Recall: Phil Beaver trusts and is committed to, but does not know the-objective-truth, of which most is undiscovered yet some is understood. Yet he works and seeks refinement for his opinion, needed only when the-indisputable-facts have not been discovered.
Our Views: VIPS. I appreciate the phrase “civic obligation,”
especially regarding the well-being of children and the additional thoughts about healthy
family. “Civic” refers to integrity
in human connections in this place. Beyond unity, integrity is fidelity to both wholeness and factual understanding. However, persons who advocate for iterative-collaboration
for public-integrity, cannot trust VIPS. My guess is that VIPS acceptance criteria entails wanting social
democracy rather than democratic-republic or simply apathetic conformity to the religion-government-partnership.
Today’s Thought. The beneficial interpretation of the
second part of the New Testament quote may be: The idea, “Be perfect,” is
literal and achievable for each unique human-being. Once your life is grounded in
Fidelity to the-discovered-facts-of-reality and rational theory derived from the interrelated facts, you’ll be
contributing to more abundant life. The first part of the quote may be interpreted: Beware
the religion-government- partnership for it will steal your life for its maintenance
benefits. (It is already established by millennial-public-apathy.)
Orleans Parish DA (Morrell). The writer’s record of
the court cases suggest a civic people's need to reform the bench. That is, judges use the
law to pick the civic people’s pockets, and the people’s apathy reduces the people's
freedom from oppression such that the liberty to live is being lessened. A
civic people may stop tolerating injustice anytime they choose. Just as a civic person earns their living, a civic person collaborates for civic justice.
Media on Trump (Russo). The media think they control
this country by controlling public opinion: public opinion determines policy,
they say. (At least that's what LSU School of Mass Communications represented to me with a list of course topics I should consider.) Defeat in one battle does not mean the war is over. However, a civic
people may appreciate each other and communicate for public-integrity while the
media ply their business plans---ending the woe brought on by the media.
Religion and Justice (Bates). For justice, ministers
should resign from their institutions and become civic practitioners: People
trained to help each person achieve individual-independence with
civic-morality. The sole purpose of religious institutions is to preserve the
institution regardless of the cost to humankind. Let me repeat the message: Ministers, become perfect servants by resigning the ministry and becoming civic practitioners. This is not my 1838 idea: see emersoncentral.com/divaddr.htm , wherein Emerson, after resigning his pulpit at age 29, four years later gave the message ministers hide from parishioners and the source of the message, in my paraphrase: You have the opportunity to perfect your unique person.
Cokie and Steve Roberts. Their collaboration often reflects
the false-pride that journalists are the most noble citizens. Take for example,
from September 21, 2016 “there is still time for professional journalists to
provide those voters with the truth about the candidates.” How egoistic it must be to imagine you can provide the truth! It is well known
that “freedom of the press,” means print anything that serves your business
plan. That boast seems appropriate even after this December 30, 2016 offering
by a couple who obfuscate the point: Since the Bill & Hillary Clintons are such obviously dissemblers,
what’s to be said about the people who gave Mrs. Clinton a 2.8 million majority
vote? Is their social-order exempt from public-integrity and civic-morality? I contend that the people who vote for Democrats in general are misled by
would-be journalists like the Roberts couple. The idea “social democracy” to
replace the USA’s democratic-republic is a scheme to ruin the world’s best
hope: The potential for most Americans iteratively-collaborating for the Security to empower
individual-independence according to the preamble to the constitution for the
USA.
Bernard Goldberg. I nominate this opinion as the column of the
half-century. Since 1966, the media has attempted to form national
policy by influencing public opinion--- false emotions lull an indolent people
into tolerance for social democracy instead of democratic-republic; social
morality instead of civic morality; communitarianism instead of
individual-independence; welfare enslavement instead of freedom from federal
oppression; tax-obligations instead of liberty to pursue personal goals; prayer
to factional gods instead of collaboration for civic justice. I am reminded of
James Meredith’s reflections on his 1966 march: “Duty and responsibility are an
equal part [of citizenship], and that’s the part the [press] has failed to pay
any attention to.” See concordmonitor.com/Civil-rights-marchers-U-S-still-needs-to-address-inequality-3635924
to read Meredith’s words, which I cannot interpret. However, they come under
the press’s caption, “Civil rights marchers: U. S. has work to do." IMO,
Meredith’s words claim the black race has work to do a half-century after his
march. In another view, Goldberg's opinion seems more a defense of what the media did in the injustice they created: The media begged woe and the USA is suffering. The media may reform if the subscribers, hired-hands, management, and owners choose public-integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment