Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with
people who may follow the blog.
Note 1: I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
Our Views (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_f8fb5098-5b83-11e7-8b78-830e10ac79b9.html)
To Barry Gautreaux: The Advocate has a talent
for turning the-objective-truth into poetic mush with no direction. “Green
grass, blue skies and the chance to play,” might be alright after expected
hammers have fallen.
Here’s
the view from one citizen. Gov. Edwards may reform anytime to make the people
of Louisiana No. 1 for his administration. And the rest of the administration may
help Edwards.
The
Advocate may plug “stop the Louisiana giveaways” into its lobby for budget
reform.
The
universities, both Southern and LSU, may admit to the harm of hosting black
separatist movements, and express that they are separatists plainly, when they
visit Baton Rouge. Free speech works both ways, but freedom of the press is
selective for reasons the press knows.
Recognizing
the gross injustice of vigilante communities, inviting tragedy only to serve a
law-suit cottage industry, may be reformed both by the people and by the court
system.
Baton
Rouge is home of A Civic People of the United States, and in three short years,
about fifty people meeting at EBRP libraries and in private have developed the
idea for a super-majority of citizens, perhaps 2/3, to collaborate for
comprehensive safety and security using the-objective-truth and the purpose and
goals expressed by a willing people. The agreement is in the preamble to the
constitution for the USA.
We hope
2/3 of Baton Rouge citizens will participate by Constitution Day, September 17,
2017. If nothing else, read, comprehend, paraphrase, adapt for 2017 living, and
restore your preamble to the original statement. Then practice, celebrate, and
promote the preamble’s civic agreement, while continuing to pursue responsible
personal preferences, such as worshiping your God or none.
However,
you will not see more than these suggestions, because civic justice comes from
the people who want comprehensive safety and security, which can be coerced by neither
government nor God: Civic justice may come from the people.
Letter, June 29.
Against
the people (Sickels). (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_a2a3edc2-5ce6-11e7-81c5-4332399ebbe1.html)
Joe Diogenes I work for comprehensive safety
and security as specified by the preamble to the constitution for the USA.
Most intellectuals are too intellectual to understand the preamble.
Witness: June
21, 1788 was not, before 2017, the fourth promotion at Main Library, Baton
Rouge, celebrated as Personal Independence Day. It commemorates the
establishment of the preamble and the amendable constitution for the USA by the
people's representatives in nine states. They ratified the world's first and
only government of, by, and for willing people (a civic people, according to
the preamble). People in the nine states left people in the remaining four
states the opportunity to either join or remain free and independent.
Based on the
preamble, the people are divided between the willing and the dissidents, some
of whom must be constrained by statutory law. The opportunity to join a civic
people is available for every citizen at every moment and place.
It is fitting that National Independence Day, July 4, follows Personal Independence Day, June 21. A nation that oppresses some of the people is a tyranny. Only when there is freedom-from oppression may each citizen acquire the responsible liberty-to pursue private preferences rather than the dictates of a civilization.
The people may use the preamble, and if a super-majority will, American may be great.
Joe Diogenes again: OK, good.
Share with your intellectual friends that the preamble is a civic agreement that has nothing to do with secularism vs religion. Each citizens may know whether they trust and commit to the preamble or are dissident to it, by reading and comprehending it.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Barbarism (Rich Lowry).
nationalreview.com/article/448994/medicaid-expansion-ahca-democrats-rhetoric-remains-hyperbolic
Research shows
that personal care is four times more effecting than medical care for personal
well-being.
How come
Obamacare supports the doctors and insurance companies instead of the people?
President Trump
is for the people. However, both the Republicans and Democrats seem to be for themselves.
Each of them is
on the chopping block, and they are on their own. President Trump is for the
people and will continue to press in their best interests.
Meanwhile, the
media is lost and I have no idea how they can be redeemed. Nothing they write
or say adds up.
Some states misrepresent their citizens (Page 2A).
startribune.com/trump-voting-commission-will-get-limited-state-voter-data/431925093/
Citizens want comprehensive safety and security in
voting, too. People in states that do not cooperate with voting panel lose
their opportunity to collaborate with citizens in other states for improvements.
Citizens in non-collaborative states (Ca, KY, MA, MI, MS, NM, NY, SD, TN, VA
and D.C) may contact representatives and governors for reform.
The preamble specifies a voluntary democratic republic (Page
13A). washingtonpost.com/national/as-july-fourth-approaches-americans-debate-democracys-fate/2017/07/01/98260d86-5e66-11e7-aa69-3964a7d55207_story.html?utm_term=.bf748d9ddea0
It is interesting that Hillel Italie does not even
mention the preamble to the constitution for the USA. The preamble is a civic
agreement to be entered by willing people who would collaborate for justice for
the people. The essence may be paraphrased as follows: Because we want comprehensive
safety and security, willing people in our states arrange and authorize a representative
republic to serve the people in their states. The preamble defines a democracy
of the willing, a civic people, vs the unwilling, the dissidents, who make up
the rest of the people. It’s “We the People of the Unites States” managing a
representative republic to serve the people.
I wonder if Italie could perceive this concept, and if
so, could he promote it.
The preamble is the greatest civic sentence ever
composed, and for 230 years it has been neglected by not only by the people but
by the civic people.
Italie’s article seems more anti-Trump than
pro-people, and perhaps that is why he overlooks President Trump’s promise in
his first inaugural address, “January 20th 2017, will be remembered as
the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.” Of course, I think
the people have always neglected the preamble and therefore never have been the
rulers of the nation, in comprehensive safety and security, as intended. Thus,
I voted twice for Donald Trump thinking he has the best chance of making America
great more than great again.
Italie chooses scholars who don’t
convince me they know anything. For example, Gordon Wood: “The
founders believed in equality but they essentially meant equality of opportunity.
Sons of weavers and cobblers could go to college and become gentlemen, but
weavers and cobblers themselves were not to become politicians and campaign for
office." Abraham Lincoln, a log splitter and surveyor became
president.
Italie uses the ideas of Joseph Ellis
to argue that 1) the Declaration of Independence established claims against the
King, which seems true, whereas 2) the constitution would use federalism to
hone democracy. Maybe it Italie that does not recognize that the constitution
for the USA promises a representative republic.
Itallie especially overlooks that the
USA does not report to the Economist Intelligence Unit, and European
intellectuals misunderstand the preamble to the constitution for the USA
because political regimes here influence the people to neglect the preamble.
I appreciated reading the opinions
that Thomas Paine advocated for democracy, Jefferson near anti-federalist, and
Hamilton and Jefferson for a strong administrative branch. I wonder if the
Broadway play of the same name depicts Hamilton as perceiving “America’s ‘disease’
was ‘democracy.’” I doubt it is that detailed.
It seems Italie is a liberal-democrat, one of
those erroneous people who wish the USA was a democracy. According to the majority
vote, Hillary Clinton would be president. However, the USA is a republic under
the rule of law, and candidates must campaign to win the Electoral College.
Likewise,
civic justice must pass the House, with a representatives closely apportioned
by population, and the Senate, with 2 per state. It then must pass possible
veto by the President. One of these branches may bring the Supreme Court in if
there is constitutional doubt. Once again, democracy is foiled by the republic.
Thank goodness.
Spanish support (Page 13A).
abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/trumps-white-house-ignoring-spanish-speakers-48389934
Spanish speakers who do not learn English are at a
disadvantage in the USA, and it is good that the White House nudges them to
learn.
When I was an
expatriate in Greece, 1792, I was learning Greek at a rapid pace and love the
phrases I can still recite. The Greeks never tired of teaching me.
Papal business as usual (Page 13A).
philly.com/philly/news/religion/20170701_ap_f95dacc56ed44740afe8464db684b9f8.html
It seems appropriate for the pope to be businesslike
and fire another wayward cardinal.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment