Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: We the willing people of nine of
the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals
stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity,
liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning
on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble
and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.
I agree.
Kennedy seems politically astute to establish the idea early.
See kennedy.senate.gov/content/sen-john-kennedy-r-la-speaks-senate-floor-push-one-time-investment-infrastructure.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Proverbs 3:27-29 CJB)
“Don’t withhold good from someone entitled to it when you
have in hand the power to do it. Don’t tell your neighbor, “Go away! Come
another time; I’ll give it to you tomorrow,” when you have it now. Don’t plan
harm against your neighbor who lives beside you trustingly.”
Dean says “Don’t wait to do good. Do it now.”
Solomon’s message is more explicit than Dean’s. Folks like
Dean utilize mystery to dust me off whereas Solomon might like my idea of
collaborating for civic morality even though our religious hopes may differ.
Letters
Civic Justice (Westmoreland)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_3037822e-b8ff-11e7-86c9-77f5af6fd3ec.html)
Thank you for
sharing your view.
I advocate civic
justice and will take deeper interest in the sentencing. See foxnews.com/us/2017/10/26/bowe-bergdahl-trial-searcher-thought-was-going-to-die-in-afghanistan.html.
From the Fox news, it does not seem the media community, perhaps including
Bergdahl’s defense team, is attentive to that fact. That does not negate your
view about Army policy.
Here’s one of
many reports of the Coast Guard incident: washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/11/bergdahl-discharged-coast-guard-joining-army-memo/.
To Scuddy
Leblanc: In quality-control
training, I learned that 85% of reportable incidents trace back to management
failure. If, in a depressed state, someone known for depression wandered away
from his post and was captured by the enemy, it seems to me the bosses who
hired a depressed person bear some responsibility for the six lost soldiers.
We need more facts to understand.
Dyslexia (Cassidy)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_864dcf76-b8fd-11e7-a0f4-d7768255d7ba.html)
The other day,
I expressed hope the legislature will approve Rep. Franklin Foil’s original
proposal---to increase TOPS requirement to 3.0 GPA---in order to create money
for things like K-12.
Please add
support for children who suffer dyslexia to my plea. Citizens including
legislators may do all they can to help children in need.
Other forums
quora.com/Whats-the-most-important-belief-required-in-order-to-be-in-love
First, “in love” is a practice that
requires two adult parties. Each intends to take care of the other for life.
Their bond is distinguished by the experience that each has the comprehensive
fidelity to self in order to trust and commit for life.
By “adult,” I mean not only chronologically
old enough for their bodies to have completed construction of the wisdom parts
of the brain (age 23 if female and 25 if male), but psychologically
mature in basic knowledge, comprehension, understanding, and intention to live
a full, meaningful life. This includes the understanding by which to decide
whether to mutually commit to procreation or not. A spouse who does not want to
mutually care for children and grandchildren should not be forced to procreate.
I think (do not know) that other
human bonds are based on attraction or appetite satisfaction rather than
comprehensive fidelity. Without fidelity, bonds usually dissolve.
Bonding for life is unusual. I
recall that perhaps 1/8th of civil marriages are monogamous. However, from
experience, I think a person may know when they 1) intend to be true to self
for life and 2) have found their spouse for life—-someone liked and who has the
same intention.
I think that before that bond has
formed there are other candidates in the world, but once a person has found
their spouse, other intimate conversation is out of the question as a matter of
fidelity to self.
To be true to self, a human cannot
demand that his or her spouse compromise or subjugate. In other words, the
search for spouse entails discovery of compatibility and intention to
collaborate for a spousal institution that is more psychologically powerful
than the separate spouses.
This view of “in love” only seems
daunting. I do not think it is. I was attracted to many persons, dated some,
tried intimacy with some, proposed and agreed to marry one, and then I
discovered my spouse. My mom observed it happening and regretted to lose hope
for a prestigious match. I flew to visit my friend and tell her I had to be
true to myself then began to woo my bride, now of 48 years, with each day
better than the day before.
I hope this helps.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment