence and how to positively use it as the-objective-truth. Then we continue research to invent new instruments of perception, in order to continually approach the-ineluctable-evidence. When we reach ineluctable perception, we may then know the-ineluctable-truth. Yet there may exist some unknowables.

For example, it seems evident that physics& its-progeny --- mathematics, forces, chemistries, psychology, fiction, indeed everything --- is controlled by the laws of physics. What controls human choice and can that power be perfected?

If choice can be universally perfected, human-utopia is a justifiable goal. If not, due regard to past error requires appreciation of traditions that were neglected.

For example, many wedding vows express the guidance: “a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh”. This may be an ancient metaphor for principles only now discernable. The laws of physics suggest that the woman’s genes and memes tend to pass on to her ova, each made unique by the man’s genes. If the man attempts to impose traditions from his father and mother to his wife and offspring, he creates conflict in his own treasure: his family. I express this opinion hoping for comments that might improve my perspective.

Everything I have written comes from my experiences& observations, and I share, hoping to be able to listen to chances to improve my opinions.

quora.com/Why-are-you-trying-to-change-history? by Andrew Parker

Which history and how?

quora.com/What-can-stop-a-diverse-democracy-from-tearing-itself-apart? by Marcelo Philippe

The rule of law. The U.S. is a constitutional republic — to intentionally-prevent democracy’s ruinous outcomes.

quora.com/Reflect-on-your-set-of-moral-values-at-this-phase-of-your-life-Where-did-you-acquire-these-values-Did-you-get-it-from-your-family-who-nurtured-you-from-the-culture-you-have-been-brought-up-or-from-the-society-that? by Mark Jhayson Inda

Approaching age 79, I read, write, speak& listen to develop the civic-integrity needed for responsible-human-independence (RHI). “Civic” refers to reliable connection& transaction to another person more than obedience to civil rules that elites develop at the civic center.

I earned opinion in the quest to answer 2 questions. First, with so many wonderful people why is the world confused? Second, with such a wonderful constitutional republic, why is the U.S. in divergent chaos?

I discovered my opinion during the last couple years. During the last 10,000 years of 300,000 years’ homo sapiens dominance, humankind has accelerated political divergence despite exponential technology-development. At first, some civilizations reasoned, if not observed, that the Gods were powerless to pursue safety& security on earth. Perhaps only one culture, Sumer, organized politically to respond to necessity& justice in human duty to the-good, notwithstanding the Gods of polytheism.

About 4,000 years ago, appreciation of the-good failed as individuals attended to the-God. Many civilizations developed& nourished – constructed -- a doctrinal-God intended to dominate other civilizations’ Gods – win wars and domestically coerce the-good. Appreciation to the-God and to the-good was lost.

Most of the world’s inhabitants subscribe to one of the doctrinal-Gods or to a philosophy. Individuals tend to adopt the way of living passed on to them during their first quarter-century of life. They’re trained to “keep the faith of their mothers”.

The Internet has made it obvious to civic-citizens that neither the-God nor government can usurp the individual’s duty to acquire the civic-integrity needed to practice, facilitate, and encourage RHI. The individual can& may ignore discipline imposed by mystery or by government. However, RHI is a self-interest, and soon we’ll observe humankind flourishing again; I think so, but don’t know.

quora.com/What-is-a-belief-opinion-commonly-accepted-in-your-culture-that-you-personally-completely-disagree-with? by Mike Wilson

In this location, it is common to witness for God with no appreciation to the-God. For example, I recently heard a minister say, “This is a loving church and our God is great.” I recalled Billy Joel’s phrase, “What am I doing here?”

I hope your question and my response goes viral, because the more people who appreciate the-God the better, in my opinion.

Since I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth (ineluctable meaning “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” especially if unknown), my opinion is not interesting to anyone but me.

But if someone asked, I’d say this: the-God seems like whatever constrains the consequences of each human choice.

Facebook

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52 May 22, 2022

Did you ever witness for God then ask your mind "What does the-God think?"?

I wonder if most of ourselves-and-our-posterity can learn to appreciate the-God, whatever that entity may be.

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52 May 27, 2022

I think the-God is necessity& justice: a force rather than an entity. I could be wrong yet don't think my opinion is from the factual reality.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Unethical self-enslavement to the sex-change industry

 

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

Unethical self-enslavement to the sex-change industry

When a person chooses to change their sex, they are dedicating their life to the sex-change industry. It matters not that they are creating jobs for all the services they will need during their lifetime. It matters not that they are creating bureaucracies to oversee the services. It matters not that they are inspiring activist groups to oppose the expansion of government. It matters not that they are creating gender-change judgeships to adjudicate the law suits. It matters not that they are creating gender-change law offices.

What matters is the choice to become a slave to a new industry.

Quora

quora.com/How-can-responsible-citizenship-stop-the-violation-of-human-rights? by Thandeka Lubisi

In responsible-citizenship, each person neither initiates nor accommodates harm to or from any person or institution. Of necessity& justice, the responsible-citizens constrain dependent fellow-citizens. Responsible-human-independence (RHI) emerges as personal self-interest.

quora.com/Who-can-bring-justice-and-peace-to-the-world? by Promisec

Utopia seems unachievable. An achievable better future seems possible if most citizens practice, facilitate& encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI) to safety& security. Then, most persons can& may reliably pursue the happiness they perceive as their lives unfold rather than submit to someone else’s view for them.

We know that only the individual has the opportunity, the power, the energy, the authority, and the-duty-to-self to pursue safety& security in their way of living. Not every person accepts their opportunity. Many persons choose a dependency: indolence, crime, tyranny, evil& worse.

Neither the-God nor government can usurp the human condition: a person can& may choose responsible-human-independence (RHI). I speculate “the-God” is whatever constrains the consequences of each human choice. Perhaps it is the laws of physic& its-progeny rather than an intelligent being.

Humankind started with abject ignorance and gradually discovers the-ineluctable-truth and how to positively benefit. (Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.) At every moment in time, the existing “ourselves and our Posterity”, quoting the preamble to the U.S. Constitution, can& may advance necessity& justice and thereby approach safety& security.

When about 2/3 of inhabitants accept and practice RHI, safety& security may begin to repress 2022’s divergent chaos.

quora.com/Which-one-of-your-good-causes-would-you-encourage-me-to-participate? by Graham C Lindsay

Join our cause. It is A Civic People of the United States: Individuals collaborating for the-good. “Civic” refers practice, facilitation, and encouragement of reliable human connections& transactions more than conformance to social and legal rules. Our Louisiana education-corporation is non-profit, non-revenue. We manage the blogs A Civic People (development) and cipbr.blogger.com (weekly comments).

The civic-citizen neither initiates nor accommodates harm/injury to or from any person or government. Fellow citizens who solicit money to coerce government into action that is more erroneous than ourselves and our Posterity can& may take in self-interest to the-good go wanting.

The republican principles to responsible-human-independence (RHI), framed in the 1787 U.S. draft Constitution, may be practiced by anyone who comprehends them. The more erroneous, states-negotiated U.S.-Constitution was ratified by Congress in 1791.

quora.com/unanswered/What-are-your-experiences-that-can-relate-to-the-concept-of-justice-as-fairness? by Emjeyy Paloo

Like so many scholars, John Rawls wrote to competing political philosophers rather than to homo sapiens, the recent humankind (the latest mutation in 0.3 of 7 million years’ evolution).

Experience& discovery of the-ineluctable-truth through 2022 informs us that necessity& justice is essential to survival, because political utopia is unachievable. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. Civic-citizens accept that they can& may act for the-good as they perceive it, despite this corrupt world, rather than wait indefinitely for the perfect civilization.

Each homo sapiens can& may develop the civic-integrity that is required to earn the lifestyle that satisfies their self-interest and pay taxes, in order to practice, facilitate, and encourage necessity& justice to everyone. Civic-citizens practice responsible-human-independence (RHI), funding government to provide civil order. If they are religious, they privately fund any religious-institution they want.

However, not everyone chooses RHI. Some humans use their individual power, energy, authority, and opportunity to develop a dependency -- such as indolence, crime, tyranny, evil, and worse. They neglect the self-interest of RHI, choosing dependency for reasons they may understand.

Utopians honestly urge the-good to everyone and work for its indefinite achievement. Civic-citizens honestly perceive they can& may act for the-good allowing the corrupt world to reform on its schedule.

Rawls attempted to influence people to wait for an “achievable utopia”. Andrew Koppelman, in “Rawls and the Market” dispels Rawls’ theory.

quora.com/What-is-Natural-Law-3? by Freidrich Gildard

“Natural law” is a vulnerable term from theological& civil squabbling: personal-God versus the-God if not whatever constrains human choice. Appreciation to the-God rather than a personal-God seems prudent.

Citing John Locke’s God, as specified in “Two Treatises of Government”, 1690,

THE great end of men's entering into society . . . the first and fundamental positive law of all common-wealths is the establishing of the legislative power; as the first and fundamental natural law . . . is the preservation of the society . . .  and . . . of every [viable] person in it. This legislative . . . sacred and unalterable . . . which is absolutely necessary to its being a law,* the consent of the society . . .*The lawful power of making laws . . . belonging so properly unto the same entire societies . . . received from God.

I accept neither 1) Locke’s God nor 2) “sacred and unalterable” legislation. I think the power that constrains human choice is the laws of physics& its progeny. It is human-being’s duty to discover the-ineluctable-truth and use it positively. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, which is beyond “unalterable”. And that whatever-constrains-human-choice is sacred is an opinion about the God-mystery. It’s a Locke-constructed leap of faith I cannot take.

The 1774 founders of the USA wrote “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God” perhaps to partially rebuke Locke plus to claim their-God would defeat the English-God, the reformed-Catholic Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The founders further rebuked Locke by false-promising “unalienable Rights . . . Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” rather than Locke’s “to preserve his property, that is, his life, liberty and estate”, Locke having defined a person as a property of Locke-God.

Homo sapiens, the recent, non-unalterable human-being, can& may set aside “natural law” in order to focus on the laws of physics; ignore mystery rather than neglect integrity; establish responsible-human-independence (RHI) at last. Accept that whatever constrains human choice will not usurp the human condition: human-beings can& may choose civic-integrity; human-beings can& may practice, facilitate& encourage safety& security to civic-citizens on earth.

To Sean Sheehy:

I think your comment would be enrichened with specificity about “God”. Do you refer to your-God or the-God of the God-mystery? If the latter, could the-God be whatever constrains the consequences of each human choice? Could the laws of physics be constraining everything including lies& fiction? Is it our task to discover the laws of physics and apply them positively? If so, is safety& security on earth solely human-being’s responsibility?

quora.com/Must-we-respect-the-bad-culture-in-our-society? by Muhammad Farhan Abdillah

Absolutely not.

The human-being has the duty to neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from any person. The civic-citizen knows this and appreciates fellow citizens who practice, facilitate, and encourage safety& security.

This appreciation principle operates mutually among citizens who share it. Thereby, warm greeting is as usual as internal focus so intense there is no greeting – only privacy. However, not every citizen appreciates life.

The moment there is offense, appreciation gives way to caution. If caution cannot be overcome, appreciation dissipates to apprehension; and apprehension to departure. When there is no recourse, there is no chance for respect.

Appreciation’s greatest strength is that it does not accommodate harm. The person who advocates respect due to mere existence does not appreciate human-being.

quora.com/Do-you-agree-with-If-you-want-peace-understand-war? by Jolina Recta

I have several concerns. I convert this ancient thought to: If you want safety& security, understand defenses. I consider indoctrination more threatening than war. For example, I doubt time on the Internet and much prefer transparent conversation.

First, peace represents utopia, which is unattainable, and is therefore an un-civic goal. “Civic” expresses reliability in human connections& transactions. Each human-being can& may behave so as to aid establishment of utopia. However, some persons miss either the opportunity, or the power, or the energy, or the authority to acquire the civic-integrity needed for responsible-human-independence (RHI). Therefore, civic-citizens have the duty to constrain dependent fellow-citizens. Necessity& justice require the rule of law, law enforcement, and continual research to increase statutory reliability. With varying qualities of both civic-citizens and dependent fellow-citizen, humankind can& may pursue safety& security so that most citizens may responsibly pursue the happiness they personally envision rather than submit to someone else’s wish for them.

Second, war seems a global staple no entity can& would constrain: most nations can avoid war but some do not want to. Consequently, the civic-citizenry monitors military power, in order to invent and maintain adequate defenses. As in all other functions, the civic-citizen earns the money to pay for RHI including infrastructure such as domestic law enforcement and national defense. The civic-citizen aids law enforcement first by observing the law. Passive citizens and resident aliens get a free ride on the provision of safety& security.

The free-ride is an artifact of the human condition: each person can& may develop a dependency& risk constraint rather than practice, facilitate& encourage RHI.

quora.com/What-is-the-right-to-life? by Ashley Mavunga

“Right to life” is nonsense that has been preserved in Western thought so elites can pick fellow-citizens’ pockets by maintaining John-Locke-God as specified in “Two Treatises of Government”, 1690. Therein, Locke wrote, “. . . for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker; all the servants of one sovereign master, sent into the world by his order, and about his business; they are his property”. As Locke-God property, a person cannot be terminated, even by choice.

Scholars don’t quote Locke-God, because they would be exposing the motives of the elites who pay them to preserve more persuasive Lockeanisms, such as “the common good”, “consent of the governed”, “liberty”, and Jefferson’s substitute for “property” (of Locke-God), “pursuit of happiness”.

Government-elites claim they preserve rights only to keep civic-citizens from accepting, practicing, facilitating, and encouraging the obvious: only the individual can constrain chaos in their way of living so as to increase their chance to preserve their life.

The U.S. is in divergent chaos. Civic-citizens can& may heed a 5,500 year-old suggestion:  Mankind is solely responsible for peace on earth. And not everyone accepts that, so those who do must aid the rule of law so as to constrain those who for various reasons do not aid the rule of law.

Pleading to church or state is no substitute for responsible-human-independence (RHI).

quora.com/What-are-some-unwritten-laws-that-you-follow? by Hellosaurus

I advocate transparency in trying to benefit from the ideas from Jesus that are affirmed by my experiences& observations. (Lots of people do that, whether they articulate it or not.) For example, develop a perfect person before death. Therefore, I follow the unwritten law: don’t expose your life& property to a non-civic-Christian and don’t make money on the name “Jesus”.

quora.com/Without-consulting-any-reference-what-is-ethics? by Maria Elina Elcarte

Ethics is self-interested action according to the-ineluctable-truth. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. Often the actor can& may admit not knowing the-ineluctable-evidence or how to perceive it. In that case, the prudent person chooses not to act, unless their life is being attacked.

For example, an entrepreneur attempts to persuade someone to change their gender. The person researches to discover how they may move past the sex-change services unto independent living. They conclude that enslavement to the gender-change industry is likely. They decline the gender change, even though they don’t know the-ineluctable-truth.

Facebook

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52 May 18, 2022

When people cite God is it their-God or the-God of the God-mystery? If the latter, could the-God be whatever constrains the consequences of each human choice? Is it our task to discover the laws of physics and apply them positively? If so, is safety& security solely human-being’s responsibility? Can& may each person practice, facilitate, and encourage civic-integrity more than civil-obedience?

facebook.com/chris.nalepa.7 May 18, 2022

Chris, I agree with your concern and expression "let our children have a childhood". Getting specific about how to do that, I'm thinking the best process is for parents to educate their children in sex, lies, and video before allowing them into public spaces and activities, especially social media.

Furthermore, reform from the tradition of teaching children fantasies& perceptions they must unlearn. Teach children that Santa Claus is a vehicle for commercial greed that plays on society's attraction to a season of good will to human kind. Teach that the earth's rotation at 1000 mph surface speed unhides the sun each morning rather than "the sun comes up" and traverses "the heavens". Teach them human reproduction, mutual attraction chemistry, female& male spousal commitment to her-family through grandchildren or more, public-service-decades a vehicle for self-discovery more than to earn a responsible way of living, and to practice, facilitate, and encourage the intention to perfect civic-integrity before dying.

Judging from children I met, some parents seem to be taking charge, notwithstanding my approach. There are many excellent children and adolescents in 2022. I trust them to address evil much better than I could.

I'm convinced that evil, empowered by the Internet, is at last defeating religion. That may not be bad, because it makes clear to humankind that neither government, nor institutional-God, nor private-God can usurp the human-being's self-duty to practice, facilitate, and encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI). Human-being civil-discipline can& may yield-to civic-integrity.

Government& God can be ignored. But whatever constrains the consequences of human choice is ineluctable. I think it is the laws of physics& its-progeny. That is, the laws of physics cannot be avoided, changed, or resisted.

Viewed this way, 2022 may be the year of the-ineluctable-truth and a pivotal year in homo sapiens' history.

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52 May 17, 2022

Safety& security on earth is solely the responsibility of persons who develop the civic-integrity needed for responsible-human-independence (RHI).

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.

Progressives misuse civility to defy civic-integrity

 

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

Progressives misuse civility to defy civic-integrity, against their own self-interest

In taking to the streets in neighborhoods where Supreme Court justices live, progressives have taken the Alinsky-Marxist organizational (AMO) view:  If an AMO-progressive thinks their rights have been denied/questioned, they claim the liberty to commit violence. It matters not that fellow citizens object to psychological violence: progressives license themselves. The justice’s family is inconvenienced and neighbors’ lives are disrupted. Progressives invite constraint.

The civic-citizens of the United States keep on practicing the 1787 U.S. intentions: integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity. Therefore, they do not learn the names and home addresses of the progressives so as to perpetrate psychological violence on the progressives.

To the civic-citizens, it’s not a matter of the law. They trust-in and commit-to the long-standing U.S. intentions: responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our Posterity”.

RHI is grounded in the-ineluctable-truth. Ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. Whatever constrains each person’s choices does not yield to AMO. I think physics& its-progeny constrain choices, yet I do not know the-ineluctable-truth.

For the first time, I doubt claiming humility to the-ineluctable-truth. Just now, I perceive humility an evaluative claim, and I am incapable of descerning the-ineluctable-truth.

News

theepochtimes.com/elon-musk-says-biden-wrong-to-think-he-was-elected-to-transform-the-country_4464694.html?utm_source=mr_recommendation&utm_medium=left_sticky

I think Musk is being political to allow his name to be associated with accusing President Donald Trump. The U.S. has never seen President Trump as Commander-in-chief with the civic-citizens supporting his platform. The U.S. intends 5 public disciplines: integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity. The Democrat Party, the FBI, the CIA, the Justice Department, the diplomatic core, and most of the deep state demonstrate that they have no integrity, let alone justice, peace, and strength. If Trump runs, I'll probably vote for him.

msn.com/en-us/news/crime/non-unanimous-verdicts-at-issue-at-louisiana-high-court/ar-AAX5TlL?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=3b1b3109d14d415c906a1c1580585848#comments

This is a case against the U.S. Supreme Court's unconstitutional activism. Here are some factual realities. First, Ramos v Louisiana asserts that 1791's Amendment VI requires states to provide unanimity when it requires impartiality. Second, with a population that is civically divided 50:50, it is statistically unlikely to reach justice with 12:0 voting. England allows 10:2 jury verdicts in criminal trials in order to lessen the influence of organized crime. The Supreme Court decides on 5:4 opinions, and mandated 12:0 to Louisiana with a 6:3 opinion. Third, their 6:3 opinion was grounded in 14th century English law, ignoring their current 10:2 verdicts. Fourth, the Louisiana Legislature acted unconstitutionally when it made ending Louisiana's 10:2 rule a referendum rather than upholding the law. Fifth, some citizens think DNA is valid to release innocent people but invalid to prove guilt and would not articulate their opinion. The people of Louisiana and the USA can demand reform to the more reliable majority jury verdict.

Quora

quora.com/Where-does-your-importance-come-from? by Gary C. Davis

You are the only entity that can practice, facilitate, and encourage chaos-constraint in your way of living. You are the only human-being who can& may choose to develop a peacemaker on earth. Only you can develop responsible-human-independence (RHI) to your person.

quora.com/What-does-the-world-need-equality-or-equity? by Albert Palmer

There’s only one entity that can& may provide peace in the world: the responsibly-independent-human-being. We know this from experience and observations so far; that is, through 2022.

Since not every person chooses responsible-human-independence, necessity& justice require laws, law-enforcement, and continual improvement of the constitutional-republic.

Statutory-justice steadily approaches equality& equity.

The civic-citizen choose to practice, facilitate, and encourage peace, aiding the rule of law to deliver both equality& equity.

quora.com/Must-everything-have-an-onus-of-truth? by Jay Ondrick

I suppose “onus” means “burden”. Perhaps “truth” means factual reality about something. We may reason that factual reality is not a burden if the something is of no interest.

For example, a person may live their entire life thinking their God is a powerful God and accepting the attendant promises. Then, the person discovers the-God and wonders if their-God is approved by the-God. Unable to decide, the person then examines expectations from their-God.

If losing the expectations is not really a burden, the possibility that the-God constrains the consequence of each human choice is not an onus.

In factual reality, what constrains the consequences of each human choice is not critical if the person practices, facilitates, and encourages civic-integrity.

quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-gender-equality-that-should-be-upheld? by Sera Ergi

In the rush to promote itself as the word of God, Christianity hides from the world the practical Jesus.

For example, Jesus suggests a man does not divorce his wife, because: “a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh”.

When 2 become one, assessment of equality is not possible.

I hope my wife of 52 years marriage plus 2 in courtship feels I am equal to her. She is the wittiest, serenely-confident person I know. When I enter the room, her eyes are on me and excite my appreciation.

Christianity is only about 1600 years old, so it is not too late for reform. Having 45,000 sects seems problematic but need not be. What’s needed is acceptable humility toward whatever constrains the consequences of a human-being’s choices.

I think mastering Jesus’ reported ideas is prudent.

quora.com/Is-there-a-way-to-bring-the-truth-out? by Gary C. Davis

There is a way to bring the truth out:  Demand the-ineluctable-truth.

Every person can& may disallow the word “truth” by demanding response to the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. The-ineluctable-truth does not respond to reason, mystery, or belief.

The-ineluctable-truth is discovered by examining the evidence. Ineluctable-evidence is verified by human-being’s experiences& observations. When discovery has not happened, the person must accept, “I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth”. The prudent person does not act on emotions, such as, to kill someone who is not attacking them.

Consider, systematic judicial corruption: When the U.S. Supreme Court votes 6:3 to require the states to provide 12:0 jury verdicts instead of 1791-U.S.-Amendment-VI-impartiality, you know the 6 are wrong. You discover the 6 corrupt justices applied 14^th century English law even though 21^st century English law allows 10:2 criminal-jury verdicts. You look further and discover that Louisiana judges and lawyers are benefiting from the federally mandated reviews of 1500 murder convictions with non-unanimous juries.

In another example, when a church proclaims “We have a strong God” they are arrogant toward the-God:  The church that retains humility toward whatever constrains the consequences of human choice& action is prudent. I think physics& its-progeny constrain human choice. For example, a person can& may claim to be the-God, yet bleeds.

Demanding the-ineluctable-truth is not easy. However, accepting “truth” creates chaos.

Now that you know a way, use and promote it. Every time you utter “the-ineluctable-truth” you’ll probably hear “What’s that?” When you explain it, you’ll receive appreciation and wonder as to why they did not know the word “ineluctable”. You can change the future. The challenge is to educate 2/3 of civic-citizens to prefer “the-ineluctable-truth” rather than “the truth” and to seek ineluctable-evidence.

Facebook

facebook.com/brenda.rivet May 12, 2022

Here's a wonderful story about Cynthia's serene confidence and goodness: it comes from family.

If I am lucky enough to be 1) reincarnated and 2) allowed to find Cynthia again, I will court her again. With her approval, I'll ask her dad for her hand in marriage AND to change my name to Phillip R. Marionneaux. I think he would accept my surprising declaration and hope the wedding-officiant would, too.

I'd be expressing the practical Jesus' political philosophy: "a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife". I'm pretty sure "PaPa" would accept me taking the family name and Cynthia's brother and sister would not object.

Unfortunately, my church didn't inform me about the practical Jesus. At least, I missed those lessons.

Connection? The Brusly High baseball field is named for Cynthia's dad, Charles K. Marionneaux.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.

The U.S. Supreme Court awakening to the laws of physics

 

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

The U.S. Supreme Court awakening to the laws of physics

Turns out the woman’s decision to remain pregnant as a matter of physics rather than privacy. Maybe she wants to consult with a doctor and maybe only for agreement to a schedule.

If the court owns up to its blunder, Congress can then pass an act admitting that the pregnant woman has the sole prerogative to remain pregnant or not, until the conception has standing, which means a caretaker who is willing to monitor and support gestation and delivery then facilitate and encourage the child during their quarter-century transition from totally dependent infant to young adult with comprehension and intention to develop a complete human being.

It’s shockingly true: human-beings don’t merely exist: they develop.

Quora

quora.com/When-you-are-still-a-child-you-have-no-responsibilities-yet-Do-you-agree-or-disagree? by JULIET TERANA

I think the newborn is totally ignorant and therefore has no responsibilities yet soon embarks on self-development and can& may succeed.

Infants have instincts that empower a whimper when their body detects hunger or bodily fluids. Neglect changes the whimper to an utter, the utter to cries, and the cries to tears plus misery-to-the-neglectful.

As soon as care is provided, happiness-expression follows. The whimper may change to that welcome sound of infant-contentment.

It is in the infant’s self-interest to learn the rote expressions of need followed by satisfaction in order to keep the care-taker informed. With practice, self-interest transitions to duty.

I think responsibility begins the moment the child is aware of this cycle. From then on, they acquire increasing responsibility and convert from infant to child, to adolescent, to youth who is acquiring comprehension& intention to mature, to adult serving fellow-citizens to earn personally desired way living, then to psychologically& physically mature responsible-human-independence (RHI).

Because no culture inculcates these principles in their youth and adults, few persons reach mature-human-being. Some progress to and die adolescent.

Facebook

facebook.com/douglas.moreman, May 6

Doug, thank you for you keen interest in the unbelievable.

 

Only a dreamer would think they might be close to an answer as to why more people don’t accept civic-integrity.

About 5,500 years ago, Sumerians observed: the-Gods cannot, so female& male human-being must constrain chaos on earth. Hebrew scholars expressed the suggestion in Genesis 1:28 but in Genesis 2 changed “the God” to “the Lord God”, extending polytheism’s mysteries to monotheism’s vain competitions.

Fast forward to 1776. The founders declared that “Nature’s God” authorized colonial-Protestant-USA to rebuke England and their reformed-Catholic Trinity. With sympathy& providence from France and Spain, they appealed to “the Supreme Judge of the world” for military victory. French military at Yorktown, VA outnumbered both American military and English military, each 3:1. And Spain helped pay the cost.

The 1787 framers specified a constitutional republic with relief from God-mystery and 5 public disciplines in order to practice, facilitate, and encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI) to willing citizens in their states. Colonial Anglo-American loyalists in at least 2 states would not ratify without a Bill of Rights like the 1689 English one. The first Congress granted themselves freedom of religion in 1789 and codified factional American Protestantism in 1791.

Faced with a February 1861 declaration of secession by 7 states, in March, President Lincoln said, “Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity, and a firm reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored land are still competent to adjust in the best way all our present difficulty”. The Civil War was Christian.

Erroneously, most people fear civic-integrity. They seek higher power to usurp their personal duty to constrain chaos in their way of living. In factual reality, neither the-God nor government can usurp the human-being duty to provide peace on earth.

It seems the Sumerians perceived the-Gods could not constrain chaos on earth, so it was up to human-being. Consequently, in only 6,000 years, they invented the wheel, fortified-cities, irrigation, writing, and many more wondrous innovations starting 10,000 years ago.

The introduction of monotheism seemed an improvement on polytheism. Unfortunately, the competing doctrines do not reserve humility toward the unknown: the-God.

Consequently, chaos has increased exponentially. Today, global population is divided 16% unaffiliated and 84% religious; folk religionists 6%, reincarnationists 22%, and monotheists 55%; Muslims 23%, Christians 32% (Jews 0.2%). There are 45,000 Protestant-Christian sects. Human-being is divided.

The warring tyrants of the world easily control divided citizens. Citizens can& may accept 2 precepts of civic-integrity. First, the Gods cannot constrain chaos on earth, so human-being must. Second, military power will not be used to constrain chaos if civic-citizens do not demand it. U.S. citizens can& may constrain government.

Civic-integrity is nothing to fear: The U.S. can& may amend the First Amendment so as to promote civic-integrity to every citizen rather than religious-freedom to Congress.

 

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/, April 8, 2022, May 5 comment

Me, too.

But we live in the best of times. Some very old habits are being challenged and the-civic-people is considering ineluctably needed reforms.

Hot on the agenda is the Supreme Court. The entity "ourselves and our Posterity" can& may require them to set aside Anglo-American-tradition& precedent to deliberate the-ineluctable-truth.

Justices don't want the entity We the People of the United States to use the word "ineluctable". It means "not to be avoided, changed, or resisted". Intentional murder is outlawed. Non-unanimous criminal jury verdicts are not outlawed in England. However, they are in the U.S., decided on 14th century English law. Louisiana is now beginning to consider retrying 1500 past murder cases due to the Supreme Court's 6:3 opinion that Louisiana's 10:2 verdicts were unconstitutional even though allowed in England in 1967.

More importantly "ourselves and our Posterity" can& may revise the First Amendment in order to facilitate& encourage individual& U.S. civic-integrity rather than religious-freedom-to-Congress.

Comment:

You changed topics, and I agree on your new premise: dependent fellow-citizens need reform. That includes the government officials who don't earn their keep; some do.

However, their change to responsible-human-independence can& may be facilitated& encouraged if the-civic-people reform the U.S. government.

facebook.com/margo.frey/posts/10223000630739099?notif_id=1651430686881061&notif_t=nf_share_story&ref=notif April 29

This thread turns my stomach.

The problem is not religious: it's physical. The Eurocommunists who are trying to destroy the U.S. and mixed economics (private capitalism, welfare, and infrastructure) understand that expansion of government eventually subdues civic-living. Therefore, they sponsor entrepreneurial complexes that can expand government fast. Every customer for sex change they can recruit unintentionally enslaves themselves for life. To proliferate the complex, they must force us to pay the bills.

Someone who perceives their psychology is in the wrong body is brainwashed. Empathy is best expressed by withholding transportation cost to their next appointment with the sex-change industry or its sponsors and redirecting them to a STEM consultant. Preacher? Never. Preacher turned social worker? Never.

If there are any preachers with civic-integrity, they have my apology for the oversight, and I'm waiting to learn the-ineluctable-evidence of the integrity. To appreciative fellow-citizens in the U.S., ineluctable means "not to be avoided, changed, or resisted". Apparently, Europeans allow change but not avoidance or resistance.

Comment

Laurel Van Der Wende "Each person is made in the image of God and thus deserves respect."

I disagree. The person who chooses to develop as mineral, plant, animal, specter, or slave cannot be appreciated much less respected.

Approaching my 80th year, I discovered something that can& may help. Ancient advice, I think Sumer political philosophy expressed by Hebrew scholars is this: human-being cannot dictate the spiritual world and is independently responsible for peace on earth. Christianity ignores this suggestion and thus Christians live in divergent chaos. Consider the 45,000 Protestant sects in the world.

A non-Christian, Jesus, transcended the millennia -- so far, 300,000 years of homo sapiens, perhaps as a man reading the available literature and thinking civically. Monotheism poses 2 problems.

First, imposing God on Jesus confuses the available civic influence. By civic I mean responsible-human-independence (RHI) to choose the-good. Second, churches impose their doctrinal God, in order to bemuse people from considering the-God: whatever controls the consequences of personal choice& action. I guess the laws of physics control the consequences of human actions.

Some churches further bemuse believers by threatening them with the Holy Spirit: ineluctable mystery. Ineluctable means "not to be avoided, changed, or resisted". That is, the factual reality is that the Holy Spirit is a mystery.

The Sumer political philosophy, perhaps 5,500 years old, is expressed in Genesis 1:28 by Hebrew scholars from 3,000 years ago. Taking advantage of what humankind has learned in the recent 6,000 years, I think the message is: Female& male human-being can& may provide order and prosperity to themselves, the lesser species, and the earth (leaving “the heavens” to mystery, perhaps Jesus).

A few statements attributed to Jesus in doubtable opinions expressed decades after Jesus died tend to affirm Genesis 1:28's message. The statements include: be perfect, before Abraham was born I am, aid your government official, the creator made them male and female, and many more. I prefer to think Jesus was a man with special talent in interpreting literature available to him, including most of the Hebrew Bible. The Christian Bible books were not written. However, I see evidence in other literature, such as Agathon's speech in Plato's "Symposium", that Jesus influenced human-beings in any age. Maybe writers plagiarized Plato. I do not know the-ineluctable-truth and admit that Jesus could be the-God. God or man, I want to comprehend the-good, or civic-integrity, as Jesus saw it. I think I can learn that from people who speak and listen with transparency.

Fellow-citizens who claim to speak for the Bible owe it to themselves to consider the Genesis 1:28 message: The individual can& may constrain chaos in their way of living. Jesus affirms that message. Accepting it, fellow citizens may ponder: Does this option decrease chaos in my way of living? If the answer is "No". They can& may choose chaos anyway. But it is in their self-interest to constrain chaos.

The sex-change industrial complex increases chaos. Individuals can& may continue to support an evil industry.

 

facebook.com/courtney.washburn May 1, 2022

I own a disk and need partners to throw with. Choose Baton Rouge an early destination.

Also, I am back at University Baptist Church (after 27 years away) to share a discovery: the USA is losing to social democracy (worse than communism) because churches constrain Jesus and divide when some members favor their group. Consequently, there are 45,000 Protestant sects on earth.

A remedy is to unbox Jesus by transparently sharing concerns then civic-solutions that increase peace (Jesus) and decrease chaos (physics).

Learn to appreciate Jesus rather than "love my church".

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.