Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: We the willing people of nine of
the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals
stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity,
liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning
on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble
and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.
I expressed in this forum my support
for gas tax to generate $0.7 billion/yr or 5% of a backlog. I kept waiting for
Gov. Edwards to follow my lead---to respond to a civic people of Louisiana. But
I never heard a word from him.
I'm not
everywhere all the time. Maybe The Advocate is aware that Gov. Edwards
encouraged legislators to vote for the tax. If so, The Advocate should say so.
If not, The Advocate should say so.
After all, The
Advocate may be a free and responsible press and thereby inform the people rather
than keep them out of the flow of essential information. I don't know
the-objective-truth.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Cannizzaro (James Gill)
(theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/james_gill/article_bbc0334a-b4d6-11e7-b038-bf7ac7da0a92.html)
I wonder how
the police---the first responders---feel about this DA’s operations and the
judicial system involved.
Landrieu (Dan Fagan) theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/article_494ae432-b534-11e7-8c75-3373da686a9e.html
I appreciate Fagan and The Advocate for publishing his
column.
I once visited New Orleans often. During five decades I
slowly reduced frequencies, both in time and in space to reduce risk. Now, I
only go under social pressure, but never by choice. If there’s music I’d like
to hear, as in the past, I play some youtube hits or surrogates. I prefer to escort visitors to Lafayette; New
Orleans is different but not worth the risk.
If there are many Louisiana residents like me, it seems to me the governor would take interest in the comprehensive safety and security of Louisiana citizens, even if the mayor could not care less.
Senator Kennedy (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_97614c24-b5e3-11e7-b12c-03cc1747bab9.html)
The Advocate
would pull my chain!
Forget about
this rumor. No way do civic citizens (including some GOP members) want to lose
Senator Kennedy’s Congressional vote. But The Advocate would like that, so they
report, perhaps request, a pollster’s speculation.
Pollsters express the opinion that public policy is set by public polls.
Pollsters, sometimes paid by the media, use social science, a misnomer, to
design polls to create what Oren Cass calls “Policy-Based Evidence Making,” in
National Affairs, No. 32, Summer 2017, page 52. See online at nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/policy-based-evidence-making.
Instead of freely
and responsibly reporting, the political press exploits public innocence.
Yesterday, Walter Williams called it “public ignorance,” but I am loath to accuse
the public when the press so egregiously abuses the First Amendment. Of course,
I write my opinion.
On the other
hand, I do encourage the public to practice rather than merely refer to the
preamble to the constitution for the USA. On that one sentence, we are divided:
Civic citizens versus dissidents to mutual, comprehensive safety and security---in
other words, justice.
Threatening NYT slant (nytimes.com/aponline/2017/10/20/world/asia/ap-as-china-north-korea-the-influence-myth-.html)
The caption
suggests a regional power contest, relieving my fear of nuclear attack.
And the view
from China is portrayed as ad hominem attack on the head office.
But Foster Klug
and the AP dump the responsibility not on the region, but on me: “As
China rises as an economic, military and diplomatic heavyweight whose reach
extends from the Americas to Asia, many here resent being dragged down by an
impoverished, stubborn, Third World dictatorship that allows its people to go
hungry while its leader lives in luxury and expands a nuclear arsenal that
could lead to war with Washington.”
Klug mixes regional military threat with international
politics as though Washington is the world-police headquarters.
Civic citizens should be able to sue Klug and the AP for
placing me in harm’s way. Let’s change the First Amendment to protect free and responsible
expression, then pass legislation that says that press writers who use
ostensible news articles to express political opinion may be fined up to two
years’ salary for minor offense with jail time when there is more potential
harm, such as this case.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment