Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Human psychological power

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
"Civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for responsible freedom more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase of the June 21, 1788 preamble:  We the civic citizens of nine of the thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services to us by the USA. I am willing to collaborate with other citizens on this paraphrase, yet may settle on and would always preserve the original text.   

Our Views (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_e31df22a-0205-11e8-bd9c-cf0c75799bc1.html)

The Advocate argues with itself for 99% of this opinion, but then concludes with the same old song: The Advocate favors picking the people’s pocket so Gov. Edwards will have more money to spend. I oppose The Advocate and Gov. Edwards.
  
Today’s thought, G.E. Dean (Proverbs 10:7-9 CJB), The Advocate, January 29, 2018, 5B.
The memory of the righteous will be for a blessing, but the reputation of the wicked will rot. Wise-hearted people take orders, but a babbling fool will have trouble. He who walks purely walks securely, but he who walks in crooked ways will be found out.

Dean, about V. 7, says, “How will you be remembered?”

As a citizen who collaborated at home and in public for private liberty with civic morality no matter what came. As a chemical engineer whose reactors will not blow up.

Letters

Responding to Edwards’ and The Advocate’s AMO attacks (Waguespack) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_e5bd6c04-0525-11e8-965b-f34fad0d30e3.html)

It is amazing that both The Advocate and Gov. Edwards use AMO tactics to address Waguespack. They have my attention, and I am focused on the good Waguespack offers.

I could understand a debate between Waguespack on his own and Dardenne according to The Advocate, but the fight they have picked? I don’t understand.

Money talks (Wharton) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_28568a08-0519-11e8-acf5-237421469838.html)

It seems to me education expense has become top heavy in administration. However the administration is not doing too well.

In these parts, there’s a big emphasis on social democracy, dialogues on racism, Marxism, government provision of human rights, and such. The American focus on consequences of the ancient, African commodity---Africans---does not compete well on the world stage. Other countries do not study black history. Until we wake up to these bad influences---lessening human, personal authority to collaborate for responsible freedom---we will continue to be 51st in a field that is perhaps 22nd in world competitive status.

Ms. Evans said it better: When there are citizens interested in education for the sake of learning then there is community support.

Other forums

quora.com/What-is-our-purpose-both-as-an-individual-and-as-a-society

Only the human individual has the physical and psychological power to collaborate for responsible freedom and to constrain, first, by civic example and, second, through statutory justice the persons who do not develop fidelity to the-objective-truth.

This tripartite statement covers the individual and the civic culture with its dissidents. It comes from the preamble to the constitution for the USA, which offers a culture that the citizen may either choose or neglect. By choices made, citizens choose associations—-societies.
  
I want to unpack this loaded response. First “human” denotes that other living species cannot control individual energy or behavior. “Collaborate” implies that in civic connections and transactions neither party cooperates-with or subjugates-to the other; but both parties behave so as to conform to the-objective-truth; in other words, neither party either imposes or tolerates force or coercion. 

“Responsible freedom” is required for personal liberty. “Civic” refers to human connections and transactions that provide both parties comprehensive safety and security; in other words, private liberty with civic morality; in other words, human justice. “Comprehensive” implies secure personal motivation, inspiration, spirituality, goals, dreams, and happiness; in other words, public and private connections conform to the human mandate: First, do no harm. “Statutory justice” refers to written law and law enforcement that is maintained at the leading edge of discovery of justice according to the-objective-truth rather than dominant opinion. “Fidelity to” is a comprehensive practice—-fidelity: to the-objective-truth, to self, to immediate family, to extended family and friends, to neighbors, to the people (nation), to the world, and to the universe, both respectively and collectively. “The-objective-truth” can only be discovered; it exists; it does not yield to reason, revelation, assumption, or any other intellectual construct; for example, the earth is like a globe rather than flat; and lying never pays.
    

Phil Beaver does not “know” the actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth which can only be discovered. He is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment