Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: Willing people in our state routinely, voluntarily collaborate for comprehensive safety and security: continuity (for self, children, grandchildren & beyond), integrity (both fidelity and wholeness), justice (freedom-from oppression), defense (prevent or constrain harm), prosperity (acquire the liberty-to pursue choices), privacy (responsibly discover & pursue personal goals), lawfulness (obey the law and reform injustices); and to preserve and cultivate the rule of law for the USA’s service to the people in their states.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward the preamble.
Our Views (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_1dae8216-4572-11e7-987e-17aac9980507.html)
It seems dialogues on racism turned to community
vigilantism and on to systematically illegal behavior. It seems the fault of We
the People of the United States.
CAO seems a modern case of taxation without representation.
It's unbelievable that food, games and trips for accepting elders has taken
more importance than preventing and correcting child abuse or providing home
care for the infirm.
The past generations have left it to us to establish
comprehensive safety and security, offered as a civic agreement in the preamble
to the constitution for the USA.
I relish a future with civic morality and public
integrity, and don’t want to leave it to our children, grandchildren or the
posterity beyond them to initiate that privilege.
After 230 years’ neglect, let’s willing people among
We the People of the United States get an essential job done; establish a
culture of comprehensive safety and security wherein every no-harm society may
flourish and dissidents are encouraged to reform by example.
Let’s make America great, and let it begin now in
Baton Rouge.
Is good good
enough? (Christopher Simon, Page 4D, July 15). It’s the Euthyphro question:
If good is good, what good is God? See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthyphro_dilemma
.
Letters.
Liberal media lies (Jones,
July 15). (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_c7b2f23a-67e9-11e7-b96e-bf1f8ab32227.html)
I never voted
for Barack Obama and never will. (In my eighth decade, John Bel Edwards taught
me the value of “none of the above.” But when Obama won, I told MWW: At least
the liberal democrats will get their chance to operate under the rule of law.
Little did I know that Obama would destroy the republican form of government as
much as he could. I want to restore the rule of statutory law.
President Trump
has the best chance to turn America’s diversity into public integrity and a
better future; in other words, make America great rather than “great again.”
I’m talking about comprehensive safety and security as expressed in the
preamble to the constitution for the USA, a civic agreement. I wrote that if he
won the presidency, it would take him three years to figure politics out.
When I voted
for candidate Trump against all the GOP alternates in my state, I felt the
other candidates had no chance of leading Americans to comprehensive safety and
security. When DNC chose Hillary Clinton, I voted for Donald Trump because I
wanted no more Clinton domineering and to stop extension of Barack Obama’s
ruinous intentions for the USA.
I was incredulous
when Trump blasted Hillary, choice media, and friends at the Al Smith dinner:
youtube.com/watch?v=NnRVAzFa6Og . Apparently, he knows politics pretty well,
and I like his trailing "We'll see."
I was tenfold
incredulous when I saw the tears and heard the anguish of the liberal democrats
on November 8, 2016 and tenfold on the tenfold when it went on for weeks, with
liberal democrats showing how publically nasty they are. They still have not
decided to get on with their personal lives.
Everyone knew
that Donald Trump staged a beauty contest in Russia in 2013. The liberal
democrats see therein the possibility to diminish President Trump. Meanwhile,
he is doing the job we twice-voters voted for.
When someone I have worked with before calls me and says, "Phil, I have an opportunity you can't pass up," I respond, "OK, what is it." If it is nothing, I say, "No thanks." I would not accept anyone's advice not to listen, and by all means, if there was nothing to it, I would not stir up the FBI. They are busy with comprehensive safety and security.
It matters not
to us whether you are a willing citizen or a dissident, but we appreciate your
expression of opinion. If President Trump makes America great for the first
time, you will be glad for the two-voters.
He said it
won’t be easy, but together we’ll get the job done. We hope “together” will
include you.
To
Philip Frady:
You're wrong. I
wrote: "Obama would destroy the republican form of government as much as
he could."
First, let's
examine "republican form of government." What does that mean, and
where is it specified?
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
China’s evil (Rich Lowry).
nationalreview.com/article/449359/donald-trump-china-no-china-isnt-going-lead
The press would
do itself a favor to move past its delusion with evaluating twitters. Readers
are bored with what the press has to say about twitters.
Landrieu such an easy target Broome makes a bid to surpass
his national status (Jeff Sadow). theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/jeff_sadow/article_0bafc49c-67de-11e7-a384-1b59ed98a39f.html
Sadow may have missed that Baton Rouge Mayor Broome will be
traveling for national attention. I’d never heard of it before, but “Broome
will present a case study on plans to revive the North Foster Drive Corridor in
the hope of ending the perception of a “tale of two cities” that exists in
Baton Rouge, the news release states.” See theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/article_f4c04ff4-68e1-11e7-afb3-c363c18dd576.html.
Landrieu may be jumping on global
warming just in time to associate with the deniers of the-objective-truth and
may be surpassed by Mrs. Broome. That could be good for Baton Rouge and New Orleans,
but I have not yet dreamt how.
Rotten tax code (George Will).
patriotpost.us/opinion/50126
I long for relief from the annual pain. Also, my memory is
lessening, and that adds to my accounting grief. Give me a flat tax!
The Advocate promotes egregious
scare-press, Page 1B (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/article_e7c0e582-6591-11e7-83ad-9b65a5595b32.html).
I
guess The Advocate is initiating a campaign to distract from fake-press to
scare-press. It’s disappointing ---shameful---to say
the least. Readers: be on alert.
Readers who
would like to read something definitive about deniers may find relief in Oren
Cass's "How to Worry about Climate Change," National Affairs, No. 30,
Winter 2017, page 115. He gives a catalogue of more worthy worries, like
250,000 medical-care deaths/year---an actuality rather than a computer-modelled
prediction.
Or read his
more recent "Climate-Change Activists Are the Real Science Deniers,"
at: nationalreview.com/article/447215/climate-changes-activists-are-real-science-deniers.
Quoting, “. . . climate activists delighted in
defining their opposition [deniers], with help from prominent figures such as
Barack Obama, who in 2014 used Twitter to condemn “climate change deniers” and
promote a website, run by Organizing for Action (formerly Obama for America).
(I had not realized before
that Obama was a twitter. I’ll stop thinking President Trump invented
presidential twitting.)
Office of Constituent Services, page 3B (John Bel Edwards)
Phone (225)342-7015 or (866)366-1121. gov.louisiana.gov/page/contact
Phone (225)342-7015 or (866)366-1121. gov.louisiana.gov/page/contact
Is it at 5550 Fla Blvd. La Resource
Center for Educators?
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment