September 26, 2017

Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to write.

Note 1:  I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
 Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.

A personal paraphrase of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver:  We the willing people of nine of the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning on June 21, 1788.

Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.   

Our Views (theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/our_views/article_5cbcea10-a229-11e7-9448-4381ac98b072.html)

Liberal democrats and other dissidents against civic morality urge “respect freedoms and each other.” Willing citizens practice “appreciate freedoms and each other.”

The First Amendment pales before the Louisiana Constitution’s gift about freedom of responsible expression. Seems like The Advocate ought to know about the difference. Why not? Or what not write about it. Does The Advocate want people to respect disrespectful speech, like “Fire!” in a crowded building? Was The Advocate born yesterday?

President Truman, on completing his presidency said he was returning from service to his role as sovereign citizen. President Trump is making the statement that as president he remains also a sovereign citizen. Maybe it is revolutionary, but I agree with him. And he defeats the irresponsible press, hands down. Benjamin Franklin wrote about an irresponsible press but did nothing about it. President Trump is doing something about it.

The Advocate’s word choice “annoy” is not representative. A better choice is disgust --- especially the unthinkable offender with the unspeakable pig socks. Maybe someday The Advocate will consider becoming a “free and responsible” press.

To Christine Kooi: That's correct.

Collectivist liberal democrats who demand respect would do better to behave so as to attract appreciation. The popular attention to respect is ruinous for people who have not considered appreciation.

 
Only willing people offer justice.

Today’s thought, G.E. Dean (Matthew 6:14, CJB)

“For if you forgive others their offenses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.”

Dean says “We forgive because the Lord has forgiven us.”

Matthew and Dean make no sense, I suppose under the belief than can confuse people. I much prefer to forgive another person because I appreciate them. I do not want incidental separation from other people. However, if a person is evil, bargains with the Lord imagined by Matthew or Dean will not influence my forgiveness.

Other forums 

facebook.com/groups/qayyum110/?multi_permalinks=1999996066947803&notif_t=group_highlights&notif_id=1506424331947871

Using Merriam-Webster online, I apply "attitude: a mental position with regard to a fact or state," and "behavior: the way in which someone conducts oneself or behaves." 

For example, my friend Hector seems negative regarding Christian beliefs and firm on expressing himself, yet diplomatic. As a result, his behavior is neutral --- he neither imposes coercion nor yields to coercion. For example, if someone said to him, "Christ died on the cross to redeem you of your sins," Hector might respond, "Are you certain?"

In this example, Hector's behavior might be deemed bad by a Christian but good by a diplomat. The example seems to suggest that motive or intention needs to be brought into the discussion.

Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.