Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: We the willing people of nine of
the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals
stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity,
liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA,
beginning on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble
and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.
I’d like to see The Advocate represent the flood victims
rather than the governor by appealing to Gov. John Bel Edwards to make amends
for his fool hearty pursuit of Vatican partnership when he should have been
attending to flood-relief requests. (They should not harp on my pet peeve.)
Edwards could travel to Washington with humility, perhaps
even apology, respecting past slights to introduce a winning story for the
flood victims. Louisiana’s Washington delegation would grant Edwards the
political support he needs in order to help the people.
Humility is a great shield against
gullibility, pride, and hubris.
Gullibility is the first of the eight deadly sins. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins.
The Advocate's
lame appeal to "the president and lawmakers" slights the flood
victims and attempts to shield Edwards.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Matthew 7:7, CJB)
“Keep asking, and it will be given to you; keep seeking, and
you will find; keep knocking, and the door will be opened to you.”
Dean says “Take Jesus at his word. Pray and believe.”
Dean seems to dismiss both the Lord and the Word. Maybe he
strategically used the lower cased “his word.” Maybe he long since dismissed concern
for the text.
Letters
Family (Rice, 10/3) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_d6c81146-a485-11e7-a3d1-a3fb89787840.html)
To JT McQuitty:
I've never clicked on a link you suggested and been disappointed.
In this case,
we find this jewel:
"Ms.
Haberman says. 'Had almost any other major Democratic candidate been the
nominee, they would have beaten Donald Trump.'”
Aren't media
writers aware of the word "might" as caution against
"would?"
I nominate this
hubris as the basis of a media neologism: A haberman.
NBR (Banks) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_a38fcaf2-a869-11e7-99c0-8b35d05973d6.html)
In “Race brings
on individual issues for each minority group,” Banks
opens the possibility for explicit expression perhaps leading to understanding
and a better future in Baton Rouge.
I understand Bank’s statement according to my narrow view. My concern is vigilantism within a minority group --- in other words, internal vigilantism.
I understand Bank’s statement according to my narrow view. My concern is vigilantism within a minority group --- in other words, internal vigilantism.
I
represent a minority group that always thought there should be separation of church
and state: Pursuit of personal, heartfelt concerns should be private. In other words, a citizen does not and should not
allow another person to impose heartfelt, private concerns. In my later
decades, I assert that failure to reform America from the
clergy-politician partnership has led to our present abyss. Further, ascent is
possible through comprehensive safety and security. So, civic morality is what
I want to discuss in public. However, race is not an issue within my minority
group, so I want to turn listener to Banks and think it is fitting to invite
Mayor Broome and the rest of the Metro-Council.
My first
desire for clarification from Banks is: Why is race an issue in your appeal? I
have learned that I can help myself in my work by listening, and that is what I
want to do: Listen to Banks’ more explicit expression.
Consumer
protection (Lonegrass) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_e32decac-a49a-11e7-b812-fff7419d14d9.html)
I agree that consumers should be able
to collectively address wrongs by corporations, but lawyer-and-judge-fees
should be limited.
However, I do not think citizens should
count on government for protection. Willing citizens iteratively collaborate
for comprehensive safety and security. That requires awareness and
communication as people who are willing to establish the effectiveness of the
goals stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA.
In collaboration with a willing people of the USA, the US Supreme Court assures that neither corporations, churches, pack groups, AMO, trial lawyers, law schools, nor any other collective usurps the power of the individual, sovereign citizen.
In collaboration with a willing people of the USA, the US Supreme Court assures that neither corporations, churches, pack groups, AMO, trial lawyers, law schools, nor any other collective usurps the power of the individual, sovereign citizen.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Vigilante arsenals (Rich Lowry)
sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2017/10/03/rich-lowry-the-passionate-non-sequiturs-of-the-gun-debate/
Lowry promotes
non sequiturs by focusing on framework and vocabulary that detract from the
reality.
At issue is
identifying persons who acquire arsenals with intent to practice vigilantism
and persons who help the vigilantes execute their violence.
Woe begotton woe? (Michael Gerson)
post-gazette.com/opinion/Op-Ed/2017/09/30/Michael-Gerson-Judge-Moore-s-zealotry-is-a-challenge-for-the-GOP/stories/201709300093
I never accepted the presence of
Steve Bannon as an indication of President Trump’s zealotry and was glad to see
Bannon go.
I consider Moore pretty bad, but am
not certain how I would vote in the next election --- perhaps against Moore. I
voted for Edwin Edwards vs David Duke and would do so again. I voted for John
Bel Edwards vs David Vitter, even though I apologize to Louisiana residents for
not being a “no vote,” because 2016 flood victims are suffering, and Edwards’
folly continues to punish them.
I do not think President Trump’s
possible success hinges on the GOP. I think only willing people can offer
justice, and that is what Trump perceives. Despite all appearances, Trump is
working to make America great. Writers like Gerson
beg woe.
Sovereign citizens (Chris Odinet)
theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/article_09749396-a7a4-11e7-a128-132ba6a63b7b.html
“Louisianans need to sit up
and pay attention.”
That’s good advice, and Odinet
is doing us a favor to call attention to civic morality. Congressional favor to
corporations is as notorious 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, and most citizens would
agree in both applications of Congressional tyranny.
Meanwhile, Odinet could help clean up Southern
Law Center’s tyranny regarding the Council On Aging against the people of
Louisiana.
Each
citizen may keep in mind: Justice comes only from willing people and there is
only one opposition: The dissidents to justice. Willingness comes from
awareness, comprehension, understanding, and, most of all, humility.
Reasonable consumer protection, based on civic collaboration by
the consumers, is essential to capitalism and the rule of law.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment