Saturday, May 11, 2024

Yeshua's civic influence to humankind may and can reform churches and nations

The comment box below invites readers to comment.

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the ineluctable truth. Ineluctable means:  Not to be assailed, avoided, broken, changed, escaped, mystified, neglected, obfuscated, rationalized, resisted, revoked, or voided. Some people erroneously imagine limiting the ineluctable truth, for example, trying to change it.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society. Civic citizens neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from anyone. Civic citizens are reliably responsible to the good rather than the bad in connections and transactions.


Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows: The civic faction, We the People of the United States, proffer & practice 6 public pursuits —- integrity, justice, safety, strength, prosperity, and responsibility, “in order to” pursue happiness “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening-to and considering other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787 text, unless it is amended by the civic-people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one with status has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by appreciative fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the faction who collaborate for statutory justice, We the People of the United States.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren to both born Americans and legal immigrants. Congressional freedom of religion, which fellow citizens have no means to constrain, oppresses freedom to develop integrity. This can be remedied by changing the First Amendment from “prohibiting” to “promoting”.

Selected theme from this month

Yeshua's civic influence to humankind

“Yeshua” is not new to the world. However, I discovered Yeshua at age 80, when I started reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998). More than other versions, CJB helps me relate to the Jews among whom Yeshua walked and talked in Aramaic, which is closer to Hebrew than to either Greek or Latin or one of the Englishes -- ancient, middle, modern, or American. (If I discover that the person’s family called him Yeshuuʿ or Isho I will change from Yeshua yet read CJB for now.)

The distinction I perceive is a real person who studied experiences and observations, said things to contemporary individuals, spoke to crowds, admonished administrators -- both mystical and practical, and improved the Torah or Tanach but did not write. On the other hand, there is competitive opinion as to how and whether/not that person fulfilled prophecy about constructed human competition: did he influence error-free living, or mysteriously-favored afterdeath, or a chosen group, or something else?

At age 80, with the aid of my church, I was resolving my conundrum -- God, Christ, Jesus, or what? -- by working to understand and apply, in voluntary collaboration with fellow citizens, Jesus’ civic influence. To admit humility, I wrote that for all I know Jesus is the God. I stand by that claim: for all I know, the God intends to be recognized as “Jesus”. I accept the God mystery.

It is not a question of splitting hairs or translation or transliteration for competitive beliefs. I am committed-to and trust-in what I may and can understand about Yeshua’s civic influence and its application to 2024’s “ourselves and our Posterity” and beyond. “Civic” refers to reliable responsibility to the good in human connections and transactions.

For example, Matthew 18:15-18 is Yeshua’s process to resolve perceived/actual human conflict -- an areligious activity to the good. The God does not correct the consequences of Yeshua's process or none. Churches and nations may and can mimic Yeshua's civic influence.

#USpreambler

Columns and Opinion

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/suspended-de-banked-but-not-sorry-john-eastman-tenfold-more-convinced-of-illegalities-in-2020-post-5632320

I do not support Eastman on the last 2 paragraphs.  First, I think his choices are inadequate. Second, I oppose dividing fellow citizens on faith, providence, and spirit -- mysteries.

About 5500 years ago, polytheistic Sumerian kings accepted that the gods leave it to humankind to order the earth to the good. Their political philosophy is expressed by competitive monotheists in Genesis 1:26-28, CJB and NIV, to include the word "rule". Paraphrasing, humankind may and can rule on earth and the God will not correct what humankind accepts.

The 1787 United States constitution accommodates the Genesis 1:26-28 politics with amenability by and for the people to practice the intentions portion of the preamble, beginning "in order to" and ending "to ourselves and our Posterity". The unstated object is statutory justice.

Eastman attempts to impose the Declaration of Independence, which is grounded in English religion. Neither the God nor a nation can assure to even one citizen life, liberty, and either property (Locke) or pursuit of happiness (Jefferson).

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, may and can drop the freedom and liberty propaganda in order to pursue reliable responsibility. A civic person heeds Ecclesiastes 10:2, Complete Jewish Bible,: "A wise man’s heart leads him rightly, but a fool’s heart leads him astray."

The United States' future rests on majority citizens' choice to accept power and authority to constrain chaos in their way of living.

CDees

Why do you assume that every principle of Western Religion is a problem? While
rigid religious dogmas are often unhelpful, there is useful wisdom to be had from the thoughtful and wise adherents of ALL of the major world faiths if you don’t approach them with the exclusionary mind of a zealot or the dismissiveness which some atheists and agnostics do.
The Declaration
of Independence was the remedy to 1000s of years of oppressive monarchical caprice and the political and religious control they used as an iron fist against free thinkers. It opened the door to genuine prosperity for most of the world. The good far outweighed the bad if you bother to do the hard work of understanding the sum total of what’s in the history textbooks AND the rest of the story that must be researched and digested in context and with an open mind…

Phillip Beaver

@CDees . Thank you for responding.
Independence from England was necessary and could not have been accomplished without Spain and France, both of whom were embroiled in Western Religion’s wars.
Unfortunately,
British loyalists who could not or chose not to return to
their mother country used freedom and liberty propaganda to undo independence. A few of the 9 required ratifying states interjected a mimic of the 1689 English Bill of Rights to be developed by the first Congress.
That rascal James Madison negotiated freedom of religion to Congress, granting them “divinity” on part with Parliament, with its 26 upper seats assigned to the Church of England’s bishops.
To undo this mischief, the civic faction of We the People of the United States may and can revised the religion clauses of
the First Amendment to “promoting” instead of “prohibiting”.
I hope this is persuasive to our generation, who may be open hearted as well as open minded.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/bright/antidote-nield-idylls-king-tennyson-1530791

Tennyson’s King-Arthur-inspiration-to-the-good seems to have failed this world, now in chaos. Quoting this article,


“This is the kind of mist we live with today—the mist of moral equivalence. This is the idea that any judgment of any one side must also lead to an equal criticism of the other. Anything less “balanced” would be bigotry. Yet this leads to absurd conclusions that simply turn morality inside out.”


I think poets have not yet recovered Yeshua, the man who 2000 years ago inspired humankind to perfect behavior despite bad attractions in life. The son of Yosef and Miryam of Nazareth was executed yet survives Christ, the Pauline myth.

Yeshua studied and affirmed Genesis 1:26-28, a Sumerian political philosophy now 5500 years old: the heavens won’t control humankind’s choices on earth. Reflecting Genesis 1:26-28, CJB and NIV, Yeshua encouraged each human-being to choose to pursue perfection before they die. In each generation, Yeshua’s integrity lives not for myths but for the ineluctable truth.


The Epoch Times’ fearless forum facilitates Christianity’s reform to Yeshua’s civic influence to the good. It is not too late for Yeshua.

Quora

https://www.quora.com/Does-a-theory-of-civil-disobedience-necessarily-depend-on-there-being-a-natural-law, Mercy

The question, "Does a theory of civil disobedience necessarily depend on there being a natural law?"

What do you mean by “natural law”?

I found consideration online: “The strongest construction of the Overlap Thesis forms the foundation for the classical naturalism of Aquinas and Blackstone. Aquinas distinguishes four kinds of law: (1) eternal law; (2) natural law; (3) human law; and (4) divine law.”

Natural law’s in the running to Aquinas.

Assume the human quest is to establish and maintain life with statutory justice to those who will accept it. Thereby, human choices to act would neither initiate nor accommodate harm to others. Not accommodating requires constraint of choices that do or would cause harm. Legislation to constrain harm and eliminate evil might be human law.

Since no human knows either the God or what that entity could be, there’s no role for “divine law”; that is, any divine law could not, would not overrule human law. This principle is expressed by a 5500 year old political philosophy suggested in Genesis 1:26-28: on earth, humankind rules. (I cite the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) as biased perception of ancient commentary on primitive thought.)

Researchers think evolution got underway 13.8 billion years ago when something activated an infinitely small and infinitely dense singularity. The consequences of the big bang seem to be constrained but not controlled by the laws of physics and its progeny, such as mathematics, forces, chemistries, biology, and psychology. Mass and energy are preserved, but paths can be altered by human choices. The physics part of path determination might be considered eternal law.

Human choices begin with the individual. Each person may and can choose to develop as a god facing death (Psalm 82:6-7, John 10:34). Individuals may choose to neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from anyone (Agathon) and accept the power and authority to rule on earth. They may practice civic integrity to the good on earth in every connection and transaction. Consequently, civic citizens aid constraint of the bad. Legislation to the good constrains for reform dissident or rebel fellow citizens and eliminates villains. Civic citizens uphold statutory justice based on ineluctable evidence rather than on emotions. Reason conforms to evidence. I think these principles express natural law.

Eternal law and divine law seem to be human constructs with little if any validity to statutory justice among gods facing death. Under human law, dissidents, rebels, and villains may remain civil by obeying legislation, whether it’s in a state of statutory justice or not. Civic citizens are alert to discovered injustice and work efficiently to increase statutory justice, meanwhile upholding the unjust legislation. In the United States, the civic good is intended “to ourselves and our Posterity”.

Extension:

When the legislature itself is a villain, civic citizens may ultimately acquire the military, organizational, and economic power to overthrow the government. It risks life and family.

The English colonists of 1774 intended to obtain the aid of Spain and France and overthrow the monarchy’s rule in America. Spain contributed money for the victory at Yorktown, 1781. Military presence was 5000 Brits with 3000 German mercenaries against 5900 Americans and 19800 French, with 9000 of them onboard ships. Cornwallis surrendered to France and the colonists. The Treaty of Paris, 1783, grants each of the 13 named colonies statehood and global independence.

Unfortunately, Loyalists imposed restoration of Anglo-divine law expressed in the 1791 Bill of Rights, foregoing the independence America had won. Our generation has the opportunity to restore American independence – establish United States independence.

Contrast the American Civil War, 1861. President Lincoln accommodated if not arrogated a 7-states attack on the 34 United States (including the rebels). I know of no greater civil disobedience and civic tyranny. Lincoln’s advantage declined from 27:7 to 22:13 during the course of the war. Civic travesty!


#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-general-publics-opinion-on-the-concept-of-everyone-having-their-own-opinion, Anon

I think most of the public erroneously holds opinion to be a private affair, when in fact, each person gains freedom to pursue the happiness they perceive if and only if they aid safety and security to humankind and the earth they inhabit.

This political principle was accepted if not discovered 5500 years ago by a succession of Sumerian kings who developed law codes. The codes expected civic citizens to constrain dissidents and rebels and eliminate villains. “Civic” means reliably responsible to the good on earth. The imperfect codes were completed by conqueror Hammurabi.

History since then illustrates the consequence when people do not practice civic integrity. That is, neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from anyone.

I know of no culture that developed these principles. However, the religion-free, 1787 United States constitution proffers a republic intended to develop statutory justice “to ourselves and our Posterity”. So far, about 12 generations have left us the opportunity to acquire the self-interest that is required to accept and practice human power and authority to the good on earth. Let’s get started.


#USpreambler

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/CurtisHJones, May 11, 2024

Happily, I lived to age 80 and, despite all the obfuscations, discovered Yeshua's civic influence. A year later, the mysteries of John, Peter, James, and most of all Paul (council of Jerusalem in 50 CE, Acts 15 CJB), not to mention Matthew, Mark, and Luke, have taken their rightful place as competing opinion.

My pursuit is comprehending what Yeshua said either in conversation or preaching to his contemporary people rather than opinion about him fulfilling Old Testament prophecy. With my opinion about Yeshua's message, I then want to listen to fellow citizens to add their perspective and perhaps arrive at Yeshua's civic influence for the generation of 2024.

For example, Matthew 18:15-18 is Yeshua's process for human conflict-resolution, which may result in forgiveness. V 18 tells us that whatever humans accommodate, the mysterious God will not correct.

By ignoring Yeshua's civic influence for 2000 years, we are experiencing and observing chaos. For example, the administrative state says this: Because the previous administration added justices we no longer yield to the Supreme Court, for example, on forgiving some student loans.

Yeshua was the precocious boy who was born to Yosef and Miryam in Nazareth 2000 years ago. He was the first ancient person to affirm Genesis 1:26-28's political philosophy grounded in discovery: The gods leave rule on earth to humankind, so here are our codes of law. Yeshua affirmed the 5500 year-old politics in John 10:34, Matthew 5:48, and Matthew 19:4-5, among others.

Reading about Yeshua in the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) helps me use his name to lessen the impositions of opinions coming from the various names imposed on Yeshua since he was executed in about 33 CE: Yeshua (3 BCE), iEsou christou (367 CE), Iesu Christi (414), Jhesu Crist (1382), Iesus Christ (1535), and Jesus Christ (1557). Shockingly, the popular name used in competitive monotheism is only 467 years old!

But I am not proffering competitive monotheism. I am sharing the joy of living to age 80 so I can commit-to and trust-in Yeshua's civic influence rather than a mysterious lordship -- a religion. I am working to share joyous reform with my church of some 45 years; they helped guide me to this discovery.

https://www.facebook.com/carolyn.m.beaver, May 10, 2024

I wonder if buying a child a dart blaster is a parent's unintended form of training for the future.

Here's a funny, somewhat unrelated, story. My brother, with my help, fabricated swords from dismantled fruit crates and made shields from cardboard and string. We pretended we were mortal enemies and reproduced the sound of the wood penetrating the cardboard by yelling "Thuck". We would mimic crusades for Christ.

Mom came running from the back door, not questioning her ears and yelling, "You boys are using a terrible word. I told you not to pick up slang from school. Now get in the house immediately!"

We didn't know to ask what was wrong with thuck. But here's the kicker: the unexpected, long term development (not necessarily consequence) did not cross her mind.

In relatively late adulthood, he said he did not have a brother.

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/, May 9, 2024

When I share my trust-in and commitment to Yeshua of Nazareth's civic influence, I am not suggesting the praise object I see on YouTube. I'm talking about the precocious boy that Yosef and Miryam reared in a harsh political and religious place 2000 years ago.

Yeshua was hidden from me until my age 80, when I discovered the Complete Jewish Bible (1998). CJB aids my comprehension of the civic influencer rather that an ancient-prophecy fulfiller.

Here's a table of impositions on his name:

Imposition Source Language Year
1. Jesus Christ Geneva English 1557
2. Iesus Christ Coverdale English 1535
3. Jhesu Crist Wycliffe English 1382
4. Iesu Christi Vulgate Latin 414
5. iEsou christou New T. Greek 367
6. other Yeshua Old T. Hebrew 200
7. Yeshua Messiah Acts 15 Aramaic 50 CE
8. Yeshua person family Aramaic 3 BCE.

Notice the 370 year gap from Yeshua to iEsou christou, then another 1190 years to Jesus Christ, 467 years ago. The Old Testament entry is for date of assembly only, because the "Yeshua" usages are for historical priests rather than a prediction.

In the US, we speak American English yet honor Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Why impose opinion on Yeshua of Nazareth? The old saw "to each his own" holds for Yeshua, too.

I think it is not too late to reform, and civic followers may and can celebrate the opportunity to appreciate Yeshua.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, May 9, 2024

This review cites risks: https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/the-evidence-on-red-meat-is-it-carcinogenic-or-healthy-5002064. As though I know what balance is, I pursue it.

https://www.facebook.com/bobby.achord, May 9, 2024

Bobby, I think you recall civic integrity (practiced) more than civility (preached).

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno/posts/10161839285032853, May 9, 2024

For about a year now, I have been reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998), written for Jews who consider Yeshua their lord. I do not know what that means to them. It helps me relate to a good person: Yeshua.

Quoting Luke 2 CJB, first, V. 4-5, "Yosef, because he was a descendant of David, went up from the town of Natzeret in the Galil to the town of David, called Beit-Lechem, in Y’hudah, to be registered, with Miryam, to whom he was engaged, and who was pregnant." Then, V. 21, "On the eighth day, when it was time for his b’rit-milah [circumcision], he was given the name Yeshua, which is what the angel had called him before his conception." I appreciate Yeshua’s family and the name they used.

Accepting Yeshua as a person is helping me understand what writers say about his aid to people's lives better than ever before. For example, John, in Chapter 10 V. 34 reports Yeshua saying, “Isn’t it written in your Torah, ‘I have said, “You people are Elohim’ ?" The footnote takes you to Psalm 82:6-7, "“My decree is: ‘You are elohim [gods, judges], sons of the Most High all of you. Nevertheless, you will die like mortals; like any prince, you will fall.’”

The message I perceive from Yeshua is this: each person I encounter may and can accept the power and authority of a god facing death. If I perceive that a person is not practicing human being (verb), I have the duty to tell them. My mirror cautions me to accept mistakes and make amends.

Yeshua, in Matthew 18:15-18, informs me that resolving direct human conflict is my responsibility. And harm I accommodate will not be corrected by the God (V. 18).

Yeshua's process for resolving human conflict is especially important when the other party convinces me I was the offensive person. Then, I may enjoy the privilege of forgiveness and restoration of friendship.

I accept the mystery of the God and pursue, through fellow gods facing death, Yeshua's living guidance.

https://www.facebook.com/margo.frey/posts/10227115669452495, May 8, 2024

I would not want my image associated with this rationalization. A few people ruin beautiful things. Most people pursue the good by constraining the bad.

Margo Tilley Frey: Laurel Van Der Wende and Phil Beaver, this wasn’t directed at you

Phil Beaver

Margo Tilley Frey I did not think it was directed at me. I just think it's bad advice and perceive an open heart as well as open mind. I was 78 when I perceived my open mind was backed by an open heart.

Open hearts express themselves, anticipating that better hearts will open to them if necessary.

https://www.facebook.com/ali.dadgar.3/posts/10225307911540827, May 7, 2024

I've been reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998), apparently for Jews who believe in "the Lord Yeshua the Messiah", quoting James 1, translated from Greek to Hebrew. I do not know what that entity means to them, regarding Christ, the distinction being whether the continually improved Torah is critical or not. However, I like reading about Yeshua and use CJB more than NIV.

Today, I discovered a wonderful difference in CJB vs NIV respecting the Old Testament. Ecclesiastes 10:2, NIV seems to accommodate today's political conflict: "The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." CJB has, "A wise man’s heart leads him rightly, but a fool’s heart leads him astray."

I prefer to mend my heart rather than criticize a fellow citizen's heart. I wonder what translations from Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic suggest in Farsi. There must be available enrichment in that translation.

https://www.facebook.com/gcleve.wright/posts/4128723917347838, May 7, 2024

Ecclesiastes 10:2, NIV seems to agree with Baba James: "The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left." And that seems appropriate for today's politics.

Often, CJB parallels NIV, but in this case, the message draws personal attention, with "A wise man’s heart leads him rightly, but a fool’s heart leads him astray." I'm more interested in improving me than others. Let them find their relief.

These days, I am less likely to know NIV's difference, because I get more personal help from CJB.

https://www.facebook.com/melanieyanyan.zamora, May 7, 2024

Nothing could make me happier that this news that you, Cleve, are now in the tender loving care of Jesus (Yeshua in my late and I think final relationship, not knowing the ineluctable truth).

At age 78, I started attending, as a friend, the Baptist church I had left when I resigned from the Baptist brotherhood and from Christianity (1994). Then, I reported to the pastor and the Sunday school class he suggested: I had returned after 27 years absence as a non-member friend with 3 ideas to share: the human being may and can pursue the ineluctable truth; the God assigned to humankind, rule to the good on earth, as stated in Genesis 1:26-28; and Jesus suggests that each person may pursue perfection before death.

After more than two years’ interaction with the people at that church, I realize that Yeshua has reliably guided me since I was baptized as an adolescent. I have been through many churches, who do their best to express and uphold opinion about Yeshua yet cannot negate what he shared in dialogue with individuals and to crowds. Yeshua, a Jew, improved Moses’ law. Ancient divinity schools could not tolerate consequential appearances, so they persuaded the government to kill Yeshua then competitively imposed their opinions on his entity.

When I married Cynthia, I did not articulate the completeness of the commitment I lived. I now know I trusted Matthew 19:4, “Haven’t you read,” [Yeshua] replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?” Yeshua referenced Genesis 1:26-28 and did not imply the husband turns his back on reliable responsibility to self, family, and humankind.

I had no idea you needed baptism and appreciate the fact that you chose it. I never knew a more reliable person. Today, I am celebrating, in my mind and in my heart, and am even more grateful for your marriage and appreciative to Mel.

Melanie Ginia Wright

Phil Beaver thank you for this wonderful message 

 

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, May 7, 2024

When a person accepts personal power and authority to practice civic integrity, elites no longer influence them. "Civic" means reliable responsibility to the good in human connections and transactions. The civic citizen constrains chaos in personal ways of living.

May 7, 2024

I get a constant stream of this kind of insight into Phil Beaver's problems in the weekly newspaper "The Epoch Times".

Published in NYC and distributed, locally by US mail from Dallas, every issue is packed with news with a conservative bias. Beginning a couple decades ago with objection to persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, the editors and writers promote civic integrity for personal survival during declining human opportunity with global elites thriving.

I promote Genesis 1:26-28, 5500 year-old Sumerian political philosophy, which I paraphrase, "The God (whatever that mystery is) assigned to humankind the responsibility to constrain chaos on earth." That is, the God neither controls nor rejects the consequences of human choices.

Consequently, when I read far right conservatism, or the hope that the God will usurp humankind's duty, I write opposition. And here's the reward. A few days or weeks later, I get an email alerting me to commentary on my suggestions. I can then return to the article and respond.

Are there other public forums that are that reliable to responsible speech? I'd like to know about them.

https://www.facebook.com/mick.kassem, May 5, 2024

Any emotion can invite ruin. Fervent belief caused the United States Civil War.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, May 5, 2024

We seem gods facing death (Psalm 82:6-7) yet civilly choose any of 7 impositions on Yeshua of Nazareth, a person who lived 2000 years ago:

1. Jesus Christ Geneva English 1557
2. Iesus Christ Coverdale English 1535
3. Jhesu Crist Wycliffe English 1382
4. Iesu Christi Vulgate Latin 414
5. iEsou christou New Testament Greek 367
6. Yeshua Old Testament Hebrew 200
7. Yeshua Messiah Acts 15 meeting Aramaic 50 CE
8. Yeshua person Nazarene family Aramaic 3 BCE.

In the US, we speak American English yet have no problem honoring Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Why must we choose an imposition on Yeshua?

My friend Hector opines that homo sapiens is incapable of reform. Only a future mutation may and can choose to appreciate Yeshua.

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno, May 5, 2024

Also,
Kindness is reliably responsible
Kindness takes care of its own
Kindness is necessary

https://www.facebook.com/gregoryfrey1, May 4, 2024

Comic criticism is easy. However, what the people need is civic integrity. Neither Gods nor nations nor churches nor political groups offer civic integrity.

In each generation, a few people have connected Jesus with civic integrity, but the power of churches maintain the babel of competitive monotheism. The consequence is the chaos this comic describes.

Relief exists and reform is possible if the intentions can be established. To get started, read both https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua and https://pace.coe.int/en/files/10684/. Let your curiosity take you beyond.

If you like, start exploring ideas Yeshua shared in direct dialogue with contemporaries including rabbis and Romans, paying less attention to opinion about Yeshua and claims to Old Testament prophesies. Again, rely on yourself.

If you begin to perceive Yeshua as an influence to the good, share your considerations with fellow citizens in order to establish collaborative concern, then listen to them to gain new perspective. Change your application of Yeshua's civic influence if you think the fellow citizen's view was to the good.

I think Yeshua's civic influence is quick and easy, because fellow citizens want the good of civic integrity.

https://www.facebook.com/james.finney.9469, May 4, 2024

The churches I've attended always had members who said they are a community of sinners or own free will rather than respond to physics and progeny -- not where I want to be. For 7 decades I looked for a church who would claim Jesus is alive because they mirror his civic integrity.

Now, I am sharing my dream with a church, who helped me during the last couple years to discover the influencer to the good rather than to sin: Yeshua.

Almost a year ago, I started reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) in parallel with NIV (1978). Now, I open NIV only as needed for name differences or textual interpretations.

In interpretation, I feel CJB aids clarity; that could be my bias. CJB more clearly witnesses to the Aramaic-speaking Nazarene, Yeshua, who 2000 years ago, pursuing the good, improved Moses' law. NIV affirms Yeshua's Aramaic words in Mark 5:41 and elsewhere.

Approaching age 81, I accept the mystery of the God, without objection or imposition, in order to pursue with willing citizens Yeshua's civic influence.

We collaborate for understanding, in order to help each other perceive the good Yeshua promotes, even though the ancient reporters may have had other agenda. (For example, some writers bemuse that sin is forgiven to those who are elected by the Bible's God.)

We don't wonder if anyone is a sinner, expecting Yeshua's civic influence to effect needed reform.

If in future we encounter offense, we will apply Yeshua's process for conflict resolution. With typical brevity, it is presented in Matthew 18:15-18. We think it is to humankind rather than to a group. Resolution leads to either mutual forgiveness or separation from a villain.

There, the clearest civic integrity is in Verse 18, which I paraphrase: if instead of promoting the good you accommodate dissidence, rebellion, or villainy, the God accepts your choice and does not limit the consequences.

Matthew 18:18 reflects both Genesis 1:26-28 (CJB or NIV), and the religion-free 1787 United States Constitution.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/gcleve.wright, May 3, 2024

For about a year now, I've been reading the Complete Jewish Bible (CJB), 1998, written for Jews who believe Yeshua was the Messiah and some that moral law must be continuously observed and improved in Yeshua's image.

Here's the same passage in CJB: "While all the people were being immersed, Yeshua too was immersed. As he was praying, heaven was opened; the Ruach HaKodesh came down on him in physical form like a dove; and a voice came from heaven, “You are my Son, whom I love; I am well pleased with you.”

Yeshua was a Jew, born to a Jewish family in Nazareth. They spoke Aramaic. In Mark 5:41, Aramaic is quoted. For example, NIV, "He took her by the hand and said to her, “Talitha koum!” (which means “Little girl, I say to you, get up!”)."

Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua and let your curiosity satisfy itself. I am glad, approaching my 81st birthday to have discovered the person whose guidance is reflected in my better choices in life.

Other civic peoples' spiritual beliefs for them are OK to me for them, as always. As for me, I accept the God mystery and trust-in and commit-to Yeshua's civic influence.

Response:

Cleve, as always, I do not know the ineluctable truth.

However, I want to collaboratively benefit from global scholarship. Please read or scan https://pace.coe.int/en/files/10684/html.

I work to restore United States independence proposed in 1787 rather than English-influenced inalienable rights of 1776. No government can assure much less ensure life, or liberty, or happiness -- any one of the 3 "rights". (John Locke had "property" where "happiness" is cited.) Nor does the God assure rights.

Furthermore, I trust that the entity that has influenced my choices to the good accepts and knows my choice to appreciate Yeshua's civic influence: I neither could nor would deny where my experiences and observations have brought me at age 81. I am just glad my church of 45 interrupted years (unintentionally) helped me discover Yeshua.

https://www.facebook.com/james.finney.9469, May 1, 2024

It seems the left claims reasonable right to continuous violence.

May 2 response:

The right did everything they could under the rule of law to have the National Guard there on January 6, 2021. Control was not the left's agenda.

Unfortunately, the left leads both Democrats and democracy against the United States republic. It is not too late for civic citizens to restore the United States to its intentions: pursuing the ineluctable truth using statutory justice "to ourselves and our Posterity".

Ponder the 5500 year old political philosophy expressed in Genesis 1:26-28. Sumerians realized that the gods accept the choices men and women take. That is, the heavens accept whatever actions men and women choose, good or bad.

Citizens who want the good must both constrain for reform fellow citizens who accommodate the bad and terminate the evil. The far right, with no humility to the God of Genesis 1:26-28, hopes their god will intervene. The far left, also with no regard for the evidence, wants government to usurp the civic citizens' duty.

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, may and can accept the power and authority to them that is suggested in Genesis 1:26-28, a pre-Israel, pre-Christianity political principle that is affirmed by history.

Recognition and acceptance of Genesis 1:26-28 could and might establish reform that can be effected in 1 or 2 generations. Lacking the ancient intentions, some 275 generations have neglected humankind's opportunity on earth.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, May 1, 2024

5500 years ago Sumerians accepted that their gods were leaving rule to the good on earth to the people. They created law codes that encouraged civic people to constrain dissidents and rebels and annihilate villains. 1500 years later, this political philosophy was recorded in Genesis 1:26-28 then refuted in Genesis 2 and beyond to the complete Bible. Some modern people choose to destroy the good rather than reform. Just now, there's chaos. It's not too late for each person to choose to constrain the bad and aid the good to themselves and their posterity. Factions of successive generations have been choosing the good for 5500 years. There will always be villains. Dissidents and rebels don't have to choose the bad.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/jules.lambert.9/posts/10225633440448857, May 1, 2024

I've always worked to understand. Reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) for about a year now, I think Yosef and Miryam called their precocious boy "Yeshua". Wikipedia scholars agree family called him Yeshua. I now perceive that unless I ponder Yeshua's statements to people in his time and discuss with colleagues I have no chance to understand and pursue the good he influences in our time. I trust neither the writers who reported on that family in Nazareth 2000 years ago nor subsequent interpreters. I want my best opportunity to use the Nazarene's name. I study the Jesus and the Christ competitions and trust-in and commit-to Yeshua's civic influence. He knows my reaction to his message: I may and can choose to behave perfectly until I die. I need not be a sinner (someone who accepts mistakes).

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/, May 1, 2024

Popular TV seems to represent a world in chaos.

I think poets have not yet discovered Yeshua, the man who 2000 years ago inspired humankind to perfect behavior despite bad attractions in life. The son of Yosef and Miryam of Nazareth was executed yet survives Christ, the Pauline myth.

Yeshua studied and affirmed Genesis 1:26-28, a Sumerian political philosophy now 5500 years old: the heavens won’t control humankind’s choices on earth.

Reflecting Genesis 1:26-28, CJB and NIV, Yeshua encouraged each human-being to choose to pursue perfection before they die. In each generation, Yeshua’s integrity lives not for myths but for the ineluctable truth.

It is not too late for Yeshua’s influence to civic people.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 30, 2024

Stewart's cover, "What a Wonderful World", with orchestra, is great. After enjoying it, I always want to hear Louis Armstrong sing it. Then I sing my lyrics: "We see trees of green . . . we see them bloom for me and you . . . they're really saying I appreciate you".

Some consensual relationships reach beyond sensation.

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/, April 29, 2024

I happily discovered the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) and have been reading it for less than a year.

Scholars agree "Jesus" spoke Aramaic and was called Yeshua.


Yeshua of Nazareth lives when people pursue and improve-to-modern-discovery Yeshua's civic influence to each generation and posterity. Because religious opinion* is imposed, neither Jesus nor Christ represents the person who lived in Nazareth 2000 years ago with his family -- mom and dad, 3 brothers, and unnamed sisters. To discover his influence rather than subsequent impositions, the name is Yeshua.

*Religion is civility grounded in mystery rather than in discovery.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 29, 2024, 3 posts

1.    Here's an example of pursuing "knowing the Bible": https://www.shilohproject.blog/whats-rape-culture-got-to-do-with-the-book-of-ruth/.

These few minutes gave me a new perspective on "consensual sex" and what "is" is. Sex is consensual if each party experiences the sensation they sought. Bill Clinton famously did not have sex.

Focus on sensual satisfaction seems egocentric.

2.    We attended a weekend debate in New Orleans and thought Dennett offered good influence.
https://www.powerofchange.org/blog/2007/3/12/debate-the-future-of-atheism.html

3.    "Let's agree to disagree" seems an impolite "shut up".

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno/posts/10161819209402853

From the article:

household spending is affected by higher interest rates and inflation

JPMorgan Chase earned $49.6 billion in profit last year, while Bank of America earned $24.9 billion.

My thought:

Most people don't understand the 1787 U.S. intentions "to ourselves and our Posterity". In 2024, most adults are satisfied to live on their children's' future.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/margo.frey/posts/10227115669452495, April 29, 2024

I would not want my image associated with this rationalization. A few people ruin beautiful things. Most people pursue the good by constraining the bad.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, April 29, 2024, 2 entries:

1.    The gap caught my attention, so I clicked on the URL and found, "Measured temperatures in downtown Chicago are altered by
@NOAA to create an imaginary warming trend." #ClimateScam

2.    Hopeful attention by a reporter I want to trust: https://www.foxnews.com/video/6351948663112 notice the ending note about technology collaboration to the West's benefit.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10/posts/10229667802912669, April 26, 2024

I'm glad to see this question. I am on a "14:10" fast and don't plan to change unless I perceive harm. So far, I perceive only good. I don't eat past 8:00 PM and before 10 to11 AM, resulting in 2 meals a day. I walk a mile at good pace then do 15 work stations most days at around 2:00 PM; but 7:00 AM works when it's hot.

Our daughters ration the food to their 5 cats.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, April 26, 2024

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, may and can reform every education department so as to practice, facilitate, and encourage students to acquire the comprehension and intention to individually develop human being (verb).

The human-being is so powerful and authoritative it takes a quarter-century for a newborn to develop the wisdom-building parts of her or his brain. It takes another couple quarter centuries to develop maturity, provided the person chose to pursue human being -- reliably responsible human independence.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/lorraine.davidson.12, April 26, 2024

On the other hand, personal integrity surpasses civil discipline, and some athletes and entertainers inspire us to pursue the good despite the bad.

https://www.facebook.com/gcleve.wright/posts/4119102484976648, April 25, 2024

I like walking in the park, too. Friends and children and dogs bring nice people there.

"We see trees of green, red roses too.
We see them bloom for me and you.
And we think to ourselves,
What a wonderful world."

https://www.facebook.com/rosemary.beaver.9/posts/7493704283999877, April 25, 2024

Sharing joy: I found that quick conversations with willing-strangers teaches plenty. There's no expectation -- only cheerful sharing. Usually, we don't even exchange names.

For example, yesterday I asked a sonogram technician if I could quickly share a recent joy.
"OK".
It's about the Bible.
"OK".
Have you ever heard of Yeshua?
"Yes; my spouse has a different Christian religion. I started studying independently, and discovered Yeshua."
Wow! Does anyone share your interest?
"I'm in a discussion group at my church."
I learned a church to consider if I get discouraged, which I doubt will happen.

People in my Sunday school class don't respond when I talk about Yeshua and reading the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) online. But they don't call me a heretic, since I am only a friend. I think Yeshua is just too new to them and they are busy living. It's OK.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231714580822515, April 25, 2024

I think the person who has not the humility to admit that the God is a mystery is delusional. I have not the faith to be an atheist.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 25, 2024

I'm a chemical engineer. The University of Tennessee instilled in me the obligation that no equipment I designed could blow up. I checked a decade after retiring with 35 years' service: nothing I designed blew up. (In other words, engineers like me don't think they know the ineluctable truth.) I think the public should appreciate engineers who dedicate themselves to the public's safety in providing necessary products. (Not to be too serious.)

https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.m.beaver/posts/10229053905605926, April 24, 2024

Great voice!

I hope he will soon be singing about Yeshua, the original person who lived in Nazareth 2000 year ago. Talk about joy!

I see Chris is from Knoxville.

https://www.facebook.com/james.finney.9469, April 23, 2024

Biden-lawlessness is not the answer to unfairness. Socrates died to prove that point, so the message is not at all new.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10/posts/10229656724515716, April 22, 2024

That's a sad story. https://louisiana-anthology.org/.../king--balcony_stories...

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno, April 22, 2024

If I reverse this, I cannot agree with Webster. Even though I am 81, I feel better than when I was 61.

I work to be happy at 101 yet would stop this moment if it was necessary to my progeny.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231700050899276, April 22, 2024

Why do fellow citizens accommodate the recent United States government? Where is the civic faction of We the People of the United States? I feel I am a member who knows many civic citizens such as you.

I voted for Trump 4 times, not because I like him, but because I like his policies and leadership. I am thrilled by his inaugural speech and his daily follow-up. I am reluctant to hold him responsible for the people who claim to support his policy. I never voted for Obama, but did all I could to aid his governance once the voters elected him. Not Biden, who I deemed an alien from the start. I cannot deny I paid my taxes all this time.

I understand that a person acts as a child/adolescent until they discover the delight of adulthood. But once they discover reliable responsibility, there's no going back to before. Are there no adults who are capable of helping themselves through Trump?

Are there too few adult-voters in the United States to stop the dismantling of its representative-republic-under-the-rule-of-written-law that is previously authorized by civic citizens who have the power to correct discovered unjust laws unto justice?

Either way, my life is dedicated to saving my posterity from the extant United States government. I appreciate your alerts to the necessity of awakening to the rule of statutory justice -- the intentions of the United States Constitution.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 22, 2024

Thank you for this message.

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, may and can reform every education department so as to practice, facilitate, and encourage pursuit of human being (verb) to every student and adult. The human being accepts responsibility to reliably constrain chaos in her or his way of living.

The human-being is so powerful and authoritative that takes a quarter century for a newborn to acquire the comprehension and intention to pursue human being. It takes another couple quarter centuries for her or him to acquire the perception that they may and can perfect their unique person. We the People of the United States may and can facilitate this teaching, if we intend to.

In necessity, persons whose practices persuade them they are approaching perfection happily provide for another to pursue that perception.

https://www.facebook.com/margo.frey/posts/10227090145374409 , April 21, 2024

Wonderful! Exploring your person. Every human-being should perceive the power and authority to discover their unique goodness. With practice, each human-being may envision and pursue personal perfection.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman, April 21, 2024

I have been trying to unravel the puzzle for 70 years and think I have the answer: Since the Sumer civilization, elite politicians and priests partner to keep humankind from mutually accepting the individual power and authority of human being (verb). It is suggested in both Genesis 1:26-28, perhaps 3700 years old, and the laws of physics and progeny: only humankind may choose to rule to the good on earth. Progeny includes mathematics, the chemistries, biology, psychology, and fiction (made possible by the unknowns). Discovery yields the ineluctable truth, and the elites "protect" humankind from the word "ineluctable", which means, collectively, unavoidable, unchangeable, and irresistible. Discovery is grounded in ineluctable evidence, to which reason yields.

These ideas are affirmed by the God, which is whatever constrains human choices, arguably a mystery. The God seems to be one of the laws of physics, the good humankind may and can attain, or a force no one has thought of. I accept the mystery of the God.

And here is the boldest obfuscation of the past 5500 years. One man, 2000 years ago, was a good student and recognized the power and authority of human being (verb). His mom and dad spoke Aramaic and called him Yeshua. I recently discovered the Complete Jewish Bible (1998) and understand Yeshua's messages, I think because I am using his name to help me think. [Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshua and let curiosity guide further reading.]

This discovery has had huge impact on my life, I think to the good.

The religion-free 1787 United States Constitution accommodates both Genesis 1:26-28 and Yeshua's civic influence. "Civic" means reliable responsibility to constrain the bad and aid the good in human connections and transactions.

The civic faction of We the People of the United States may and can reform state and church simultaneously. If so, the threat of social democracy will yield to the United States republic (reviving the Declaration of Independence from European religious-wars).

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to theineluctabletruth, which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like. He uses the hashtag #USpreambler.

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Open heart more important than open mind

 The comment box below invites readers to comment.

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the ineluctable truth. Ineluctable means:  Not to be assailed, avoided, broken, changed, escaped, mystified, neglected, obfuscated, rationalized, resisted, revoked, or voided. Some people erroneously imagine limiting the ineluctable truth, for example, trying to change it.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society. Civic citizens neither initiate nor accommodate harm to or from anyone. Civic citizens are reliably responsible in connections and transactions.


Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows: The civic faction, We the People of the United States, proffer & practice 6 public pursuits —- integrity, justice, safety, strength, prosperity, and responsibility, “in order to” pursue happiness “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening-to and considering other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787 text, unless it is amended by the civic-people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one with status has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by appreciative fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the faction who collaborate for statutory justice, We the People of the United States.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren to both born Americans and legal immigrants. Congressional freedom of religion, which fellow citizens have no means to constrain, oppresses freedom to develop integrity. This can be remedied by changing the First Amendment from “prohibiting” to “promoting”.

Selected theme from this month

Open mind and open heart

It’s not too late to discover Yeshua’s influence to the civic good. Civic means reliable responsibility in human connections and transactions, in order to mutually constrain the bad and aid the good on earth.

As we watch the year 2024 unfold, it seems that European style social democracy is dominating the United State republic: the proffered rule of law managed by the civic faction of We the People of the United States.

I voted for Donald Trump 4 times, and am prepared to vote for him twice more, assuming he remains a viable candidate. If not, I will vote for the next best option, perhaps the Republican nominee or maybe Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. The Democrats seem to mimic European political hope.

Meanwhile, I work hard to pay the bills, broadly support my family, neighbors and friends and maintain my physical and psychological health. I’ve been doing that in self-interest for almost 7 decades. I always had an open mind and discovered a couple years ago that I also have an open heart.

Unexpectedly, accepting the open heart prompted me to privately alert a fellow citizen if I perceive they plan or initiate civic error. It isn’t easy, yet most experiences have been delightful. Often, expressing my concern leads to discovery that my perception was in error. Other times, the other person appreciates my suggestion and makes use of it.

Recently, in one case, a substantial contract was completed rather than terminated by the contractor. In 2 cases benefits to me were each near one thousand dollars. In the most rewarding case, I now share a friendship that was not previously possible. In a few cases, there was no response, and I left responsibility with the other party. In other words, just as I am empowered and authorized to alert a fellow citizen, they may and can choose to ignore my concern.

In that case, I am in Part 2 of a process for resolution of concern. In Part 2, I can either accept the other party’s resistance or approach another fellow citizen, inform them of my concern, then ask them to go with me to discuss with the first party. Part 2 is more complicated (the second party may disagree with me or in agreement face first party refusal to listen to our presentation), so my concern must be high if I pursue Part 2.

In the one high-concern case I experienced, the second fellow citizen had direct information and joined with me in approaching the first fellow citizen, writing a statement of the facts. The first party ignored the collaborative notice, which invited me to consider Part 3: public disclosure of the dispute.

Part 3, in this case, involved small claims court. The judge decided in my favor. This process was time consuming and frustrating yet worth the effort toward civic integrity. I recommend small claims court, but don’t expect a second experience.

In these incidents I perceive the other party also learned and is glad for the experience, perhaps excepting the court judgement. I feel that other party considered it a cost of his business plan.

Yeshua’s message about resolution of civic disputes is briefly presented in Matthew 18:15-18, Complete Jewish Bible (CJB), 1998. Failure to resolve issues leaves them to infinity.

Unfortunately, another person, Kefa, confused Yeshua’s “[win] back your brother” with “forgive him”, and the church vaguely promotes forgiveness rather than resolution. However, a civic people may and can reform the church.

A 5500 year old Sumerian political philosophy, expressed in Genesis 1:26-28, CJB, makes it clear that humankind is in charge of constraining the bad and effecting the good on earth. The religion-free 1787 United States Constitution accommodates Genesis 1:26-28.

#USpreambler

News

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-responds-to-lindsey-grahams-criticism-of-his-abortion-announcement-5625229

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, erred when the 1789 generation allowed the first congress to restore Anglo-American religion to itself--Congress. That tyranny may and can be remedied by changing the First-Amendment-religion-clause from “prohibiting” to “promoting”.

The Internet empowers the modern civic faction to separate factual-reality from mystery. It takes a quarter-century for an infant to complete the wisdom-building parts of the brain. Providing time for necessary experience and observation, an adult ought not parent until age 35 or so, implying grand parenting at age 70 or so. Human being (verb) is too powerful and authoritative to be wasted on self-gratification without appreciation for the laws of physics.

Civic citizens may accept the humility to rule to the good and constrain the bad on earth. Thereby, adults may at last reform, in order to care for Progeny more than satisfy personal passions.

The Church emotionally led the abortion debate during the past 7 decades on the erroneous claim that life begins at conception, when human viability begins when a woman produces a physically and psychologically whole egg. Psychology is a progeny of physics.
CONTINUED

CONTINUATION

Immediately, Congress may and can initiate legislation to protect ova from wanton women plus women from wayward men yet upholding an authentic couple’s opportunity to bond without risking unwanted conception. The civic faction may end the church-state partnership without compromising individuals’ responsible beliefs.

#USpreambler

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/entertainment/the-rock-reveals-why-he-wont-endorse-any-white-house-hopeful-this-year-5622668

@theRock and other legal voters

 Genesis 1:26-28 informs us that human beings may and can rule to the good and constrain the bad on earth. Neither the God nor government will usurp humankind's responsibility. Vote in your self-interest. Endorse in your self-interest.

 

Quoting the Complete Jewish Bible, "Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image . . . and let them rule over [other species.]  in his own image . . . male and female he created them. God said to them, “Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over . . .  the earth.”

 

The God expressed humility in leaving it to humankind to rule the earth. Each of us can mirror the God's humility by accepting the responsibility to effect the good and constrain the bad in our ways of living.

 

The religion-free 1787 United States Constitution accommodates the 5500 year old political philosophy expressed by Semitic-speaking people in Genesis 1:26-28. It's evident in both the processes for amendment by the people and in the intentions sentence of the preamble.

 

#USpreambler

And on X. @theRock

Genesis 1:26-28 informs us that we may and can rule to the good and constrain the bad on earth. Neither the God nor government will usurp humankind's responsibility. Vote in your self-interest. Endorse in your self-interest.

 

Columns and Opinion

https://news.kehila.org/jesus-yeshua-or-yahshua

"If I find myself in the right context, I might say Yeshua when I speak English." I encourage you to keep this practice but lean more toward Yeshua. The other names lose subscribers in their sectarian pursuits and they never know they are neglecting the precocious 12 year old who knew Genesis 1:26-28 so well that he could astound any rabbi who gave him the time of day. And when the emperor's emissary queried him, he said, "I have come to witness to the truth". I think Yeshua was referring to the ineluctable truth some 1500 years before the word "ineluctable" was invented. #USpreambler

https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/the-orwellian-assault-on-the-past-continues-5560278?utm_source=commentbtn&utm_medium=email&cmt=1&utm_campaign=cns-2024-03-31&cmt_id=9ea9653e-2367-4bd4-a3b7-731f94b8b4f1

@Hunting Targ , I appreciate your comments -- especially your fidelity to Yeshua, a person who is neither the church constructed Jesus nor competitive with Christ. See my facebook, "Phil Beaver" for more about my "discovery", at age 81, of a precocious boy born to Yosef and Miryam and not to be slighted by not using his name.  Based on mitochondrial DNA studies, I feel kin to them. It's impossible for me to feel kin to either Jesus or to  Christ. (I accept that I could be wrong., but don't think so.) #USpreambler

Quora

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-name-of-the-law-that-requires-individuals-to-follow-laws-even-if-they-disagree-with-them/, Anon


I know of no law that requires individuals to follow laws even if they disagree with them. It is a practice that flows from self-interest in statutory justice, which is the continuous pursuit of flawless law codes and enforcement.

Human being (verb) is so powerful, authoritative, and active that need for legislation cannot be considered before an injustice is perceived. Perception is insufficient to establish that legislation is needed and if so, how it should be crafted. Often, no law is preferred to bad law or false adjudication.

A famous illustration is Socrates tried and accepting execution for teaching false Gods when no man knows the God. Plato’s Socrates acted to defend the law, even though the law was corrupt.

Pursuit of statutory justice is the key to a republican form of government. In democracy, groups compete to constrain law in their favor rather than to pursue civic integrity as time unfolds.

In the United States, the civic faction, We the People of the United States, has not, so far accepted the intentions stated in the religion-free 1787 U.S. Constitution. The majority, in 1789, allowed Congress to authorize Congressional divinity under God, ignoring Socrates’ point:  No man knows the God.

Aliens to civic integrity under We the People of the United States are attacking the United States republic with brazen lawlessness.

The civic faction needs to insist on a constitutional amendment to require a license to vote. Qualifications for the license might include proof of citizenship, a statement of how and why the U.S. Constitution guarantees a republican form of government, and demonstration of how the person has, during the recent 3 years, supported the intentions sentence in the preamble to the Constitution. That sentence begins “in order to” and ends “to ourselves and our Posterity”.


#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-being-a-human-doing-versus-a-human-being-accurate-What-is-the-reasoning-behind-this-idea, Mehdi S.


Born in America, I prefer Merriam-Webster usage. For “subjectivity” they have “the quality, state, or nature of being subjective”, for which I choose to address “of or relating to the essential being of that which has substance, qualities, attributes, or relations”. For “essential” they have “of the utmost importance”.

It seemed logical to consider the definition of “subject”, and “that of which a quality, attribute, or relation may be affirmed or in which it may inhere” seems appropriate. I wanted to find “object” an antonym, but did not. However, “subject” is listed as an antonym of “object”. Uses of “object” that I would address include “something material that may be perceived” and “something mental or physical toward which thought, feeling, or action is directed”.

#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-being-a-human-doing-versus-a-human-being-accurate-What-is-the-reasoning-behind-this-idea, Brian Adler


Each person may face self-evaluation. Individuals may experience, observe, and study the laws of physics and progeny, and choose either to accommodate the bad or aid the good to life on earth. Physics’ progeny includes mathematics, economics, biology, and psychology.

You consider weighing species: ant, honeybee, cat, dog, human, rhinoceros, and elephant I listed by typical size. People who avoid, change, or resist the good choose to live like mineral, vegetable, animal, spirit, or villain. This actual reality is as old as sex and slavery.

The political solution was suggested at least 5500 years ago in polytheistic, Sumer civilization. Successive kings led development of codes of law and rules of enforcement wherein civic citizens constrain slackers and rebels and execute villains. The last of these codes was published by their Babylonian conquer, Hammurabi.

Soon, competitive monotheists engaged the political philosophy, and a competitor modified the Sumerian political philosophy in Genesis 1:26-28. Read it in the Complete Jewish Bible and in the New International version to receive the word “rule”. I think Genesis 1:26-28 cites what the laws of physics inform us: mystery left it to female and male human being to constrain chaos and pursue the good on earth.

Yes, each of us should re-examine human being (verb). Authentic human-being is so powerful and authoritative that It takes a quarter century for a person to acquire comprehension and intention to pursue the practice. It takes another couple quarter centuries to begin to perceive personal progress.

The religion-free, 1787 United States Constitution accommodates Genesis 1:26-28’s message.

#USpreambler

Brian Adler:

Thank you for a brilliant answer, Phil. I enjoyed reading it.

Please let me ruminate on it and reckon just how it serves to address the relative importance of animal lives.

PRB again,
People don’t realize that the key to quora-excellence is brilliant questions. Some of my words and phrases can be found in prior posts. However, the arrangement and new thoughts came from your question and its presentation. Thank you, Brian.

Extending to your rumination, consider the thoroughbred horse. As a fold, it stood on 4 legs in 1 hour, found its mare’s tit in 3 hours, received training, and peaked in performance in 3 years. It takes an informed person 25 years to gain understanding and intention to develop human being (verb) and another couple decades to mature as a human-being. A few perfect their unique person just before death arrives.

https://www.quora.com/What-weights-heavier-responsibility-to-protect-the-law-or-to-protect-people, Jeremiah Sariritan


In evaluating choices, it seems essential to include the key consideration. Justice seems the key to responsibility regarding law versus people.

Written law should be continually reviewed to discover injustice and reform to pursue if not attain statutory justice. Unjust law that could kill people or ruin property can and must be reformed.

Should injustice be upheld while reform is considered? If there are no actual threats, an injunction can be used to stay injustice while statutory/legislative deliberation is underway. Delay could have served Socrates, who was unjustly convicted. Delay could have served Yeshua, who was unjustly convicted.

However, if people are being killed due to an unjust law, civil resistance is called for, and the resisters need the power to overcome law enforcement, be it the police (domestic tyranny) or the military (alien attack). Moreover, the resisters need alignment with justice.

Consider, for example, the American Revolution against English tyranny. The British colonists could not have defeated England. However, the signers of the Declaration of Independence had relationships with Spain and France, neither of which wanted England to gain control of the Mississippi River. The decisive battle, at Yorktown, Virginia, was planned and dominantly manned by France and partially funded by Spain. The Americans’ partnership with France and Spain and George Washington’s humility were brilliant.

On the other hand, the American Civil War was grounded in errant Christian opinion that the God had a plan for redeeming blacks from the sins of their ancestors and that abolitionists were evil for proposing to accelerate the God’s plan. After initiation in 1854 in Bleeding Kansas, 7 states met in February, 1861, and decided to fire on the United States. The military ratio was 7 slave states against 27 non-slave states. Abraham Lincoln knew this overpowering strength and therefore is not my hero. Seven states firing on Fort Sumter was folly on two counts: insufficient power and unjust cause.

Civic people employ law to pursue statutory justice according to the ineluctable truth.

#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-being-a-human-doing-versus-a-human-being-accurate-What-is-the-reasoning-behind-this-idea, Anon


When “truth” is merely opinion, it is better to say “I don’t know” than to represent your opinion as truth. For example, the statement “God allows if not causes bad events” is opinion rather than truth.

Actually, “truth” itself seems controversial. Humankind needs a more specific expression for actual reality. Actual reality does not respond to human endeavors. The laws of physics and its progeny operate regardless of human achievement, so human efficiency pursues discovery based on evidence.

The product of the discovery process is “the ineluctable truth”. Among the incomparable adjectives, “ineluctable” seems the most independent of human constructs. Merriam-Webster (MW) reports usage as “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. The “or” implies all 3 modifiers operate. The modifiers can be used to categorize less specific adjectives.

First, avoidance is attempted with infallible, immutable, uncontestable, and incontrovertible.

Second, change is attempted when the object is replaced. For example, reason attributes the cause of the laws of physics to God and constructs doctrine. The consequence is competitive constructs without evidence. If researchers eventually discover the cause of the laws of physics, there’ll be no incentive to call it “the God”: the cause of the laws of physics is sufficient.

Third, adjectives suggesting resistance include inescapable, inevitable,

#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-freedom-it-this-point-if-everything-build-to-take-your-freedom-and-you-have-to-live-pointlessly-according-to-society-that-already-determine-how-you-should-live, Nāṣir N. H. (Ren Kazuki)


I don’t know the ineluctable truth yet experience and observe consequences.

I think Genesis 1:26-28, New International Version, reflects actual reality: the human being may and can perfect order to the good and constraint to the bad in living his or her life yet is part of humankind. The person who accepts power and authority to choose the good never repeats a mistake and may pursue personal perfection before death. Yet they are subject to fellow citizens’ mistakes and choices to the bad.

Paraphrasing the reference: whatever controls what-is leaves it to humankind to choose the good and constrain the bad on earth. The laws of physics prove that choosing the good is in a person’s self-interest, yet many people invite consequences of the bad. To the extent that a person can avoid consequences of bad choices, he or she is free. However, the person who habitually accommodates the bad is a slave to consequences.

(The 1787, religion-free United States Constitution proffers these principles “to ourselves and our Posterity.)

#USpreambler

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-common-misconceptions-about-Ancient-Greece/answer/Viktor-Couder%C3%A9#comments, PRB comment


I am disappointed that you did not discuss Plato’s “Symposium”, which analyses both male-male and male-female sexual action. I favor Agathon’s argument and often paraphrase it.

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/mick.kassem, April 19, 2024

Property tax made sense when borders were protected and criminals were apprehended. We still have building codes, utilities regulation, emergency clean-up, and other services. Taxation of water supply, sewage disposal, and garbage pickup has also become corrupt.

https://www.facebook.com/bill.beard.984, April 19, 2024 video

A short story: Anton Chekhov, "Rothscild's Fiddle". I want to read and could not write a mimic from Marfa's viewpoint.

https://www.facebook.com/james.finney.9469, April 19, 2024

The human-being is so powerful and authoritative that it takes a quarter-century for her or him to complete the wisdom-building parts of their brain. It takes another couple quarter-centuries for her or him to accumulate experiences and observations on which to perfect their way of living. Together, humankind may and can continuously pursue perfection. Humility and understanding are the wings of perfection, and knowledge undergirds humility. The human collective may and can be appreciated. It is essential for every education department to reform so as to practice, facilitate, and encourage human being (verb).

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231665745401660, April 16, 2024

I'm reminded of President Ike Eisenhower's warning against the Industrial-Military Complex -- an unbridled money maker at taxpayer's expense. Also, it's unsettling that yesterday I worked very hard clearing limbs to make way for back-yard mowing service the first time this year.

Thank goodness for global relevance from articles like Dan M. Berger, "Israel's Other War, Against Hezbollah", April 10-16, 2024. The Epoch Times, which seems to reliably share the concerns of people living the hell in Israel. Interestingly, neither Google nor Edge nor my subscription allowed me to access Berger's article. I hope you can find it. I will store my hard copy for awhile.

All this, of necessity, detracts from my current work: Sharing personal discovery that when the Bible says we need to speak, write, and share a name, it's authentically Yeshua (Aramaic) rather than Jesus (competitive English-label). It's wonderful to think the civic influence that helped me to a good choices in life was expressed by an ancient person of another name. Also, church can no longer confound me with One, Trinity, Christ, Satan, and other phantasms intended to distract me from the God -- whatever constrains the consequences of human choices to act.

Berger reports nearby towns in Israel overlooking Lebanon, with different ethnic majorities: 100 % Christian, 1/2 Christian and 2/3 Muslim, Jewish, and Druze. I wonder if such people have always been aware of Yeshua. I am glad that at age 80 I took interest in the Complete Jewish Bible.

Either way, I do not expect a second coming. I think Genesis 1:26-28 makes it clear that humankind is one group whose members may choose the good, the bad, or apathy in dealing with villainy. The civic citizens may and can constrain dissidents and rebels and annihilate villains. The sooner most people accept the God, whatever it may be, and individual power, authority, and self-interest to constrain the bad so as to choose the good, the better.

Yeshua is alive after 2000 years, because in each generation (more than 200, so far) there are a few who discover, practice, and further his civic influence. The chaos the world is suffering might accelerate interest in promoting the leading edge of political philosophy to the good. Contrary to the bad in humankind we are taught, I think I'll observe reform developing before death arrives to me.

 

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno/posts/10161796182222853, April 15

Please read the Wikipedia article on "Yeshua" and follow your curiosity. I am concerned that it was actually, really Yeshua who said something like this: if you don't pursue my name and thoughts, you can’t aid the civic good, because I encourage reform when needed.

As I understand it, the ancient Greek translation of the Torah, 250 years before Josef and Myriam begot Yeshua, required Ἰησοῦς for Yeshua and Joshua; also, χριστός for prophesied, anointed king. When Yeshua proved to be precocious, he drew attention, and Greek speaking Jews called him Isou and other variations of Ἰησοῦς accepting Hebrew speakers calling him Yeshua. And vice versa.

About 17 years after Jerusalem executed Yeshua, Paul objected to the Torah requirement of circumcision, because it discouraged pagan interest in Yeshua. John seemed to prefer Torah adherence, but Peter thought the pagans should be accommodated. James proposed a compromise for Paul to carry with him.

However, Paul traveled in Turkey and Greece promoting Yeshua as savior of souls in afterdeath rather than promoter of civic integrity for life. Greek was the dominant language in Pauline churches, so Yeshua was spoken less frequently than Ἰησοῦς.  Also, a title rather than a surname, χριστός, attached to an entity that differs from Yeshua.

To anyone who has been flummoxed by competitive monotheism, as I have been for about 80 of my 81 years, it is good to know that the civic integrity that can be discovered in the Bible probably are endorsed by Yeshua. I think Yeshua's civic influence facilitates an achievable better future for humankind.

I think Yeshua is good news for future church.

https://www.facebook.com/CurtisHJones/posts/10225342723542661, April 13, 2024

Students don't "deserve" Biden's bribe and the civic faction, We the People of the United States, does not "deserve" the alien powers that control the Democrat Party.

Once a civic citizen always an appreciator of veterans.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 13, 2024

 

There's no comfort in learning that scholars think the person who lived, preached, and practiced civic integrity was called Yeshua by his mom and dad.

True or false, I grew up to think that if I don't appreciate his name, I will not benefit from his 2000 year old encouragement to resist the bad and choose the good.

On the other hand, if all this energy was spent on discovery of Yeshua, an achievable better future might be established.

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno, April 13, 2024

Shannon, thank you for inspiration.

This daily thought is a wonderful opportunity to illustrate the impact of Genesis 1:26-28 on human psychology, a progeny of physics.

My paraphrase of Genesis 1:26-28 is this: female and male human being has sole responsibility to resist the bad and pursue the good on earth. The rest of the Bible expresses the consequence of personally neglecting duty to human being (verb).

The human-being is so powerful and authoritative that it takes 25 years for its body to complete the wisdom parts of its brain (23 years for females). Youth who are aware/informed take the personal responsibility to acquire the understanding and intention to pursue adult human being. If so, after a couple more quarter centuries, that person may perceive pursuit of personal perfection. Perhaps a few human-beings achieve the happiness of unique perfection before death arrives.

In contrast, the sheep dog threatens the wolf on instinct. The wolf perceives that injury could mean death, so instinctively avoids sheep-dog encounters. The shepherd observed this competition and owns a sheep dog for enterprise. Reciprocity grounds appreciation between shepherd and dog.

Not every person appreciates Genesis 1:26-28, even though the laws of physics clarify the message as experiences and observations march on. Some people accommodate or choose being mineral, vegetable, animal, spirit, or villain rather than responsible human-being -- civic citizen to the world.

The civic citizen appreciates fellow-citizens and pursues statutory justice, in order to motivate dissidents and rebels to reform. Fellow citizens cooperate to annihilate habitual villains, in order to establish that habitual villainy invites death.

Appreciation of life motivates observance of Genesis 1:26-28, a political philosophy that is at least 5500 years old and astonishingly neglected and institutionally repressed.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 12, 2024

I was reared in East Tennessee with at least four competitive brands of Bible thumpin. I came here to practice chemical engineering and later met a 26 year-old school teacher who is the most serenely confident person I know. Through her, I have a glimpse of what it means to be Louisiana-French Catholic, with 2 Canadian grandparents, one Parisian, and one German.

Somehow, she got the Genesis 1:26-28 message: Mystery left female and male human being responsible to choose to constrain the bad and promote the good on earth -- unto perfection.

The rest of the Bible reports the chaos that results when human-beings assume churches and nations usurp personal responsibility to constrain chaos in life-style. The part of this I heard directly from her is this: God and Jesus are the same, and I, Cynthia, cannot explain the mystery.

I've spent many working weeks then weekends with this wonderful person, enjoying all kinds of music and art, here in Louisiana and across southern Europe. We met many wonderful people in the dancehalls and festivals of Louisiana (thank you, Gina and others) and at fire-walking, Kalo Pascha, and other festivals in Greece. My wife never has to ponder: she just quietly makes people happy wherever she is.

She taught me that of all the gifts, unpretentious humility is the best. Happily, I shared that opinion about her with her dad.

In Louisiana, there are many people who pursue perfection to constrain the bad and practice the good on earth. It took this Tennessee boy 25 years to get the message and as much again to perceive reform.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10/posts/10229564282844732, April 6

Clark overcame her first half performance. It seems her late-game 4-point-play made the difference. I'm glad I watched the game and know Bueckers is great, too.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231606424958686, April 6

Sacks' post reminded me to re-read again Donald Trump's inaugural speech. Two sentences stand out. First, "What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people." Second, "I will fight for you with every breath in my body – and I will never, ever let you down."

By surviving the Biden administration's politicization of the United States Constitution, Trump is fulfilling his promise, and I can think of no other person in history who has done as much. The question is: are there enough voters who want government by, of, and for "ourselves and our Posterity", quoting the preamble?

I think there are, and hope I get to cast my 5th and 6th votes for Trump. Mike Pence showed again that religious beliefs ought not override integrity to the people, so I hope for the best in Trump's VP deliberations.

https://www.facebook.com/iamnumerouno/posts/10161778430742853, April 6

I agree: you live the tattoo's statement. Thank you for sharing.

What's wonderful is that you're not alone. Yeshua, the precocious son of ancients Josef and Miryam, comes shinning through each generation's political and religious barriers and never misleads people who intend to aid the good and oppose the bad on earth.

We advance Yeshua's impact to humankind when we practice and promote his civic influence, which begins with affirmation of Genesis 1:26-28, NIV and CJB: rule the way you live. The mysterious God is humble enough to allow a person to choose the good and oppose the bad on earth: each person may and can be humble like the God. Through reliable responsibility, each person may preserve their opportunity to choose the good.

Yeshua's affirmation is not critical to the individual, as evidenced by the political and spiritual opposition, especially church competition, each generation experiences.

Yeshua's contemporaries used Koine Greek interpretations of "Yeshua" and "messiah". Politics and religion developed Latin, then English surrogates, "Jesus" and "Christ", to obfuscate if not eliminate our ancient brother, Yeshua. Some people know about Yeshua yet do not insist on his name -- accept a substitute. I reformed, yet will talk "Jesus", avoiding competitive titles such as "Messiah" or "Christ" and others.

Yeshua, conceived from Miryam's ovum, had mitochondrial DNA like ours: homo sapiens descended from one woman who lived about 155,000 years ago. Thus, his family is ancient-kin to subsequent generations. His brother Yaakov has been compromised to "James" and to history, his sisters aren't even named.

Because they are gods facing death (see John 10:34 and Psalm 82:6-7), some people practice Genesis 1:26-28, never having learned about Yeshua, his rearing under Josef and Miryam during typical political and religious turmoil, and his unique understanding of the Torah and Jewish history. In other words, while Yeshua affirms Genesis 1:26-28, Genesis 1:26-28 does not affirm Yeshua. It is no burden to me if Yeshua was another god facing death; I don't know.

I'm just glad Yeshua suggested that Phil Beaver can pursue perfection in the image of the God, mysterious as that entity is (see Matthew 5:48). What's new for me is that the Internet empowers me to discover the facts and earn my opinion.

My 2-part opinion is this: it is not too late for humankind to accept the mystery of the God and adopt Genesis 1:26-28s message: only you may rule the way you live, and civic citizens affirm Yeshua's encouragement: pursue perfection of your person.

https://www.facebook.com/sherri.joubert, March 7

Thank you, Sherri,

It's up to fellow citizens to effect that separation: neither the God nor government can usurp civic responsibility. "Civic" means reliably responsible to the good on earth. It takes intentions, perseverance, and creativity to pursue the good and constrain the bad.

The religion-free, 1787 United States Constitution (minus the Anglo-American Bill of Rights) affirms what the Sumerians had surmised 5500 years ago and Semitic-speaking people recorded 3900 years ago in Genesis 1:26-28: the God, whatever it is, has the humility to leave to humankind the responsibility to rule to the good and constrain the bad to the earth. Each person may choose humble reliability to rule their life to the good; or not.

Then 2000 years ago came Miryam and Josef, who bore their son, the precocious Yeshua. Yeshua studied local law and ceremony and reformed both -- despite opposition that continues to this moment. His outstanding message is: you can pursue perfection in living. (I write opinion, because I do not know the ineluctable truth.)

In Matthew 19:3-8, he said people's hearts had hardened but living persons may and can reform. Yeshua said a person can, during life, pursue human being (verb) and mirror the God's perfection (Matthew 5:48). Accordingly, a few people never repeat a mistake. It would not surprise me if Sherri is like that and improving. Since Yeshua did not write, it isn't easy.

When a person listens to opinion/doctrine that negates or displaces Yeshua's civic influence, they risk offending the family who named him Yeshua, the man himself, and the God. Our civic integrity applies to dead citizens, fellow citizens, and "our Posterity", quoting the United States Constitution. Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" frees fellow citizens to consider Yeshua's opinion.

To listen to the authentic Yeshua requires separation of the ineluctable truth from mystery. To appreciate surrogate influence invites risk I do not want. I did not arrive at this commitment alone and appreciate the continuum of fellow citizens: past, present, and future.

P.S.: Why does Facebook spell-alert "Yeshua"? Check it on Wikipedia.

#USpreambler

https://www.facebook.com/sherri.joubert, April 4

I'll vouch for that as a colleague in Sherri's work place and a civic friend.

I wish I could post a pic of my wife, Cynthia but don't have her permission. Cynthia and Sherri share serene confidence with all who know them.

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/, April 4

Then came Miryam and Josef, who bore the precocious Yeshua. Yeshua studied local law and ceremony and reformed them despite opposition.

For example, in Matthew 19:3-8, he said people's hearts had hardened but living persons may and can reform. He said a person can, during life, pursue human being (verb) and mirror perfection (Matthew 5:48). A few people never repeat a mistake.

Alas, institutions co-opted Yeshua's unique stewardship as competitive divinity, and the consequence is a 2024 world bemused by sex. It's not too late for reform.

By merely deciding to, humankind can decipher Yeshua's messages that are hidden in the competitive Bible babel, practice them, and expand them to this generation's necessities.

For example, find the positive in metaphors like in Matthew 10:38, "And anyone who does not take up his execution-stake and follow me is not worthy of me." It speaks to me to say: if you have not mastered my process for resolution and forgiveness (Matthew 18:15-20), you must change your attitude. Intentional society can do better than one person.

People may and can accept that civic integrity is a self-interest, Yeshua's chief message. Rejecting Yeshua's civic inflluence is a risk I cannot take.

"Civic" means reliably responsible to the good and constraining the bad on earth.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231595656169473, April 4

Physics and its progeny (everything including biology and psychology) is so complicated!

I wonder if someone's idea of breaking up glaciers and dragging them toward the equator would balance solar energy without unintended harm to humankind's responsibility to the earth (Genesis 1:26-28).

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10, April 4 and on my facebook

Then came Miryam and Josef, who bore the precocious Yeshua. Yeshua studied local law and ceremony and reformed them despite opposition.

For example, in Matthew 19:3-8, he said people's hearts had hardened but living persons may and can reform. He said a person can, during life, pursue human being (verb) and mirror perfection (Matthew 5:48). A few people never repeat a mistake.

Alas, institutions co-opted Yeshua's unique stewardship as competitive divinity, and the consequence is a 2024 world bemused by sex. It's not too late for reform.

By merely deciding to, humankind can decipher Yeshua's messages hidden in the competitive Bible babel, practice them, and expand them to this generation's necessities.

For example, find the positive in metaphors like in Matthew 10:38, "And anyone who does not take up his execution-stake and follow me is not worthy of me." It speaks to me to say: if you have not mastered my process for resolution and forgiveness (Matthew 18:15-20), you must change your attitude. Intentional society can do better than one person.

People may and can accept that civic integrity is a self-interest, Yeshua's chief message.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231584353286908, April 3

I suspect vaccines. I had the first 3, and they changed my life negatively -- have had respiratory problems ever since. I'm now off the list of vaccine-marketing targets.

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231566235313970, April 2

"Can you think of any examples of that?"

General R. E. Lee wrote to his wife, 5 years before the Civil War and 2 years into Bleeding Kansas that abolitionists were evil for trying to accelerate the Southern Christian's God's millennial plan to redeem the blacks for their ancestors sins. See https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/letter-from-robert-e-lee-to-mary-randolph-custis-lee-december-27-1856/.

Somebody scream, because this is not common knowledge: The Civil War was caused by errant Christian preaching in Virginia and other slave states.

Both the Methodist Connexion and the Baptist convention split in the same year, 1845, north vs south, over abolitionism.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10/posts/10229545443693765, April 2

I'd like to focus on extreme talent for today.

One of the most tragic features of life is that few people read the New International Version of the Bible and associate with Yeshua, the person his parents addressed before he was a teacher on whom people would impose "Jesus" or the title "Christ". Yeshua's greatest power is to encourage humility. From Yeshua, people can find civic integrity like Matthew 19:3-8, which I quote,

"Some Pharisees came to [Yeshua] to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?” “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” “Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?” [Yeshua] replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. "

The key to the NIV version is "united to his wife", instead of "united with" or "cleave to". The authentic man is ineluctably committed to his wife and their spouse hood, her ova, their offspring, their grandchildren, and beyond. He appreciates the four grandparents who so cherish their two children. I have observed, in New Orleans, five generations celebrating the music at a festival at Audubon Park.

Are there any novels about romance under Yeshua's 19:3-8 civic influence? Does one suggest how men's hearts hardened "from the beginning"?

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/posts/10161145611258599,

Yeshua’s image of me is what I hope to be.

https://www.facebook.com/mick.kassem, March 23

The problem is deeper than Morse suggests.

Humankind fears accepting Genesis 1:26-28 humility: I paraphrase, in the image of the God, you have the power and authority to constrain chaos in the way you live.

The rest of the Bible depicts the babel that occurs when humankind looks to the clergy partnering with politicians to pursue the good and not accommodate the bad to the earth, leaving management of other worlds to the God.

The God humbly leaves to humankind the responsibility to the earth. It is not too late for reform.

Yeshua affirmed Genesis 1:26-28, and both "Jesus" and the title "Christ" lessen Jeshua's civic impact.

I had not posted this message before, because it takes time to discover Yeshua in our world.

https://www.facebook.com/mick.kassem/posts/10227816966301978, and https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.m.beaver/posts/10228945583097931, March 31

Ongoing reform from competitive monotheism is new to me. His mom and dad called him Yeshua (English Joshua), which I prefer much as I prefer people to use my children’s names. For example, when someone calls Rebekah “Rebecca” it bothers me. When someone-who-knows-her spells Rebekah “Rebecca”, it offends me. I always report the “Rebecca” mistake when it comes to my attention, then forget the incident. In other words, I do not recall repetition in half a century.

This easy reflection reminds me of forgiveness, a demanding process Matthew attributed to Yeshua in Chapter 18:15-20. I paraphrase:

In private, report perceived offense; if resolved (maybe you reformed and made amends), all is well; if not, convince a fellow citizen to join your presentation then approach the accused to debate again; if not – no sympathizer, no second presentation, or no resolution, present your case to society. Society may treat the offending party as irresponsible, arrogant, or evil. The motivation is that whatever harm you tolerate continues to lessen living, while harms you resolve bring peace.

The importance of this process to Yeshua is evident in his parting commission to his apostles, reported in John 20:23, “If you forgive someone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you hold them, they are held.”

Both of the above references exemplify Yeshua’s use of metaphors that run deep to reliable responsibility to the good on earth. By accepting responsibility to address offenses when they arise, a person, aware or not, effects Yeshua’s resistance to the bad on earth. After the metaphors “I am”, light, the word, fulfill the law, and peace, Yeshua’s commission to forgive seems ineluctable. It is humankind’s responsibility to interpret the metaphors to the good rather than to compete.

Interestingly, once again, when a discovery appears in my life, a little research shows I am late yet not unhappy. I found a 4 minute introduction to the name, Yeshua. The etymology is explained as Yehoshua–Yeshua–Iēsous–IESVS–Iesu–Jesus through transliteration rather than translation. “By the time the New Testament was written, the Septuagint had already transliterated ישוע (Yeshuaʿ) into Koine Greek as closely as possible in the 3rd-century BCE [250 years before Yeshua was born], the result being Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous).” A blunt, modern, heartfelt notice exists. His family history seems connected to everyone alive.

The “Christ” debate need not dominate humankind. In the Septuagint , “Christ comes from the Greek word χριστός (chrīstós), meaning ‘anointed one’.” Some Jewish clergy predicted an anointed one would unite the 12 tribes of Israel and grant their kingdom. A faction of contemporary Jews thought Yeshua was the anointed one, even after the people of Jerusalem executed him.

Many non-Jews developed Yeshua as the God, usually as the Trinity. That’s when competitive monotheism kicked in and “Christ” obscured Yeshua. That’s gotta stop, in my opinion, shocking as it may seem. Humankind is responsible to pursue the good rather than the bad on earth. Of course, I don’t know – only pursue the ineluctable truth.

Note: it does not take too long to review the commentary I found to support the above message:

Online at https://www.dbu.edu/.../christ.../jesus-and-metaphors.html

Online at https://lpb.pbslearningmedia.org/.../origin-of-everything/

Online at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_(name)

Online at http://www.cccla.org/about/the-name-yeshua/

Online at https://www.oneforisrael.org/.../how-yeshua-became-jesus.../

Online at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_(title)

 

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.moreman/posts/10231555438604059, March 29

I may and can have opposing opinion. I think voting should require a license. And the third licensing requirement should be to own a personal interpretation of the intentions sentence in the preamble to the United States Constitution.

https://www.facebook.com/emily.toth.10/posts/10229526797787629, March 29

The authentic man thinks he may and can be reliably responsible for life to his spouse hood and offspring including grandchildren and beyond. Unfortunately, physics and its progeny -- chemistry, biology, and psychology -- afford some men excess can and insufficient may.

Happily, I united to the most serenely confident, wittiest woman I ever knew. She accommodates my hopeful person after 54 years' marriage.

https://www.facebook.com/brenda.rivet, March 28

There's too much confusion about civic forgiveness. "Civic" refers to reliably responsible connections and transactions to the good rather than accommodating the bad. I advocate Yeshua's influence, which could aid a flummoxed society. It's found in Matthew 18:15-18, CJB:

“Moreover, if your brother commits a sin against you, go and show him his fault — but privately, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won back your brother. If he doesn’t listen, take one or two others with you so that every accusation can be supported by the testimony of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to hear them, tell the congregation; and if he refuses to listen even to the congregation, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax-collector. Yes! I tell you people that whatever you prohibit on earth will be prohibited in heaven, and whatever you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven."

In private, you may discover that you are at fault and apologize. If you have not won your friend over, finding someone who agrees with you and wants to join the discussion may be difficult. Two or three of you deciding to go public means serious offense, and constraint may be called for. Yeshua addressed the importance of resolving incidents.

I only recently discovered that the couple we know as Mary and Joseph named their first son Yeshua, which is Joshua transliterated. The path to "Jesus" is complex, and I accept it where necessary but prefer the name the family probably used: Yeshua.

https://www.facebook.com/gregoryfrey1/posts/10231860342707116, March 27

Download the lyrics for listening to "A Song for You": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkjEILbesQ8

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52, March 25

I read agony in Gaza but no plans for peace. Let me share one: promote Yeshua’s civic influence.

It seems to me a Jewish couple, 2000 years ago, named their son Yeshua, in Aramaic equivalent to the Hebrew Yeshua; same word. And 200 years before Yeshua was born, through Greek transliteration Yeshua was also expressed as Jesus or a Greek equivalent.

No Messiah issue in this ancient development. Messiah and chosen people is a private, religious pursuit by some Hebrews, and poses no issue to my way of living, born Southern Baptist and born again when I chose to pursue human being (verb). I attend a Baptist church as a friend.

I feel that every good decision I made in my life was influenced by Jesus. However, my mom told me to always appreciate the name a family uses. Recently, I learned it probably is Yeshua. Therefore, I am grateful to Yesuha and want to learn more about his actions under the name his mom and dad used.

I am willing to substitute "Jesus" if the other party prefers Jesus. However, I leave it to the other party's privacy if they want to impose the title "Christ", because that introduces human division I do not support. Specifically, Christians assert salvation of soul in the person’s afterdeath, granted the Trinity’s gift, rather than salvation of the person who mirror’s thegod’s humility to the good.

Yeshua suggested that each human being may and can pursue perfect performance to the good, depending upon their intentions. I first read this suggestion in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Divinity School Address”, 1838 but now perceive it in Genesis 1:26-28 with no objections in the 1787 United States Constitution.

In the course of overcoming phantasies grounded in human sacrifice as a means of bargaining with thegod mystery, writers wrote condemnation of the descendants of Hagar, not only comparing a donkey, but enacting brutal war over possession of land.

If I were a descendant of Hagar, I don't think I could ever appreciate a person who defends that perhaps 3700 year old condemnation. It may and can be removed from Judeo-Christian affirmation.

The Bible suggests loving your enemy. I think pity is a form of love and vice versa. However, pity does not foster appreciation. And mutual appreciation is what descendants of Hagar and descendants of Sarai may and can achieve. They may and can accept, in thegod’s image, the humility to rule to the good and constrain the bad on earth.

Order is necessary, because there will always be dissidents, rebels, and villains.

#USpreambler

PRB comment:

Whatever else may be said about Yeshua, he was a scholar and advocate of Genesis 1:26-28. He affirmed that we are gods facing death. If we, the descendants of Abraham adopt the god-like-humility to rule on earth, we can end human sacrifice once and for all, by ending war.

https://www.facebook.com/phil.beaver.52/posts/10161127977528599, March 25

Terry and Sackchasa, I appreciate your "likes".
I want to add that Genesis 1 is a Semitic-people's expression of Mesopotamian, I think Sumerian, political philosophy -- innocently attempting to assess 200,000 years' development of homo sapiens, the current mutation of human being (verb).
A faction of Semitic people wanted to prevent human sacrifice, so relocated from Sumer and established blood sacrifices excluding humans. A faction refined the sacrificial systems so as to include grains and oils, affordable by more people. From them developed a faction known as Israel, the nation and Hebrews, a diverse people. A small faction is Christian and another faction thinks Jesus fulfilled the Torah. Some of them think Jesus will return as the Messiah to unite Israel.
Non-Jews developed Christ, a title representing salvation of souls by thegod rather than salvation of people form intentional error (sin). Christ lessens Jesus' civic influence. We can lessen the impact of Christ by adopting the name Yeshua, which the boy's mom and dad used to address him. I advocate Yeshua's civic influence. "Civic" means reliably responsible to the good and against the bad in human connections and transactions.
I think every human would like to claim they are humble -- may be a god facing death. I don't know if sacrifice remains a part of political humility but hope not: acting to the good and constraining the bad seems sufficient. But I don't know.
God is a mystery, and 5500 years ago Sumerian cities had patron deities intended to aid citizens in war against invading aliens. Patron deities developed into competitive monotheism, which is more divisive than polytheism. Think of language's Babel.
The key to Genesis 1:26-28, especially NIV and CJB, is that it has thegod mystery saying: let us make humankind in our image so they may rule on earth. Thus, thegod are humble enough to leave order on earth to humankind. Since thegod are doing the allowing, humankind can provide order on earth.
The question before history is: will humankind develop the humility to accept the power and authority to rule the earth?
The religion-free, 1787 United States Constitution proffers the intention to establish and maintain sufficient humility "to ourselves and our Posterity".
Thank you both for the motivation to write this. Phil

https://www.facebook.com/john.lee.7370/posts/7514976871875066, March 234

John, I think it is wonderful that you are the person who wrote, "Sometimes I had chosen to do right things but not to do things right." The authentic person controls the first part of your statement and needs civic collaboration for the second part.

The professional who has civic integrity makes the right choice even when civility demands the wrong choice.

Civic people replace unjust laws with statutory justice.

Comments on a blog post

https://www.thenewatlantis.com/text-patterns/can-anyone-help-me-understand-ephraim, Alan Jacobs, September 1, 2017 and on my facebook

Radner responded, “My job, one way or the other, is to try to be clearer for everyone. I wish there were a key to help people "understand what I write". That's not possible.”

I amplify Radner’s resolve. If a writer to humankind “writes to the audience”, he or she can pursue neither personal thoughts nor the ineluctable truth.

I think I understand Jacobs’ post and may resolve his angst; he may say. Radner described mimicable humility an ancient Semitic-speaking writer suggested in Genesis 1:26-28. I paraphrase, in the beginning, whatever-is-in-charge of what-is, granted humankind the opportunity to choose to constrain chaos on earth. In common terms, the God had the humility to trust humankind to discover they want to pursue the good and constrain the bad on earth. Each person may choose to mimic the God’s humility.

Radner kindly broke his words down, and I explain his phrases in my thoughts, as follows. Although evolution of humankind started perhaps 7 million years ago, DNA shows that everyone alive is a descendant of one homo sapiens woman who lived perhaps 150 thousand years ago:  Today, we are biologically connected, past, present, and future. So far, only homo sapiens left “memory” of this “biology of connection”, yet the primitive past is contained in DNA we may “hope” to discover and understand. Homo sapiens pursues whatever-is-in-charge of what-is as the "truth of God". We cannot relate to what our persons “really are” if we misinterpret these biological connections; connectedly, one person, one generation, one humankind, and one beginning that may end without constraint. Radner concludes that his book encourages “faith in accord with the basic convictions of the Christian Gospel as presented in the Scriptures”.

Radner left to the reader interpretation of “Christian Gospel”. That could be a hook to persuade the reader to buy the book; I don’t think so. To me, it’s an invitation to express Yeshua’s civic influence. “Civic” means reliably responsible to the good (constraining or eliminating the bad) in human connections and transactions.   

I think the scripture is a collection of stories about the consequences when people do not discover personal humility and accept the power and authority to constrain chaos in their way of living. I am grateful for persistence and to my wife and our children and fellow civic citizens for persuading me that the good is my self-interest and to Yeshua, that precocious 12-year old who was left in the temple court conversing with the rabbis.

I like to honor the best idea of the name his family used, “Yeshua”, and am comfortable with “Jesus”. I work to persuade every person who pursues human being (verb) to practice Yeshua’s civic influence. Of representative commenters about Yeshua’s significance – James, Paul, and Emerson, I prefer Emerson’s thought that Jesus understood the power and authority of civic humankind who mirrors the humble God of Genesis 1:26-28.

The religion-free, 1787 United States Constitution seems to mirror Genesis 1:26-28 humility.

#USpreambler

PRB comment

I overlooked Alan Jacobs's key concern:  Radner's phrase "God’s life as our creator". Jacobs stipulates "God is eternal in himself", I think traditionally overlooking the God and author of Genesis 1:26-28. If humankind fails to constrain chaos, the God's image on earth dies.

Neither before nor since Yeshua (some prefer "Jesus") has anyone informed us that because Genesis 1:26-28 says we may, in the God's image, pursue the good and constrain the bad to the earth, our individual performance can be perfect and aid humankind.

The precocious Yeshua was executed in his early 30s. In every generation some people discover Yeshua. Some intend to mimic Yeshua's civic integrity by improving applications with fellow human-beings. A faction approaches perfection before they die. So far, the creation is not dead. Eventually, the good may dominate if not annihilate the bad on earth.

Another PRB comment

In commenting to Jacobs, Radner wrote, "In the context of the book, a "biology of connection" is laid out as involving the fact that we are (biologically) born of a mother and a father, and thereby connected to a network of other persons, including those that support families; and we in turn give rise to such networks.

There's more to the God connection.

I don't know the mystery of Yeshua (Jesus to many). The Christian view is that he was born of Mary's ovum as God incarnate. Consequently, Yeshua was like everyone alive today -- a homo sapiens descended from one woman who lived perhaps 150 thousand years ago, as I wrote yesterday.

If this is the ineluctable truth, God's biological connection is a matter of physics. And Yeshua's affirmation of Genesis 1:26-28 comes full circle.

More yet; PRB comment

Radner’s phrase “the truth of God’s life as our creator” may be read as “the truth of duration”, where “duration” represents how long humankind survives, in order to remove the mysteries “God”, “life”, and “our creator”. I think duration accommodates both the doctrine of eternal God and the God’s humility in leaving humankind responsible to preserve life on earth (Genesis 1:26-28, NIV and CJB).

If we assume “our creation” when life began to evolve on earth, some 4.3 billion years ago, then humankind annihilates life, there’ll be the duration -- one measure “of God’s life as our creator”. There’ll remain humility to the God – whatever constrains human choice. Only then may the unavoidable and unchangeable and irresistible, the ineluctable, truth, be knowable.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to theineluctabletruth, which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like. He uses the hashtag #USpreambler.