Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: We the willing people of nine of
the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals
stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity,
liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning
on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble
and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.
Once again, The Advocate draws attention to the USA.
I speculate The Advocate aims to bemuse Louisiana’s No. 1,
the people, respecting Gov. John Bel Edwards’ dismal record at applying for the
federal safety net in a timely, aware way. States must compete for those funds,
and Edwards left Louisiana’s congressmen with nothing be embarrassment in
Winter, 2017, after efforts for a Vatican partnership. And approaching October,
only a few million of $1.7 billion dollars has reached a few citizens.
The Advocate’s focus: “It is still a challenge and deserves some
political will at the national level about ways to make the bureaucracy move
faster and more effectively.” Willing citizens may get Louisiana up to
speed in the competition for federal dollars. Meanwhile, maybe Edwards ought to
step aside for a more capable governor.
“In Praise of
Poverty,” Christopher Simon, page 4E, The Advocate, September 16 (Luke 6:20-22,
CJB)
“He looked at his talmidim and said: ‘How
blessed are you poor! for the Kingdom of God is yours. How blessed are you who
are hungry! for you will be filled. How blessed are you who are crying now! for
you will laugh. How blessed you are whenever people hate you and ostracize you
and insult you and denounce you as a criminal on account of the Son of Man.’”
I’m reminded of Frederick Douglass’s idea that there’s not a
person who thinks that poverty is good for him or her.
Other forums
quora.com/Are-all-lives-equal
Ova are not equal, so the answer to your question seems to
be, “No.”
Also, spermatozoon are not equal, so on a second evidence
the answer seems to be, “No.”
Life has a small chance to begin on conception, but the
conceived cell must subdivide, progress to implantation, survive gestation and
delivery, and receive care for life. With this additional evidence, the
prospects for equality seem profoundly negative.
The answer to your question, I am convinced, is, “No.”
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment