2022: the people can& may unleash the-ineluctable-truth

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for individual happiness with civic integrity more than for the city, state, nation, or society.

Consider writing a personal paraphrase of the preamble, which offers fellow citizens mutual appreciation:  For discussion, I convert the preamble’s predicate phrases to nouns and paraphrase it for my interpretation of its proposal as follows We the People of the United States proffer & practice 5 public disciplines —- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” encourage & facilitate responsible-human-independence “to ourselves and our Posterity”. I want to improve my interpretation by listening to other citizens and their interpretations yet would preserve the original, 1787, text, unless it is amended by the people.

It seems the Supreme Court occasionally refers to it, and no one has challenged whether or not the preamble is a legal statement. The fact that it changed this independent country from a confederation of states to a union of states deliberately managed by disciplined fellow citizens convinces me the preamble is legal. Equity in opportunity and outcome is shared by the people who collaborate for human justice.

Every citizen has equal opportunity to either trust-in and collaborate-on the goals stated in the preamble or be dissident to the agreement. I think 2/3 of citizens try somewhat to use the preamble but many do not articulate commitment to the goals. However, it seems less than 2/3 understand that “posterity” implies grandchildren. “Freedom of religion,” which fellow citizens have no means to discipline, oppresses freedom to develop integrity.

Selected theme from this week

2022: the people can& may unleash the-ineluctable-truth

“Ineluctable” was published as a translation in 1571. It was published with truth as “ineluctable truth” and “the ineluctable truth” in 1906. These facts may be viewed on the Google ngram viewer. So far, I have not discovered the publishers of the phrases.

I am proud of my education: Staub Elementary, Tyson Jr. High, West High school, and the University of Tennessee, all in Knoxville. I am also glad that my wife, Cynthia, and our 3 children and our associations taught me the can& may of being a human-being.

Yet I object that my educators, “journalists”, professors, scholars, the clergy, Justices, and politicians left it to a chemical engineer to coin the phrase the-ineluctable truth, the hyphens inviting the listener to not disassemble the phrase. My list reminded me of philosophers, so I searched “ineluctable” at plato.stanford .edu with its 11 documents and found no “ineluctable truth” and ep.utm .edu with its 4 documents and none with “truth”.

In my few contacts, I perceive a certain portion of our fellow-citizens resist the phrase “the-ineluctable-truth” for reasons they may comprehend. However, not one civic-citizen has expressed less than delight on being informed to consider it. Especially when I share the scenario of being sworn in to testify and clarifying with the judge that you are swearing to the-ineluctable-truth: when you express, “I don’t know” that’s as far as you will go, when that is so.

Justices& lawyers who encounter the public unleashing of the-ineluctable-truth will be prudent to take appreciative caution not to attempt to avoid, change, or resist the tsunami-like reformation of the rule of law based on legal precedent to law grounded in the-ineluctable-evidence.

I am grateful to Harold Weingarten, who in 2006 asked: Are you citing ultimate truth, absolute truth, God’s truth, or Phil’s truth? In perhaps 2019 or later, the articulation “the-ineluctable-truth” emerged.

It’s pursuit was expressed in the 1787 U.S. Constitution, repressed by the 1789 Congress, and since then bemused by the U.S. Supreme Court. We, the 2022 “ourselves and our Posterity” can& may unlock the-ineluctable-truth for eternity.

Quora

quora.com/Confucius-said-To-see-what-is-right-and-not-to-do-it-is-want-of-courage-or-of-principle-What-would-you-say-is-a-good-modern-example-of-this-happening? by Graham C Lindsay

People can& may speak to the-ineluctable-truth, often admitting to self, then in public, lack-of-knowledge (simply, ignorance). Unfortunately, many people accept belief.

“Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” merriam-webster .com, a word published 400 years ago and used with “truth” 116 years ago.

quora.com/What-do-you-think-is-the-common-good? by Liezl Cayanan

I think necessity& justice motivate the human-being to practice, facilitate, and encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI). Relying on the-ineluctable-truth, the individual can& may independently constrain chaos in their way of living. The consequence of constraining chaos is fidelity in human connections and transactions.

But not every person chooses the civic-integrity required for RHI. Some persons prefer dependency, and some of them take advantage of the civic-people. For example, some people think crime pays. Others strive for tyranny over the minds of men --- psychological tyranny.

Among the psychological tyrants of the past, none has generated more loss in fewer centuries than the Englishman John Locke, d. 1704. Locke seems the source of the erroneous, RHI-distracting term “common good”. He uses it 3 times in “Two Treatises of Government”, 1690.

But here’s Locke’s worst, to my knowledge: The emphasis is mine in, “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker; all the servants of one sovereign master, sent into the world by his order, and about his business; they are his property, whose workmanship they are, made to last during his, not one another's pleasure: and being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us, that may authorize us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for [our uses]”.

Physics and the-ineluctable-truth do not yield to reason. Nature is physics and it answers to the laws of physics. To purport to behave for the common good takes hubris against the-ineluctable-truth, most of which has not been discovered. That is, the-ineluctable-truth exists, but most of it is not known.

I do not know the-ineluctable-truth, so can only share my opinion, which I did. To see how insignificant my considerations are, search “the common good” at plato.stanford.edu/. Notice that 2,870 documents were found. The first, “The Common Good”, 2018 is 24 pages long and scholarly. It mentions Locke 5 times without referencing the Locke-tyranny I raised above.

I recommend forgetting “the common good”, in order to focus on civic RHI. It clearly strives to preserve the opportunity to pursue the-good, which requires the civic people to constrain dependent fellow-citizens, some of whom can but won’t reform. John Locke could but wouldn’t, I think; we, the-civic-people, need to stop accommodating the loss and misery.

quora.com/How-does-the-USA-balance-the-rights-of-the-individual-and-the-cohesion-of-the-state-and-nation? by Graham C Lindsay

Mr. Lindsay, thank you. I think you are correct to imply that the U.S. is a strange metaphysic: the individual human-being can& may have sovereignty in their state and nation; city as well, and within some cities, residents in some subdivisions may tax homeowners to fund additional security, common grounds maintenance, perks for their governing board and such. In Kenilworth Subdivision, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, and earth, I resist adding another layer of political oppression a subdivision board offers. I practice, facilitate, and encourage responsible-human-independence (RHI).

We understand homo sapiens is about 300,000 years old, and about 5,500 years ago, cuneiform law-codes established civic constraints; for example, widows and orphans would not pay taxes, and criminals were punished not for revenge but to constrain crime and reform offenders. “Civic” implies fidelity in human connections& transactions. The polytheistic cultures credited the Gods rather than necessity for inspiring justice. In other words, they expressed dependency rather than self-interested independence.

Metaphysical dependency evolved from primitive perceptions. For example, the sun often killed people. Some people speculated that the sun is a supernatural power that demands human flesh. Some developed human sacrifice to bargain favor from a tribal Sun-God. In 2022 human sacrifice is almost extinct, and we comprehend the sun is a natural nuclear reactor. Sun-Gods are obsolete, but diverse-God-doctrine persists.

Primitive attitudes toward the sun illustrates that even fiction is a progeny of physics -- through the un-discovered laws. Mankind observes physical phenomena and begins the process of comprehension. If human perception cannot design the research to unlock the unknowns, the human-being tends to adopt their favored speculation and call it belief. Thereby, they repress their potential for discovery; perhaps the perception was false, like a mirage. In their self-interest, they ought to conduct a process: I think I observe something, research to discover any reality and meaning, on failure to prove its reality, wait for a new perspective by which to resume the research. Meanwhile, accept and proclaim when needed: I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth.

Physics& its progeny manage evolution in response to changes in the environment. The laws of physics control the consequence of every action, and physics’ progeny increase/decrease in number with changes in the universe. For example, plasma chemistry could not produce the elements until the universe cooled enough. And placental mammals were not possible in earth-atmosphere with only 10% oxygen (200 million years ago) compared to 21% now.

Cuneiform script was developed in Sumer, in ancient Mesopotamia. The kings who authorized it had no idea that dinosaurs had existed 65 million years ago. Otherwise, they might not have claimed that human-being can& may order the earth so as to dominate the lesser species. Nevertheless, we, the people of 2022 who seek the-good can be grateful to the culture that suggested a political philosophy: human-being can& may independently provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to the earth. To the individual, the cuneiform message seems:  Human-being, you can& may independently constrain chaos in your way of living. That personal politic seems like RHI to me.

Then, like now, tribes competed for survival. Polytheists changed to fewer, stronger Gods. Eventually monotheism dominated, with particular tribes bargaining with their God for favor. Instead of many Gods controlling cultural speculations, one God controlled everything for a particular tribe. At war, one’s God would defeat the other’s God. The Western politics of RHI could not develop under human-dependence on diverse Gods.

Competing monotheisms accelerated when the metaphysical Abraham emerged, about 4,200 years ago. Ignoring the potential for chaos, he and 3 wives created competing descendants. The consequence is a world with 45% non-Abrahamic people with particular cultures and the rest Abrahamic descendants with competing cultures. Chaos increased to divergence.

Briefly, the sequence of events pivotal to my response, Mr. Lindsay, is: 300,000 years ago homo sapiens branched off from bipeds; 6 thousand years ago a culture suggested RHI; 3 thousand years ago scholars attributed RHI to God rather than to necessity& justice, spiritualism rather than physics; 1700 years ago competing cultures canonized Bibles claiming Jesus is the-controversial-God – anywhere from Unity to Trinity; 566 years ago, papal bulls “authorized” slavery, African slave-trade to expand the kingdom of their God; 400 years ago, Europe, at war over Protestantism began colonizing N. America and soon imposed slavery for agricultural labor; 234 years ago, the free& independent USA issued a Constitution that proposes RHI to every citizen; 230 years ago Congress repressed the 1787 U.S. Constitution by ratifying the 1791 Bill of Rights, in order to re-store British tradition in the USA. In 2022, the-good people can& may adopt humility to whatever-controls-the-consequences-of-human-choices.

This year, 2022, is the first year since the significance of the-ineluctable-truth has been fully expressed. “Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted”, merriam-webster.com. Someone published “ineluctable” in 1571 translation from a foreign language, so it has existed at least 400 years. It was published with “truth” as “ineluctable truth” and “the ineluctable truth” in 1906. I added hyphens to invite the reader to not disassemble the phrase. Without “the”, false truths can be imposed on unsuspecting thinkers.

By focusing on the now un-hidden word, “ineluctable”, and applying it to discover the-ineluctable-truth, the-good people of the U.S. can accept RHI and may apply it to constrain chaos in their personal way of living. Necessity& justice requires them to constrain fellow-citizens who choose dependency rather than civic-integrity.

The can& may of the human condition, together with the power of the-ineluctable-truth, seems proposed in the 1787 U.S. Constitution. We, civic-citizens among We the People of the United States can& may establish a culture of humble-integrity. We’ll have to amend the Bill of Rights to empower an achievable better future.

In the U.S., it’s a matter of evolution more than revolution, because the 1787 U.S. Constitution (235 years old) comports to Genesis 1:28 (5,500 years old).

Can-you-help-me-understand-Romans-7-15-25-What-does-it-fully-mean? by Donna Rayne

First, I can only share my opinion, because I do not know the-ineluctable-truth, which a considerate human-being works to discover (during their individual, 2nd through 4th quarter centuries, after the 1st quarter century to personally accept being a human-being). Fortunate is the person who employs experiences& observations intending to perfect their-unique-good before death.

Second, I think the Bible canonizers erred when they included Genesis-1, a 3,000 year old comprehension of a 5,500 year-old political philosophy, perhaps from Sumer.

I assert “erred”, because a modern, 2022 comprehension (based on the recent 5,500 years’ discovery) holds Genesis-1 to be artful, neglected awareness-if-not-advice, astonishingly at the dawn of both grammar and monotheism. Then, perhaps 150,000 year-old language& primitive knowledge could be used to ponder individually then collaborate in essential pairs, female& male, then in groups.

Humankind divided into two groups according to willingness to choose for necessity& justice or banal satisfactions --- responsible-human-independence (RHI) or dependence; physics& progeny or metaphysics; the-ineluctable-truth or speculation (belief). Those 2 groups subdivided unto 2 diversities. In subsequent millennia, diversity diverged unto chaos.

My 2022 comprehension of Genesis 1:28 is this: female&male-human-being can& may independently provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to Earth; provide peace; constrain chaos in personal behavior& in societies; develop humankind. The rest of Bible canon debates whatever-controls-the-consequences-of-human-choices. Restating, the rest of the Bible journals, through 2000 years ago, how “Western” civilizations developed today’s Western chaos.

If these opinions seem plausible if not reliable, consider how to apply them: Societies ought-to practice, encourage, and facilitate self-discipline to all citizens. That’s the can& may, and there remains the how. I contend that each person self-disciplines by learning-to-apply the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable”, first published 400 years ago in translation, means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” merriam-webster .com. In practice, each individual can& may accept& declare, “I do not know”, when they don’t know. If necessary, they share hard-earned opinion, claiming it is not the-ineluctable-truth.

Now, to your question:  By developing integrity to the-ineluctable-truth, each human-being can& may appreciate& avoid the miserable dependency Paul expressed in Romans 7:15-25. Paul shamelessly cries “my mind . . . a slave to God’s law . . . my . . . nature a slave to . . . sin” as though there is no Paul-personal-discipline to consider! Moreover, Paul disassembles the Trinity in “. . . God . . . delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!” He essentially discounts the-God for “our Lord” and the Old Testaments "the Lord God" and others OT Gods. And where’s his regard for the Holy Spirit?

The Christian scheme -- canonizing Jesus to compete with the Gods of the Bible is a consequence of group-search for reliable dependency – bargaining for the-God that is willing to usurp the civic-RHI that was suggested 5,500 years ago. Let me say that again: civilizations seek a God that will claim to usurp RHI.

In Sumer’s era, the individual faced the uncertainty of physics& its-progeny, as we do today. Long before, even more primitive humankind observed that the sun could kill (now we know due to overexposure) and imagined the sun a supernatural power, eventually labeled “God”. Many civilizations bargained with sun Gods, and many speculated that the-God demands human flesh. Some sacrificed their excellent citizens to the-God. Now, despite extant-modern human-sacrifice, we know the sun is a natural nuclear reactor, yet have not overcome dependency on the-God for competition among self, individuals,& groups.

In addition to spiritual hope& comfort to believers, does Jesus offer civic influence? I think so:  Jesus’s cryptic messages empower the metaphysics: our collective quest to discover and apply the-good. Recall, we are at the advancing edge of 300,000 years’ homo sapiens psychological development. We are obligated to our posterity, including our direct descendants.

Just as Paul expressed opinion 2,000 years ago, Ralph Waldo Emerson expressed opinion 184 years ago: “Alone [Jesus] estimated the greatness of man . . . God incarnates himself in man, and evermore goes forth anew to take possession of his world. But what a distortion did [Jesus’] doctrine and memory suffer . . . Christianity became a Mythus, as the poetic teaching of Greece and of Egypt”.

Emerson advanced the-metaphysical-Jesus, the human collaboration to consider Jesus’ reported statements: be perfect [in your can& may], before founders were born I am, help your magistrate constrain chaos, you are gods-facing-death, be humble, be peaceful, and more.

It seems Jesus affirmed Genesis 1:28, and we good-citizens can& may practice, facilitate, and encourage civic-RHI while privately pursuing personal-spiritual-happiness.

I hope this helps and would appreciate your improvements on the opinions I expressed. I expressed gratitude to you, Ms. Rayne, today at “appreciations” on promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

quora.com/Should-people-be-allowed-to-force-their-religious-beliefs-on-others? by Zara Samsin

The person who appreciates& accepts that they are a human-being is a god-facing-death and therefore ought to respond to necessity& justice. However, not every person accepts that they are a human-being, perhaps until death confronts them with the-ineluctable-truth.

The human-being can& may choose to be religious, and if so, religion does not relieve them of 2 self-interests: civic-integrity and spiritual-humility.

First, civic-integrity demands responsible-human-independence (RHI); thereby, civic-citizens rely on neither religious-doctrine nor civil-rule for good-citizenship. They neither initiate nor accommodate harm/injury to-or-from any person/association.

Second, even though they hope-with& take-comfort-in their spiritual-beliefs, they retain appreciation& humility to whatever-controls-the-consequences-of-human-being-choices, for short, whatever-judges-personal-choices, or response-to-can& may. In other words, they never leave it to their person to approve their spirituality.

Under these principles, no one can force religious-beliefs on appreciative-human-beings. However, if someone chooses to try, the human-being accommodates the effort for 4 reasons. First, by allowing the speaker, the listener creates personal-opportunity to learn. Second, by sincerely listening, the human-being may choose to improve their opinion. Third, by considering the speaker’s opinions, the listener might suggest improvement the speaker can use. Fourth, the accumulated chaos on earth is lessened each time 2 people sincerely talk, and together they might create a message all fellow-citizens can& may consider.

My thought is: never pass an opportunity to consider a peaceful fellow-citizen’s heartfelt civic-concerns, no matter what they are.

Samsin, I think your question is awesome, and I express gratitude today at “appreciations” on promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

quora.com/Am-I-the-clearly-intended-and-expressed-beneficiary-of-the-U-S-Bill-of-Rights/answer/Phil-Beaver-1?__nsrc__=4&__snid3__=31120722531&comment_id=241297513&comment_type=2? by Richard Kohn

Fascinating: “extremely interesting” or not AMO (Alinsky-Marxist organized).

If my dream comes true, Congress soon informs SCOTUS that legal precedent can no longer supplant the-ineluctable-truth. The ABA (and all state bar associations or equal), as of this moment, are awakened to public awareness of the word “ineluctable”. Consequently, the ABA researches foreign-language equivalents, its English publication in 1571, publications “ineluctable truth” and “the ineluctable truth” in 1906, and publication with hyphens so the phrase cannot be disassembled — “the-ineluctable-truth”. Most of it is unknown and humankind works to-discover and-use it to reduce chaos to the living species, to the Earth and beyond.

Law school? Are you kidding me? There is no way I would have discovered “ineluctable” and “ineluctable truth” if I had attended law school.

History? There’s no way I would own comprehension of the U.S. preamble by which to guide my civic decisions if I had studied history. Chemical engineering gave me the physics-integrity by which to discover metaphysical-integrity.

If you are unable to read these thoughts, I suggest: get to work. You can& may learn. I cannot teach you.

And your suggestion that I would move away from the USA-republic suggests that the first class you should take is basic reading without emotions.

Best wishes, and thank you for the response. Come again if you have something that might improve my work, just for phunn, or for your purpose again.

Law professors

quora.com/May-God-with-integrity-practice-infidelity-and-abuse/answer/Simon-Binks-2/comment/73410777?__nsrc__=4&__snid3__=3250589111  from last week

To

Facebook

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52, January 14, 2022

People can& may speak to the-ineluctable-truth (tIT), often admitting to self, then publically declaring privation-of-personal-knowledge to tIT. Unfortunately, many people accept/promote belief.

“Ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” merriam-webster .com, a word published 400 years ago and used with “truth” 116 years ago.

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52, January 12, 2022

I think the Bible canonizers erred when they included Genesis-1, a 3,000 year old comprehension of a 5,500 year-old political philosophy, perhaps from Sumer.

I assert “erred”, because a 2022 comprehension (based on the recent 5,500 years’ discovery) holds Genesis-1 to be artful, neglected awareness-if-not-advice at the dawn of both grammar and monotheism. Then, perhaps 150,000 year-old language could be used to think individually and collaborate in essential pairs, female& male, then in groups.

Two groups divided according to willingness to guide actions for necessity& justice or none --- responsible-human-independence (RHI) or dependence; physics& progeny or metaphysics; the-ineluctable-truth or speculation (belief). Those 2 groups subdivided unto 2 diversities. In subsequent millennia, diversity has diverged unto chaos.

My 2022 comprehension of Genesis 1:28 is this: female&male-human-being can& may independently provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to Earth; provide peace to most living individuals& to Earth; constrain chaos in personal behavior& in societies; develop humankind. The rest of Bible canon debates whatever-controls-the-consequences-of-human-choices, both individual& group actions. Restating, the rest of the Bible journals, through 2000 years ago, record how “Western” civilizations developed today’s Western chaos.

If these opinions seem reliable, consider how to apply them: Societies ought-to practice, encourage, and facilitate self-discipline to all citizens. That’s the can& may, and there remains the how. I contend that each person self-disciplines by learning-to-apply the-ineluctable-truth. “Ineluctable”, first published 400 years ago in translation, means “not to be avoided, changed, or resisted” merriam-webster .com. In practice, each individual can& may accept& say, “I do not know”, when they don’t know.

By developing integrity to the-ineluctable-truth, each human-being can& may appreciate& avoid the miserable dependency-expressions Paul shared in Romans 7:15-25. Paul shamelessly cries “my mind . . . a slave to God’s law . . . my . . . nature a slave to . . . sin” as though there is no Paul-personal-discipline to consider! Moreover, Paul disassembles the Trinity in “. . . God . . . delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!” He essentially discounts the-God for “our Lord” and the Old Testaments "the Lord God" and others.

The Christian scheme -- canonizing Jesus to compete with the Gods of the Bible is a consequence of group-search for reliable dependency – bargaining for the-God that is willing to usurp the civic-RHI that was suggested 5,500 years ago.

In Sumer’s time, the individual faced the uncertainty of physics& its-progeny. Long before, even more primitive humankind observed that the sun could kill (now we know due to overexposure) and imagined the sun a supernatural power, eventually labeled “God”. Many civilizations bargained with sun Gods, and many speculated that the-God demands human flesh. Some sacrificed their excellent citizens to the-God. Now, despite modern human-sacrifice, we know the sun is a natural nuclear reactor, but have not overcome dependency on the-God for competition among self, individuals,& groups.

In addition to spiritual hope& comfort to believers, does Jesus offer civic influence? I think so:  Jesus’s cryptic messages empower the metaphysics of our collective quest to discover and apply the-good. Recall, we are at the leading edge of 300,000 years’ homo sapiens psychological development. We are obligated to our posterity, including our direct descendants.

Just as Paul expressed opinion 2,000 years ago, Ralph Waldo Emerson expressed opinion 184 years ago: “Alone [Jesus] estimated the greatness of man . . . God incarnates himself in man, and evermore goes forth anew to take possession of his world. But what a distortion did [Jesus’] doctrine and memory suffer . . . Christianity became a Mythus, as the poetic teaching of Greece and of Egypt”.

Emerson advanced the-metaphysical-Jesus, the human collaboration to consider Jesus’ reported statements: be perfect in your can& may, before founders were born I am, help your magistrate constrain chaos, you are gods-facing-death, be humble, be peaceful, and more.

It seems Jesus affirmed Genesis 1:28, and we good-citizens can& may practice, facilitate, and encourage civic-RHI while pursuing personal-spiritual-happiness in privacy.

facebook.com/phil.beaver.52, January 10, 2022

Here are some ideas in language few care to comprehend, as the U.S.-chaos diverges.

My prime thought is: never pass an opportunity to consider a peaceful fellow-citizen’s heartfelt civic-concerns, no matter what they are.

The person who appreciates& accepts that they are a human-being is a god-facing-death and therefore ought to respond to necessity& justice. However, not every person accepts that they are a human-being --- perhaps until death confronts them with the-ineluctable-truth.

The human-being can& may choose to be religious, and if so, religion does not relieve them of 2 self-interests: civic-integrity and spiritual-humility.

First, civic-integrity demands responsible-human-independence (RHI). RHI-civic-citizens rely on neither religious-doctrine nor civil-rule for good-citizenship. They neither initiate nor accommodate harm/injury to-or-from any person/association.

Second, even though they hope-with& take-comfort-in their spiritual-beliefs, they retain appreciation& humility to whatever-controls-the-consequences-of-human-being-choices, for short, whatever-judges-personal-choices, or response-to-can& may do good. In other words, they never leave it to their person to approve their spirituality.

Under these principles, no one can force religious-beliefs on appreciative-human-beings. However, if someone chooses to try, the human-being accommodates the effort for 4 reasons. First, by allowing the speaker, the listener creates personal-opportunity to learn. Second, by sincerely listening, the human-being may choose to improve their opinion. Third, by considering the speaker’s opinions, the listener might suggest improvement the speaker can use. Fourth, the accumulated chaos on earth is lessened each time 2 people sincerely talk, and together they might create a message all fellow-citizens can& may consider.

Cleve Wright

Hey buddy

PRB: Shipbuilder, if anyone ever asks me, Phil can you say you have friends, I will respond, "Yes. Contact Cleve Wright and when you are convinced, I'll give you another friend's name."

So, I wanted to expand on my 2-decades-old phrase "god-facing-death" and googled to find Jesus' statement about it in the Bible. I thereby stumbled upon a comprehensive article: ucg. org/the-good-news/the-surprising-sayings-of-jesus-christ-you-are-gods.

The author, Tom Robinson, did not mention Genesis 1:28, a 5,500 year-old political philosophy coming from Sumer, from which Israel emerged 3,000 years ago. The Genesis-1 author understood the creator made female& male in "our" image. Considering all that humankind has discovered in the recent 5,500 years, my comprehension of V 1:28 is: female&male-human-being, you can& may independently provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to the earth.

I think that infers that the infant who lives within practice, facilitation, and encouragement to choose to be a human-being, can& may perfect their person before ineluctable death. A person can discover this on their own, but that is unlikely.

Another point that Robinson overlooks is that the-god-facing-death can only practice integrity during life, so the doctrine to live for resurrection may be flawed. It may be that some church doctrine defies Jesus.

Phil Beaver does not “know.” He trusts in and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. Conventional wisdom has truth founded on reason, but it obviously does not work.

Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com, and consider essays from the latest and going back as far as you like.