Wednesday, May 10, 2017

May 10, 2017

Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening to other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with people who may follow the blog.
Note:  I often connect words in a phrase with dashes in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, the writer expresses his “belief,” knowing he could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.

 The Advocate:  See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge
  
Our Views (Who wants to grab the reported sheriffs money?). I support first responders in law enforcement and appreciate The Advocate running that glad-handing photo with this editorial. 

There's no civic place for Christianity in voluntary public-integrity. (Nobody collaborates about the power of their God.)

The photo invokes the curiosity: what money does the Louisiana Family Forum perceive in prison reform? We already suspect what Burl Cain did with his religious fame. It seems like a pure-money-Elmer-Gantry story.

In the doctrine of discovery for God (Catholic) and his son Jesus Christ (Protestant), slaves were imported for agricultural labor, and the Church authorization instructed agents to convert the slaves to Christianity. The slave experience---chains, whips, brutality and rape to slaves with physical burdens to masters and psychological burdens to owners---taught the slaves to regard Christianity as Satan and Christians as devils. That view was exacerbated by liberation theology in Brazil in the 1950s, I understand. I also understand the pope squelched liberation theology in 1962. But James H. Cone advanced black power and black liberation theology in 1969 and Jeremiah Wright preaches it now. I do not object to anyone’s religion, as long as there is no harm. However, Bible interpretation robs people of their chances at life. (It is alright to believe in salvation of the soul, but not at the cost of someone’s life, especially your own. Churches that promote venom and hatred are erroneous.) People who offer each other civic safety & security should be mutually appreciated.

How do prisoners who have been subjected to Christianity feel about the Christian-crimes against them---the robbery of their craft shows and such?

As a civic citizen, I oppose the use of captives in prison to further religion. I think it is unconstitutional, regardless of Supreme Court opinion that legislative prayer is for legislators rather than the people. (See Greece v Galloway.)

It is encouraging that Legislators are listening to the sheriffs.

To Cleve Wright on FB (May 9 views): One more thought on Civil War legacy.
  
As far as I know, Barack Obama is responsible for the slavery phrase "America's original sin." Maybe he learned it from someone, but those who accept it are lessened by a colossal lie. Africa and Europe imposed slavery on America originating 1600 years ago, and America has substantially recovered from the evil in only 229 years.
 
Slavery is among the Bible's original sins: slave-master passages should have been purged before 300 A.D.

The 4th century Catholic Church canonized the Bible on Constantine's directive. The 15th century Catholic Church "authorized" the doctrine of discovery for God and the trade with Africa for agricultural slave-labor in the colonies.

European Protestant kings in the 16th-17th centuries competed with Catholic kings in the doctrine of discovery, creating the Atlantic Slave Trade.

Americans won independence from England and started becoming America on June 21, 1788, only 229 years ago. In that time, voting changed from 5% of free citizens to 100% of citizens excluding criminals. There's much more progress, and immigrants arrive here poor and become prosperous--leading in educating themselves, professions, free enterprise, and other productiveness.

Everyone here is a victim of a canonized Bible, but most people overlook the Bible's fallacies, behave according to the essence of the preamble to the constitution for the USA, and call themselves American.
 
Many Bible-believers look to the salvation of their souls while taking personal responsibility for civic justice and prosperity in their lives.
  
Only 2/3 of representatives of 2/3 of the states ratified the preamble on June 21, 1788. About 1/3 were dissidents and laggards. There will always be dissidents, but hopefully the people will, with awareness, approach the integrity: We the People of the United States.
Again: The physics of slavery has been the same since the beginning of time: chains, whips, brutality and rape to slaves with psychological and physical burdens to masters.

Use the URL bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Slavery,-In-Nt and read and pretend your work as a shipbuilder does not benefit you---you are kept in one room and fed what your owner wants to feed you. If he feels bad today, he whips you. Use those Bible passages to help you accept your enslavement.

The Church should have purged the slave verses from the canonized Bible.
  
Again: My continuing message is: keep the monuments and attach plaques that commemorate that white-Christian church went to war with white-Christian church over slavery. The slavery that was institutionalized by erroneous Bible passages. White-Christian church won the Civil War.

Some descendants of the slaves, rather than embrace freedom-from oppression, liberty-to pursue peaceful happiness, and fidelity to the-objective-truth, want another war based on black-church interpretation of the same Bible. It's an erroneous choice.

Only by candidly addressing history can the people avoid repeating history. With iterative-collaboration, which you and I always practice, the people may establish voluntary public-integrity, which is necessary for broadly-defined-civic-safety-&-security.

Again: Also, Church claims that slavery is an institution of God came from Bible interpretation by the ancients. Paraphrasing, St. Augustine claimed it was God's revenge for sin. 

See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_slavery for a kinder-seeming view of St. A's thought.

Again: That's valid observation, but it does not dismiss the concluding remark in the declaration of secession, "more erroneous religious belief."

You also touch on another dot in my theory that Lincoln did not expect the religious fervor for war that had been fomented by Christian ministers in the south in the 1850s. Lincoln asserted that the constitution does not stipulate that return of escaped slaves was a federal responsibility; he left it to the states. See his first inaugural address.
     
Today’s thought (James 1:17). As Dean gets further into James, we may perceive a dilemma: What is good?

Socrates asked, about 500 years before James wrote, and I paraphrase: Does the good define God or does God define the good? See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthyphro_dilemma .
More simply: Is God good; if so, what’s wrong with good? Why isn’t it better to coach people to be good and avoid tempting some to be God?

Letters

  
Film subsidy (Vosbein). I found recommendations in Scott's 2013-14 study and hope they are being considered:
 
" some expenditures that currently qualify have minimal direct impact to Louisiana’s economy." Consider changes: "(1) amending state law to eliminate certain spending presently qualified because the state enjoys little if any benefit from it, (2) changing state law to allow LDED to take steps to
improve the quality of audits conducted on qualifying spending and (3) LDED should
take steps to automate the analytics of the film expenditure review process."
  
See louisianaentertainment.gov/docs/default-source/default-library/2015_oeid_program_impact_report_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  
Froma Harrop column (Obama speech). After all, what’s the purpose of civic service if not personal gain?

Besides, what James Madison wrote in Federalist 10 is obsolete to liberal democracy: Right?
    
Robert Samuelson column (will upset global economics). After Karl Marx recorded his prescient-folly for the world to read I don’t see how an aware economist can write “will” when “may” is such a glaring choice.

I guess unbridled opinion is consistent with fake news.

Woody Jenkins (Page 1B). Do you think Woody Jenkins and black leaders collaborate for public-integrity or civic justice? I hope so but think not. Do black leaders discriminate on the basis of race?

Trump tells Comey, “Ya fiead.” (Page 1A). I was amazed at Comey’s case for Hillary Clinton and don’t think there’s much more to say.

I did not know it then, but he was Obama’s choice.

Police officers (Page 1A). Our hearts are broken.

Sanctuary city (Page 2A). To Phil Stanley: This issue brought to my attention the view that philanthropy can be a form of lawlessness.

See religionnews.com/2017/03/19/analysis-new-sanctuary-movement/ for a recent analysis of an activity dating from 1980.

Also, Gates Foundation philanthropy perhaps to access book sales and testing services comes to mind.

Beware philanthropy: it may be a way to circumvent the law until the pepetrators are caught.

Other Forums

  
·        Patricia Gillenwater says


Appreciate your entire comments.

I too will vote for Trump again.



  
Thank you, Ms. Gillenwater for the encouragement. I have been in this work for four years and will soon host the 4th annual ratification day celebration at a local library. I hope to just have a general discussion about the importance of the civic agreement that is stated in the preamble. If you are near Baton Rouge on June 21, please join us.

My sister, Dona Bean in Karns, TN, pointed out a couple weeks ago that Richard Dreyfuss, the great actor, has been promoting civics for 30 years. He got involved on the 200th anniversary of Constitution Day (a holiday as of 2005). See http://thedreyfussinitiative.org/ . I’m not sure his work is active in many cities.

He uses “civic” in the customary way, for example, civic-minded as in citizen for the city. I use “civic” to represent citizens of life who collaborate so that public connections and transactions assure individual justice. In civic justice neither party cooperates or subjugates; both collaborate. Also, both parties are aware that there will always be dissidents to civic justice.
  

Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. Phil trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. Phil is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment