Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening when people share experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, a person expresses his “belief,” knowing he or she could
be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the preamble by & for Phil Beaver: We the willing people of nine of
the thirteen United States commit to and trust in the purpose and goals
stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity,
liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA, beginning
on June 21, 1788.
Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble
and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its agreement.
I agree, and justice comes only from a civic people.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Matthew 19:5-6 CJB)
“and that he said, `For this reason a man should leave his
father and mother and be united with his wife, and the two are to become one
flesh'? Thus they are no longer two, but one. So then, no one should
split apart what God has joined together.”
Dean says “Marriage is God’s plan. Stay married.”
The-objective-truth, in its progeny called “biology,”
informs humankind. Incest creates genetic problems. Homosexuality does not
permit independent procreation---technology such as ménage a trois is required.
Thus, fidelity excludes procreation when the partners are homosexuals. Procreation
and parenting with fidelity to the-objective-truth extends to grandchildren and
beyond.
Dean advocates vague ideas that may not correctly reflect
Matthew’s primitive understanding. I trust-in and commit-to the-objective-truth.
Other people choose their paths, but I am intolerant of civic injustice. I
think Dean promotes civic injustice.
Letters
Vote yes on hotel tax (Fetterman and Engelsman, Nov.
14)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_5e11d468-c96e-11e7-aae7-e7b6e253dd44.html)
To John
Smith: Baton Rouge, with its
parks, libraries, and civic events with widespread good-will, is, for those who
want it, an oasis in a conflicted world. Moreover, it is the center of
innovation for civic peace. No where else, excepting where there are people who
follow our blogs, can you find ideas like this:
This nation is distinct in the world in that it is authorized and supervised by the people who trust-in and commit-to the civic agreement in the preamble to the constitution for the USA. Only a civic people may offer justice. Collaboration to discover the-objective-truth offers the needed power.
This nation is distinct in the world in that it is authorized and supervised by the people who trust-in and commit-to the civic agreement in the preamble to the constitution for the USA. Only a civic people may offer justice. Collaboration to discover the-objective-truth offers the needed power.
Mitch Landrieu’s tyranny (Stewart)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_c4f289d2-c970-11e7-9ed9-27e5c4157164.html)
I think Landrieu
is a tyrant, but being an honest businessman does not exonerate a writer from
the obligation to public integrity.
In 1852, Frederick Douglass said: “There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that
does not know that slavery is wrong for him.” Perhaps Lee saw it as salvation of souls.
In 1856,
rebuking the abolitionists in a letter to his wife, Robert E. Lee wrote, “The
painful discipline [African blacks] are undergoing, is necessary for their
instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better
things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is Known & ordered by a
wise & merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the
mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of
fiery Controversy.”
Lee wrote to his wife in honesty. However, he did not
display the integrity of having looked in the mirror and asked, “If American
theism made me a slave because of my skin color and ethnicity, would I abide it?”
With integrity, he might have sold all his property and moved from Virginia.
To, say a territory like Bleeding Kansas.
That was five years before Virginia became the eighth state to secede, practically eliminating Lee’s liberty to choose.
That was five years before Virginia became the eighth state to secede, practically eliminating Lee’s liberty to choose.
Justice comes from civic citizens rather than God or
government (borrowed from A. Lincoln, 1861).
If Stewart had
it correct, I apologize for my ignorance to the-objective-truth.
To Philip Frady: What's your specific objection to my opinion?
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Writing for the audience (Lanny Keller)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/lanny_keller/article_6d21d73c-c8b0-11e7-b841-4bc668754fd9.html)
Non-fiction
writing, Mass Communications, and political science, I think erroneously,
informed this chemical engineer to write for the audience. I think Mr. K and
The Advocate do not write for the people of Louisiana; there’s some other
audience.
In this
particular column, I perceive seasoned use of the non sequitur fallacy: “the
extraordinary coalition of conservatives and liberals, business groups and
churches is . . . not . . . speaking, this is the data.” I don’t think it’s
data speaking. I think it’s a coalition against the people of Louisiana, aided
by a free and irresponsible (to the people) press.
As I understand
political rectitude, “writing for the audience” means making an educated guess
as to what’s in the listener’s intentions, devising a way to present the
message so that it seems to satisfy the listener’s expectations, and hoping
that deception is not detected. By political preference, the moderately skilled
writer divides a surveyed audience into loyalists, moderates, and opposites.
The writer shapes statements to please loyalists, invite moderates, and bemuse
opposites. Thus, one message has three purposes.
Because I do
not feel smart enough to question someone and extract their opinion, I have
never trusted power to share my message in their language. I especially have no
talent for reading the communications from three segments of an audience.
Sucks, I might conclude that Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama is president.
Alas, I can only write my message and hope the other party will either care
enough to respond to the actual idea or not hit me in the head with something
hard. A good example is my term “civic morality,” which relates to public peace
more than municipal goals.
When the press
chooses to write for an audience, they direct their writers to write for that
audience. However, press responsibility to the people is to report the facts
and maintain the record of progress toward civic morality. This principle may
be gleaned from the preamble plus the First Amendment amended to address a free
and responsible press. The press may say that a chemical engineer has not the
propriety to make such a statement. However, that merely suggests that the
press is not writing for the people.
Second message: Other than my hometown newspaper seeming to contribute
to a free and irresponsible press, another pet peeve is the abuse of first
responders---from police to DA’s---sandwiched between people who think crime
pays and the court system and legislators who cooperate in, even exacerbate the
people’s pocket picking. The Kevin Smith case reported on Page 3B today is an
illustration.
Louisiana, rather than move next to
felony crime, might do better to look at judicial changes that would expedite
release of minor offenders who are held in jail against the presumption of
innocence. The topic is covered well by Arthur L. Rizer, III, “The Conservative
Case for Jail Reform,” National Affairs, No. 33.
Tax code (George Will) http://sunshinestatenews.com/story/repeal-and-replace-tax-code
I like it that will has shifted to dissing Trump to dissing
the GOP.
Nevertheless, I will be surprised if the present tax code
work turns to a success.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which
most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of
the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment