Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth,
which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the June 21, 1788 preamble: We the civic citizens of nine of the
thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated
herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and
perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA. Composing
their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive
whether they are willing or dissident toward its principles.
Readers who like to understand
American history that avoids conflicting scholarly opinion about it may study
the documents. For example, the colonial charters, the declarations from the First
Continental Congress, the Articles of Confederation, the fact of surrender (to
France and the states) at Yorktown, the Treaty of Paris, and the draft
constitution for the USA.
Then, applying experiences and
observations through 2018, the person may form an autodidactic summary. Mine
goes like this:
The indigenous people on this continent
had no sense of property ownership or competitive theisms. The Europeans who
agreed under colonizers to cross the Atlantic to settle this country were
escaping religious persecution and classism established by the
clergy-baron-partnerships (for example, Magna Carta in England and the Vatican’s
doctrine of discovery). European commoners knew nothing about survival in an
unsettled land, but learned from the people who had inhabited the land for millennia.
By about 1720, loyal European
subjects who were also settlers realized they were being made slaves to England
and to supervision of the African slave labor being placed here. They requested
self-rule rather than imposition of laws from across the Atlantic. Unheard,
they changed their style from colonists to statesmen. They began writing state
constitutions and later declared independence from England. With France’s help,
they won England’s treaty as thirteen free and independent states (even though
eight were slave states). Some inhabitants were dissident, and some dissidents
returned to Europe, some taking slaves with them. The people who remained were
divided: patriots, passives, resentful loyalists, and slaves. After four years,
patriots realized they could not survive as free and independent states and
called a convention to strengthen the Articles of Confederation.
The result was a draft
constitution dated September 17, 1787, which was not signed by the dissident
1/3 of the convention’s delegates (Rhode Island sent none). Accordingly, some
states held ratification conventions, and on June 21, the ninth required state
had ratified, establishing the USA. The nation had not existed beforehand. The four
dissident states remained free and independent, but one more had joined before
the USA began operations on March 4, 1789. Thus, the First Congress took
actions that represented only ten of the thirteen states.
Among the First Congress’s early
actions was awarding themselves divine legislative status by hiring Protestant
chaplains. They restored the clergy-legislature-partnership according to
English custom but under American theism. The USA’s journey stayed on this erroneous
path ever since, but restoration to the American discovery now seems underway.
Through the documents, we
perceive that the 1787 signers of the draft constitution perceived American
freedom-from coercion and force with liberty-to pursue personal happiness
rather than someone else’s ideal or doctrine. With these first principles, we have experienced
the possibility for private liberty with civic morality in various public
meetings at EBRP libraries.
Humankind does not yet know what
the American discovery is. However, it may be close to this: In only the human species,
each individual has both the potential physical power and potential
psychological power to accept the authority to establish responsible freedom in communications
and behavior. That is, when two individuals converse and act, whether in public
or in private, each has the authority to collaborate for mutual justice. In
other words, both parties neither impose nor brook force or coercion. How and
why this human, individual authority came to be is not essential to the brief
lifetime each human may enjoy. Only fidelity to the personal authority is
critical. However, it is important for clergy-politician-partnerships to avoid
attempting to limit or usurp an individual’s authority to collaborate for
responsible freedom at any point in their lifetime.
A free an irresponsible press represses their writers’ opportunities
to collaborate to discover responsible freedom during their personal lifetimes.
We hope 2018 is the year of reform to a free and responsible press, at least in
Baton Rouge.
Today’s thought, G.E.
Dean (Psalms 33:4 CJB)
“For the word of ADONAI is true, and all
his work is trustworthy.”
Dean says, “We can always count on God to do the
right thing. Have faith in God.”
David and Dean each claims that he speaks for either Adonai,
the Lord, or God. The mystery is not trivial, and it is not unfortunate that
each person has the authority to resolve the mystery using responsible freedom.
Letters
State services are
going to be pushed back to the states (Knight, Dec 27) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_bbdd6cca-e6cd-11e7-b719-e73caac85d4f.html)
To Michael D. Day:
Another guy did the same thing in 2011, and Cy Rawls came to
your defense: ://theadvocate.com/.../article_159a82ad-46c0-5f7f-8c7c....
“Eight years” ago reminded me of journalist Bill Bankston (d. 2015). Thank you.
“Eight years” ago reminded me of journalist Bill Bankston (d. 2015). Thank you.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts, or actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth
of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic
People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See
online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment