Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
"Civic"
refers to citizens who collaborate for individual
happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or
society.
Consider writing a personal
paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation: For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and
paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer &
practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and
prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate
responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to
other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787,
text, unless it is amended by the people.
It seems the
Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or
not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this
independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states
deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble
is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who
collaborate for human justice.
Every citizen
has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in
the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try
somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the
goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies
grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to
discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.
Selected theme from this week
Human-rights-propaganda empowers the U.S. tyrants
I’m receiving a passel of questions about “human rights”. In
my perception, the only right a human-being can demand of another is the right
to constrain chaos in personal-living regardless of the other’s practices. I
don’t know the-ineluctable-truth. (Study “ineluctable” then apply it to
the-truth.)
The people who wrote “. . . Nature's God . . . their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights . . . Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness . . .” were politely
opposing the Church of England’s Trinity and rebuking John Locke’s “Life,
Liberty, and Property” where “property claims a human-being is Locke-God’s
property and thereby unassailable. The founders declared religious pursuit to
personal-privacy.
But what nation or God can warrant life, independence, property, or the pursuit
of happiness? I omit “liberty” because it has been proven to be the mob&
tyrant’s license to take fellow-citizens’ heads, blood, property: their all.
Necessity& justice demand that we fellow-citizens
constrain chaos in our way of living so the collective of civic citizens have
the chance to constrain dependent-fellow-citizens so as to preserve human
viability. “Civic” means practicing humble-integrity in human-connections. And
integrity means responsibly earning your way of living and paying taxes. Taxes
cover the infrastructure for constitutional-law enforcement plus research to
establish and maintain statutory justice.
By persuading the entity We the People of the United States
to debate human-rights, the elites in government pick our pockets with
immunity, never fearing that we might require them to demonstrate the
humble-integrity that is required for responsible-human-independence (RHI).
News
Freedom of
speech?, thanks to October 15, 2021; https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/judge-docks-lt-col-scheller-5000-in-pay-criticizes-governments-conduct_4050828.html?
Likewise, lessening U.S. medical-patient-care-outcomes is
happening daily when administrators, through their lawyers, "patient
advocate" departments, and financial-profit advisors, press doctors,
nurses, and first-care takers to "follow protocol" rather than
deliver health-care, then press surviving patients to accommodate the
“institutional efficiency” of loading doctors with administrative “obligation”.
It's an administrative-pandemic that especially injures& terminates the
elderly, in my opinion. (Edited)
Quora
https://www.quora.com/Should-young-people-be-given-the-right-equal-rights-to-give-an-opinion-to-adults-Because-here-when-you-are-old-you-are-right-and-when-you-are-young-everything-you-say-is-wrong?
by Cristine Gille
I appreciate the opportunity to address your question. In my
fourth quarter-century my mentors are a fraction of my age. When I was a father
to 3 children with my wife of now 52 years, I read Kahlil Gibran’s short poem “On
Children” and reared our 3 children in appreciation of their intentions to
address the world of 2021 rather than follow me as in 1980. Now, my children stay
ahead of me daily. I could not survive without them. Don’t get me wrong I am
not dependent. However, I cannot contend with the daily problems they take in
stride. The understand 2021s divergent chaos but are not impressed with it. Yet
they pay their taxes.
My wife and I stopped smoking together, cold-turkey, in
1972, when we became convinced it would kill us --- diminish our intentions to
care for our children and any grandchildren for life. In 2018, I felt alcoholic
beverage-habits were killing me, and I quit, cold turkey. The next time we had
a grand dinner (shrimp linguini, avocado& tomato salad, and garlic&
olive-oil toast), I offered to open a bottle of red for her only, and she said,
“No, thanks, I gave it up”. Astounding wit! I put on Billy Joel “Scenes from an
Italian Restaurant” for nostalgia. Last Friday, upset with medical-administration’s
carelessness for my wife’s future and my chest pains, I made the personal
commitment that frustration would never affect me again. My children set the
example.
The sentiment Gibran expressed comes full circle when the
appreciative parent& neighbor approaches completion.
Please speak your opinion and ask your brilliant questions. I’m listening and
learning as I write.
https://www.quora.com/Why-must-the-typical-newborn-human-being-discover-choose-independent-civic-integrity-if-in-living-they-will-neither-initiate-nor-accommodate-harm-injury-to-any-person-or-association-including-family/answer/Alfred-E-Neuman-28?
by Alfred E Neuman
Thank you for
responding, AEN.
William Faulkner, in “Barn Burning” depicts an
adolescent boy walking into the woods rather than return to his family. I
prefer Falkner’s dead-presence to yours.
https://www.quora.com/Can-you-define-modernism-and-postmodernism-in-a-short-and-simple-answer?
by Othmane
I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth and think your question
pertains to Western political philosophy. The short and simple is that the
American woman, beginning in 1919 (modernism), lessened their reliance on 1) authentic
man and 2) religious hope. Abandonment to single-motherhood after 1953
(postmodernism) invited chaos. The remedy is for men, and now women, to
reform to their authenticity. If you don’t need my construct, that’s fine.
Skipping prior evolution, the current human-being, homo sapiens, seems about 300
thousand-years-old. About 5 thousand years ago, a political philosopher
suggested, in 2021 terms: female& male-human-being can independently
provide order& prosperity to living species and to the world. Infidelity
and chaos would not be consistent with that suggestion. About 3 thousand years
ago, Hebrew scholars expressed the suggestion as the-God’s blessing to
female& male-human-being. (“The-God” is my 2021 expression for whatever
controls the outcome of human behavior, perhaps the laws of physics; in no way
would I presume to know or bind myself to 3 thousand-year-old opinion about 5
thousand-year-old metaphysics.) About 25
hundred years ago the Greeks suggested that necessity& justice require the
civic-citizen to neither initiate nor accommodate harm/injury to-or-from any
person or association including family. About 1660 years ago, diverse churches
canonized the Holy Bible, which reviews the above mentioned literary-history
and adds the metaphysical Jesus, the-God to those humans who are chosen by
the-God to believe Jesus. According to the Apostle John, the un-chosen hate Jesus,
hate his disciples, and hate the-God (John 15:18-23). About 500 years ago,
Protestant Bibles were canonized. The unintended consequences of each
canonization is that Genesis 1 expresses the 5 thousand year old suggestion
that femal& male are responsible for peace on earth, and the rest of the
Holy Bible is a report on the consequences of non-performance: infidelity.
Regardless, Western-European thinkers led the reformation
that challenged the Roman-Catholic Trinity (Father, Jesus, and Holy Ghost) and motivated
England’s constitutional provision of a Protestant monarchy in 1689’s Bill of
Rights. John Locke, early Calvinist and later perhaps Deist, was instrumental
in this change. His Locke-God-given-rights were “life, liberty, and property”,
where each human-being, or at least each man, was Locke-God property and
therefore unassailable by any person or institution including self. Scholars
discounted physics by labeling it nature and counting reason as more reliable.
The founders of the uSA, in their 1776 declaration of war
for independence from England, cited “Nature’s God” for authority to defend
themselves against the English Trinity and rebuked Locke by amending his claim
to human-rights as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. The
framers of the 1787 U.S. constitution upheld the separation of church and state
by proffering 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength,
and prosperity, leaving religion to personal-privacy. However, the First Congress
egregiously imposed religion-Congress partnership then claimed Lockean “consent
of the governed” when none of the 99% Protestant voters of 1789 complained
(voters being some 5% of the 80% free-faction).
Skip the industrial age and more, to women’s suffrage,
passed by Congress in 1919, and on to the Kinesey Reports of 1948 and 1953, and
I think you have modernity, or the social break from Chapter XI Machiavellianism
that empowers religion-dominance in politics. Even though finding an authentic
man (who would care for her and her viable ova for life) was difficult for the
authentic woman, women began to free themselves from dependency on either
religion for hope and comfort or one man for happiness. It was an unfortunate-reaction
to 4,932 years’ male dominance.
Without the sacrificial-caring power of the female, the
chaos of irresponsibility has produced exponential chaos-divergence in the past
68 years. Whereas modernism denied the-ineluctable-truths suggested in
humankind’s literature, including the Bible’s metaphysics, postmodernism states
the arrogance that female&male-human-being can avoid, change, and resist
constraint, whether physics or metaphysics. If the needed-reform started now, I
think an achievable better future would be perceived in about 84 years.
The idea that postmodern free-thought ought to be imposed on
a viable human-ovum seems self-defeating offensive-arrogance.
https://www.quora.com/Are-rights-not-granted-by-the-Constitution-illegal?
by Pipi C
I study the Constitution often and am not aware of any rights
it grants beyond a citizen’s right to join the entity We the People of the
United States as defined in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution.
In my 2021 view, the preamble reads like this: We the People
of the United States who want to practice integrity, justice, peace, strength,
and prosperity proffer this constitution “in order to” encourage&
facilitate responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our
Posterity”.
No standards are offered for the 5 domestic disciplines or RHI,
and the disciplines do not include religion. We the People of the United States is the committed-faction who encourage& facilitate the totality.
Thus, the only right I perceive reliable is the right to
join We the People of the United States. The “rights” tacked on by Congress in
the Bill of Rights are obviously neither supportable nor valid to RHI.
That’s why they are so contested in 2021, perhaps a year of reckoning for
Congressional-tyranny in the USA.
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-is-an-example-of-a-conflict-that-might-occur-due-to-individualism-and-collectivism?
by Airon Jae Condol
I’ll first set the parameters for my response: The collective that attempts to deny
responsible pursuit of personal-happiness is in conflict.
First, your scope is human-being, its latest& exclusive
mutation, homo sapiens, about 300
thousand years into psychological evolution. Psychology is a subset of
the phenomena that emerge& develop according to the-laws-of-physics. (The
hyphens invite the reader not to disassemble the phrase and its meaning: the
necessity& justice that exists and human-beings may discover. Also, the
“word1& word2” syntax expresses mutual requirement under the laws of
physics; “civic” refers to humble-integrity in human-connections.
Humble-integrity means accepting& admitting “I don’t know” when that is so.)
My presentation may seem peculiar; it is the product of intention to find words
and phrases that seem reliable to the experiences& observations of most
human-beings, no matter where they are in their journey to chronological&
psychological maturity-to their unique person.
Civic-integrity requires fidelity to the-ineluctable-evidence.
“Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, merriam-webster.com.
Research, appreciating& preserving the-ineluctable-evidence, leads to
the-objective-truth (negative or positive). With ultimately-required
instruments of perception, research may approach the-ineluctable-truth.
Note: “ineluctable” was used in translation from ancient,
foreign words in 1571, infrequently since then, and “the ineluctable truth” was
used in 1906 and sparingly since. Among educators and such, the usages should
be well-warn for reliability versus vagaries like “fundamental truth” or
“Truth”. I prefer the accuracy, precision, and specificity of
“the-ineluctable-truth” and shop for an improvement: Please share it. But why
isn’t “ineluctable” a common word and “ineluctable truth” well known?
The human-being is born totally ignorant and may be
encouraged& coached into 5 critical acceptances: 1) being human-being
rather than assuming an opposite such as animal, plant, mineral, “soul” or
“incarnation”; 2) responsibility to choose humble-integrity; 3) intending&
practicing responsible-human-independence (RHI) rather than dependency; 4) the
individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA)
to constrain chaos in personal-behavior; and 5) humankind has had less than 10
billion person-years to develop, yet the newborn has less than a century to
perfect their unique person. Thus, whereas necessity& justice seem to
accommodate homo sapiens’ collective
failures, the individual starts with constraints: quickly discover& accept
the-ineluctable-truth, retaining the “What’s that?” of childhood. Human error
cannot be accommodated unto personal-habit.
Unfortunately, the world’s Education Departments resist the
principals suggested above. They serve governments so as to develop “the
workers we need” (Barack Obama, 2012). Consequently humankind is divided into 2
factional collectives: individuals who fortunately pursue RHI with/without the
empowering articulations, and persons who resist the necessary civic-integrity;
fellow citizens who pursue either 1) civic-life or 2) dependency. Dependency is
made possible by psychological variations: awareness, intelligence, knowledge,
unavoidable-dependency, gullibility, cunning, egocentricity, wealth etc.
The civic citizen separates state from church and therefore
need-not share any spiritual interests they may-or-may-not pursue: they happily
debate parallel-political-viewpoints that conserve individual-opportunity for
personal-happiness rather than impose a collective metaphysic. They always
struggle for mutual opportunity for private-happiness and therefore never
“agree to disagree” or otherwise stonewall fellow-citizens. Dependent fellow
citizens who cause/accommodate harm/injury need reform --- from indolence,
infidelity, crime, tyranny, evil, and worse. Civic citizens fund constitutional
law-enforcement plus research toward ever-improving statutory justice. Utopia
or other totalitarianism is unexpected let alone unwanted.
I now feel positioned to respond to your question: First, the
individual is born into a conflicted totality and therefore has self-interest
in responsible-independence. Second, most persons practice necessity&
justice in order to aid mutual, comprehensive safety& security: survival
seems viable. Third, no entity will usurp the human-being’s
personal-responsibility to constrain chaos in their way of living and thus aid
humankind’s independent-responsibility for peace in this world.
The collective that attempts to deny individual-opportunity
to develop humble-integrity is conflicted.
https://www.quora.com/Which-of-the-natural-rights-life-liberty-or-property-is-most-important?
by Gaby Gonzales
The
phrase is part of U.S. enslavement to dependence on a “higher power”.
What’s
important to fellow-citizens is to recognize 3 things: “natural” means
God-given, the-God is Lockean early-Calvinism or late-Deism and throughout his
life Lockean-God. Third, every human-being is a property of the-Locke-God, and
therefore no person can deny another life, liberty, or property.
The
uSA founders, in the 1976 declaration of war for independence from England not
only claimed authority from “Nature’s God” so as to politely deny the
English-reformed-Catholic-Trinity, they rebuked John Locke by changing his
“rights” to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. In other words, no
American, I think including the Chapter XI Machiavellian James Madison, wanted
to betray his/her-personal-God for the Locke-God.
Alas,
the Tories who stayed in the U.S. gained the upper hand and influenced the
First Congress to re-establish church-legislation “divinity” in America,
mimicking England’s constitutional legislative-partnership with 26
Church-of-England-seats in Parliament. Other re-institutions of Anglo-American
tradition are less egregious, I think.
We,
the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can& must amend the First Amendment
so as to encourage& facilitate the civic-humble-integrity needed for
responsible-human-independence (RHI) rather than
continue to accommodate the Congress, Supreme Court, and administration
civil-religious-pride: civil tyranny.
Additionally,
we must reform the Supreme Court so that the entity We the People of the United
States can continuously purse statutory-justice based on the-ineluctable-truth rather than majority opinion with favor to precedence. The
U.S. intention is for the continuum “ourselves and our Posterity” to discover
the standards for domestic integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity.
If
your experiences& observations affirm these ideas, do the work to improve
them to your satisfaction and make them happen. (Also, help me get my
expressions right, if you perceive necessity.)
Speaking
of enslavement, the Lockean jargon is constantly before us. However, the word
“ineluctable”, meaning “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” was translated
from other languages before 1571, and published with “truth” in 1906.
Why
have the educators (and others) been hiding “the-ineluctable-truth” all this
time? I suggest that “reasonable truth”, “fundamental truth”, and many others
empower them over fellow-citizens. Promoting “science” which can be faked with
statistics and lies, instead of research based on the-ineluctable-evidence also
enslaves us.
https://www.quora.com/How-important-are-human-rights?
by Sherlianne Corpuz
One human-right is essential. Choosing to be a human-being ought
not be denied to any person.
Because female& male-human-being can, their opportunity
to constrain chaos in personal-behavior is their only defensible civic-demand.
No entity can warrant a person’s life, independence, property, or pursuit of
happiness.
I mention “female” first, because during her fertile years
her body may originate up to 400 potential persons, who upon lifetime-support
with her authentic-mate may choose to be human-beings if not one of the dependent
entities: animal, plant, mineral, or soul.
I use “independence” where “liberty” is an expected “right”
because 1) in 1789 the French revolutionaries taught the world that “liberty”
can be taken as license to take fellow-citizens heads and 2) the history lesson
was repeated in blood during some summers of the 1960s, 1970s, and in 2020 in
U.S. Democrat-dominated-cities; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Power_movement.
Human-rights-violence is just another excuse for not
accepting the necessity& justice of responsible-human-independence (RHI).
https://www.quora.com/Why-should-men-and-women-have-equal-rights-1?
by Dulcie Mabilangan
I received the email-question “Do you think all citizens should have the same rights?”
Yes, I do. There’s only one human right: the opportunity to
constrain chaos in personal behavior.
Female& male-human-being is the only species with the
awareness and grammar by which to live without chaos. Consequently,
necessity& justice require them to independently provide order&
prosperity to life in this world. By “independently” I mean that neither
government nor the power that controls the consequences of human action will
usurp responsible-human-independence (RHI).
This is not at all a novel suggestion. It was expressed in
colloquialism, 5 thousand years ago in the Middle East. The suggestion was
interpreted by a Hebrew scribe 2 thousand years later, in Genesis 1:26-28. The
rest of the worlds’ Bible canon express the consequences of infidelity in
female-male intimacy. In Genesis 2, Adam does not appreciate Eve and they beget
twins destined for murder. Fourteen generations later, Sara suspects she is
infertile and suggests surrogate conception, gestation, and delivery by Hagar.
Then Sara has a boy, creating a divided family. The chaos escalates over the
rest of the Bible. Now, 2 thousand years later, humankind’s division is
divergent.
The male fidelity to female and vice versa suggested in
Genesis 1:28 never took. The suggestion came in the recent 5 thousand years of
300 thousand years since hominids branched to homo sapiens.
Since then only one culture was proffered that comports to
the Genesis-1 political philosophy. Together, the uSA’s 1776 declaration of
independence from England and the 1787 U.S. domestic order framed in the
constitution proffer 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace,
strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage& facilitate the
humble-integrity that is required for responsible-human-independence “to
ourselves and our Posterity”. It is a fantastic proposition, with standards
left to posterity’s posterity to discover.
The 1787 U.S. intentions were regressed by the First
Congress when they imposed a religion-legislation partnership to restore
Anglo-American tradition rather than uphold the independence the uSA had won
with military providence from France. We, the 2021 “ourselves and our
Posterity” can& must terminate Anglo-American tradition, starting by
revising the First Amendment so as to promote civic integrity rather than civil
religion and requiring the Supreme Court to reform to rule-of-law according to
the-ineluctable-truth rather than judicial precedent or temporal opinion.
In proportion to homo sapiens’ 295 thousand years to the
suggestion of human fidelity 5 thousand years ago, the entity We the People of
the United States can establish the 1787 U.S. intentions in only 84 years.
That’s about 4 generations after 12 generations left us this opportunity. Let’s
get started today.
https://www.quora.com/What-does-social-responsibility-mean-to-you?
by Chanda Dacuyan
First, I intend to constrain chaos in my way of living.
Thus, I act out of civic necessity& justice. “Civic”
means fidelity to human-connections. That is, I neither initiate nor
accommodate harm/injury to or from any person or association, including self
and family.
Rather than accept dependency, I practice
responsible-human-independence (RHI), using humble-integrity to
guide personal-integrity. Integrity is based on the-ineluctable-truth to
be discovered by researching physics and it progeny, including psychology.
“Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”,
merriam-webster.com. Civic humility comes from listening to the voices and
watching the faces in my human connections. Any consequences rest with me.
Second, since it takes two to connect, I accept that I won’t
always get what I want.
https://www.quora.com/What-matters-most-to-you-to-be-good-or-to-be-right?
by Sheena Mae Sarza
I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth. I think
the-good (purpose) and the-right (justice) cannot be separated by a human-being,
so it’s best to aim for both. There are 3 aspects of being-in the-right:
intention, awareness, and practice. Balancing them requires a psychology of
humility: intention to be both good and right, awareness that there may be
differing viewpoints, and actions to satisfy both views; always.
It takes about a quarter-century for a newborn to acquire
the comprehension and intention to live a complete human lifetime. By complete,
I mean perfecting their unique person. That is, achieving their personal-perfection,
not universal perfection. People say “Be all you can be”.
The encouraged& coached human-being may in adolescence
accept that they have the individual power, the individual energy, and the
individual authority (HIPEA) to develop either humble-integrity or
egocentricity. [The ‘word1& word2” syntax indicates mutual requirement.] I
discuss intentional egocentricity below.
The discouraged and un-coached youth is likely to become an egocentrically
dependent-adult, perhaps never discovering HIPEA. Yet it is possible for them
to rise above their youth and accept the self-interest of using
humble-integrity in-order-to develop personal-integrity. This human-miracle is
not possible in seclusion, because the-ineluctable-truth is written on the
faces and expressed by the voices the person connects with in daily living. The
person who is born into injustice cannot consider departure until he or she has
encountered justice. Thus, either by early coaching or by civic-connections
each person may develop civic responsible-human-independence (RHI),
founded in humble-integrity. But not every person is civic.
The person who unfortunately uses HIPEA for egocentricity
becomes a dependent: indolent, abuser, infidel, criminal, tyrant, evil, or
worse: a fellow-citizen who needs reform and begs constraint or isolation.
Because these principals are not promoted by Education
Departments, we live in a confused world that utilizes plausible-truths –-
usually falsehoods --- as assumptions for action. An unfortunate, dedicated
driver with a rider whose illness or injury is life threating has another
passenger waving hands, blinks headlights, and honks horn to pass, and the
unfortunate driver in front flashes into road rage and maneuvers to stay in
front at a slowed pace. Or a patient requesting information about their medical
care has been turned away before and now won’t accept “No” for an answer; the health-agent
asserts he/she has not the authority to help: the patient has the option to leave,
again without an answer or ask for a boss. Daily, many wrong actions are taken.
Being right is the difficult part, and errors are bound to happen. It takes two
to be both good and right in human connections.
I prefer to be good, always, persist without frustration,
and if stonewalled, depart with goodwill to assert the right in another time
and human-connection. I intend to never break this self-reliance: civic
frustration will not invade my person. I hope to satisfy both the-good and
the-right.
https://www.quora.com/Does-civil-law-or-due-process-of-law-protect-life-liberty-and-property?
by Holly Lloyd
No. That’s a political construct concocted by Englishman
John Locke, d. 1704. The uSA founders rebuked Locke’s politics when in 1776’s
declaration of war for independence they, formerly loyal British subjects,
claimed human rights under “Nature’s God” rather than the English Trinity:
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They claimed religious freedom was
one of the reasons they had left their homelands, be it England or another
European country with religious oppression.
Shockingly, Locke’s “property” meant the property of the
Locke-God, whatever he thought at the time. His construct was that no
government or person could deny God’s property, even the property itself. It’s
no surprise the uSA founders rebuked Locke’s philosophy.
The French, in 1789 proved that liberty is too often a
license to take fellow-citizens’ blood. The U.S. Democrat Party demonstrated it
again in 2020 when Democratic mayors supported injury, death, and property
destruction in their cities. It continues with the Biden-administration’s reign
of lawlessness. We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can& must turn
to responsible-human-independence (RHI), the 1787 U.S. intentions, in order to
survive as the world’s best hope for an achievable, better future.
We’ll know the minority-entity We the People of the United
States has come alive when the national debt starts declining. I’d like to be
around when that happens. Meanwhile, since the debt is increasing, each newborn
U.S. citizen or immigrant is assuming $7 million federal debt. I doubt the
illegal U.S. inhabitants care.
https://www.quora.com/Does-preventing-harm-to-others-provide-warrant-for-restricting-and-interfering-with-an-individual-s-liberty-Should-a-governing-authority-be-able-to-restrict-and-limit-the-actions-of-individuals-for-their-own-good?
by Danai Thomas
Yes and yes.
Necessity& justice demand that female&
male-human-being independently constrain chaos to living beings in the world,
because humankind is the only species that can. That implies that each
individual neither initiates nor accommodates harm/injury to-or-from any
person/association including self and family.
For many reasons, most of all the two facts that 1) it takes
a quarter-century for a person to acquire the comprehension& intention to-be
a human-being plus another quarter-century or more to gain experiences&
observations that empower responsible-human-independence (RHI) and 2) humankind always
has ranges of chronological and psychological maturities. The civic-citizens,
who constrain chaos, must fund and aid law-enforcement as well as the research
to discover and enact statutory justice so as to motivate dependent citizens to
reform. Herein, “civic” means mutual fidelity in human-connections.
Also, liberty is license either 1) granted by the winner of
war and their authorized magistrate or 2) taken by the mob with intentions to
injure, kill, and/or damage property. Bestowed-liberty is no surrogate for civic-independence,
which each human-being may possess. This does not hold for people who choose to
be dependent --- animal, plant, mineral, or soul --- rather than nourish the
humble-integrity needed for RHI.
The passive citizen, who does not both fund and aid both law
enforcement and development of statutory justice is a dependent. That is, the
civic-citizen stays informed and aids fidelity in human connections for all
life more than for personal-afterdeath.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-duties-of-the-judicial-branch?
by Greg Thomas
Necessity& justice demand that
female&male-human-being, because they can, constrain chaos in this world.
Persons who accept that they are human-beings accept that charge and earn their
way of living plus the infrastructure that is necessary to provide mutual,
comprehensive safety& security so that citizens who so choose may
responsibly pursue the happiness they perceive at each stage in their lifetime
rather than submit to the image another entity has for them. They, the civic-citizens,
practice responsible-human-independence (RHI).
Not every citizen chooses RHI. For reasons they may
or may not understand, they nourish a dependency: indolence, abuse, infidelity,
crime, tyranny, evil, and worse.
Members of the judiciary system must first be civic-citizens
dedicated to RHI. As such, they accept that they are servants to a divided
humankind: civic citizens who are paying the bills and aiding the discovery of
statutory justice, and dependent fellow-citizens who may risk causing harm/injury
that results in their accusation, indictment, conviction, and notice to reform.
The duty of the judicial branch is to complete the demand
for justice in-necessity to humankind.
https://www.quora.com/What-s-the-difference-between-law-and-right-Why-is-the-law-limiting-us-when-we-do-what-is-good-for-us-Can-I-say-law-infringes-and-protects-at-the-same-time?
by SHADRACH AMOAH
Recalling that I know neither the-objective-truth nor the-ineluctable-truth,
I have earned a well-grounded opinion. I share the opinion in hopes of learning
from fellow-citizens. [The hyphens beg the reader not to disassemble the
thoughts. Also, I am puzzled as to why “ineluctable”, in use since 1571 AD, is
not an everyday word among civic-citizens. It means “not to be avoided, changed,
or resisted”. Herein, “civic” refers to mutual-fidelity in human-connections.]
First, I considered your phrase “do what is good for us”,
which I think is at the heart of a human-being’s purpose and a synonym for both
the-right (as in opportunity) and the-good (as in consequences). That is to
say, it is civic for a human being to act in self-interest. The question, which
is but ought-not-be eternal to every newborn is: how does a person discover
self-interest?
To homo sapiens, the only remaining
representative of human-beings (unless the next mutation, homo integritas or such
is already emerging), an ancient “ourselves”, 5 thousand years ago, suggested
to their “Posterity” (ourselves in 2021): female& male-human-being, for
necessity& justice can& must constrain chaos in this world. [The “word1&
word2” syntax implies mutual requirement. For example, female&male are
required for humankind’s survival.]
Second, you and I may mutually understand “law”. I learned
from you, Mr. Amoah, that “law infringes and protects at the same time”.
“Infringe” surprised me. And merriam-webster.com suggested “defeat” or
“frustrate”, and https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/infringe
suggested “limit”. These usages seem valid for the specific laws that constrain
a human-being to self-interest: the laws of physics and its progeny ---
mathematics, the chemistries, biology, psychology, imagination, fiction, indeed
everything. For simplicity, I’ll call it the laws of physics, or physics
for short. Writers 400 years ago confused readers with the word “nature” and
later with the word “science”. The reliable human function is research based on
the-ineluctable-evidence. Its product is the-objective-truth until instruments
of perception empower research to approach if not attain the-ineluctable-truth
that interconnects with physics.
Responding to necessity& justice, the civic human-being
accepts each of: 1) being human, 2) having the individual power, energy, and
authority (HIPEA) to constrain chaos in their lifetime, 3) pursuing
the-ineluctable-evidence when “I don’t know” won’t constrain chaos, 4) choosing
humble-integrity by which to gauge personal-integrity, and 5) acting with
responsible-human-independence (RHI) in self-interest. In other words, none of
reason, revelation, faith, hope, charity, coercion, or force can cause them to
avoid, change, or resist the laws of physics. The civic-citizen faithfully
retains their infantile posture “I don’t know” when they don’t know. If
necessary, they research to learn the-ineluctable-truth, in order to practice
humble-integrity. If there is no need for action, they may retain “I don’t
know” and take no action. The never act on opinion, except under actual
physical attack.
Hopefully my concerns engage your experiences&
observations. My response to your teaching is this: the-rule-of-law by opinions
of justices who attempt to preserve precedent and thereby [vainly] attempt
to avoid, change, or resist the laws of physics is wrong. Their rule-of-law
must be reformed to continually discover and codify statutory justice based on
the-objective-truth when the-ineluctable-truth is yet undiscovered.
The-objective-truth is reliable until instruments of better-perception are
available, and the approach to the-ineluctable-truth advances. For example, the
earth, once thought to be firmament floating on water, with the heavens above
and the spirit of God a fog is known to be among the planets in our galaxy in
the outer space rather than “other world” humankind is exploring.
The civic-citizen is constrained to ask, how can a Supreme
Court brook the idea that entrepreneurs can persuade teenagers that their
psychology does not fit their biology and for a fee they can “correct” the physics,
leaving psychology wellness?
For example, the male typically suffers from heterophobia:
the fear of committing-to for-life a woman and her ova, some 400 during typical
fertility. If he cannot work it out on his own with the woman who is committed
to him, he can seek counselling to overcome his well-known fear. Or he can talk
to someone like me, who in their fifty-second year of marriage, reports a
ruined life but not ruined spouses. The horrendous losses and misery spouses
often encounter need not lessen each of the persons. A negative illustration of
this principal is shared by Anton Chekov in “Rothschild’s Fiddle”.
I assert that egregious offenses against humankind are
motivated by a long history of government interference in capitalism.
Capitalism is a human connection between necessity and provision. The
risk-taking entrepreneur perceives the need and does the work to provide, and
the grateful consumer pays the cost when the price is feasible for them. The
elites of the world have distorted the system so as to direct consumerism to
support the very rich, with government subsidies for entrepreneurs and
entitlements for consumers. The end of the government pyramid-scheme is ruin,
according to the laws of physics.
https://www.quora.com/What-famous-philosophers-advocated-totalitarianism?
by Jean Wormington
For a reliable response, I would study the first 10 of 30
documents and perhaps more listed at https://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=Totalitarianism
. To decide I really needed to know, I’d scan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
with the caution that I am reading leftist bias; that is my opinion, and I do not
claim to know the-ineluctable-truth.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-right-to-work-the-most-fundamental-among-all-employee-rights?
by Derley Paculba
I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable” means “not
to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. It’s a word that shows up on the google
ngram from 1576 to 1576 then off and on until 1906, when it’s frequency leaves
the zero-line perhaps permanently. It seems the political philosophers and
scholars hid “the ineluctable truth” as a discussion topic from us for a
reason. I speculate that they wanted to preserve the opportunity to construct
reasonable-truth in-order-to aid the elites’ success: wealth to pay scholars
high salaries. I don’t think this was a conspiracy; individual scholars
protected their employee rights.
The falsehoods about human rights is a construct by
Englishman John Locke, died 1704. He wrote the preposterous idea that every
human being is the property of the-God that Locke promoted and therefore
government must warrant “life, liberty and property”. “Property” therein refers
to the human-being as Locke-God’s property, in Locke’s youth, a Calvin-God and
later a Deism-God. The uSA founders, in 1776, rebuked England by appealing to
“Nature’s God” for human-authority rather than to the English,
reformed-Catholic-Trinity. They also rebuked John Locke by asserting
Nature’s-God-given-rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
We, the 2020 “ourselves and our Posterity”, received a clear
message from the Democrat Party and Democrat run cities that there is no U.S.
intention to warrant domestic freedom from death, injury, and loss of property.
When a mob licenses itself to liberty, Democrats support them. The French
licensed liberty in 1789 for a decade of terror. The 1787 U.S. intention is the
humble-integrity by which to practice responsible-human-independence (RHI).
I think the only provision a citizen should expect from
their government is the opportunity to develop humble-integrity by which to
gage personal-integrity. In humble-integrity, each civic-citizen takes charge
to attain the comprehension and intention to live a complete human lifetime.
Here “civic” means practicing fidelity in every human-connection. As a young
adult, they enter the job market with qualifications for a most necessary
service of their era. In this era, anything a robot can do should not be a
person’s career choice. The civic-citizens participate in politics in order to
aid “ourselves and our Posterity” in advancing necessary-statutory-justice.
In no way would they borrow money on their children’s and
grandchildren’s futures.
The sooner most people accept that they are a human being
and therefore have the right to develop RHI the sooner most children will be
so educated by their parents and every Education Department. No human-being
should assume they are dependent on the-God or a government: necessity&
justice require each human-being and humankind to consider practicing RHI,
in order to aid peace in this world.
https://www.quora.com/Is-freedom-important-to-the-ethical-experience-of-a-person-Will-the-absence-of-the-ethics-and-moral-impact-the-world?
by Queen
Freedom is a privilege granted by the victor in war.
Whatever freedom a citizen is granted must be used to develop
responsible-human-independence (RHI). Therefore, the civic-citizens in a nation
must encourage& facilitate the humble-integrity that is required for RHI.
The person who achieves RHI orders both internal and external constraints. For
example, I stopped smoking in 1972, and consuming alcoholic drinks in 2018, yet
hope to pay taxes every year.
https://www.quora.com/In-general-how-much-can-Eastern-Asiatic-and-Western-Eurocentric-cultures-bias-observation-of-History-and-civil-humane-rights-be-trusted-Can-either-be-trusted-at-all-or-are-both-about-maintaining-power-and-control-of?
by Rich Ameninhat
I think no matter where they were born, the female&
male-human-being has the same opportunity: to accept being a human being;
accept the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual
authority (HIPEA) to develop humble-integrity; and accommodate the external
constraints that allow them to live a lifetime while practicing
responsible-human-independence (RHI).
I would not attempt to suggest how this is done in a
communist country. I don’t think there are communist cultures and don’t know
how to suggest the people overcome the regime.
I’m only familiar with U.S. tyranny, and attribute the
repression to a majority who think Congressional freedom of religion and
freedom of the media are worth living for. I work to persuade the 2021
“ourselves and our posterity” to amend the First Amendment in order to
encourage& facilitate civic humble-integrity rather than civil
religious-pride to Congress, the Supreme Court, and the administration. To
reserve to personal privacy sufficient humility toward whatever controls the
consequences of human behavior. Make certain that fellow-citizens who cannot
separate church and state cannot get elected or appointed to office.
If the entity We the People of the United States accomplishes
this necessity& justice, the rest of the world’s people will have hope for
the first time since 1787: before the Congressional tyranny that established
Anglo-American-tradition, repressing U.S. independence, in 1791.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-ethics-govern-ones-action-and-the-ethical-requirements-of-a-good-action?
by Sharmaine Talay
I think your question is brilliant and am challenged to
share my opinion and learn from your response.
At some point, each considerate human-being may ask “What am
I?” and continue the question until answered. Unfortunately, no group has
developed a culture that seeks the-ineluctable-truth and journals humankind’s
discoveries [ineluctable means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted]. If
they had, there’d be a code of human ethics for each newborn to read and choose
whether to be ethical or not. However, there are some prior necessities.
First, a person may accept that they are a human-being
rather than either an animal working to satisfy banal appetites, plant growing
for a fixed purpose, mineral supporting life, or phantasmal soul.
Second, the human-being may accept their individual power,
individual energy, and individual authority (HIPEA) to choose their person’s
psychology.
Third, they may choose either humble-integrity or a
dependency. If humble-integrity, they act on necessity& justice and thereby
develop responsible-human-independence (RHI). They constrain chaos in their
way of living. The dependencies include indolence, abuse, infidelity, crime,
tyranny, evil, or worse.
Fourth, the individual may accept that action that causes or
accommodates harm/injury to any person by any person invites statutory law
enforcement. Consequently, the persons who develop humble-integrity must bear
the cost of a judicial system plus aid the development of statutory justice,
and the dependents must make certain they do not cause harm/injury that invites
accusation. If they are convicted, they either reform or sustain the
appropriate constraint, perhaps termination.
Fifth, since humankind has some 8 trillion person-years of
experience& observations during the recent 5 thousand years after grammar
empowered intelligence to develop knowledge, it is impossible for the
individual human-being to know enough to practice responsible-human-independence
(RHI)
alone. Therefore, they must, during life, aid the political process that
produces a civic culture, where “civic” refers to human connections with
mutually-humble-integrity.
This is an ethics by humankind, based on the-ineluctable-evidence:
only female& male-human-being can constrain chaos in this world, and they
cannot assume utopia will usurp their responsibility.
Law professors
https://lawliberty.org/book-review/lying-about-the-authority-of-the-law and Law & Liberty | Facebook
Professor Movsesian herein
practices scholarship for scholars, with no regard for civic-citizens. Internal
scholarship exacerbates the U.S. government’s failure to secure the global
independence won with French military providence in 1781. The adolescent First
Congress restored, as much as they could, Anglo-American religious-error,
regressing 1787 USA independence to 1789 U.S. dependence on factional-American
Protestantism. As the 1782 motto “E Pluribus Unum” appealed for reform,
the U.S. acquiesced to Judeo-Catholicism; consider the
composition of the current Supreme Court.
Quoting the article:
In the words of the Declaration of Independence, “Governments are
instituted among Men” to “secure” our rights and “deriv[e] their just powers
from the consent of the governed.”
Movsesian promotes pure English, John Locke, propaganda
meant to persuade commoners to accept Chapter XI Machiavellian
religion-legislation partnership. The 1689 English Bill of Rights assures a
Protestant monarchy and the 26 constitutionally provided Parliament seats for
the Church of England. The First Congress, ill prepared for independence, re-established
factional-Protestant partnership with Congress, at the people’s expense. One
scholar wrote that the people did not object, as though 99% of 1788s free
citizens and 100% of legislators were not Protestant. Herein is the domestic
tyranny of “consent of the governed”:
It’s consent of the faction that subjugate their persons.
Also quoting, “The Constitution has authority because “We
the People” have agreed to it.”
Not so. Such scholars delude themselves to the totalitarianism
in the 1787-font-induced mesmerism of the preamble’s subject: the entity We
the People of the United States. That’s the faction of U.S. citizens who
intend-to-and-do practice the 5 domestic-disciplines that follow: integrity,
justice, peace, strength, and prosperity. The disciplines’ particulars are,
respectively, wholeness to the-ineluctable-evidence, justice in necessity,
human connections that mutually encourage& facilitate responsible private
happiness rather than the dictates of another entity, preparedness to repel
both internal and external attacks, and sufficient work to responsibly fund
personal-happiness plus pay taxes and aid local, state, and federal
infrastructure including first response to physical or psychological violence.
“ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. The five
domestic disciplines are adopted by the few, “in order to” encourage&
facilitate responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our
Posterity”. “Posterity” includes descendants and legal immigrants. The object
of the preamble, “ourselves and our Posterity”, is totalitarian in both
demographic and in private-psychology: intentions to either RHI
or to a dependency, such as Anglo-American tradition, U.S. infidelity, abuse,
crime, tyranny, evil, or worse.
The faction who practice the 1787 constitutional intentions
encourage& facilitate reform to dissident fellow-citizens. Quite plainly,
the 1787 Constitution offers no standards of either disciplinary practices or
the purpose: RHI. That’s because the continuum “ourselves” expects
“Posterity” to continually approach statutory justice in necessity to
the-ineluctable-truth.
A fellow-citizen who admits to not knowing
the-ineluctable-truth must look to considerate fellow-citizens to accept the
dilemma, create solutions, express them with the intentions for an achievable
better future, and together effect the action that offers mutual, comprehensive
safety and security so that each citizen may pursue the humble-integrity that
is required for RHI. So far, neither most scholars nor most politicians nor
most voters qualify as members of the entity We the People of the United
States.
And quoting, “Smith begins his book with an account of how
consent provides the grounding for law’s authority in a liberal democracy.
Given the West’s “pervasive” commitment to individual freedom and equality, he
writes, no alternative justification could serve.”
This is a throwback to the obsolete parts of the 1776
Declaration of Independence’s human authority on Lockean “Nature and Nature’s
God”. According to Locke, each human being is a property of God and no person
should diminish God’s property. But the founders cited “Nature’s God” to rebuke
England without denigrating its reformed-Catholic Trinity, praised and
worshipped by many colonists. Also, they rebuked Locke by changing Locke-God-granted
human-rights from “life, liberty, and property” to the founders’ “life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”, an equally preposterous government boast.
And quoting, “Genuine authority involves hierarchy and received
obligation, concepts “antithetical” to “egalitarian autonomy.”
This scholarly reasoning is false. Authority can only be
discovered and does not respond to acceptance or reception. The authority of
the-ineluctable-truth exists and humankind’s duty is to discover and
responsibly apply it.
This chemical engineer is constrained to ask why he
discovered the phrase “the-ineluctable-truth” rather than encountering it in a
constitutional-scholar’s work. My notion is that “truth” reserves to the
scholar an opportunity to present reasonable-truth despite what the construct may
cost the persuaded-reader. In other words, the scholar is motivated to seek the
same kinds of rewards artists like the Sistine Chapel’s ceiling-painter
received: excess money, notoriety to an elite faction, and fame.
And quoting, “Most originalists today hold that courts
should give a constitutional provision the meaning it had at the time of its
adoption, its “original public meaning.” Doing so, the argument goes, shows
respect for the authority of the lawgiver, the “We the People” in whose name
the Constitution binds us. But if “We the People” is just a construct, what
sense does that make? Why should we defer to the dictates of a fictional
lawgiver who never existed? And how would we know what a fictional person
meant, anyway?”
This paragraph borders on pretense: the entity We the People
of the United States is that faction who comprehend and practice the 1787 U.S.
intentions: RHI. Federalist 10 demonstrates beyond doubt that the 1787
framers were attentive to majority and minority factions, and Federalist 54
addresses slaves. The framers themselves were psychologically divided: some
wanted to preserve “We the States”, some doubted potential-sincerity to RHI
by the majority, and some wanted to impose on “We the People” the Trinity:
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
The egregious fallacy of the U.S. rule-of-law is the
pretense that 5:4 or other dominant legal opinion provides the basis to responsibly
discover and practice the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable” first appeared
before 1620 as interpretation of older foreign languages; https://www.etymonline.com/word/ineluctable.
It’s frequency in google ngram is non-zero in each: 1571 to 1576, 1649 to 1660,
1697 to 1702, 1714 to 1733, and stays near the zero line from 1776 forward.
“Ineluctable truth” leaves the zero line in 1906, and “the ineluctable truth”
was dominant in 1906 and declined perhaps in 1917. Thus, scholars have had
their chance at “the-ineluctable-truth” and did not deem it worthy of their
attention. Why?
We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can& must act:
amend the First Amendment so as to promote the humble integrity required for RHI,
reform the U.S. Supreme court to pursue statutory justice according to
the-ineluctable-evidence rather than Court-opinion, license the vote only to
sincere-citizens who comprehend and practice the 1787 U.S. intentions as they
personally articulate them, and thereby prevent dissidents to the U.S.
intentions from holding government office.
Civic citizens don’t lie, because they accept that
the-ineluctable-truth will eventually expose consequential human loss&
misery, even though no scholar, politician, clergy, professor or friend shared
awareness of “ineluctable” when presenting “truth”.
Anthony Duke, I'm no fan of Al Gore and am grateful he did not
become president.
However, I think you speak the-objective-truth if not
the-ineluctable-truth in appreciating the factional-work of the Liberty Fund.
Moreover, you inspired my thought that Reason is the religion
that has kept the word "ineluctable" from modifying
"the-truth" for 450 years. Once the people accept any discovery of
the-ineluctable-truth, the scholars who support a faction, be it Democrats or
Republicans, lose their power to construct Reasonable-truth.
I write to learn from fellow-citizens, especially
civic-citizens, and if there are no objections, I added your name today on my
"appreciations" post at promotethepreamble.blogspot .com
.
Facebook
Two thoughts. First, this program
ought to aid the panhandler's acceptance of their person as a human-being.
Second, a parallel program should be started to promote widespread acceptance
that a human being can take charge of their individual power, individual
energy, and individual authority (HIPEA) to constrain chaos in their way of
living and fidelity in connecting with fellow-citizens.
Phil Beaver | Facebook
10/15/21
Only the-ineluctable-truth can inspire a newborn, as they
discover life, to comprehend& intend to develop their person as a
human-being rather than as mystery-soul or such. “Ineluctable” means “not to be
avoided, changed, or resisted” merriam-webster.com. Why don’t we all know
this word, “ineluctable”, first used in English in 1571?
Personal development, progressing during the person’s
quarter-centuries, may be encouraged& facilitated by a civic culture, even
if the people hope for ethnically preferred afterdeath. For example, an
areligious culture can inspire their youth by the self-interest to accomplish
the-good during life.
In such a culture, ignorance is reliably accepted and shared
so as to preserve open-minds& open-hearts. For example, a child asks “Does
the entity “the-God” exist?” A civic-adult who chooses& nourishes a
personal-God responds “I hope so but don’t know the-ineluctable-truth, and like
everyone must hold sufficient humility toward the-God.”
In another example, the child asks “Will the sun come out
tomorrow?” The civic-adult responds “By perception, it will, unless a storm
hides it. However, it’s important to know that daily, the earth’s rotation on
its axis un-hides the sun each morning in the east after hiding it last evening
in the west: the earth rotates from west to east. I could go on.
Inculcating mythos slows the development of a civic-culture.
Phil Beaver | Facebook
10/13/21
I want to discover the-objective-truth and new instruments
for perception, in-order-to approach the-ineluctable-truth. Ineluctable means
“not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” (merriam-webster.com). [The hyphens are
intended to preserve precision& accuracy.]
The Google ngram shows “ineluctable” usage —- a translation
of an old word —- off and on since 1571 and permanently departing the abscissa in 1906. Google-book-usage-percent, times 10,000, peaked at 2.45 in 1574, 0.283
in 1684, and 0.228 in 2002, respectively; declining interest. In 1906, “the ineluctable
truth” slightly dominated “ineluctable truth” but dropped to 50% its usage in
2002; declining interest. “Truth” peaked at 339 in 1654, 230 in 1842, and 110
in 2019; declining interest. Its peak was 14,500 % higher than the
"ineluctable" peak.
This chemical engineer is constrained to ask: Why haven’t
political philosophers, social pseudo-scientists, law professors, elected
officials, journalists, educators, and clergy encouraged& facilitated the
entity We the People of the United States master-discoverers of
the-ineluctable-truth?
I suggest it is because plausible-truth, metaphysics,
religion, and imagination empowers elites among liberal-arts professionals to
pick the people’s pockets with immunity. Their scholars write to support the
competitive wealthy.
I read& write to reform all Education Departments —
local, state, and federal —- to reform, in-order-to inculcate in our youth
personal-intention& performance-to take charge of being a human-being: to
develop the comprehension& humble-integrity that is required to practice
responsible-human-independence (RHI) for life rather than "schools and
colleges to train our workers", quoting President Barack Obama's second
inaugural address.
https://www.abbreviations.com/
to submit RHI, responsible-human-independence
The U.S. culture that is
proffered by the 1787 Constitution proposes 5 domestic disciplines ---
integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, "in order to"
encourage and facilitate responsible-human-independence "to ourselves and
our Posterity", a continuum of generations that pursue necessity and
justice.
Phil
Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which
can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it
obviously does not work.
Phil is agent
for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit
corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays
from the latest and going back as far as you like.
No comments:
Post a Comment