Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: Willing people in our state routinely, voluntarily collaborate for comprehensive safety and security: continuity (for self, children, grandchildren & beyond), integrity (both fidelity and wholeness), justice (freedom-from oppression), defense (prevent or constrain harm), prosperity (acquire the liberty-to pursue choices), privacy (responsibly discover & pursue personal goals), lawfulness (obey the law and reform injustices); and to preserve and cultivate the rule of law for the USA’s service to the people in their states.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward the preamble.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Psalms 14:15-16, CJB)
“The eyes of all are looking to you; you give them their
food at the right time. You open your hand
and satisfy the desire of every living thing.”
and satisfy the desire of every living thing.”
Dean says “God is amazing. He takes care of all.”
David and Dean are “insiders,” whatever that is.
Other forums
To Leonard Marx:
I assume “This makes no sense,” refers to my comments.
I was constrained to ponder, “What’s the motive for writing
such scorn?” I have no idea what “this” refers to, but I advocate that American
citizens use the preamble to the constitution for the USA in order to effect
self-governance.
Leonard Marx’s comment gave me a new perspective on AMO:
Alinsky-Marxist organizing. Alinsky Rule No. 5: "’Ridicule is man's most
potent weapon.’ There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also
works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.” Once a
person is aware of this rule, he or she is immune to ridicule, but looks on the
party who employs it as weak.
W. F. Buckley, Jr., said “Alinsky is twice formidable. For
one thing, he is very close to being an organizational genius.” See archive.org/stream/nsia-fbi-alinsky/Alinsky,%20Saul-HQ-2_djvu.txt.
Their debate at youtube.com/watch?v=OsfxnaFaHWI literally ends with Alinsky’s
idea of when vigilantism is justified: when equality and dignity are denied.
Both equality and dignity are subjective issues and should never be used to
justify violence.
Many people fear---are not prepared for---the civic agreement
that is stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA, and they do
everything they can to keep willing people divided. Meanwhile
posterity---children, grandchildren and beyond---are being saddled with
enormous adult debt. I work to defuse the power of ridicule and the
subjectivity of “equality and dignity.”
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment