Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with
people who may follow the blog.
Note 1: I often dash words in a phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
Note 2: It is important to note "civic" as in
citizens for the people rather than citizens for the city.
Our Views (superficial history).
Perhaps The
Advocate got its “fake news” boldness by captioning Swanson’s erroneous letter
to the editor “The Civil War was about slavery.”
The Advocate
may sometime address the conclusion of the Declaration of Secession’s catalogue
of complaints: “. . . public opinion at the North has invested a great
political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief.”
The above quote
and others, and many 1850’s sermons in the South, are evidence that the Civil
War was started to affirm the Bible as the divine Word of God: Slavery is an
institution of God. St. Augustine justified slavery as punishment for sin unto
the generations of the sinner. God would empower 7 states to overcome 27
states.
Because the
“more religious belief” phrase has not been admitted, considered, and resolved,
history may repeat itself.
The Bible seems
to condone slavery, so there’s a dilemma: either the Bible is erroneous or the
less erroneous slavery will prevail in a future war. Let's face the dilemma.
Considering
flat earth, young earth, Jesus-hate, subjugation of women, and the slavery
errors, I conclude that many Bible passages are wrong. There is no dilemma for
me: Both the Bible and slavery are wrong.
As long as this
civilization represents the Bible as unquestionable on civic justice, I
consider myself in dissent. I support people who want
broadly-defined-civic-safety-&-security so that each person may pursue for
life the happiness they perceive rather than a dominant doctrine for afterdeath.
Today’s thought
(James 2:19).
Dean makes a plain message about deeds mysterious. I have yet to grasp Dean’s
purpose.
Just as I had no influence on my coming, I’ll have no
influence on my going. Therefore, low as I may be, I respond to the promise: Be
perfect.
Letters
Crossroads (Rantz). I
think Rantz is saying medical care must become personal health care with
national care for catastrophic illness or accident. Let insurance go to the
trash bin of history except for people who want it. If so, I agree but need to see the details.
Religion war (Swanson).
Swanson’s quotes present support that the Civil War was started on the Declaration
of Secession’s claim against the north’s “more erroneous religious belief.”
He quotes, “blessings
of African slavery,” and “heavenly ordained supremacy of the white man.”
I think
history’s lessen is being woefully overlooked in Louisiana: Don’t start a war holding
“more erroneous
religious belief.”
Plaques with such message may be attached to Civil War
monuments here.
Rich Lowry column (Comey firing).
Don’t forget the voters.
I think the media oppose my vote for someone who may rescue the USA from liberal democrats. Certainly, liberal democrats oppose my vote: The USA is a representative government.
E. J. Dionne column. I fear the media’s authoritarianism.
The basic
norm in the media is to speculate, cite and official who must remain anonymous,
then state a conclusion. I fear that process.
The media
try to plant untruths to create autocracy.
The media
often include as news articles speculation on reports by other media outlets.
They present as news opinion about media opinion.
The media scares readers, but Dionne takes it a little
too far.
Michael Gerson
column (evangelicals). I don’t need relief from the lyric ’Twas
grace that taught my heart to fear.”
At least Gerson
honed my verbal awareness. “Anodyne” seems more obscure than “inoffensive.” I
might be an intellectual country bumpkin or “rube.” I often prefer
Merriam-Webster, but liked Google’s eschatology: “the part of theology concerned with death, judgment, and the
final destiny of the soul and of humankind.” I would have continued to
think the cliché “end times.”
But I doubt the verity of
Gerson’s arrows: “shocking lowly character” of “exclusion and bias.” I think
those practices are widespread. I would not exclude Gerson from Gerson’s venom.
Lanny Keller column (HB71). Keller writes like a true
liberal democrat: can’t decide which of his opinions to express yet leans left.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment