September 9, 2017

Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to write.

Note 1:  I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
 Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.

A personal paraphrase of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver:  We the willing people of nine of the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning on June 21, 1788.

Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement. 

Today’s thought, G.E. Dean (Psalms 5:4, CJB)

“For you are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; evil cannot remain with you.”

Dean says “God will never condone evil.”

  

David and Dean seem to be teaming up to limit what God can do. I don’t trust them.

Letters

CASA (Kadair) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_5ebe6186-93f1-11e7-8069-cfc13d57457d.html)

I appreciate the training, education, and an earned opinion.

Law enforcement (Polito) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_58edcbb4-93ee-11e7-9cbd-7326a6815e4f.html)

I agree.

In addition, philanthropy movements that defeat law enforcement should suffer legislative reform and enforcement.

American Bishops who support Vatican interests against the American people should suffer law enforcement and, if necessary, new legislation.

Votes count (Garner) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_2aac8f2a-93ed-11e7-81e7-5322a87e9fe8.html)

  

Patti, I hope you remember me from two founding weeks in a local Americans United for separation of church and state. In my opinion, there is no place in civic discourse for the word “hate.” My “civic” refers to citizens collaborating for justice during every decade of their respective lives.

I voted for primary candidate Donald Trump, because I thought the other GOP candidates were too weak for the job that may be done. I voted for presidential candidate Donald Trump because I thought Hillary Clinton and the liberal-democracy press would be the continuation of a national disaster. (America is a republic, as some liberal-democrats --- outside the unteachable press --- discovered.) Thus, more than some votes, both of my two votes counted.

I work for comprehensive safety and security. I urge fellow citizens, including President Trump, to collaborate to establish civic justice. I think within a couple years, we’ll begin to observe him doing so. Maybe then you will be writing words of appreciation rather than hate.

  

Columns. (The fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)

  

Liberal-democracy’s attack on America will fail (Charles Lane) (http://nypost.com/2017/09/05/why-us-debt-is-all-about-exporting-the-rule-of-law/)

I agree that the American republic, in other words, the rule of law, is America’s greatest asset, but after the people. 

President Obama and the liberal democrats that empowered him intend to defeat the American republic. Obama has not stopped and is present as the OFA, with headquarters in Washington and Chicago. I think his Alinsky-Marxist organization (AMO) was responsible for the police-allowed disturbance in Charlottesville.

Lane writes about what made America great, and President Trump speaks of “again.” However, it is possible that President Trump has assembled an administration that will make America greath.

  

Cultivating fidelity (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/article_40475150-922e-11e7-9098-a30349ccf5f1.html)

“Surrendering to God,” for those involved is frequently a continually mysterious quest. Most humans are so psychologically powerful that they do not accept the teaching of another person. In other words, humans learn by experience, either first hand, or by observing loss and misery by other people.

Citing a mystery example, each person may come to their own perception of hate, even the hate expressed by Jesus in Luke 14:26. See bible.org/seriespage/lesson-70-cost-discipleship-luke-1425-35 for one pastor’s explanation. I always heard it is Jesus’s utmost expression of love for the individual.

My view is that there is no excuse for the word hate respecting human relations, so the writer did not represent Jesus, who did not write. In other words, I do not appreciate the “love” the writer expressed.

I hope I have caught the reader’s interest, because I want to meaningfully share this thought, during the first half of my eighth decade. The key to a meaningful, full life is comprehensive fidelity. Recall I claim this is my thought, not the-objective-truth, which I do not know.

“Comprehensive fidelity,” is fidelity, both respectively and collectively, to the-objective-truth, to your person, to immediate family, to extensive family and friends, to the people, to the nation, to the world, and to the universe. The comprehensiveness seems incomprehensible yet simple: there are no mysteries. The practice may be cultivated by admitting inevitable mistakes and neither repeating them nor making them habits. Low as I may be, I humbly trust this practice.

This does not mean I neither pray nor have hopes nor criticize other people’s inspiration and motivation for comprehensive safety and security.

 

The Church (religionnews.com/2017/09/06/embargoed-christian-america-dwindling-including-white-evangelicals-study-shows/)

The caption of this report on the latest Pew Research on America’s religious landscape, “’Christian America’ dwindling” is unnecessarily alarming. The fact is, America’s promise of comprehensive safety and security is working.

In other words, the American promise of civic morality is emerging. “Civic” refers to citizens collaborating for mutually responsible liberty during every decade of their lives, which is possible only when most people consider religion a private pursuit or none. That is, a person’s God or none is not subjected to public collaboration.

While it is true that America’s 1790 free population (excluding 20% African slaves) was 99% factional Protestant, only 5% could vote. In 2017, “43 percent of Americans identify as white Christians, and 30 percent as white Protestants,” but 100% of non-felons may vote. The purpose and aims stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA are at work, despite seeming neglect.

The preamble states and agreement: We the People of the United States, because we want civic order, agree to the aim and goals stated herein and authorize a limited central government, the USA, to serve the people in their states. People who, for reasons they may or may not understand, do not trust and commit to the agreement are dissidents. They may live their entire lives as dissidents as long any actual harm done by them is not discovered. Some are innocent, and others not so much. For example, some think crime pays until their criminal activity is discovered and law enforcement is applied. Thus, the preamble divides the people as the willing versus the dissident.

I think 2017 is a pivotal year in which the preamble’s promise of civic morality will be recognized by a willing majority who are unnecessarily divided by religion and political regimes that employ religion to establish power over innocent factions of the willing people.

 

Advertisement (Christopher Simon, “How to Be a Better Lover,” page 4E)

How long has “love” for commercial purposes failed civic morality? I recommend changing to “appreciate.” Also, I resist someone’s “must.” Consider the first sentence so changed: To appreciate others, you may first appreciate yourself.”

Other forums 

quora.com/What-can-be-done-to-overcome-prejudice-towards-gender-equality

The existence of the question is a travesty. It is born of doubt in the power of human psychology. Every human being may cultivate fidelity to the-objective-truth. Those who do not cultivate the intention to fidelity beg woe.

The-objective-truth is the reality to which each human strives to conform. It is not the Truth, The Truth, ultimate truth, absolute truth, God’s truth, Supreme Court opinion, settled law, your truth, my truth, the Church’s truth, reason, revelation, the Word, or any other substitute men have imagined.

Merriam-Webster online informs “gender” means a. sex and b. the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex. Using these words, a woman is treated equally if her sex, behavior, culture, and psychology is appreciated as a woman. By no means would treating her as a man be equality.

Treating a man as a man and a woman as a woman is justice and by no means is it prejudice.

The human species is psychologically powerful. He or she will not accept the statements of another person, but only accepts the-objective-truth. Thus, if a person pretends to be of the opposite sex and honestly arouses a person, discovery of the-objective-truth results in separation, perhaps worse.

There are hucksters who advertise they can medically provide gender change. However, they cannot address false perceptions. A man who erroneously perceives he is a woman will not be happy after his genitals and hormones have been replaced and the false impression disappears. It would be better to seek counseling on fidelity to the-objective-truth.

The proposition that people of differing gender should be treated the same is false. Equality comes when a person is appreciated as he or she is. This appreciation starts with the person.

5 Views · Answer requested by Saddiq Noor

quora.com/In-your-very-own-opinion-what-does-gender-equality-mean-And-how-would-you-promote-it?

For opinion on “meaning of gender equality” please see quora.com/What-can-be-done-to-overcome-prejudice-towards-gender-equality, tendered only last evening. Comment if you want to. Now, I turn to promotion of gender equality.

The question may be considered from the perspective of the ovum who is waiting --- to be fertilized into conception, to attach, to be gestated, to be delivered, to survive infancy and to transition into young adult with comprehension, understanding, and intent to live a complete human experience over some ninety years. No ovum would be forced into a life that is void of appreciation, but it happens every moment.

The authentic woman is aware that during her fertile years she may generate about 400 ova. Springing from obligations to her viable ova, her entire being has the tendency to care for others. Humankind honors her role and intends to appreciate her responsible care. This intention is equal to every woman but may be lessened by the woman who does not appreciate her gender and her responsibilities to her ova. Among her obligations is to choose association with an authentic man.

A real man has appreciative regard for his spermatozoa and the person and body that produces them. Moreover, he appreciates the unique role of the woman --- her body, her genes, her memes, her psychology --- and her obligations to her ova. He would threaten neither her well-being nor that of perhaps 400 potential persons she may generate. He would not approach her live ova without full intent to care for her and their children for life. His intention to responsibility extends to their grandchildren and beyond.

These principles speak for themselves and operate in the misery and loss some humans generate every moment. Each person may observe these principles in the faces of children who are suffering and in adult lives made miserable by their family’s past disregard for gender roles. Education systems ineffectively teach, even obfuscate, these principles. Legislatures and civil courts exacerbate the ruin by not regarding ova as potential persons and children as persons.

The human being is driven by appetites that seem overwhelmingly powerful. However, the well-coached child may emerge from adolescence with personal authenticity.

I promote gender equality according to these principles. A woman should be appreciated equally as a woman until she demonstrates privation in care for herself or her ova. A man should be treated equally as a man until he demonstrates that he does not intend authentic performance. The idea of treating a man as a woman, or vice-versa, is preposterous.

1 View · Answer requested by Saddiq Noor

Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.