Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth,
which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the June 21, 1788 preamble: We the civic citizens of nine of the
thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated
herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and
perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA. Composing
their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive
whether they are willing or dissident toward its principles.
I appreciate The Advocate’s explicit expression, “[TOPS] a popular
program that Louisiana can’t really afford.”
Also, their presentation prompts me to suggest a plan with
increase to 2.75 GPA for ninth graders and 3.0 for seventh graders, so as to
achieve Rep. Foil’s original proposal in six years.
Lastly, I hope
The Advocate will stop alienating the people against each other with phrases
like “not a good deal for the
Louisiana taxpayer,” and “assure taxpayers their money is well spent.”
The administration’s poor use of Louisiana funds and the Legislature’s
bad laws hurt every citizen. No citizen gets something for nothing from
taxpayers---political gratuity comes from the general fund. Even TOPS awardees
are hurt by philanthropic cunning.
The Associated Press promotes “rights”
rather than responsible freedom
The couple could move to a location
that permits pet goats, but the AP promotes their “right” to impose their physician-supported
belief in pet therapy to beg exception to local ordinance.
The AP turns the “rights” opinion into international pseudo news.
The AP turns the “rights” opinion into international pseudo news.
A civic people may revise the First
Amendment so as to protect a free and responsible press.
thestar.com/news/world/2017/12/09/trump-pays-tribute-to-civil-rights-leaders-amid-dissent-from-some-politicians.html
The AP’s Darlene Superville sub-captions
President Trump’s commemoration, “protesters pan his track record,” as though
the record is anything but integrity.
However, many “leaders” such as Jim Hood, Derrick Johnson, Mayor Chokwe Lumumba, and John Lewis stonewall Trump’s noble statements, not admitting to themselves that civic stonewalling is a form of lying to self.
However, many “leaders” such as Jim Hood, Derrick Johnson, Mayor Chokwe Lumumba, and John Lewis stonewall Trump’s noble statements, not admitting to themselves that civic stonewalling is a form of lying to self.
The AP chooses to side with them by
publishing the phrase “track record” as though it is not good. President Trump
listens to the other party. If the other party honestly expresses privation in
integrity, the President expresses integrity and waits for the other party to
come to the table with integrity.
Listen to President Trump’s speech
and know that these are the principles on which I voted twice for Donald J.
Trump: once to defeat ineffective GOP
candidates and second to defeat the liberal democrats who want to destroy the
American republic: youtube.com/watch?v=-qvKwl3rzyw.
I would not say everything
the way the President does. For example, I think “equality” and “God” are
unjustly held by the priestly-politician-partnership to be mysteries. In these
229 years since the USA was established on June 21, 1788, understanding of the evolution
of the species has discovered that humankind has the physical and psychological
power to establish responsible civic liberty. “Civic” refers to justice in
human connections more than conformance to municipal or civil goals.
BTW. The Trump administration
proposes to make Medgar Eger’s Mississippi home a national monument. usnews.com/news/best-states/mississippi/articles/2017-09-20/memo-consider-civil-rights-home-for-national-monument.
Letters
LGBT right to choose discrimination
(Swanson-Doran, Dec 9) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_4ef53842-da37-11e7-a211-0b0a14417330.html)
To John Smith
and Ms. Evans: The
Supreme Court’s fabrication of opinion on opinion is construed to be
constitutional. Quoting Obergefell vs Hodges, “The right of
same-sex couples to marry is also derived from the Fourteenth Amendment’s
guarantee of equal protection. The Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection
Clause are connected in a profound way.”
However, try to apply their opinion to a child’s right to be
conceived through contracts created by same-sex partners. Perhaps you can begin
to perceive my point that marriage for procreation is distinct from marriage
for love: The Supreme Court is willfully
out of touch with actual-reality or the-objective-truth in its obligation to
protect a child to be appreciated by the man and woman who empower the child’s
genes and hereditary memes---the child’s dignity and equality to be appreciated
by his or her mom and dad.
Of course, as always, dissidents invite woe, but they should
not be condoned by errant court.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Public surveillance (James Gill and Dan Fagan)
(theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/james_gill/article_d08f571e-db8d-11e7-a41d-c727863ed3ca.html
and theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/article_90536a14-db74-11e7-880c-7bc94202e557.html)
I like public surveillance.
Some Americans
have read, considered, and understood the civic agreement offered by the preamble
to the constitution for the USA. It proposes a utopia that it seems cannot be
achieved: “We the People of the United States [want and therefore agree to] . .
. “
It is important
to admit to self that some seven trillion human-years of experience show that
there will always be civic citizens living with dissidents to statutory justice
(civic laws with moral law enforcement). The presence of cameras is consistent
with that evident reality.
Traitors? (Mark Ballard)
theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/elections/article_7a2489b6-dc56-11e7-9013-f7c62bc11f50.html
“Moore . . . was twice kicked
off the Alabama bench for putting the Bible ahead of state law.” Therein
is my worry. Take for example the federal Defense of Marriage Act. It was
passed by Congress on American theism, in other words, religious tradition.
A successful K-12 civics student would know that a religious basis is bound to
fail.
I hand carried to the Louisiana AG’s
office an essay that marriage should be defended based on physics’ progeny, human
biology: a conception, on successful
gestation and delivery is a person, fully entitled to Justice Kennedy’s claim
to fame: dignity and equality. The infant is owed appreciation by the man and
woman who shared genes and hereditary memes with the person rather than a contractual
arrangement to satisfy same-sex adults. The message was addressed to Kyle
Duncan. The eventual consequence was Obergefell vs Hodges (2015). The Bible-thumpers
failed to defend marriage for procreation.
To say that Bible thumpers “distrust
journalists and politicians” minimizes their offense against a civic people.
First, I cannot identify a journalist---someone who chronicles humankind’s
progress toward civic morality or any other concept toward responsible human
freedom. Second, political regimes have fallen short of encouraging the people
to collaborate to discover the-objective-truth rather than conflict over constructed
opinions; in other words, to work for civic peace here while allow people to nourish
responsible hopes for the hereafter (borrowing from Antonin Scalia).
People who place their hopes on the
Louisiana Family Forum have my sympathy. However, I encourage them to consider life’s
opportunity to collaborate for civic justice, keeping religious hopes a private
pursuit.
People in Alabama are responsible
for civic morality there, and they have supported Moore for a long time. It
seems these sex accusations are new, and the DNC has never looked more evil
(criminal was long-since passed). I am in no position to question Alabama
citizens’ conduct.
HIV-AIDS Philanthropy (http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/article_602d17da-db98-11e7-b127-bb07daf9d4d9.html)
I agree with
you, Chin. Beware people bearing gifts to non-profit recruits and the
professors who promote them.
I discovered this year the insidiousness of philanthropy to
undermine human responsible freedom. Gilead Sciences’ $100 million grant
program illustrates my point. Their ten-year business plan is to convert
non-profit businesses into federal and state taxation.
We know from some seven trillion human-years of observation
that human connections have four levels of connection: potential, civic, consideration,
bonding, and procreation. In potential, there’s proximity without mutual will;
in civic, there’s mutually beneficial exchange; in consideration, there’s mutual
interest; in bonding, there’s commitment; in procreation there’s responsibility
and duty. More qualified people wrote better progressions from proximity to
procreation, but many people have never imagined the life-determining impact of
human connections. Citizens are divided between those who appreciate human
connections and those who, for reasons that vary from ignorance to criminality
and evil do not care.
A civic culture would educate the people about 1) the human
duty to be responsibly free and 2) appreciation of other humans so as to
preserve their opportunity for responsible freedom. Experience shows that
utopia cannot be expected, so a civic people develop statutory justice to
constrain dissidents against responsible freedom. The USA, established by 2/3
of the people in nine states, on June 21, 1788, has the constitutional
structure by which to develop human responsible freedom. However, the politics
of American theism, imposed by the First Congress before May, 1789, has so far
bemused the people.
Human connections may be used to satisfy appetites. Shirley
Lolis knows, “people come for testing . . . concerned about HIV. [She’s] having
unprotected sex and her partner doesn’t like using condoms. [Metro Health
recommends] a one-pill-a-day regimen known as PrEP, a pre-exposure prophylaxis.”
Cost is about $18,000/year plus health risks (e.g., other STDs) and social
pressures. See pbs.org/newshour/health/8-things-didnt-know-truvadaprep.
The agencies that benefit from Gilead’s marketing plan are
not doing a civic people a favor. See the article in The Advocate. People who
do not take an active role in civic justice---stay informed and collaborate for
civic justice---may expect continuation of the chaos we are experiencing. I am
alert to the widespread use of philanthropy to undermine civic viability--- human
responsible freedom.
Other forums
quora.com/What-are-the-ten-cardinal-rules-of-life/answer/Phil-Beaver-1
Sorry. I
forgot the other nine.
facebook.com/groups/qayyum110/permalink/2034237903523619/
During some 7 trillion human-years of evolution, humankind
has not focused on the possibility, responsibility, and practices for personal
freedom. Personal freedom is possible with fidelity to the-objective-truth,
which can only be discovered---cannot be invented; or constructed from mystery.
An authentic woman is aware that during her fertile years
she may deliver about 400 viable ova. In freedom, she accepts collaborative
association with her potential ova and the periodic viable ovum. In other
words, she maintains both physical and psychological health. In healthy
psychology, she makes certain that the men around her appreciate her
collaborative association and would neither risk her well-being nor threaten
her ova with unwanted conception. By unwanted conception I mean life without
receiving personal appreciation, which even though perhaps unable to think, no
ovum wants.
For these reason, a civic culture informs and coaches its
children unto basic understanding and intent to develop into an authentic
person, whether male or female. An authentic human collaborates for civic
justice, wherein most people maintain fidelity to the-objective-truth. A civic
culture is aware that 1) there will always be people who for their reasons
tests the-objective-truth, perhaps to push the envelop of discovery and 2) some
people try to employ the civic culture to, by defying the-objective-truth, gain
personally perceived advantage. The latter types, dissidents, can only be
constrained by civic justice. Arbitrary opinion is insufficient in the struggle
for public integrity.
A better future is achievable through collaboration for
authentic living with the awareness that the human being is both physically and
psychologically capable of responsible freedom. Only the people can effect the
reform of Gods and governments so as to make human freedom the majority's way
of living, accepting that dissidents may be constrained only by statutory
justice.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts, or actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth
of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic
People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See
online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment