Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
"Civic"
refers to citizens who collaborate for individual
happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or
society.
Consider writing a personal
paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation: For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and
paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer &
practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and
prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate
responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to
other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787,
text, unless it is amended by the people.
It seems the
Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or
not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this
independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states
deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is
legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who
collaborate for human justice.
Every citizen
has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in
the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try
somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the
goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies
grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to
discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.
Selected theme from this week
The right to constrain personal-chaos
Many people debate civil rights because governments invite
the bemusement. However, female&male-human-being may behave so as to
constrain chaos in their way of living. The 2021 U.S. “ourselves and our
Posterity”, including legal immigrants, may improve their achievable future.
Quora
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-little-known-rights-of-American-citizens-that-they-all-should-be-aware-of?
by Taina Sorensen
1.
It’s important to
observe that this is a confused and conflicted world. But the individual may
choose to constrain chaos in daily choices. Also, it is OK for an individual to
practice, facilitate, and encourage perfecting each unique-human-being. Unique
perfection involves some personal acceptances. The person may:
a.
Develop human being,
especially their person’s humble-integrity, rather than mineral, plant, animal,
or mysterious “soul”.
b.
Develop individual
power, individual energy, and individual authority (HIPEA) to appreciate their
person.
c.
Use HIPEA for
civic-integrity rather than for a dependency, such as, government, personal-God,
indolence, abuse, infidelity, crime, evil, tyranny, and worse. Accept that
choosing independence is a subjective act: some choose dependency.
d.
Learn the laws of
physics& its-progeny; mathematics, forces, energy& mass, chemistries,
biology, psychology and be aware of imagination, fiction, indeed everything. Identify&
doubt metaphysics, without discouraging hope.
e.
Act on necessity&
justice.
f.
Never repeat a
mistake. Never lie.
g.
Neither initiate nor
accommodate harm to-or-from any person or institution.
h.
Practice, encourage, and
facilitate responsible-human-independence (RHI).
i.
Appreciation fellow-citizen
as they are and where they are in their opportunity for HIPEA and RHI. Express
subjectivity in words that appeal to their experiences& observations.
Constrain to-reform dependents who harm/injure others.
j.
Retain child-like confidence
when you don’t know the-ineluctable-truth: frankly express “I don’t know”. If
necessary, follow with subjectivity or opinion, then repeat, “But I don’t
know”. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”,
merriam-webster.com.
k.
Walk away from
psychological violence or physical threat, alert to call for defense. Hope for
a better, future-contact-with/awareness-of that fellow-citizen.
l.
Accept that the HIPEA&
RHI children may develop could sustain parents to serve grandchildren in a way
of living no one could have imagined. In other words, be alert to learn from children.
2.
This may strike you as
a proposal for utopia, but it is not. It is the human-culture that is intended
by the 1787 U.S. Constitution. Its intentions are sufficiently abstract for the
continuum “ourselves and our Posterity” to discover personal
ineluctable-happiness rather than submit to an institutional vision for each
unique person. It’s like a meritocracy with RHI as the standard.
The faction We the People of the
United States may practice, encourage, and facilitate 5
domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity,
“in order to” develop responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our
Posterity” including legal immigrants.
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-people-from-the-USA-so-afraid-about-the-government-violating-their-rights-and-freedom-guns-vaccination-face-masks-speech-etc-when-it-is-one-of-the-most-permissive-governments-in-the-world?
by Ivan Lara
I like the way you put it, Mr. Lara, “. . . the people from
the USA”.
Not from articulation, but from actions, the civic-continuum
“ourselves and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants) practice, facilitate,
and encourage 5 domestic disciplines: integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity,
in order to assure the safety& security that is necessary for each
civic-individual to responsibly pursue the happiness they want rather than
submit to the vision for them held by another person or entity.
I call it responsible-human-independence (RHI), and the faction We the People of
the United States knows that freedom-from oppression and license to liberty are
granted by the winner in war or the mob. But RHI is a personal
practice they know and will not surrender.
The Washington DC mob, by accepting alien money and
arrogantly ignoring the U.S. Constitution has invited ruin, and their ruin is coming
at the hands of the 2021 ourselves and our Posterity.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-it-seems-that-communism-needs-to-be-actively-enforced-into-people-by-its-own-government-Doesnt-this-mean-by-itself-that-it-is-a-flawed-doctrine?
by Ivan Lara
I think so.
However, the imposition of concern about communism in the
1950s empowered the Eisenhower administration to impose on the entity We the
People of the United States the arrogance “In God We Trust” instead of 1872’s “E
Pluribus Unum” and later to insert the prayer “under God” in the pledge of
allegiance.
Perhaps “the-God” controls the consequences of human
choices. But no one can claim to know what the-God is, and those who claim it’s
their personal-God haven’t faced their failure to reserve humility deemed
adequate by the-God. For example, Bush II claimed 50 million Americans approved
his decision to invade Iraq. The consequences are disastrous.
Necessity& justice hold female&male-human-being
accountable for order& prosperity in this world. We, the 2021 “ourselves
and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants) have urgent self-interest to
amend the First Amendment so as to practice, facilitate, and encourage
responsible-human-independence rather than Congressional pride in “freedom of
religion”. Second, we must reform the Supreme Court so as to develop statutory-justice
on the-ineluctable-evidence rather than legal precedent. “Ineluctable” means “not
to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.
The entity We the People of the United States is accommodating
oppression by Congress and the Supreme Court. Only ourselves and our posterity
can stop it.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-privacy-for-you-How-important-is-privacy?
by Ola Cola
Merriam-webster.com offers a second usage: freedom from
unauthorized intrusion.
The way things are, a woman who is pregnant is charged by
necessity& justice to consider whether she should remain pregnant or not.
The way things are, no one has the prerogative to overturn her decision.
https://www.quora.com/What-should-be-a-universal-law-accepted-by-all-countries?
by Nellie Meeker
Every country should warrant each citizen the opportunity to
develop the humble-integrity that is required to practice, facilitate, and
encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI) to the continuum of living
citizens.
https://www.quora.com/Johannes-Radebe-said-Its-tough-to-know-that-we-still-exist-in-a-world-where-others-dont-have-human-rights-How-can-countries-be-encouraged-to-improve-their-human-rights?
by Graham C Lindsay
I think considerate grandparents and great-grandparents
(G&GG) who are aware of the-domestic-disciplines& purpose-their-country-proffers
are best positioned to propose the requisite governmental reforms.
First, G&GG can dispel the mystery of human-rights.
Parties claim human-rights without specifying who will enforce them. For
example, some people claim the right to force a pregnant woman to gestate&
deliver when she believes her delivered-person would be unappreciated for life.
Don’t ask me to be the enforcer of such tyranny over children.
I heard an education professor a couple years ago say
“all-her-people” have the right to know math. Is that tensor theory, calculus,
or 2 apples plus 2 oranges equals 4 fruit? How does government coerce learning
math learning?
In 2021, G&GG have the best hopes for their children and
grandchildren and fear the future with each U.S. newborn facing $7.2 million
increasing federal debt.
For my personal way-of-living, the U.S. preamble and the
1787 U.S. Constitution, together with the 1776 declaration of war for
independence from England (excluding the 1791 Bill of Rights), propose the
following domestic discipline: The
civic people of these states practice, facilitate, and encourage 5 civic
disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity,
“in-order-to” continually improve responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to
ourselves and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants). Religion is
not among the disciplines, because mystery is a private pursuit.
“Responsible-independence” precludes licensed “liberty”. Posterity’s posterity
continually discovers and enacts statutory-justice.
G&GG institute the licensing of voters, who must
demonstrate behavior according to their view of the above stated national
intentions --- for example, have a job that pays their way of living. Their
license must be renewed every seven years with evidence of what they have done
lately to aid U.S. civic-integrity. Local, state, and federal politicians who
do not practice RHI get unelected or fired if appointed.
https://www.quora.com/I-know-this-was-asked-before-but-lets-do-something-different-Are-there-ANY-changes-from-when-the-bill-of-rights-was-ratified-to-today-that-may-affect-any-of-the-amendments?
by Nicholas Volkmuth
Three documents encourage U.S.
responsible-human-independence: Genesis 1:28 suggesting that human-being may
choose to independently provide order& prosperity to earth and its
inhabitants, the 1776 declaration of war for independence from England, and the
1787 Constitution’s five domestic disciplines that omit religion, assigning it
to personal-privacy.
The 1791 Bill of Rights, re-established U.S. dependency on
Blackstone and church-state partnership to mimic the Church of England’s seats
in Parliament.
Then 99% of U.S. free citizens were Protestants and 5% could vote. Today, 43%
are Protestants and nearly 100% may vote.
https://www.quora.com/Considering-the-sources-presented-what-is-the-best-way-to-establish-a-civic-nation-inclusion-rights-values-beliefs?
by Nicholas Volkmuth
About
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-define-politics?
by Ronnie Fasil
Politics is civic power. In most countries, the good people
accommodate tyranny in apathy, so everybody suffers.
https://www.quora.com/How-did-America-usher-in-a-world-hinged-on-freedom?
by Olanrewaju Rufai
I don’t know, and I don’t like it. But I want
civic-integrity.
What’s important is the unavoidable, unchangeable, and
irresistible truth, the-ineluctable-truth, and I don’t know it.
What I think is that seventeenth-century Western Europe
debated individual freedom-from oppression and liberty-to pursue happiness as
the property of God. In 1215, Magna Carta, England established church-state
partnership with the king answering to Catholic Bishops and Parliament and
changed it to Protestant-Parliament partnership in 1689.
France felt that the-God of consequence of human choices
held humankind responsible for temporal discipline. They considered humankind
in charge of human development on earth and demanded personal liberty,
equality, and fraternity in the 10-year reign of terror starting in 1789; just
2 years after the 1787 U.S. Constitution. They substantially kicked the Church
out of France.
Together, the uSA 1776 Declaration of independence from
England and the 1787 U.S. Constitution to establish domestic discipline propose
responsible-human-independence (RHI). However, a couple states demanded that
the U.S. mimic the 1689 English bill of rights.
The power of government bestowed-freedom& licensed-liberty
repressed responsible-human-independence, empowering politicians to make
themselves elites along with the clergy, Today, the USA mimics the English,
Chapter XI Machiavellianism of church-state partnership.
Both clergy hierarchies and government officials live high
on the hog at the people’s expense. The people neither rebel nor emigrate,
waiting for their personal-God to relive their family from the loss and misery.
We the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can end the
tyranny by amending the First Amendment so as to propose civic-integrity rather
than civil-religion. Freedom& liberty are no substitute for
responsible-human-independence.
https://ethicsandmorals.quora.com/?__ni__=0&__nsrc__=4&__snid3__=28867245295&__tiids__=44037119?
by Samantha Deshmukh
The
way things are, in the U.S. there are more than 800 million viable ova per year
and 4 million births. About 5 million embryo perish in gestation, including
abortions. During as much as 8 days that it takes a conception to move through
the fallopian tube and attach to the uterus, many pass out of the woman’s body
unnoticed. Perhaps there are less than 90 million lost single-cell to multicell
embryo per year.
The
way things are, there are very many chances for ova to perish, and fewer
chances for conceptions to perish. Physics and its progeny determine the
consequences of human choices. The mother knows whether choices either 1) both
delivered& promise the equity and dignity a human conception is due or 2)
the gestated and delivered baby would face life without appreciation much less
love. Her decision to terminate her pregnancy cannot be avoided, changed, or
resisted, without liability to her and her embryo. It’s a liability I will not
consider, let alone accept.
No
person or institution has the authority to demand that a woman remain pregnant
when she has made her decision to terminate her pregnancy.
https://www.quora.com/Does-the-formal-definition-of-democracy-require-a-country-to-have-basic-human-rights-even-when-the-majority-of-voters-voted-to-abandon-them?
by Mykhailo Seniutovych
What are the basic human rights?
I know of only one: the right to constrain chaos in your
choices for your life. The external chaos must be managed.
Democracy’s that promise human rights, the right to life,
for example, can’t deliver.
Thank goodness, I live in the USA; a republic with national
elections designed to spoil democracy.
Law professors
To
For Facebook/Twitter
Facebook,
Nov 15, 2021: 9:10 CST
I agree with the sentiment. My assessment
of "the way we found it" rests with the U.S. proposition before that
tyrant James Madison led congress and the supreme court to restore English
dependency with legislative, factional-American Protestant chaplains in 1789
and 1689 English-mimicking 1791 Bill of Rights. The 1787 Constitution promotes
civic-integrity rather than federal-religious-pride and imposition of "freedom
of religion" rather than RHI (see below).
We, the "ourselves and our
Posterity" (including legal immigrants) may restore the
responsible-human-independence (RHI) proposed recently in the 1787 U.S.
Constitution, the 1776 declaration of war for independence, and the 5,000
year-old suggestion in Genesis 1:26-28 that the-God of consequences of
human-being choices will not usurp the individual human-being's option to
behave for peace to the earth and its inhabitants.
The factional entity We the People of the
United States may amend the First Amendment so as to promote civic-integrity
rather than civil-religion.
If this message appeals to your
experiences& observations, share it and earnestly plead (pray) that it goes
viral.
Bible applications, springing from my
interpretations, NIV
PRB personal-principles
“. . . [the-God, controller-of-consequences-of-human-being-choices] . . . said, ‘Let us make mankind . . . in our
likeness, so that they may rule over the [living
species]’ . . . male and female he created them [and informed]
them, “Be fruitful . . . fill the earth and subdue it. Rule
over the [living species].” Genesis
1:26-28, characterizing 5,000 year-old Sumer-political-philosophy in
3,000 year-old Hebrew bias.
“. . . [the-God, controller-of-consequences-of-personal-choices] is
alive and active . . . it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.”
Hebrews 4:12.
“Every kingdom divided against itself is laid waste, and no
city or house divided against itself will stand.” Matthew 12:25.
“Your
father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was
glad.” So the Jews said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have
You seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before
Abraham was born, I am”, John
8:56-58.
Conclusion: the-God knows when a person/institution begs exemption
from the Sumer politics, human-being “may rule”, or prefers dependency, for
example, on Jesus. I think Genesis 1 suggests responsible-human-independence (RHI).
Further, the suggestion, coming before Abraham was born, may have come from the
metaphysical Jesus; that is, the-good that emerges from open-minded&
open-hearted Jesus-study.
Western religious philosophy developed the debate between 1)
English preservation of the human-individual as Lockean-property of the
English Trinity (or Unity after John Lock religious transition from
Calvinism to perhaps Deism) vs French argument that providing peace on earth is
human-necessity& justice (perhaps Voltaire). The French lost the argument
to 1789 violence toward fellow citizens rather than appreciation for heritage
that could lead to RHI. The repressed 1787-U.S.-Constitution proffers a culture of
RHI,
and we, the “ourselves and our Posterity” can establish it at last by amending
the First Amendment so as to promote civic-integrity rather than
civil-religious-division.
Likewise, the Christianity can reduce some 45,000 denominations by
focusing on being human under whatever controls the consequences of personal
and institutional choices. Appreciating a fellow-citizens behavior to aid peace
on earth need-not . . . should not be constrained by religious affiliation/none.
Caution: above, I emphasized Bible-words by deleting phrases; the
interested reader should check the complete interpretation they rely on,
in-order-to consider my unintended-omissions of personal-essentials I need to
consider in appreciation to the differing views. In other words, I write in
order to listen in mutual comprehension.
Application from Luke 17
1-4
“. . . Jesus said to his
disciples: “Things
that cause people to stumble [dependency] are bound to come, but
woe to anyone through whom they come. 2 It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with
a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little
ones to stumble. So watch yourselves. “If your brother or sister sins
against you [errs], rebuke them; and if they
repent, forgive them. Even if they sin against you
seven times in a day and seven times come back to you saying ‘I repent,’ you
must forgive them.” (In other words, to rebuke an offense requires personal
appreciation and humble expression sufficient to invoke and accept apology.)
5 The apostles said to the Lord, “Increase
our faith! [Why should we rebuke, observe the offender’s repentance, and
forgive?”
6 He replied, “If you have faith as small as a mustard
seed, you can say to this mulberry tree, ‘Be uprooted and planted in the
sea,’ and it will obey you.
7 “Suppose one of you has a servant
plowing or looking after the sheep. Will he say to the servant when he comes in
from the field, ‘Come along now and sit down to eat’? 8 Won’t he rather say, ‘Prepare my supper,
get yourself ready and wait on me while I eat and drink; after that you
may eat and drink’? 9 Will he thank the servant because he did what he was told
to do? 10 So you also, when you have done everything you were told to
do, should say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.’ [Because I so inform my disciples.]” (In
other words, Jesus rebuked the disciples for offending Jesus’ power, energy,
and authority.)
Jesus [Personal-humility to follow unexpected instruction]
Heals Ten Men With Leprosy
11 Now on his way to Jerusalem, Jesus traveled along the border
between Samaria and Galilee [divided Abrahamic-descendants]. As he was going into a village, ten men who had leprosy met him.
They stood at a distance and called out in a loud voice,
“Jesus, Master, have pity on us!” . . . he said, “Go, show yourselves to the priests.” And
as they went, they were cleansed. One of them, when he saw he was healed, came
back, praising God in a loud voice. He threw
himself at Jesus’ feet and thanked him—and he was a Samaritan. Jesus
asked, “Were not all ten cleansed? Where are the
other nine? Has no one returned to give praise to
God except this foreigner?” Then he said to
him, “Rise and go; your faith [humility] has
made you well.”
Story comments:
The lepers were humble enough to drop habitual
begging and follow a suggestion. Not reaching the priest, they were healed by
their personal-initiative. One of 10 wanted to thank Jesus for the suggestion
to act. The other nine happily resumed their lives, having learned nothing. The
priests, authors of complicated ritual for healing leprosy continued their vain
practices, unaware, or perhaps to benefit from hearsay.
Again, it takes appreciation to rebuke a
fellow-human-being-in-error, regardless of ethnic background. It is up to them
to consider reliable rebuke and either repent or continue civic division.
Religious chaos in 2021:
Pew research assess the 2015 world inhabitants as
Christians, Muslims, Unaffiliated, Hindu, Buddhist, folk religions, other, and
Jews at 31.2% 24.1, 16, 15.1, 6.9, 5.7, 0.8, and 0.2, respectively. There are,
arguably, 45,000 Christian sects and 6 Muslim sects. On average, a Christian
sect represents 0.0007% of world population, compared to 4% per Muslim sect and
0.2% Jews. There are 195 countries, on average, 0.5% of world population.
It seems prudent for each individual to develop RHI
in their country for life and for posterity, letting the eternally-divisive
mystery of soul take care of itself.
Applying U.S. principles:
Americans who would avoid, change, or resist the RHI
suggested in Genesis 1 plus, together, the 1776 Declaration with the 1787
Constitution are as lost as leprosy-curing priests. The-God does not usurp
the-human-being-opportunity to provide order& prosperity to this world.
Phil
Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which
can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it
obviously does not work.
Phil is agent
for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit
corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays
from the latest and going back as far as you like.
No comments:
Post a Comment