Friday, October 6, 2017

October 6, 2017

Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to write.
Note 1:  I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
 Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver:  We the willing people of nine of the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.  
  
Our Views (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_eebdfd32-a549-11e7-ae20-cf5624b27507.html)

I asked myself before: Why do you, Phil, so frequently oppose The Advocate’s views? This morning’s writing gives me a clue. The Advocate’s writers don’t perceive the human condition as naturally non-divisive. In other words, divisiveness is learned.

The Advocate does not import to me the universally obvious reality --- the-objective-truth: All people share the path toward civic morality and the present space-time on that path.
  
The Advocate fruitlessly portrays a struggle between President Donald Trump and the world; Gov. John Bel Edwards above the people of Louisiana; liberal democracy above the rule of law; the judicial system above we the people of the United States; religion vs the law; taxpayers vs the people; the people vs posterity. The fabricated competiveness goes on and on. Arbitrarily dividing the people hurts the children.

Bob Newhart had a wise cure for psychotic problems: see youtube.com/watch?v=Ow0lr63y4Mw  (thank you, Dona Bean, d. 9/20/17).

The Advocate could invent a free and responsible press, at least in Baton Rouge.

Today’s thought, G.E. Dean (Psalms 9:9-10, CJB)
“Adonai is a stronghold for the oppressed, a tower of strength in times of trouble. Those who know your name put their trust in you, for you have not abandoned those who seek you, Adonai.”

Dean says “God will take care of you if you will let him.”

David instructs the Lord. Dean asserts that God will fulfill David’s instructions. I doubt David and Dean. Interestingly, Dean omitted David’s instruction in v 8: “He will judge the world in righteousness; he will judge the peoples fairly.”
  
Letters

Gun control (Grice) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_aab871d6-a944-11e7-bd8d-b360da1f7d31.html)

I nominate this letter for “Nanny State Freak” for 2017.

No way would I be a part of deciding that another peaceful human should be disallowed from self-defense in a world with an ample population of vigilantes in the possession of arsenals. Nor would I restrict a peaceful person from the privilege of hunting.

The dialogue may change from gun control to restriction of vigilante empowerment. Lessening blind hatred for the GOP could help, too.

People who wish to replace American republicanism, or the rule of law, with liberal democracy beg woe, as we observe daily.

Columns. (The fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
  
Louisiana’s superior constitution (James Gill) (theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/james_gill/article_c953f4b4-a857-11e7-bb88-ffb09968d7f0.html)
I like Gill’s lobbying.

My group is 23 % of the population, and we always report to jury duty. If one of ours is accused, we will protect him or her against all odds.
 
Louisiana’s rules work against us, so we’d like to undo them. The Louisiana constitution bothers us about freedom of expression, too. It says we can be held responsible when we lie.

(I write in irony, for those who are not accustomed to such expressions.)

To Jerry:  the only jury duty I completed involved a work accident. It was obvious that the plaintiff did not obey work rules and injured himself. One jury member made no sense, but just kept saying, "Exxon can pay. Give him the money." Thank goodness no one listened.

To Jerry again:  Your comment "so straightforward" helped me realize for the first time that judges fail the public when they allow a case like that one to go to jury trial.

If just one jury person had been influenced by the chorus "give him the money," injustice made possible by a judge would have been the outcome.
   
Satan? (Cal Thomas) richmond.com/opinion/their-opinion/guest-columnists/cal-thomas-column-defining-evil/article_0c09190f-c419-51d3-923a-2631c7f993d2.html

In “Perhaps Paddock embraced evil just this once, or maybe it was waiting to ambush him,” Thomas tacitly blames Satan. In calthomas.com/transcripts/evil-and-las-vegas-shootings, Thomas explicitly blames Satan.

Thomas has helped me understand a civic immorality about Christianity as we know it: Christianity empowers people to willingly not take responsibility for public evil.

The year was about 1978, and I had taken my family --- MWW and three children --- to Houston. I was at work, and they were touring in our car. In a flash flood, my coworker and I abandoned his car and walked to the motel. I panicked until I saw our family car, high and dry in the parking lot. When I entered the room, MWW was bathing to recover from her rain experience and three adolescents were watching a nude Angie Dickinson on TV. I turned the TV off and gave them a talk about nourishing evil by watching it. The lesson took.

It seems Cal Thomas never got that lecture and therefore never overcame the Satan myth. That does not mean the rest of us need to brook the imposition of Satan: Willing people can constrain overt evil and incarcerate perpetrators.
  
Lost motivation to write (Dana Milbank) (washingtonpost.com/opinions/greatness-is-within-trumps-reach/2017/09/29/25e22348-a53a-11e7-ade1-76d061d56efa_story.html?utm_term=.877c0fc9d88d)

Mr. Milbank, when did you lose the motivation to be a writer?

Other forums 

facebook.com/events/147891432436562/?acontext=%7B"ref"%3A"29"%2C"ref_notif_type"%3A"event_joined_nearby"%2C"action_history"%3A"null"%7D&notif_id=1507212477081558&notif_t=event_joined_nearby

Whoever authorized the change from a rainbow emblem to that awful fist emblem is erroneous IMO.
The clinched fist is a solidarity emblem that represents what I refer to as Alinsky-Marxist organization (AMO). AMO bosses have, for the past five decades, turned the justice of the church-based civil rights movement of the 1950s to mid 1960s into a fabricated "victims vs oppressors revolution," that due to injustice begs woe. In the last few decades, AMO has worked to establish a collectivist democracy by combining minority groups who for their reasons feel victimized.

Interestingly, AMO excludes my group: people willing to establish comprehensive safety and security so that each living person may, during every decade of his or her candle of life, responsibly pursue the heartfelt happiness he or she perceives rather than the work someone else would impose on them.
 
AMO has its purpose: Conflict for chaos rather than civic morality, wherein willing people collaborate to live each decade of their lives at the leading edge of goodness. 

AMO seeks to destroy the American republic; in other words, the rule of law. AMO recruits people to join the cause and cares not about the recruit's comprehensive safety and security.

The multicolored, awful-looking, clinched fist seems a warning sign for people who treasure responsible, personal liberty.



Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment