Our
Views: In
this one disgraceful event, the principles of Louisiana’s cultural conflicts
are illustrated.
First there’s Chapter XI Machiavellianism: The
religion-government-partnership can keep the people so bemused the partnership
can do whatever it wants and the people don’t complain. From this principle
comes political correctness, wherein dominant opinion or social democracy may
dictate public policy. Fidelity to the-indisputable-facts losses significance
to ever-changing symbols of civilization. In modern democracy, the sub-culture
that takes for granted “side friends” and girlfriends as commonplace for wives
is given consideration.
Thus, cultural morals, religious morals, social morals
prevent consideration of civic morality. There is no possibility for political
morality or public-integrity: In
contemporary democracy, fidelity is set aside so as to both nourish and satisfy
adult appetites. Senators choose consider accommodating infidelity. One Senator
attempts to turns a third chance into a second chance. Mayors challenge the
police to accommodate the culture of adult satisfaction rather than enforce
statutory laws that protect the public. Judges grant leniency, foiling the work
of the police.
The culprits in this saga are a civic people. We estimate
2/3 of inhabitants, want broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security but settle
for divisive movements like Together Baton Rouge, Moment or Movements, Manners
of the Heart and other faith-based works. Religious movements are naturally
divisive. In a civic culture, every real-no-harm faith-based or
other cultural preferences thrive without either imposing or yielding to
coercion.
The responsibility for establishing a civic culture
rests with the people rather than either God or the government.
Today’s
Thought. I
mean no offense to readers who love this long-standing feature. I am offended
by the absence of ideas that could promote appreciation for trust and
confidence in the-objective-truth (I now pay my subscription cost but may not
always so subjugate myself).
John wrote, “Very truly I tell
you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and
will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.” Also, “This is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose
none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.”
These
thoughts from John might inspire dedicating my death to a future. However, for
life, I want perfect fidelity to the-objective-truth, whether discovered or
not. Therefore, I care more what I do than what I imagine.
Dean’s
interpretation is OK by me for him, but I prefer mine for me.
Stupid hatred (Erenberg). “We reject him” begs woe, and delivered woe feels bad; bad; bad.
Ms Erenberg, please come out of your
imaginary world long enough to define “LGBTQ equality.” Does it mean equal
opportunity to turn feral human-infancy into a nightmare? OK, then it is good
for Price to nudge opposition: it seems self-evident that successful living
requires fidelity to the facts rather than personal imagination.
No? I hope to address your
definition.
Even if Price uses Bible interpretation for his personal comfort, your religious hope is no substitute for his, but you both may face reality.
Even if Price uses Bible interpretation for his personal comfort, your religious hope is no substitute for his, but you both may face reality.
The Bible attempts, in 4000 year-old
terms, to express the-indisputable-facts-of-reality. But Price and others can
impose on Bible-interpretation the understanding of human biology and psychology.
“NCJW believes . . .” However, a
civic people act on the facts. Cassidy and Kennedy have demonstrated that they
believe in God but act on facts. They stake their lives on reality and their
deaths on faith. I hope they ignore your attempts to impose your dream-world on
the public.
Abortion (Davies). Some sincere responses to your hypotheticals. The woman has more value than her embryo due to her independence, duty, and responsibility. If the unborn, after the 8-inch journey does not implant onto the womb, it perishes without notice. Once implanted, it may be relieved of biological errors by natural abortion. The ultimate natural abortion is the mother’s decision, for whatever reason, to not continue gestation.
Fertile women know they produce a viable ovum about 13 times a year during about thirty years. The woman with personal autonomy has collaborative association with her viable ova. She seeks an authentic man, who will collaboratively associate with both her and her viable ova. No other man is worthy of her attention and risk to her viable ova. Only a couple who intend to be faithful to a viable ovum’s potential children are worthy of conceiving.
In the quest for a successful candle of life, the useful reference to Jesus is this: You may live perfectly. I learned that idea from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay at emersoncentral.com/divaddr.htm , an American underground writing that is understandably suppressed by the Christianity business-sector. I’ll let you discover Emerson’s source. It took me 15 years to climb out of my cave of indoctrination enough to perhaps understand Emerson's claim.
Richard Cohen column. So many time opinion against a person’s person rather than opinion is reversed in the expressions: “Here was the liar in full contempt for [the-objective-truth].”
Cal
Thomas column. I think people in 97% of
America’s counties voting for Trump is interesting. I do not like the list of
American mistakes in foreign interventions, but appreciate Thomas’s essay.
E.J.
Dionne column. Dionne is uncommonly
willing to champion a loser: liberal democracy. Keeping Obamacare would
threaten all Americans; so what’s with this “real Americans?”
Edward
Pratt column. This week seemed cut and
pasty. It’d be creative to show how Obama countered James Meredith’s claim,
“[Since 1966, duty] and responsibility are . . . the part the black race has
failed to pay any attention to." At Meredith’s prestige in Civil-Rights
justice you’d think somebody would take the responsibility to respond.
Troy
Brown (Page 1A). Does Sen. Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb recommend
a culture wherein all women submit to infidelity and which supports a husband
who also beats the girlfriend? Is this lifestyle intended for life? How is that
life defined? Is it feral? Cultural? Communal? Civil? It certainly does not
seem civic. Where’s James Meredith’s argument?
I’m reminded again of James Meredith’s claim, “[Since
1966, duty] and responsibility are . . . the part the black race has failed to
pay any attention to." At Meredith’s prestige in Civil-Rights justice, the
leader of the Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Cedric Richmond could weigh
in---perhaps lend some guidance to the Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus.
What a way to initiate MLK weak! Let’s have a mayoral conversation
on Dialogues on Race and church. Together? Are you kidding me? The facts-of-reality
in Baton Rouge and in Louisiana are unbelievable!
Right
to marry (Page
1A). IMO common-law marriage might suffice to relieve this man’s predicament.
So the will to sue on his behalf of others seems just another attack on a
civic people by a social-democracy lawyer or contemporary-liberal lawyer. A civic
people are not responsible for an individual’s papers, and the importance of
personal identity is known worldwide.
Vatican partnership (Page 3A). Louisiana citizens will miss the execution of
the office of the governor as Edwards leads in the furtherance of a
Vatican-Edwards-partnership. This is not the function of governor of the Great
State of Louisiana. Yet the people, according to Chapter XI Machiavellianism,
may be expected to tolerate Edwards’ misbehavior. After all, it is perhaps a
one-time opportunity for him and his entourage to pick the people’s pockets.
Of prime interest is keeping the Mexican corridor for
Catholic-sponsored refuge from Central-American terror. Latin-American coyote
systems sending and Catholic-Charities in Louisiana receiving.
It is a civic people’s duty and responsibility to themselves
to end the losses and misery imposed by the religion-government-partnership.
Sadow column oline. I agree with Sadow. Rather
than consult with Senator Cassidy Gov. John Bel Edwards acted on his campaign
promise and the slogan, "It's the right thing to do," rather than
the-indisputable-facts. Now, he harps on Medicaid expansion as though it is his
signature accomplishment rather than a failure. Gee seems to help hide the
facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment