Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.
Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual equality: For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my proposal as follows: “Willing citizens collaborate, communicate, and connect to provide 5 public institutions—integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity—so as to encourage responsible human liberty to living people.” I want to collaborate with the other citizens on this paraphrase and theirs yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.
It seems no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.
Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.
Selected theme from this week
A quora question prompted perhaps my clearest encouragement for individuals to pay attention to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition with the-objective-truth as standard for justice. The-objective-truth is the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured and the-literal-truth is asymptotically approached.
Quora
https://www.quora.com/How-would-you-define-freedom-1?
Freedom is prevention of arbitrary constraints, both external and internal, with acceptance of the-literal-truth. For example, I am not colonial-British, because I was born in America and want to behave as a member of We the People of the United States.
Humankind is constrained by the laws of physics, which control evolution. As physical evolution unfolds, humankind does the noble work of pursuing the-literal-truth by discovering the-objective-truth as indicated by ineluctable evidence. Asymptotically, the-objective-truth approaches the-literal-truth. Humankind know so much it is difficult for a human to learn much of it in a lifetime, perhaps 80 years.
Some humans argue that reason can be used to extrapolate from the-objective-truth to the-literal-truth, and they influence people whose emotions dissuade demands for objectivity. For example, I once overlooked or warmed to a famous lyric “Twas Grace that taught my heart to fear.” I suffered an imposed fear or psychological tyranny. However, as I progressed into college it seemed clear to me that Maslow’s hierarchy of needs can be viewed as personal responsibilities. For example, if you want to choose food rather than accept from a bureaucrat, you must earn.
When I was a child, I understood that America was exceptional because of “we, the people” and “freedom of religion.” However, a sixteen-month overseas assignment made me realize the world is peopled with great individuals, and that some cultures have open-minded civic practices. It inspired me to examine more closely the U.S. Constitution. I discovered its preamble, the U.S. Preamble. A few decades later, I view the U.S. Preamble as a proposition for self-discipline to achieve mutual, comprehensive safety and security.
The U.S. Preamble offers citizens the proposition which I interpret for my way of living as follows: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity (original nouns are Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare, respectively) ---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the continuum of living people. This seems a proposition to aid freedom-from tyranny so as to secure individual liberty-to develop responsible human integrity as evolution unfolds. It is neutral to religion, race, gender, wealth, and other civic factors.
In my maturity, low as it may be, I accept that I must conform to the-literal-truth, which I may pursue through the-objective-truth, admitting I do not know when I do not know. I accept the mystery of whatever-God-is. I try to be informed of government decisions in my city, state, and country; publically express my preferences; and vote for politicians who seem to be of We the People of the United States rather than “we, the people.” I try to aid freedom-from both internal and external constraints so as to secure liberty-to my wife, me, our children, and other people.
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-are-the-three-main-causes-of-human-rights-violations?
First, most humans do not accept individual power, energy, and authority (HIPEA) to develop integrity rather than wander into infidelity.
Second, most humans erroneously believe their god will eventually relieve the people of governmental abuse, not recognizing that theists futilely debate the mystery of whatever-God-is and thereby establish a democracy that prevents non-theists who would like to aid responsible human liberty to develop integrity.
Third, church-state partnerships recognize that theists will neither rebel nor leave the country, and therefore the partnership can pick the people’s pockets with immunity.
Fellow citizens can terminate this abuse of the people by accepting HIPEA to develop civic integrity, maintaining hopes that their god will provide them a favorable afterdeath. Afterdeath is that vast time after body, mind, and person have stopped functioning. Neither governments nor whatever-God-is makes promises favorable afterdeath.
https://www.quora.com/As-democracy-is-losing-popularity-what-other-form-of-government-will-replace-it?
I read, write, and conduct open meetings at public libraries to promote two practices: 1) individual discipline that is so true to human experience and observations that most people practice it and 2) individual pursuit of the-literal-truth as standard for human integrity.
Individual practices when in civic majority promote collective success, and I think 2/3 participation in civic citizenship is achievable as soon as this message is widely read. I have appealed to my two U.S. Senators, Cassidy and Kennedy, to bring the proposal to the U.S. Senate. I will not try again to approach Democrats.
The first principle---individual discipline as requisite to collective discipline---derives from my interpretation of 2400 year-old Greek suggestion. Humankind can establish individual equity under statutory justice. Equity rather than equality because every human is unique. Statutory justice as perfect law, a worthy human goal.
In my country, the USA, the trust-in and commitment-to discover equity under statutory justice is offered in the U.S. Preamble, the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. It is a controversial, 52-word proposal that each citizen may interpret to order his or her lifetime. A lifetime is the perhaps 80 year opportunity to develop human integrity regarding perhaps 7 trillion man-years of humankind’s accumulated experience and observations.
My interpretation of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition to fellow citizens this morning is: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity (original nouns Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare, respectively)---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to the continuum of living people. There may be a better people’s proposal, and I’d like to know of it. By all means it is not the United Nation’s declaration of human rights.
In my work to comprehend the U.S. Preamble, two principles stand out.
First, the U.S. Preamble does not refer to preservation of the 1788 U.S. culture, a form of “originalism.” The object of the public aid to five institutions is “to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” At all times, “ourselves” is living citizens and “our Posterity” is future citizens including grandchildren and beyond. Thus, current civic families aid the five public institutions to secure liberty to the parents’ grandchildren and beyond. Citizens who do not consider much less aid the U.S. Preamble’s proposition are dissident fellows who may reform at any time. Without my articulations, I think about 2/3 of citizens aid the proposition by virtue of their genes and memes, but because of political obfuscations, civic votes teeter on 50% plus one.
Second, while the 1788 standard for justice may have been each voting citizen’s factional American Protestantism (a private division), only 5% of inhabitants could vote, and they were land-owning men. Since its establishment as a global nation on June 21, 1788, the USA has suffered obfuscation of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition as secular, whereas it is neutral to religion, race, gender, and other civic errors. Alas, so far, instead of religiously neutral the USA has been a democracy under competitive theists, with non-theists sharing the burden of the mystery of whatever-God-is. American democracy is as ruinous as any other democracy and egregiously ruinous to non-theists. The U.S. Preamble left it to us and our posterity to establish reliable human standards as evolution unfolds.
Both physical and cultural discoveries emerge from ineluctable evidence we call the-objective-truth. For example, like erroneous physical perceptions such as the sun’ll come out tomorrow, lies inevitably are exposed by physical evidence. The men elevated Kipling’s man who would be king to a god until the primitive women cut the god’s wrist to observe the blood. The earth, rotating on its axis, hides the sun each evening and un-hides it each morning.
The-objective-truth often changes because of new instruments or new interpretations of past evidence. Therefore, open-minded people often state “I don’t know,” before expressing a hard-earned opinion. For example, to the challenge “Solve the mystery of whatever-God-is” the civic citizen might answer “The existence of God has not been disproven, so I don’t know.” With open minds, humankind trusts-in and is committed-to asymptotically approaching the-literal-truth.
Regardless of my work, I think humankind is on a deliberate march toward a civic agreement similar to the U.S. Preamble under pursuit of statutory justice through discovery of the-literal-truth. I hope my work will accelerate the march so that I may witness an achievable better future.
https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-motivates-voters-more-self-interest-or-public-good?
I think most voters mistakenly perceive self-interest as public good under Chapter XI Machiavellianism; https://www.constitution.org/mac/prince11.htm.
That is, most people think their god controls government and eventually things will work for the good. Their belief is so strong they do nothing: neither hold government accountable nor leave the country. Only a dreamer would object to the god-government partnership under freedom of religion. However, I work to encourage Americans to amend the First Amendment to encourage integrity, a human duty, rather than religion, a business institution.
The church-state partnership in America represses the people’s proposition, which is stated in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble). Every citizen is invited to consider: Am I a member of We the People of the United States as stated in the U.S. Preamble? It is a controversial proposition.
First, its provision “to . . . our Posterity” applies the commitments to future citizens. Thus, in “Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” the “ourselves” is current citizens and “Posterity” is future citizens.
Further, civic citizens aid the five public institutions---Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare---under standards for justice. The standards are not specified, so living citizens may discover statutory justice under the-literal-truth.
In 1788, when nine states established the USA as a global nation, many citizens assumed that their god would work things out. In the 231 years since then it has become obvious that whatever-God-is is a mystery and therefore reliance on personal gods is a matter of theism’s competitive faction versus the rest of the people.
A new standard is needed, and we suggest the-objective-truth, which is the ineluctable evidence of actual reality. Objective research is the reliable tool for asymptotically comprehending the-literal-truth.
When most people accept both physical and psychological evolution, an achievable better future may develop. In a civic culture, integrity is critical to living even for people who have hope for a favorable afterdeath, that vast time after body, mind, and person stop functioning. Neither whatever-God-is nor government nor the partnership promise a good afterdeath.
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/How-does-America-both-live-up-and-fail-to-live-up-to-its-ideals-ideals-meaning-equality-rights-opportunity-liberty-and-democracy?
Your ideals, excepting the opportunity to liberty, seem alien to the U.S. Preamble, our fellow citizens’ stated purpose.
Nine of January 14, 1784’s thirteen eastern seaboard global states established on June 21, 1788 the Union of states that legally terminated the 1774 Confederation of states.
The purpose of 1788’s USA is stated in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble). It offers each citizen the opportunity to aid five public institutions---Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare---in order to secure liberty to living citizens.
The U.S. Preamble leaves it to individuals to aid the five public institutions according to personal practice, implying that securing human liberty is an individual responsibility. Hopefully, the collective responsibility under the U.S. Preamble secures national liberty.
The articles that follow the U.S. Preamble guarantee the states a republican form of government not only literally but in many checks and balances to prevent popular dominance. Aliens such as British loyalists and Alinsky-Marxist organizations (AMO) would like to undo the American republic.
U.S. citizens have the wonderful opportunity to be either of We the People of the United States as defined in the U.S. Preamble or dissidents. Being dissident risks subjugation to the law, depending upon whether harm against fellow citizens is noticed or not. Dissidence does not mean civic action to identify and correct unjust laws. It means opposition to responsible human liberty---oppositions such as crime, tyranny, or a fellow citizen’s infidelity to the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.
I don’t think you listed America’s ideals. Democracy promotes chaos. Each human is unique: equality seems neither possible nor desirable. The only human right that seems justified is the opportunity to individually develop integrity, the human right that cannot be denied even by force. Opportunities like earning so as to choose your food rather than accept what is offered by a bureaucrat come with integrity.
I think some people overlook their opportunity to human life. Human living requires a nest of acceptances I have not yet thought through. Here’s a start. Acceptance that you are a human being. Acceptance of evolution. Acceptance that humans are the only species with the awareness and grammar by which to develop integrity. Acceptance that each human individual has the power, the energy, and the authority (HIPEA) to develop either integrity or infidelity. Acceptance that civic humans communicate, collaborate, and connect for equity under just laws. Acceptance that in the USA, the agreement to develop statutory justice is offered in the U.S. Preamble under the literal truth as standard for achievement. No one knows the closeness to the ideal We the People of the United States will achieve.
While humankind has been developing integrity for perhaps 150,000 years, with acceleration during the last 10,000 years, an individual’s chance to discover and develop integrity has a duration of about 80 years. Some fellow citizens offer encouragement and coaching unto integrity, and neither whatever-God-is nor government encourages citizens to undertake the U.S. Preamble’s discipline so as to avoid drifting into infidelity. Accepting his or her HIPEA, the individual may discover and develop integrity.
Acceptance of responsible human liberty under the literal truth is offered in the U.S. Preamble rather than in alien literature.
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-is-the-meaning-of-freedom-2?
It is interesting that “freedom” and “liberty” are each controversial.
I think they can be clarified by using either “freedom-from” or “liberty-to” in natural sentences.
This innovation helped me interpret the U.S. Preamble as offering public freedom-from tyranny so as to encourage the private liberty-to develop responsible individual happiness.
The preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble) is a civic, civil, and legal proposition each citizen may (or may not) interpret so as to order his or her pursuit of individual happiness with civic integrity.
My interpretation today is: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity (original nouns are Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare)---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. The standard by which civic citizens develop statutory justice is the-objective-truth, which is the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured and by which the-literal-truth is approached. Dissidents are encouraged by example to join We the People of the United States.
Someone said that maturity is freedom from both internal and external constraints. I think freedom-from external constraints is not possible, because humans must conform to the-objective-truth if not the-literal-truth. Therefore, maturity seems the liberty-to develop integrity, which is not contingent on external constraints.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-political-belief-you-hold?
A better future is achievable now if most citizens accept the U.S. Preamble’s proposition under the-objective-truth.
The U.S. Preamble offers individual happiness with civic integrity to living citizens. It is neutral to religion, gender, race, wealth, and heritage.
Here’s my interpretation today: We the People of the United States (civic citizens) communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity (original nouns are Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare)---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. The standard by which civic citizens develop statutory justice is the-objective-truth, which is the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured and by which the-literal-truth is approached.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-social-issues-that-engineers-could-solve?
Engineers are trained to either efficiently discover the root cause of actual reality or accept not knowing for now.
For example, people in a civic culture do not lie to each other in order to lessen human loss and misery rather than to observe some rule.
Everything evolved from physics the object of study, expressed as E=mC2. Fiction derives from imagination about what has not been discovered. Humankind’s noble task is to resolve essential fiction.
There is no social issue engineers could not resolve. For example, as long as the mystery of whatever-God-is has not been resolved, it is prudent for a human to not turn his or her back on whatever-God-may-be.
https://www.quora.com/Is-equality-synonymous-to-fairness/answer?
No. Equity is close to fairness and distant from
equality.
We say each human is
unique. How can the unique be equal or treated equally?
https://www.quora.com/Is-fighting-for-freedom-the-same-as-being-willing-to-give-up-freedom-to-preserve-it?
Fighting-for is active: willing-to is passive.
Fighting is risky: being willing is safe.
Fighting may win: giving up loses.
Loss to preserve is an oxymoron.
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/How-many-human-rights-articles-are-there?
The universal declaration has 30 articles touching more or less than a hundred rights, depending on how you count; https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html.
However, I suggest there is only one defensible human right: freedom-from tyranny so as to have the liberty-to develop integrity.
Since the human individual has the power, energy, and authority (HIPEA) to either develop integrity or not, external tyranny may not matter.
https://www.quora.com/Do-you-trust-any-form-of-government?
Yes. I trust the statutory justice that is offered in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble). Despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s arrogance, the U.S. Preamble is a civic, civil, and legal contract offer. For example, its ratification terminated the 1774 Confederation of 13 States and established a Union of nine states on June 21, 1788.
Citizens may choose to be of We the People of the United States as defined in the U.S. Preamble or be dissidents. Every citizen is invited to consider the U.S. Preamble and use his or her interpretation of it to order his or her civic, civil, and legal life. When life ends, his or her way of living ends.
The U.S. Preamble offers individual happiness with civic integrity to living citizens. It is neutral to religion, gender, race, wealth, heritage, philosophy, governance---essentially everything but discipline; individual discipline that holds collective discipline accountable.
Here’s my interpretation today: We the People of the United States (civic citizens) communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity (original nouns are Unity, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare)---in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens. The standard by which civic citizens develop statutory justice is the-objective-truth, which is the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured and by which the-literal-truth is approached.
Under the U.S. Preamble and the-objective-truth or the-literal-truth, there is no way civic citizens would saddle the people’s children with $22.7 trillion national debt! Because the debt is growing, each newborn’s share may exceed $5.7 million. Yet each special interest group (political identity) shamelessly lobbies for more federal dollars. In other words, greedy special interest groups are competitively burdening the nation’s children and beyond.
No one knows how trustworthy could be civic citizens’ discipline according to the U.S. Preamble with the-objective-truth as the standard for pursuing the statutory justice of the-literal-truth. However, I encourage fellow individuals to test the U.S. Preamble’s powers.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-separation-of-the-three-branches-of-government-considered-so-important-What-happens-if-they-are-not-separate?
To bemuse the civic people---the entity “We the People of the United States.”
One source says the purpose is to prevent autocracy; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers. The 1787 U.S. Constitution specifies a 3-branched Union of states in a civic people’s republican federation. By “civic people” I refer to people in acceptance of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.
The U.S. Preamble, the preamble to the U.S. Constitution is a civic, civil, and legal proposition to fellow citizens, which each individual may either trust-in and commit-to or deny. It expresses the will to aid development of statutory justice. I doubt any U.S. Supreme Court justice ever claimed he or she was first a member of We the People of the United States who accept the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.
Powers to the Union’s executive, legislative, and judicial branches are limited so as not to impose on either the state constitutions or the civic people. However, the Bill of Rights, created by the 1789-91 Congress, imposed a church-state partnership to make Congress seem divine in competition with the Canterbury-Parliament partnership in England. Additionally, it stipulated unconstrained freedom of the press, deviating from the principle of separation of powers. My state, Louisiana, stipulates that the speaker may be held responsible for expressions.
I encourage every citizen to study the U.S. Preamble and interpret it so as to order his or her practice in human, individual power, energy, and authority (HIPEA) so as to pursue integrity rather than infidelity to the-objective-truth, which is the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured. Thereby, each citizen may develop the individual discipline by which to hold government officials accountable.
My claims require no scholarly reviews or quotations of “founding fathers.” However, denial of my claims requires lots of proprietary work so as to pretend to know better than what everybody knows: neither whatever-God-is nor government will deliver responsibility. Responsibility comes only from a civic people, in the U.S., defined as “We the People of the United States” in the U.S. preamble.
https://www.quora.com/Shouldnt-basic-human-necessities-be-human-rights?
No.
Your question is centered on someone else fulfilling the human necessities. Since neither whatever-God-is nor government will meet a human’s needs, it seems obvious that it is an individual responsibility.
Not only that, but only the individual can determine his or her necessities. For example, I do not view infidelity as a necessity and therefore focus on developing and practicing integrity.
Viewed from the human ovum, the only necessity is to perish if he or she cannot expect to be inseminated with the intentions to provide the perhaps 3 decades encouragement and coaching required for the transition from feral infant to young adult with the understanding and intent to develop human integrity rather than fidelity to the-objective-truth. That is, the ineluctable evidence by which literal truth is measured.
Fellow citizens may commit to making certain that every feral infant is encouraged and coached to accept the human individual power, energy, and authority to practice integrity rather than infidelity to the-objective-truth. This entails revolutionary changes in education systems, starting with adult education.
https://www.quora.com/What-type-of-laws-can-be-put-in-place-to-hold-people-in-position-of-power-more-accountable?
Establish the U.S. Preamble as the divisive civic, civil, and legal purpose of the USA. People who are not of We the People of the United States are either dissidents or aliens.
The Greeks, 2400 years ago informed humankind that humans may develop equity by discovering statutory justice, a worthy goal that may be approached by amending laws when injustice is discovered.
It is unjust for the people to struggle for statutory justice while the politicians legislate abusive statutory law. Therefore, a qualification for candidacy for office may be requirement of a platform that reflects past aid to the development of statutory justice.
In the USA, the people’s proposition to aid statutory justice is controversial and expressed in the U.S. Preamble, the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. It is the civic, civil, and legal statement of purpose for this nation of people including its Supreme Court Justices, President, and Congress.
My interpretation, for this post is: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid statutory justice respecting five public institutions---integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity---in order to encourage responsible human liberty according to the-objective-truth to living and future individuals; the-objective-truth is the ineluctable evidence by which literal truth is understood.
Thus, in the USA, the people may require all candidates for office---local, state, and federal---to run on a platform listing both past aid and future plans to aid their individual interpretation of the U.S. Preamble’s proposition.
I have asked my two State Senators to develop this principle by creating the Senate rule that each session will begin with a unison statement of the U.S. Preamble so as to remind 100 Senators that they are first fellow citizens among We the People of the United States rather than dissidents.
So far, their response has been stonewalling. The principle that justice can only come from the people overlooks that elected officials are of the people rather than divine beings.
Perhaps this idea will catch on, go viral, and effect establishment of the U.S. Preamble within the USA.
https://www.quora.com/Do-you-believe-there-is-such-a-thing-as-too-much-freedom?
Yes. Too much freedom of opinion.
I think FDR’s 1941 four freedoms address begged woe. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Freedoms.
I would replace the freedoms-from with encouragement-to, as follows:
Speech responsible speech
Worship development of integrity
Want aid statutory justice
Fear aid safety and security.
I assume that Mrs. Roosevelt continued this human travesty by creating the United Nations statement of human rights.
Neither the mystery of whatever-God-is nor government can provide the self-discipline human beings need.
The preamble to the U.S. Constitution (the U.S. Preamble) offers a people’s proposition for individual discipline. I interpret those controversial 52 words: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living citizens now and in the future.
This proposition offers mutual, comprehensive safety and security as the living people continually discover the-objective-truth. That is, uncover the ineluctable evidence by which actual reality may be understood.
Because most humans ignore the-objective-truth and thereby have no standards for justice and truth, humankind now suffers too much freedom of opinion.
https://www.quora.com/Are-you-fine-with-the-government-funding-Pride-LGBT?
No.
My response is based on the personal acceptances that follow:
I am a human being;
I have the duty to fellow citizens to aid equity under statutory justice;
Human beings emerge from a unique human ovum;
The ovum is due human equity and dignity;
The woman whose body generated the ovum and the man who inseminated it are obligated to encourage the embryo’s equity and dignity to develop unto responsible human liberty;
The USA is a republic with a people’s proposition each citizen may interpret to support the responsible life he or she wants;
My interpretation of the preamble to the U.S. Constitution is, today: We the People of the United States communicate, collaborate, and connect to aid integrity, justice, peace, defense, and prosperity in order to encourage responsible human liberty to living and future people;
The citizens who deny equity and dignity to each human ovum are not of We the People of the United States, even though he or she may be a U.S. Supreme Court justice.
Today, I answered a related question: See https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-important-ways-queer-LGBT-allies-can-impact-social-justice-work?
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-important-ways-queer-LGBT-allies-can-impact-social-justice-work?
It’s important for queer-LGBT allies to consider a set of acceptances that:
Each person is a human being;
Humans are the only species with the awareness and grammar by which to develop integrity;
A human emerges from a unique ovum and may develop equity under integrity but not equality;
Diversity is a matter of statistics of physics and its progeny, e.g., biology, plus individual choices;
With human-individual power, energy, and authority (HIPEA) a person may choose to test physics;
Individuals who choose infidelity to physics beg woe;
Humans in the same locale, for freedom-from tyranny, develop power for integrity over infidelity,
The standard for integrity is the ineluctable evidence I call “the-objective-truth”;
Evidence informs humans that pursuit of integrity may be encouraged unto the third generation;
Aware families aid human liberty-to discipline to integrity and encourage the parent’s grandchildren;
Most humans want appreciation and companionship;
No human can justly fault a mutual commitment to appreciation and companionship for life;
However, partners for life are not exempt from duty to the dignity and equity due the human ovum.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-examples-of-inviolable-human-rights?
The human individual continually has the undeniable opportunity to discover and develop integrity to the-objective-truth---the ineluctable evidence by which truth is measured.
Typically, individuals allow infidelity to creep in. Many overlook the opportunity to reform. Some mistake a recent infidelity as ruin rather than vital notice to reform.
Under existing civilizations and cultures, independent discovery of the-objective-truth is unlikely. Citizens may reform education systems so as to encourage and coach the young to use their human powers to develop integrity.
Practicing integrity empowers achieving integrity. In the practice, the individual considers a heartfelt concern; obtains the ineluctable evidence to discover the concern is not unfounded; studies the discovery so as to understand how to benefit; orders personal living for the benefit; shares the understanding and open-mindedly responds to public reaction; if improvement in understanding is identified, the adjustments are made and shared; if new evidence requires change in understanding, the process is retraced as necessary. In review, the process is: concern, discovery, understanding, order, share and listen, perhaps improve, and remain alert to new discovery.
With this process, humankind’s understanding approaches the-objective-truth. Individual incorruptibility accumulates as human completeness.
I know of no other inviolable human right. For example, frequently, small infidelities to the-objective-truth negate a right to life. Ova, embryos, and infants are especially susceptible to human infidelity.
Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.
Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.
No comments:
Post a Comment