Phil Beaver seeks to
collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment
box below invites readers to write.
"Civic" refers
to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic
integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.
Consider writing a
personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual
appreciation: For
discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase
it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public
disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order
to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and
our Posterity”. I want to improve
my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet
would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.
It seems the Supreme
Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the
preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent
country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately
managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal.
Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for
human justice.
Every citizen has equal
opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the
preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat
to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals.
However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies
grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to
discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.
Selected theme from this
week
Personal-chaos: a choice
The suggestion that
the human-being can& may choose responsible-human-independence is recorded
in two documents: artistically in Genesis 1:28 and abstractly in the 1787 U.S.
Constitution.
Individuals in 2021 are
asking what can be done, and this week, some proposals are offered.
News
Law prof suggests rewrites of First and Second Amendments
that do not mention free press or bearing arms (msn.com) (Be
woke-to hold ineffectual the adolescent law professors)
To Donald
Adams with thanks to Joseph Doherty
The First Amendment
can& may protect civic-integrity rather than spiritualism/metaphysics. It’s
up to us, the people of 2021. The 2nd Amendment was updated by
Heller.
I have been writing proposals to amend the First Amendment since the late
nineties. In 2021, I own a personal interpretation of the preamble which
clarifies that the preamble does not include spiritualism in its 5 domestic disciplines:
Union, Justice, Tranquility, defense, and Welfare (I prefer integrity, justice,
peace, strength, and prosperity, respectively). I speculate that the 55 framers
created the perception that spiritualism is neither a civic issue nor a civil
demand and therefore must be assigned to privacy.
Only the 5-membered committee of style was privy to the debate that revised the
draft preamble from a simple presentation of the Constitution to include a
statement of intentions. Thus, even the 39 signers (thank you all) had not
discussed the U.S. purpose. We, the "ourselves and our Posterity" of
2021 can& may establish responsible-human-independence rather than
Anglo-American tradition, at last.
The foremost needed
action is to amend the First Amendment so the-good people of the U.S. practice,
facilitate,& encourage 1) civic-integrity rather than
spirituality/metaphysics, 2) speech/assembly that neither initiates nor
accommodates harm/injury to/from any person, 3) and commercially-journaling
pursuit of the-ineluctable-truth. (Scholars hide "ineluctable", first
published in 1571, which means "not to be avoided, changed, or
resisted", merriam-webster. com).
The Anglo-American dominance of 1788 imposed the 1791 mimic of England's 1689
Bill of Rights, and amendments to assure conformity to the U.S. preamble's
intentions are needed. That's a topic for another day.
Please read more
and comment at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com and at cipbr.blogspot.com.
Quora
quora.com/Can-determination-responsibility-and-respect-be-taught? by Emily Burns
I think so, but not by
the existing Education Departments. Several acceptances& reforms must take
place, so as to induce individual responsible-human-independence (RHI)
among at least two thirds of adolescents& adults.
About 5,500 years ago, a
culture, perhaps in Mesopotamia, expressed the political suggestion that
humankind can& may independently provide order&
prosperity to the lesser species and to Earth. Then about 4,200 years ago
the Code of Ur-Nammu, in
Sumerian cuneiform, listed punishment& fines in law enforcement. That is to
say, Sumerians accepted that the-good citizens must work not only to earn their
way of living but must independently pay for law enforcement&
justice-development to reform/terminate fellow citizen who could but wouldn’t
voluntarily constrain civic-chaos.
Tribes began to
construct doctrinal-Gods to empower the-good --- usurp RHI.
Tribal wars increased chaos on Earth rather than increasing peace under the
5,500 year-old suggestion. In 2021, humankind experiences& observes the
potential for chaos diverging unto ruin.
The good-people must
reform Education Departments from “training the workers we need” to practicing,
facilitating, and encouraging the civic-integrity that is required for
individual RHI. That is, they must motivate children to
choose human-being rather than an opposite: passive, vegetable, animal, evil,
or spirit.
The human-being is so
individually powerful, energetic, authoritative, and obligated-to-self (HIPEAO)
that it takes a quarter-century with exemplary facilitation& encouragement
to consider& choose the work to acquire comprehension& intention to live
a complete human lifetime. By complete, I mean achieving the RHI-perfection
of her/his unique-person, before afterdeath, that vast time after body, mind,
and person stop functioning.
No culture on earth
has Education Departments with these intentions. However, the suggestion is
recorded in two documents: artistically in Genesis 1:28 and abstractly in the
1787 U.S. Constitution.
Every
considerate-citizen could& should own a personal interpretation of the
purpose-sentence in the U.S. Constitution. My view, just now, follows: We,
the-good-citizens of We the People of the United States practice,
facilitate,& encourage 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice,
peace, strength, and prosperity, "in order to” establish& maintain
responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our
Posterity”, including legal immigrants. Notice that the preamble does not
include spiritualism/religion in the disciplines, and I appreciate independence
rather than “liberty”.
What each person needs
is appreciation-for the opportunity and determination-to develop as a
human-being.
quora.com/Are-people-usually-in-denial-of-the-facts-to-mitigate-or-circumvent-their-responsibility? by Dillon Lowe
At first, I was stumped
by “usually”.
However, necessity& justice demand that every person constrain chaos in
their way of living. If two-thirds of fellow citizens practiced
civic-integrity, there could be peace on Earth.
After 5,500 years’
grammar, humankind is travelling in space and groveling in
adult-banal-satisfaction.
quora.com/What-does-the-Bible-mean-by-Gods-chosen-people-Israelites? by Mark
Shulmann
Of course, no one knows
the-ineluctable-truth, and “scholars” have “protected” humankind from the word
“ineluctable”, meaning “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”
(merriam-webster.com opinion).
In 2021, fellow-citizens
can& may apply what humankind has discovered so far. For example, we know
that by physics& its-progeny we are exploring the former “heavens”, using
jet propulsion to attain orbit and maneuver vehicles there.
Also, we comprehend that
our mutation, homo sapiens, is about 300,000 years old. HS
developed both grammar and the transition to monotheism about 6,000 years ago.
About 5,500 years ago, a
polytheistic culture, perhaps Sumer, suggested the political philosophy, paraphrasing
to 2021 comprehension: the species female&male-human-being can& may independently
provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to Earth.
Individually& collectively, the human-being could . . . should constrain
chaos in their way of living. About 2,500 years later, Hebrew scholars
journaled the philosophy in their art. Fog over the water was the spirit of
God, and God as “we” created female& male in his image
and assigned to them sole responsibility for peace on Earth. Study Genesis 1:28
to consider my view: female& male may practice civic-integrity.
Nobody knows why the
Hebrew scholars started the Bible with the ancient political philosophy; I
think it was a mistake to their intentions. In Genesis 2, they introduced “the
Lord God” in competition with the-God of Genesis 1. Eve, rather than created in
the image of the “we” God, was taken from Adam’s rib. And instead of having the
image of the-God, Eve was gullible to a lesser species and betrayed Adam.
Later, at Sarah’s behest, Abraham did a ménage a trois with
Hagar, and created sons to beget enemies unto divergent chaos. The rest of the
Bible journals female& male infidelity in competition to persuade the Lord
God to usurp the Sumerian suggestion: responsible-human-independence (RHI)
can provide peace on earth if female& male adopt the intention.
At some point, a messiah
would make Israel rulers of humankind --- chaos enough to gentiles. However, a
Hebrew-faction opined Jesus the messiah, greatly increasing spiritual chaos.
Some gentiles created Christianity. By 400 AD there were many Christian
orthodoxies. Then in 1537 Luther unleashed Protestantism, and today there are
over 45,000 Christian sects.
Tragically, this review
touches only 4.3 billion competitive believers, leaving 3.6 billion global-citizens
subject to the civic chaos derived from Bible-spiritualties. I think, it is
past time for Bible believers to take stock of Genesis 1:28’s RHI.
Knowledge of the scholar’s forbidden word, ineluctable, might aid civic
motivation to put spiritual pursuits in their rightful place: privacy, with
humility toward the source of Genesis 1:28.
Armed with Genesis 1’s
suggestion that humankind is solely responsible for peace on Earth
Bible-derived civic-integrity could lead the world to domestic peace, preserving
to the individual the opportunity to survive and pursue the spiritual happiness
they desire rather than suffer in 2021’s diverging civic-chaos.
Can& may reflects choice. Why not peace at last?
quora.com/Do-you-believe-in-freedom-Why-What-do-you-think-about-freedom? by Esraa Ismail
I think freedom is a
false human construct that pretends life without yielding to the constraints of
physics& its progeny. To promote freedom, scholars obfuscate “ineluctable”,
which means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, merriam-webster.com.
In John Locke’s “natural
law theory” each human being is a property of what I call “Locke-God” and as
such is due life, liberty, and property. The 1774 USA founders were more
spiritually humble so changed “property” to “the pursuit of happiness”.
These developments were
influenced by “the Enlightenment” arguments over secularism vs spiritualism;
physics vs metaphysics; Catholicism vs Protestantism, not to mention Judaism,
Islam, and Eastern religions and philosophies. The 1787 framers, accepting the
world’s most diverse population, wrote a constitution grounded in domestic
discipline. They assigned spiritualism to privacy, if pursued.
The intentions to
domestic discipline are stated in the conditional portion of the 2-sentence
preamble to the U.S. Constitution. In my December 2021 view, the intentions
are: The-good of We the People of the United States, practice,
facilitate, and encourage 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace,
strength, and prosperity, “in order to” establish& maintain
responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our Posterity” including
legal immigrants. These 38 words propose a culture’s continuous journey to
perfection in necessity& justice only posterity’s posterity might imagine.
It seems a novel
proposal for peace in the U.S. that might influence peace in the world. In
other words, if two-thirds of fellow-citizens in the U.S. chose to live
according to the preamble, the civic-citizens would dominate so as to gradually
reduce living in a dependency.
However,
human-discipline is not at all novel, as the political suggestion
was expressed 5,500 years ago then artfully reported 3,000 years ago in Genesis
1. In my December 2021 view, Genesis 1:28 suggests: female& male-human-being
can& may independently provide order& and prosperity to the lesser
species and to the earth.
To obtain the fruits
of the Genesis-1 suggestion, the human-being must appreciate fellow
human-beings, collaborate to discover physics& its-progeny, and civically
benefit from the discovery. Choosing to avoid, change, or resist the
necessity& justice suggested in Genesis-1 leaves the person without freedom
from ruin.
Freedom from physics is
impossible, and responsible-human-independence (RHI) accommodates life.
Government’s function is to practice, facilitate, and encourage RHI rather than
bestow freedom and license liberty.
quora.com/unanswered/Which-human-rights-are-overlooked-but-are-important? by
Christian Mora
It takes a quarter century
for a feral human-infant to transition to young human-being with
comprehension& intention to practice, facilitate& encourage the
humble-integrity that is required for responsible-human-independence.
The opportunity to
discover& pursue humble-integrity for life is the-human-right.
quora.com/How-do-human-rights-lead-to-indispline? by James Mwansa
Mr. Mwansa, I am
grateful for your creative, brief expression concerning a constructed
conundrum, and say so in “appreciations” posted at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
People who scream about
“rights” are vainly trying to convince themselves to accept personal-living
without responsible-human-independence (RHI) and persuade civic-fellow-citizens
to accommodate dependency. In necessity& justice, humankind cannot
accommodate the imposition.
Merriam-webster.com
opines that “indiscipline” (noun) means “lack of discipline”. That empty
definition can be improved by considering the synonyms and antonyms. Also,
consider “discipline” (noun), the last of 3 applications: “the checking of
one's true feelings and impulses when dealing with others”. That’s not to
slight the first usage: “a region of activity, knowledge, or influence”,
because either accepting RHI/not impacts personal-life outcome.
Reading Wikipedia
(with the caution that it’s drift seems left-leaning), the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights is informative. “The precise meaning of
the term right is
controversial and is the subject of continued philosophical debate . .
. some thinkers suggest that human rights should be a minimum requirement
to avoid the worst-case abuses, while others see it as a higher standard.” I’m pleased that the article includes “The true forerunner of human rights discourse
was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the
medieval natural law tradition that became prominent during
the European Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke . . .” I will offer a wiki revision to
point out that Locke boasted that each human-being is the property of what I’ll
call “Locke-God”, and therefore no person is to be lessened by other people
(properties) or self.
The notion of
government owing English “rights” in the USA was contested by both the 1774 USA
founders and the 1787 U.S. framers. Only 5 days before the 39 of 55 delegates
signed the 1787 U.S. Constitution, the 5-person Committee of Style added intentions to
the presentation of the laws to “the-good People” of the USA.
In my December 2021
view, the intentions are: The-good of We the People of the United
States, practice, facilitate, and encourage 5 domestic disciplines ---
integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to”
establish& maintain responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and
our Posterity” including legal immigrants.
The U.S. citizen who
perceives sympathy/empathy for anyone who demands “rights” has not come to
grips with what it means to be one of the-good among We
the People of the United States. The-good citizen appreciates a fellow-citizen
enough to clearly, kindly rebuke them when they offend, confirm that the
accused received the rebuke, grant time for them to consider the rebuke&
evaluate the incident. The appreciative-accused may rebut the rebuke if necessary
or accept responsibility if the accusation is ineluctably-true, repent&
apologize, and appreciate forgiveness. The accuser forgave the moment the
accused showed appreciation-for attention-to-the-incident and if presented
with ineluctable necessity& justice to recant, perhaps
personally-reform, does so. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or
resisted” merriam-webster.com. Responsible fellow-citizens stand ready to
repeat the appreciation-cycle-of-rebuke as often as needed, always collaborating
for civic-integrity.
Such principles
emerged not only from the domestic 1787 U.S. Constitution and the 1776
declaration of war against England, but from a 5,500 year-old Sumerian
political philosophy artistically recorded in Genesis-1. In my 2021
view: Necessity& justice inform female&male-human-being that
they can& may independently provide order& prosperity to the lesser
species and to the earth.
Every human-being
can& may choose to practice civic-integrity rather than demand “rights” to
be provided by fellow-citizens who practice, facilitate, and encourage RHI and
will not accommodate fellow-citizens’ intentions to dependency.
In other words, peace
on earth is an individual-human-responsibility& appreciative-obligation,
not a right.
quora.com/Does-every-individual-have-the-responsibility-to-act-in-a-manner-that-is-beneficial-to-society-and-not-solely-to-the-individual? by Justine Reyes
As personal chronology
demands the human-being to develop self, necessity& justice make it plain
that he/she may take charge of constraining chaos in their way of living. In
other words, responsible-human-independence (RHI) is in the individual’s
self-interest.
We have evidence that
this principle was expressed in a Mesopotamian culture nearly 6,000 years ago,
perhaps in the polytheistic Sumer, some 5,500 years ago. However, 2,500 years
later, Hebrew scholars reported the suggestion as a demand of “the Creator” or
“God”. “We” created “male& female” in “his” image. That’s in Genesis 1. However,
in Genesis 2, Hebrew scholars expressed “the Lord God” as taking woman from
man’s rib, refuting the Genesis 1 “we” create male and female in “his image”.
Further the scholars have Eve betray Adam, initiating a trend in Bible stories
thereafter. Thus, the scholar attempt to establish Genesis 2 “the Lord God” in
a hierarchy superior to the-God.
The rest of the Bible is
a journal of the expanding competition for a higher power that will usurp the
female& male-human-being RHI to the living species and to the world, and
the consequences of individual choices to foster banal appetites that lead to
ruin rather than peace on Earth.
Every person has the
opportunity to accept the obvious: constraining chaos in your-chosen
way-of-living is in your personal best-interest, and society is the incidental
beneficiary of the individual’s civic-integrity. And we, the 2021 “ourselves
and our Posterity” are without excuse for accommodating Judeo-Christian chaos
in the pride of the First Amendment’s freedom of religion to Congress rather
than practice, facilitation, and encouragement to domestic civic-integrity.
The U.S. and the world
suffer divergent chaos as a consequence of 5,500 years’ competitive quest to
find a personal-God that will overturn the-God in favor of “my tribe”.
Of course, I don’t claim
to know the-ineluctable-truth, so only write my opinion. I’m just glad to know
“ineluctable”, which means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”,
merriam-webster. com. And we can& may amend the First Amendment for
civic-integrity.
Law professors
lawliberty.org/melville-thoughts-on-liberty/
English
Professor John E. Alvis reminds me that just when you think you have a novel
thought you happily discover someone already published parallel thinking. I’m
sincere in “happily”, because the discovery affirms your line of thought.
Recently,
I have written in various forums that the only valid human-right I can imagine
it the opportunity to develop the civic-integrity required for
responsible-human-independence (RHI). I assert that this public discipline is
expressed for the USA in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. Alvis,
erroneously I think, reaches back to the 1776 declaration of war for
independence from England and forward to Abraham Lincoln’s unfortunate use of
the declaration to supersede the Constitution, but otherwise parallels some of
my arguments.
Quoting
Alvis, “. . . political liberty for
slaves and for non-slaves alike is at stake in America’s Civil War . . .
inconsistency in respect of national first principles . . . ‘all men are
created equal’.” I contend that the declaration of war negated superiority of
each kings over individuals and Parliament over Congress. Also, reference to
Nature’s God and “pursuit of Happiness” rebuked Locke-God’s property-ownership
of human-beings. Nonetheless, the 1787 Constitution benefited from the national
pressure to provide for emancipation of the slaves, and the framers paved the
way, as Frederick Douglas said in his 1852, “4th of July”
speech in Rochester.
Again, “. . . a central
character who seeks to assert a freedom he conceives as independence . . . the
pursuit of freedom must be so conducted as to acknowledge and observe cognate
responsibilities . . . a liberty to discharge duties is the most valuable of
freedoms . . . man’s freedom is his greatest instrumental good because whether
exercised for good or for ill, it is the faculty which distinguishes human
beings from the lower animals . . . the American Constitution provides best
ground for cultivating self-mastery.” In other words, Abraham Lincoln’s
revisionist history is not worthy: the declaration of war led to the U.S.
opportunity to devise a republic founded on domestic discipline, and the
framers go the job done.
What’s wonderful about
Professor Alvis’s commentary on Melville’s legacy is that, ignoring Lincoln’s
unfortunate bemusement, they affirm the 5,500 year old political philosophy
that is expressed, in light of humankind’s discoveries since then, that
humankind can& may independently provide order& prosperity on Earth.
The philosophy is expressed, in 3,000 year-old local-scholarship in Genesis
1:28 and affirmed in the 1787 U.S. Constitution.
I just read
lawliberty.org/melville-thoughts-on-liberty/ and so wish to compliment it's
impact on liberty& freedom vs independence& duty.
I urge you to consider
restoring your earlier provisions for readers to comment any time they wish. I
realize controversies arise. However, America is about the
responsible-human-independence and duty to comment.
Happy 2022.
Phil Beaver
Facebook
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
12/25/2021
Necessity& justice
demand that every person constrain chaos in their way of living. If two-thirds
of fellow citizens practiced civic-integrity, there could be peace on Earth.
After 6,000 years’
grammar, 300,000 year-old homo sapiens is travelling in space and groveling in
adult-banal-satisfaction.
In 2020, the living
"ourselves and our Posterity" can& may stop the divergent chaos.
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
12/24/2021
Please remember to look
up "ineluctable", first published in English in 1571. It means
"not to be avoided, changed, or resisted" (the merriam-webster.com
opinion).
Ineluctable was
published with "truth" and "the . . . truth" in 1906. I
like to use hyphens to invite the reader not to disassemble the phrase,
the-ineluctable-truth. (Thank you, Harold Weingarten, in a 2006 forum.)
Influential law
professors and Justices "protect" us from this knowledge so as to
preserve their "wisdom" in developing the-rule-of-law according to
legal-precedent rather than the-ineluctable-truth. Beware “original meaning”.
By virally sharing this
2021 knowledge, we, "the-good People" among We the People of the
United States can& may, in 2022, initiate civic-integrity in the USA; that
is, chosen, individual& collaborative responsible-human-independence rather
than continually-bemusing-government bestowed-freedom and licensed-liberty.
As we go forward, ask
everyone you appreciate if they know “ineluctable” (perhaps anyone who offers
"hello"). If “Yes”, ask what it means to future human-appreciation.
If they don’t mention “the-ineluctable-truth” share that it is not to be
avoided, changed, or resisted. Add your improvement to my opinion that our
government is in divergent chaos after 234 years’ neglect of the “ineluctable”.
facebook.com/sherri.joubert, 12/24/2021
Happy birthday, Sherri
Here's a powerful word
the scholars have "protected" us from knowing: ineluctable. It means,
"not to be avoided, changed, or resisted", merriam-webster.com.
It was first published
in 1571 in translation to English. In 1906, it was published in the phrases
"ineluctable truth" and "the ineluctable truth". I
discovered these facts after asking, has my development
"the-ineluctable-truth" (thanks to Harold Weingarten, PhD, Chemist,
recently moved from BR to California) been published before? The hyphens invite
the reader to not disassemble the phrase.
In the future, if I am
to witness to something in court and am presented an oath, I will pose 1 or 2
questions. Certainly, I will ask what "truth" I am being asked to
represent. After the response, I will make the statement that I will answer
"I don't know", when that is so, and to
"The-ineluctable-truth" in case I know it; for example, my name is
Phil.
I suspect law professors
influence "scholars" to "shield" us from
the-ineluctable-truth so that they can manipulate political power by keeping us
bemused with "legal precedent". The scholars perceive preservation of
high salaries by nurturing the bemusement indefinitely, all with immunity
because it is traditional. We are now living the consequence: divergent chaos
in the USA.
Thank you for the Higgs
b post. The-metaphysical-Jesus is to human-appreciation what the Higgs boson is
to force-resistance. The human-being appreciates fellow-citizens, in-order-to
practice, facilitate, and encourage the-good. We fellow-citizens appreciate
Sherri Joubert.
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
12/23/2021
Civil rights? The
opportunity to discover& pursue humble-integrity for life is
the-human-right.
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
12/22/2021
Belief in doctrine
prevents humility to both self and the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable” means
“not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, merriam-webster.com.
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52,
12/22/2021
Belief in freedom
prevents responsible-human-independence, first privately then collectively.
facebook.com/phil.beaver.52, 122121 (A
2022 view of the “Golden Rule”?)
The appreciative caution/rebuke cycle: a 2021 view of
"the Golden Rule"?
Practicing Leviticus 19:17-18, "[Caution] your
neighbor frankly [in-order-to appreciate him/her] as yourself."
Conversely, upon receiving rebuke/caution, appreciate the opportunity to
discover/approach the-ineluctable-truth according-to necessity& justice.
In a civic-culture, the cycle of mutual appreciation
--- speaker perceive harm/injury & caution/rebuke; listener consider &
respond/reform; speaker forgive/respond, is repeated as often as harm/injury is
observed.
The person who tries to avoid, change, or resist
caution/rebuke, invites woe.
I don't like being instructed to "rebuke" my
neighbor, yet I think communication is essential to fulfilling our obligation
to provide peace on Earth.
Friends, please suggest improvement.
Phil Beaver does not
“know.” He trusts in and is
committed to the-objective-truth which can only be
discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously
does not work.
Phil is agent for A
Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit
corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays
from the latest and going back as far as you like.
No comments:
Post a Comment