Appreciate 1781 French aid to 1787-U.S.-proposed individual-independence

 Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

Appreciate French aid to U.S.-proffered individual-independence

Distraction from the victory of independence to the bestowal-of or license-to liberty is no aid to 1787 U.S. intentions: responsible-human-independence (RHI) "to ourselves and our Posterity".

At Yorktown, VA in September, 1781, England surrendered to France and the uSA’s Continental army, ending the American war for independence. In 1784, the individually cited 13 free& independent states ratified the 1783 Treaty of Paris. In 1787, 12 of the states proffered U.S. domestic order predicated on 5 domestic disciplines “to ourselves and our Posterity”. The disciplines are: integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity.

So far, the faction We the People of the United States has not accepted the RHI that the colonial “ourselves” won. U.S. dependency in 2021 is split to English tradition vs French enlightenment: religious-conservatism v social-democracy; civic-integrity v agency-rulemaking. The Congress and the Supreme Court are accommodating-bystanders to career agents in regulatory departements who dictate U.S. subjugation.

The 1787 “ourselves” promoted freedom& liberty, letting independence slip, yet were divided: Antifederalists v Federalists, who, more or less, begot the Democrats v Republicans of 2021, respectively. Heretofore, the 2 parties struggled under an electorate that sought RHI yet could not articulate it, bemused by democracy v republicanism.

In 1787, French& English philosophy-competition continued. The storming of the Bastille on July 14, 1789 involved 98 casualties. Edmund Burke wrote to Charles-Jean-François Depont, in November, 1789, hope for “a government of real energy for all foreign and all domestic purposes, with the most perfect security to the liberty and safety of individuals”. Thomas Paine moved from London to Paris and argued against Burke in support of the revolution. Their argument, between two Brits, seems the basis of political left v right more than the U.S. Antifederalists v Federalist.

The U.S. may suspect “liberty” as too often taken as license to shed fellow-citizens’ blood, as in some U.S. Democrat-run cities in summer, 2020. Regardless, the U.S. may restore focus on independence, especially RHI to secure safety (Burke). The U.S. may accept freedom& liberty bestowals by the victor in war or domestic violence and promote the individual self-interest of RHI.

In almost 13 years, the USA and France can celebrate 150 years since France’s gift. It would be altogether fitting for the USA to propose and France to agree to revise the gift’s name to “The Statue of Independence” on “Independence Island” in New York Harbor, just south of Ellis Island. I hope to help celebrate from my den-TV.

Quora

https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Who-painted-the-1831-work-Liberty-Leading-the-People? by Diana Crisan

Regardless of the artist’s sensational subjugation of the woman, I’m happily independent of both French and Democrat license to “liberty”. My homeland proffers responsible-human-independence (RHI) to person’s who don’t want a dependency --- higher power, abuse, infidelity, indolence, tyranny, crime, evil, and worse. I think the faction We the People of the United States will keep it that way unto “ourselves and our Posterity”.

When I was a boy, in the 1950s, reaction to the community helped me accept the necessity to educate myself for the career most compatible with my aptitude, so as to pursue the happiness I perceived in each decade of my life rather than submit to the conflict and confusion everywhere. I served for 35 years one company who assured chemical-manufacturing viability& safety to the people.

Dependent fellow-citizens tell me I was privileged, and I agree: I had the public-school-opportunity to choose to take charge of my education rather than depend on parents, teachers, and fellow-students.

Now, in my fourth quarter century, I am glad I ordered my person’s subjectivity for RHI rather than for freedom& liberty. Only now can I articulate that appreciation for the USA --- neither France nor England nor other people.

I’d like to thank France for their choice to aid the English-colonies at Yorktown, VA to Cornwallis’ surrender to France and the Continental army in 1781, winning the war for 13 states’ independence.

For domestic order, the 1787 U.S. Constitution proffered 5 domestic disciplines (reserving religion to adult-personal-privacy), “in order to” encourage, facilitate, and practice RHI “to ourselves and our Posterity” unto necessity& statutory-justice.

To commemorate 1787 and express gratitude, I recommend re-naming that wonderful French-gift to the U.S. in New York Harbor “The Statue of Independence” on “Independence Island”, just south of Ellis Island in New Jersey waters.

 

https://www.quora.com/Which-is-more-effective-in-correcting-injustice-charity-or-grass-root-level-political-action? by David Klein

I think neither charity nor imposition corrects injustice. The only way to correct injustice is to constrain chaos in personal lifestyle and thereby encourage, and facilitate responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our Posterity”, in order to constrain civil dependency.

Thus, the civic citizen neither initiates nor accommodates harm/injury to or from any person or institution.

When 2/3 of fellow citizens are practicing these principles, an achievable better future will be evident.

It takes a human-infant a quarter century to acquire the comprehension and intention to embark on their person’s adult-subjectivity that may or may not favor the civic-integrity required for RHI. For example, an infant reared in a community of un-constrained tyrants is likely to choose tyranny. Consequently, a utopia with no civil-infrastructure for constraint is unlikely.

However, a culture wherein most people may pursue the happiness they perceive in each decade developing RHI, rather than subject to someone else’s vision for them, is possible under the-ineluctable-evidence rather than under legislative& judicial-tradition. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, a more precise& accurate expression than any other “truth” modifier I encountered, including “Truth”.

I seek a better expression.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-Republicans-portrayed-in-corporate-media-as-the-party-of-fiscal-responsibility? by Sheeraj Mian

Mian, I recorded gratitude for you question on my “appreciations” post at promotethepramble.blogsot.com. I hope this essay helps.

First, I can’t confirm that corporate media portray Republicans as fiscal conservatives. I don’t think they are fiscally responsible.

Merriam-webster.com informs me that “fiscal” means “of or relating to taxation, public revenues, or public debt”. Both parties always increase the national debt-ceiling.

I view republicans as erroneous preservers of dependency on Anglo-American tradition. The U.S. consequence in 2021 is first, Judeo-Catholicism rather than Protestantism partnering with the legislature, court, and administration, while the only un-constrained branch, the media, promotes social democracy. Second, the court runs “the rule of law” on English precedent extended to the U.S. rather than on the-ineluctable-truth (merely as a distraction from the fact that administrative agencies unconstitutionally write the rules that U.S. citizens must accommodate). Meanwhile, democrats are attempting to impose social democracy despite the U.S. constitution’s guarantee of a republican form of government.

The modifier “ineluctable” expresses the-truth “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. In other words, the-extant-truth that yields not to reason, revelation, the-God, any other human construct, or to typical modifiers like “fundamental”, “liberal” or “ultimate” or “Truth”. We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants) must stop the tyranny by all four branches.

A culture 5,000 years ago suggested that female& male-human-being may choose to independently provide order& prosperity to the living species and to this world. In other words, human-being is responsible for the earth while the rest of universe is under other other-worldly sovereignty. Since then, diverse elites have attempted to construct otherworld mysteries --- ideologies& theisms --- that would usurp the suggested responsible-human-independence (RHI) in order to make theirs the supreme tribe.

The 2021 psychological consequence: while humankind is safely& securely exploring the former “heavens”, RHI has arrogantly developed divergent chaos, with $300 trillion debt, $29 trillion to the domestically-factional We the People of the United States. I don’t perceive any group worthy of “fiscal-responsible-party”.

In 1787, the U.S. culture was proffered on the principle of domestic discipline with unlimited standards of success --- to be determined by posterity’s Posterity. The U.S. Constitution provides for amendment by “ourselves and our Posterity” under 5 disciplines, to achieve independence rather than bestow liberty. Commensurate with the 1776 declaration of war for independence to “the good People of these Colonies”, the 1787 Constitution separates church and state. The 1787 U.S. reserved to personal-privacy the individual’s choice to develop a religion or not.

Each U.S. citizen may (choose to) ponder the 1787 Constitution, particularly its preamble, which has 2 sentences: presentation of the U.S. republic and statement of the republic’s intentions. The morning, my interpretation of the intentions is:  The civic people of the United States encourage, facilitate, and practice 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” develop statutory justice “to ourselves and our Posterity”. A civic-people cannot warrant each other’s life, liberty, property, religion, and pursuit of happiness; however, they may choose to encourage, facilitate, and practice the 5 disciplines needed for the civic-integrity needed for RHI.

But the 1788 elites who represented the people in their states were divided, neglecting civic-integrity, between issues including: Federalism v states’ rights: British-conservationism v French& liberalism; metaphysics v physics& progeny; “nature” v reason; presidential-monarchy v representative-republicanism; communitarianism v individualism; necessity& justice v tradition; self-discipline v coercion& force; freedom& liberty v independence.

And Thomas Paine, in “The Crisis” inspired& motivated non-loyalist-colonists to exonerate Nature’s-God. They took full responsibility for killing fellow-subject-invaders in red coats. Paine moved to London in 1787 and entered debate with Edmund Burke (a Catholic-tolerant student of John Locke) regarding the French Revolution. Their argument became the basis of left v right political competition in the U.S., affecting our lives today.

The French decade of bloodletting, 1789 through 1799, negates any notion that “liberty” is preferred to RHI. After the French& Indian War between England& the colonists v France, the USA won independence in 1781 when Cornwallis surrendered to France and the Continental army at Yorktown, VA, USA. Then, in 1789, the U.S. forfeited the independence codified in the 1787 Constitution, when Congress imposed the 1791 Bill of Rights, mimicking England’s 1689 Bill of Rights as much as possible. Today, the U.S. right v left division can, regrettably, be traced to Burke v Paine: 2 Englishmen.

Nevertheless, the continental dots extend from Federalists --- Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and political-Madison with their strong central government, to religious conservatism that mimics England’s Chapter XI Machiavellianism and Burke. Yet the right cannot claim fiscal responsibility. And from Antifederalists (who fought for individual-independence to fellow citizens) --- Jefferson, before-change-Madison, and Monroe, to social democracy that does not admit to the U.S. republic; often touts liberty, equality, and brotherhood; promotes Alinskly-Marxist organizations; and is happily loading their descendants with endless debt.

We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can stop the misery& loss, first, by amending the First Amendment so as to encourage, facilitate, and practice civic RHI rather than accommodate religion-Congress-Court partnership. Establish independence from England v France competition at last.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-inherently-bad-features-of-politics? by Roger Cassiano Ribeiro Ramos

Human being may, from infancy through their first quarter-century, acquire the comprehension& intention to act on necessity& justice. Most cultures inculcate the perception that church and state are higher powers the individual just has to live with. Their private life is so busy struggling with a confused& conflicted world, they happily yield to a church-state partnership that determines their future. After all, their 2 parents, 4 grandparents, and 8 great-grandparents survived the system, they believe.

They never consider the 5,000 year-old suggestion that female&male-human-being may constrain chaos in their way of living. Consequently, they never examine their ancestors’ participations in conflicts, and merely repeat the tradition. Meanwhile, the people who spend the time& energy to gain power and make political decisions tyrannize the proudly non-political fellow-citizens.

Secondly, some people subrogate their self-interest in politics to an association or party and thereby enslave themselves to the happiness someone else has for them. Some are even soldiers for AMO leaders (Alinsky-Marxist organizations) or the opposition.

For example, many Christian conservatives could not separate church& state enough to vote for Donald Trump, and are now facing Democrat-Party economic inflation; the Chinese Communist Party pandemic, technology theft, and Internet intrusion; no border protection; increasing entitlements to illegal aliens; runaway debt; alien power in the U.S.; and no known remedy.

We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” can end the loss& misery by restoring the 1787 U.S. intentions together with the 1776 declaration of domestic independence; that is to say, stop depending on English legal opinion and Church of England tradition.

The first step is to amend the First Amendment so as to encourage, facilitate, and practice civic responsible-human-independence (RHI) rather than accommodate the tyranny of now Judeo-Christian-Congress partnership. Let Parliament be “divine” but hold Congress accountable to RHI.

We may choose an achievable better future by accepting an ancient idea: constrain chaos by acting on necessity& justice and holding government accountable. Leave the pursuit of religion/none to personal privacy.

https://www.quora.com/Which-is-better-to-have-one-unifying-ideology-in-a-community-country-or-to-have-different-ideologies-How-would-that-impact-the-community-or-society? by Lin

I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth; that is, the-truth “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”.

I think a culture with a supermajority, say 2/3 civic-citizens, who both 1) constrain chaos in their personal way of living and 2) encourage, facilitate, and practice necessity& justice by holding government accountable is better.

 A culture in the Middle East 5,000 years ago suggested, in 2021 awareness, that female& male-human-being may provide order& prosperity to the living species and to the earth. None of the cultures that evolved since then have advocated living under the choice to 1) constrain chaos in personal living and 2) fund both law-enforcement and research to discover and enact statutory justice. Instead, thinkers construct ideologies and utopia that do not appreciate the “may” in the ancient suggestion.

Being human entails the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to choose rather than constrain chaos. Thus, there are diverse dependencies: religion, welfare, abuse, infidelity, crime, evil, tyranny, and worse. Human being acts in perceived self-interest. The child reared in unconstrained crime may think crime pays. And so far, no culture has inculcated in their youth, adults, churches, and local, state, and federal governments the principle that responsible-human-independence is in the person’s self-interest.

We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants) can restore to the U.S. the 1787 Constitution’s and 1776 Declaration’s intentions to establish 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage, facilitate, and practice responsible-human-independence to “ourselves and our Posterity”. The first step is to amend the First Amendment so as to proffer civic humble-integrity rather than civil religious-pride.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-relationship-between-human-rights-and-poverty-reduction? by Harra Mae Pañales

Necessity& justice (N& J) demand that female& male-human-being constrain chaos in this world --- behave with responsible-human-independence (RHI). The aware& informed person may comprehend, encourage, and practice (N& J) or not. In other words, human being may choose to transfer childhood dependency on parents to government, to a personal-God, or to accommodating fellow-citizens.

Whereas a foal stands on 4 legs 1 hour after delivery, it takes a human-newborn 11 months to stand on 2 feet. And it takes a quarter century for typical human being to complete the wisdom-building parts of their person’s brain. Then, they may, over the next 1-2 quarter centuries acquire the experiences& observations that persuade them that RHI is in their best interest.

Thus, N& J demand that civic-citizens both constrain chaos in their way of living and constrain dependencies, including: attempting to develop a personal-God that will usurp RHI, indolence, abuse, infidelity, crime, evil, tyranny, and worse.

If a civic life is comprised of work, study, and leisure, the minimum N& J for each person would be to earn enough to pay for their living, taxes, and savings for retirement. If 2/3 of citizens practiced RHI, they’d need to earn 1/3 extra to sustain the average dependent, or 150% of their personal needs.

We understand that our homo-branch, sapiens, is 300,000 years old, and the N& J suggestion was first expressed 5,000 years ago in Sumer. However, elites within tribes have always claimed knowledge with which to empower their tribe to supremacy in the world, often through a personal-God that usurps RHI. In other words, instead of the tribe behaving for N& J, heir tribal-God would deliver them from that humility.

Instead of educating all youth to accept these principles and take charge to acquire comprehension& intention to be complete human being, elites influence government so as to favor their own. The favor starts with elite education, about which I know little. At age 78, I have a book to read about it.

The second major element is the economic system. Career politicians maintain a theory of economic expansion. With constant expansion, government revenues always increase. And as long as commerce is increasing, entrepreneurs can claim as much profit as the consumer will pay. And if government subsidizes the consumer, there’s no limit to the profits entrepreneurs take. Most people just want to live, without taking on the difficult work and risk of providing new, necessary products& services: the entrepreneur deserves viable reward. Competitive grocery businesses take 1 to 3% profit. When an entrepreneur creates an un-needed business, corrupt government supports them anyway, so as to keep the economy expanding. For example, the gender-change entrepreneurs prey on adolescent children, and the U.S. government views it as an expansion of commerce.

The only valid human right I can cite is the opportunity to develop RHI, and that starts with considering& accepting human being. Instead, the U.S. Congress, in 1791, imposed the tradition that first you are a property of the-God, and Congress is in charge of how property is to be treated. The U.S. Supreme Court aids this tyranny over civic-people, for example in Greece v Galloway, 2014.

We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” (includes legal immigrants) can begin to reform to the intentions of the 1787 U.S. Constitution and the 1776 Declaration with its “Nature’s God” instead of the English Trinity. The first step is to amend the First Amendment in order to encourage, facilitate, and practice RHI instead of legally-imposed-religious-hope.

https://www.quora.com/Do-you-detest-people-who-have-a-lower-standard-than-you? by D. Lowe

Not at all. In fact, I am intolerant of tolerance toward my subjectivity in choosing humble-integrity by which to gage my personal integrity. When I perceive the other party is tolerant of my self-doubted political opinion, I change the subject to the weather, sports, or other small talk:  They will not learn one more sincere thought from me, until they demonstrate sufficient humility to lessen their pride. I fully accept that I could be mistaken: I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth. However, if the other party does not try to return to the serious topic, I feel they confirmed my perception.

Physically, to assure my preparedness, I trained on how to react to a gun at my nose. I feel it’s an obligation and self-interest to be strong in defense of fellow-citizens, especially self and family.

The person who pointed a gun at my nose might not fare well in the actions I take, but there would be neither hate nor detestation in my choice to take control. In constraining the offender for first responders to arrive, I would be as gentle as possible.

My intention in calling-in aid would be secondarily for the offender to reform, leaving it to statutory justice as to whether any penalties would be suffered. If I just let them walk away, I’d feel guilty of hate.

https://www.quora.com/What-makes-human-being-equal? by Felix Philip

Mr. Philip, yours is a teaching question, and I show my gratitude on my “appreciations” post at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

Human being is born totally ignorant in a confused and conflicted community& world. Unlike the foal, in 1 hour standing on 4 legs, human being takes 11 months to stand on 2 legs. Human being takes about a quarter century to complete constructing the wisdom-building parts of the brain. Psychological maturity --- responsible-human-independence (RHI) to both physical and psychological constraints --- requires 2 to 3 more quarter centuries if adolescence is surpassed.

Human being can acquire the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to pursue humble-integrity and may choose to develop either RHI or a dependency. Among the dependencies are reason, indolence, abuse, infidelity, evil, tyranny, and worse. Developing RHI requires personal-subjection to the-ineluctable-truth, most of which humankind does not know.

“Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. That word emerged in 1571 translation from an older language, and by 1906 was used to with “truth”, both as “ineluctable truth” and as “the ineluctable truth”. I add two hyphens to invite the reader not to lessen the precision& accuracy of “the-ineluctable-truth” while I listen for a better expression. Obviously, the liberal-arts professionals have “conserved” the people’s opportunity to avoid, change, and resist. Why? Opportunism?

Since no culture inculcates these principles in their members, human being is born with equal opportunity to discover them. I read, write, and listen, intending to reform human-education departments --- politics, in order to encourage, facilitate, and practice RHI.

https://www.quora.com/Do-you-believe-that-Americans-are-currently-being-underestimated-in-their-commitment-to-freedom-and-the-courage-that-many-will-display-to-protect-those-freedoms-Why-or-why-not? by Steve Blad

I do.

Not only that, I returned to my Baptist church after 30 years’ absence with a hope to aid reform with a message: there is more to be learned from the metaphysical Jesus than from precious blood. I’m not willing to say, than from the body of Jesus, because the members of my church are essential to my maturing. (In other words, I “blame” them for inspiring me to take 30 years off to discover myself: not elect to believe Jesus Christ, yet perhaps elect to believe the-God. I don’t know.

Recently, I discovered that the first literature my church relies on suggests that female& male-human-being may independently provide order& prosperity to the living species and to the world. I call it choosing to be civic-citizens and practicing responsible-human-independence (RHI). Then, right away, the literature represents a culture and its conversant-God, who chose them for kingship to the world. The rest of the literature is about tribes competing for their-God to usurp RHI in their culture’s favor.

Furthermore, I can make the case that the Jesus of “before Abraham was born I AM” is the author of Genesis 1:26-28’s suggestion to constrain chaos on earth. Thus, humankind can get the metaphorical message to constrain chaos in self-interest, while diverse believers continue to pursue the hope& comfort of spiritual pursuits or other responsible happiness.

We’ll see if my church and others can choose an unfamiliar subjectivity regarding the-God to whom everyone may reserve sufficient humility.

This is a matter of establishing independence after 233 years of Anglo-American tyranny imposed by the first Congress. We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” may amend the First Amendment so as to promote civic humble-integrity rather than civil religious-pride.

https://www.quora.com/I-pursue-the-right-the-true-and-the-good-I-aspire-for-the-good-future-How-about-you? by Spencer Ferri

I write to urge the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” to amend the First Amendment so as to encourage, facilitate, and practice the civic-integrity required for responsible-human-independence (RHI) rather than Congressional-religious-pride.

Will you help make it happen?

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meaning-of-the-phrase-inalienable-right? by Dhruval Patel

“Inalienable right” is a reasonable interpretation of John Locke fantasy in “Two Treatises of Government”, 1690: “The obligations of the law of nature cease not in society, but only in many cases are drawn closer, and have by human laws known penalties annexed to them, to inforce their observation. Thus the law of nature stands as an eternal rule to all men, legislators as well as others. The rules that they make for other men's actions, must, as well as their own and other men's actions, be conformable to the law of nature, i.e. to the will of God, of which that is a declaration, and the fundamental law of nature being the preservation of mankind, no human sanction can be good, or valid against it.”

Thus, Lockean “law of nature” is “the will of God”. It’s a false premise, because no human or society knows either the will of their-God or that the-God exists.

The only reliable human-right I am aware of is the opportunity to develop humble-integrity to the laws of physics and its progeny, including mathematics, the chemistries, biology, psychology, fiction, in fact everything that exists in any era.

330 years ago, John Locke chose to refute Robert Filmer’s subjectivity. Likewise, in 2021, we may choose to ignore Lockean subjectivity. We may accept that neither government nor the-God will usurp humankind’s responsibility to constrain chaos in this world. To the individual, that means to constrain chaos in personal behavior.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-rule-of-law-important? by Okoro Mark Uchenna

Humankind has known for about 5,000 years the suggestion from necessity& justice that each human being may constrain chaos in their way of living, in order to encourage, facilitate, and practice responsible pursuit of personal-happiness rather than submit to “communal-happiness” impositions to them. I call this responsible-human-independence (RHI) by civic citizens, where “civic” refers to fidelity in human connections more than submission to civil rules.

The person who accepts that they are a human being, may discover the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to develop humble integrity. They may choose humility to either RHI or to a dependency.

If RHI, they maintain “I don’t know” when they don’t know and do the work to discover the-ineluctable-truth if they need to know. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, a word which the liberal-arts professionals have hidden from the people, leaving them with manipulated truths, popularly called “science” and “ethics”.

Research first discovers the-ineluctable-evidence and then, if necessary, invents any new instruments of perception needed to approach the-ineluctable-truth. Before this process was understood, research was deemed unreliable in comparison with reason. However, research routinely corrects reason. Research is so reliable Jeff Bezos recently took a few passengers to weightlessness 65 miles above earth and back, in safety& security.

However, not every person is aware of civic-citizenship. In fact, no culture inculcates RHI. Consequently, many people are in a state of dependency: indolence, submission to an ideology, infidelity, abuse, crime, evil, tyranny, and worse. In order to assure a civic-people the opportunity to develop humble-integrity, the “ourselves and our Posterity” at any time must fund law-enforcement and the research to provide statutory justice.

So far, the people have counted on judicial opinion for law enforcement, and the consequence is chaos. Therefore, the basis of law-enforcement must be revised to the-ineluctable-truth. Once that is accomplished, an achievable better future, with the self-interest in necessity& justice more obvious to more citizens.

It is critical for the rule of law to be based on the-ineluctable-evidence rather than judicial opinion.

quora.com/What-embodies-your-idea-of-the-word-Liberty-which-is-so-engrained-in-our-USA-ideology-and-was-a-key-ingredient-to-setting-up-our-government-way-back-with-the-founding-fathers-do-you-think-some-of-its-value-has-been? by David Phillips

Mr. Phillips your question seems rhetorical. if so, I agree with you.

Moreover, the members of the entity We the People of the United States can . . . should establish the human-being’s individual power, individual energy, and individual authority (HIPEA) to pursue responsible-human-independence (RHI) rather than subject-to government-bestowed-liberty.

Briefly at about 98.3% of homo sapiens’ development to date (300,000 years), an ancient culture, 5,000 years ago suggested that female& male-human-being may independently provide order& prosperity to the living species and to this world, the earth. 2,000 years later, scribes codified the suggestion as the-God’s encouragement to RHI. That was in Genesis 1. But in Genesis 2, the scribes changed to a private-God communicating directly with the scribes’ ancestors. Since then, elites within races, civilizations, cultures, and societies have constructed doctrinal-Gods their tribes might accept as willing to usurp RHI so as to benefit their tribe. For example, in 1956, the USA changed its motto, applicable to the-factional-Gods, “E Pluribus Unum”, to the motto “In God We Trust” regressing RHI to competitive mysteries rather than to willing people.

Scholars often attribute to John Locke, d. 1704, the concept of humankind’s natural liberty: bestowed by the-God to the-God’s property:  Therefore, in Lockeism, no person, society, or government can deny the rights to life, liberty, and property. However, Jesus reportedly suggested appreciating temporal-Caesar for life and the-God for the mysterious soul.  Augustine, d. 430 AD, proposed temporal authority as necessary to encourage& facilitate spiritual opportunity. The Roman Catholic Church was then the major contender in this Western struggle between church and state, even though there were competing Christian orthodoxies in the world --- Greek, Russian, Ethiopian, and others. Also, there were the Jews and the Arabs and their factions, opposed by Rome. Humankind has always maintained chaos rather than developing order and prosperity, suggested 5,000 years ago.

Chaos increased when Martin Luther introduced Protestantism and two kingdoms: temporal and spiritual. John Locke, originally Calvinist but later his own Deist, helped constitutionalize a Protestant monarchy in the 1689 Bill of Rights. His advocate, Edmund Burke (d. 1797), however, accommodated the individual’s Catholic conscience. Burke opposed the French Revolution and the Thomas Paine (d. 1809) affirmation. Thomas Jefferson (d. 1826) supported separation of church and state.

The French Revolution licensed liberty to take fellow-citizens’ heads, and U.S.-Democrat cities in summer 2020 licensed liberty to kill or injure fellow citizens and trash property. Alinsky-Marxist organizers’ soldiers may consider the self-interest of RHI.

Use of RHI to read the 1776 declaration of war for independence from England and the proffered 1787 U.S. Constitution establishes intent to separate church and state, promising a republican from of government. However, the nine ratifying states agreed to add an Anglo-American Bill of Rights, and the First Congress regressed the intended RHI. Their tyranny has prevailed since then, and the Supreme Court affirms the arrogance against We the People of the United States.

We, the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” (including legal immigrants) can begin to correct the tyranny of liberty rather than independence by amending the First Amendment in order to encourage, facilitate, and practice the humble-integrity to the-ineluctable-truth that is required for RHI. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, whereas “freedom of religion” pretends the subjectivity to reject outright the-ineluctable-evidence.

No civic-citizen should be denied the opportunity to develop humble-integrity, reserving sufficient humility toward the-God --- the entity that controls the consequences of human choices.

https://www.quora.com/The-cliche-The-family-that-prays-together-stays-togethersuggests-more-than-a-religious-message-What-is-an-essay-that-provides-a-sociological-interpretation-of-this-message? by Reii Hemsworth

Mr. Hemsworth, I appreciate your question and say so in my “appreciations” post at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

In my view, psychologically-successful family-prayer is a democratic-expression of mutual commitment& integrity rather than a doctrinal ritual. By democratic, I mean each member of the family, with the fortunate family, as many as 5 generations at the table, have the opportunity to express heartfelt concern for their decade in life and receive open-minded, open-hearted, concrete ideas that may resolve the concern and teach other family members. A culture with such family prayer-practice may survive their age’s divergent chaos. For example, with such practice R. E. Lee might have sold everything and moved to a non-slave state in 1856, when Bleeding Kansas foretold the white-on-white-Christian blood-letting.

I think homo sapiens, thought to be 300,000 years old, about 5,000 years ago acquired a political suggestion that willing members may independently provide order& prosperity to living species and to this world. The message was expressed 2,000 years later as encouragement (blessing), without either facilitation, coercion, or license-bestowal, by the-God; meaning whatever controls the consequences of human choices and events, rather than a doctrinal-God or hypothesis.

Only yesterday, I accepted Jean Rafenski Reynolds’ suggestion that all my choices/opinions are subjective, even though I may claim objectivity. To Jean’s point, I know it’s customary to express “The sun’ll come out tomorrow” (a little more representative than “The sun’ll come up tomorrow”). But I choose to-say “The earth’s rotation on its axis will un-hide the sun tomorrow.” Thereby, I express preference-to the- physics rather than-to its popular-perception. I choose to express the physical facts rather than the metaphysical convention.

Once a human-being overpowers perception and shares the objective facts, it is difficult to reverse the choice --- to affirm erroneous subjectivity-to-perception. Psychologically mature human-beings reserve sufficient humility to the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”; merriam-webster.com. Similarly, a human-being may develop a personal-God for hope& comfort yet maintain sufficient humility toward the-God.

Members of the-human-species may-choose to develop the-humble-integrity that-is necessary for responsible-human-independence (RHI). For example, the person who always heard& accepted “The sun’ll come out tomorrow”, when asked if that is so, can anticipate a physics-lesson and respond “I don’t know: you tell me”. Acceptance of the physics invites more awe, such as: the earth’s surface-rotation-speed is 1,000 miles per hour; thank physics for gravity! In all things, the prudent person responds “I don’t know” when they don’t know.

A typical person may live 80 years. Homo sapiens have some 10 trillion person-years of experiences& observations. Fortunately, only the facts& discoveries that are essential-to the living “ourselves and our Posterity” need be known& utilized, responsibly/not. Some people, neglecting self-interest, choose dependency rather than RHI.

Elites prey-on dependents. For example, it matters not that Google-ngrams show “the ineluctable truth” was expressed in 1906 and “ineluctable” was used in translation in 1571. It is essential that the continuum of living human-beings subjugate to nothing less than the-objective-truth if the-ineluctable-truth has not been discovered. The-objective-truth is the result of cumulative evidence when humankind has not yet invented the instruments of perception for proof. For example, in the fifth century B.C. the Greeks suggested that the earth is like a globe and proved it 2 centuries later. Yet it was 1520 AD before anyone sailed around the world (2 thousand years later). Last week, Jeff Bezos orbited the earth and returned with passengers. In this case, the-objective-truth became the-ineluctable-truth in about about 2,400 years, in my subjectivity. (Yet there remain a few who subjugate themselves to a flat-earth, maybe 1 in 15 in some countries.) I object to the liberal-arts professions hiding “the-ineluctable-truth” from the people. I search for a more powerful expression.

During the recent 5,000 years, discoveries accelerated on research to discover the laws of physics and its progeny --- mathematics, electromagnetic forces, the chemistries, biology, psychology, imagination, and fictions. Physics-discovery during the recent 100 years has been staggering.

However, psychology was& is mired in elite competition to persuade the-God to usurp RHI, in order to favor one polity; one tribe. Beginning with monotheism, 4,000 years ago, elites have led civilizations to war under doctrinal-Gods to which the people would subjugate. The consequence was chaos rather than order& prosperity to humankind. The use of “nature” to equivocate “the laws of physics” confuses people.

In the Middle East and the West, resistance to RHI evolved into competition between Jews and others, especially Arabs and Africans 3800 years ago. Arabs adopted competitive movements that by 800 AD produced Islam. “Gentiles” accepted competitive Christian Orthodoxies in 300 to 400 AD. Catholicism encountered reform 800 years ago then factional-Protestantism 500 years ago. Ethiopian Orthodoxy demands attention in the twenty-first century. After Enlightenment, capitalism, and Industrialization, during the recent 100 years, Western psychology passed through modernism, questioning all prior authority, to postmodernism, regressing to-control humankind’s future based on reason and technology rather than the laws of physics (my subjectivity).

After the flood, it was said that the age of human-being would be 120 years. Technology is making that a potential, physical reality. However, with world debt approaching $300 trillion and U.S. debt nearing $29 trillion, many people in the world don’t know how to cope. Their chaos is catastrophic. Only the elites might want 120 years of living.

The family that prays together with open-minds& open-hearts keeps the world in the hope& comfort that peace on earth is possible, as long as the civic-people appreciate each other’s RHI in deed& word. With widespread awareness of the-ineluctable-truth and the ancient literature (Genesis 1:26-28) suggestion to RHI, a better future is attainable.

Let’s spread this message for people to consider.  

https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-feel-is-the-most-significant-and-legitimate-reason-or-reason-s-for-not-spreading-democracy? by Alex White

There are many ways to express humankind’s dilemma. During the recent 300,000 years, humankind developed into only homo sapiens. Before now, there’ve been perhaps 10 trillion person-years of experience and observation, awareness hastened by language. Discovery since grammar was invented, about 5,000 years ago, was rapid. And in the last 400 years discovery accelerated in technology but lagged in psychology. Why? What power enabled scholars to help elites constrain widespread enlightenment?

The psychologically mature human being has the individual power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to maintain the humble-integrity that is required for responsible-human-independence. However, it takes an encouraged and well-coached child a quarter-century to acquire the comprehension and intention to take charge of their person to perfect a complete, unique lifetime. It takes another quarter-century or 2 for them to acquire the experiences and observations on which to choose action or in-action for necessity and justice. No culture teaches these principles, and only by accepting civic-integrity as self-interest can a human-being aspire to succeed. But something changed.

Psychology accelerated during the last 100 years, and with Internet publication in 1993, progress became exponential. Everything that a person needs to perfect their unique person is suggested on the Internet and, moreover, in the bright faces and voices they connect-with each day.

In 1906, the then 350-year old word “ineluctable” was used to modify truth. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. Also, in 1906, the expression was specific, with the article “the”. (Today, two hyphens invite the listener not to disassemble the expression: the-ineluctable-truth.)

Ten years later, women started winning the national right to vote, awarded in 1919. Then, with the Kinsey reports of 1948 and 1953, women broke male dominance. It became clear that the female body could provide around 400 viable ova during her fertile years. An authentic woman needed an authentic man who would care for her and their offspring for life. The male was to serve woman and their family for life. When most men balked at the proposition, women fulfilled their perceived purpose without a man and eventually, without religion. The consequence is privation of self-interest never prevalent before.

For the recent 30 years, humankind has been questioning all authority. In 2021, chaos reigns and hopefully is approaching the abyss so that responsible-human-independence (RHI) may emerge at last. There are in place three documents, which if used with recent discovery to pursue the-ineluctable-truth can make an achievable better future possible.

Viewed with my meager comprehension of what humankind knows in 2021, the 5,000 year-old political philosophy that was suggested by a culture in Sumer and competitively expressed 2,000 years later in Genesis 1:26-28 means: female and male human being may independently-provide order and prosperity to the living species in this world. This principle is strengthened in the uSA’s 1776 declaration of war for independence from England together with the U.S.’s 1787 Constitution for domestic discipline.

The members of the society We the People of the United States can establish pursuit of the-ineluctable-truth, as proposed in the above three documents, by amending the First Amendment so as to practice, encourage, and facilitate civic-integrity rather than religious-pride.

The journey to approach the-ineluctable-truth is too arduous to entrust to votes of a majority who may be enthralled with perceptions and take license to shed fellow-citizens’ blood. The U.S. must uphold its promise of a republic under the-ineluctable-truth, to be discovered by the continuum “ourselves and our Posterity”.

Mr. White, I appreciate your question and say so in my “appreciations” post at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Can-a-society-permanently-enjoy-the-fruits-of-science-without-seeking-the-greatest-good-for-its-members? by David Klein

I don’t think so yet accept my subjectivity (thank you, Jean).

Let me examine the words you chose for your profound, perhaps rhetorical question. It takes quite a bit to build my argument, but I think the U.S. will reform when the society We the People of the United States amends the First Amendment so as to encourage, practice, and facilitate civic-integrity rather than religious pride. I encourage the 2021 “ourselves and our Posterity” (includes legal immigrants) to effect this reform before 2022 rolls in, so as to stop the $7 million growing debt to each member of the society of 2022 posterity, near 4,000 in number.

First, what’s “society”? It might indicate a faction of human-beings who happily both 1) benefit from research and 2) pay for the entrepreneurs& entertainers (E&E) to take the riches. If so, “members” could be the 90% who miss “the greatest good”. But “society” could express the portion of human-beings and their posterity who continually pursue necessity& justice; that is, the faction who practice responsible-human-independence (RHI) and therefore constrain dependency. It seems to me the former society is doomed to failure and the latter is approaching the abyss from which fellow-citizens who constrain dependency will reform so as to encourage& facilitate widespread participation in RHI.

Briefly, the customers must hold government (the seat of civil coercion& force) accountable for equitable rewards to suppliers (E&E) without undue wealth to the administrators who tie necessity to provision and convert fantasy into futile pursuit, for example, technology for physical gender-change with no idea where the customer’s psychology will end. I write to suggest that the individual can and therefore may constrain chaos in their way of living, and that majority membership in the society of constraint lessens the risk of divergent chaos.

Second, what’s “science”? Merriam-webster. com opines in 2021 usage “science” means “knowledge about or study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation.” I think this usage equivocates “research” and accepts the seventeenth-century, erroneous claims that “reason” is more reliable than research (because the results must be revised as researchers invent new instruments of perception). I’m less un-comfortable with Britannica .com’s “any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws.” In 2021, we’re pretty certain that chemistries --- biology and electrolysis manage psychology. Yet “general truths” and “fundamental laws” are obfuscations to “the-ineluctable-truth” and “the laws of physics and its progeny”, respectively. “Ineluctable” has been known for 450 years, and the reader is justified in asking: Why would Britannica choose “general” when “ineluctable” is known? In general, the liberal-arts professions have systematically hidden “ineluctable” form the public’s attention, delaying discovery of the phrase “the-ineluctable-truth”.  It means the-truth not to be avoided, changed, or resisted.

 

Cambridge. org/us/dictionary/english/science offers “(knowledge from) the careful study of the structure and behavior of the physical world, especially by watching, measuring, and doing experiments, and the development of theories to describe the results of these activities”.

 

I think the reason for this confusion is that “social sciences”, partnering with social-journalism, attempt to establish authority based on human subjectivity: opinion rather than physics& its progeny& source. Popular opinion would overthrow the-ineluctable-truth, if it could. See sciencecouncil.org/about-science/our-definition-of-science/.

Third, consider “research”. Cambridge suggests “a detailed study of a subject, especially in order to discover (new) information or reach a (new) understanding”. Britannica presents “Basic research is defined as the work of scientists and others who pursue their investigations without conscious goals, other than the desire to unravel the secrets of nature”. MW offers “careful study that is done to find and report new knowledge about something”. “Secrets of nature” is nostalgic enough to bemuse many fellow-citizens from their opportunity to discover the laws of physics, its progeny, and its source.

In 2021, human-beings benefit from all the discovery that has occurred before now. Jeff Bezos just returned from orbiting the earth in the former other-worldly “heavens”. Daily, new discovery provides more evidence that psychology is controlled by the laws of physics. Proof that each human-being can develop the humble-integrity that is required to constrain chaos in their way of living is exponentially observed. As more fellow-citizens accept the self-interest of constraining chaos, advances toward an achievable better future will accelerate.

The age of responsible-human-independence is dawning.

https://www.quora.com/Is-patriotism-a-myth? by Pandora Box

Merriam-webster. com tells us “patriotism” means “love for or devotion to one's country”.

I think “individual appreciation for and civic-aid to one’s country” is more realistic, and I have done that. But I did not serve in the military, so I yield the above definition to veterans, if they prefer it.

The members of We the People of the United States are patriotic, “in order to” practice, encourage, and facilitate responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our Posterity”. Posterity includes descendants and legal immigrants. Since “ourselves” is increasing federal debt, Posterity faces an increasing $7 million federal debt each.

Fiscal reform could restore widespread patriotism.

https://www.quora.com/How-can-age-diversity-be-addressed? by ValPac

If fellow-citizens at age 10 would read Kahlil Gibran’s “On Children” to their parents, then the parents read it to the children when the children are 15, then again when the children are 50, the grandchildren might benefit from the same sequence; https://poets.org/poem/children-1. 

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-in-the-US-think-that-without-property-rights-no-other-rights-are-possible-or-generally-that-property-is-an-essential-right-bound-up-with-self-and-self-ownership? by Peter Stillman

I can’t speak for “many U.S. citizens” and don’t know the-ineluctable-truth. (Check “ineluctable”, if you don’t know it.)

I think the citizens you cite value personal-privacy, in-order-to practice responsible-human-independence (RHI) and perceive it’s only possible in home-ownership on as much land as personal earnings will support.

It’s neither easy nor cheap and requires commitment to family for life; not a bad idea.

Law professors

https://lawliberty.org/judge-pryors-friendly-fire and Law & Liberty | Facebook

Professor Hadley Arkes wrote “Judge Pryor shares with us the understanding that the Constitution did not spring from a brute imposition of force—it was drawn from some anchoring “truths” about the rightful governance of human beings. As the understanding ran at the Founding, no man was by nature the ruler of other men in the way that God was by nature the ruler of men, and men were by nature the rulers of dogs and horses. The “self-evident” truth of the Declaration then was that the only rightful government for human beings drew its just powers from ‘the consent of the governed.’”

This John Locke logic is perverted: it asserts that human beings understand natural law and therefore can consent to the will of God. Locke wrote in 1690 “Thus the law of nature stands as an eternal rule to all men, legislators as well as others. The rules that they make for other men's actions, must, as well as their own and other men's actions, be conformable to the law of nature, i.e. to the will of God.”

Now that this Lockean arrogance is publically known, perhaps law professors will retreat from “natural law” equivocated as “the will of God” altogether, and begin to pursue the-ineluctable-truth to rule the law. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”. The word was translated from an older language in 1571 and used to express “the ineluctable truth” in 1906. Adding two hyphens strengthen that phrase.

The accuracy& precision of “the-ineluctable-truth” is powerful, yet I seek an even better expression. Maybe we’ll discover the source of the laws of physics and its progeny.

[We’ll see if this comment survives censorship. I doubt it.] It’s still there on 10/30/2021.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.