December 16, 2017

Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.

Note 1:  I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error.
 Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.

A personal paraphrase of the June 21, 1788 preamble:  We the civic citizens of nine of the thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA. Composing their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive whether they are willing or dissident toward its principles.  

Our Views (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_0df80952-dacb-11e7-8967-47e63ca0e7dc.html)

It's a wonderful, developing opportunity.

I would seek a school that would coach my children: You are a person; this is your life and you have both the physical power and the psychological power to develop responsible freedom during your lifetime. Also, it would have the curriculum to offer my children the opportunity to learn the basic knowledge---the understanding and intent to enter young adulthood with the personal authority to live a complete life in collaboration to discover and establish public justice. Any hopes for favorable afterdeath or other hereafter would remain a concern for the children to discover or not, on their own.

I wonder if such a school exists.

Our Views Dec 13 (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_8e953af2-e021-11e7-b7a0-1310e942f15b.html)

To Baton Rouge From My View:

Your confusion derives from your personal arrogance when you attempt to read.

I wrote, “It is alright for Christians to know they will have a favorable afterdeath. However, it is immoral for them to try impose on the people of the USA the fear of human, responsible civic freedom---in other words, justice.”

Your posts fail to acknowledge either “alright for Christians to know” or “civic freedom---in other words, justice.” Later you write, “. . . we still can not figure out what your point really even is here.”

Face it, there’s nothing for your crowd to “figure out.” Just read, without y’all’s arrogance, what I wrote. My concluding statement is, “I wish every Christian success during their afterdeath but want them to collaborate during life to discover civic justice rather than conflict for dominant opinion.”

Your arrogance in the face of your failure to “defend the faith” is to retreat to your personal authority---the Catholic priests. However, I respond to you that they also retreat, not from Phil Beaver and the consequences of EBRP library meetings, but from the-objective-truth.

Humankind has progressed in the 1700 years that Bible doctrine has remained stagnant. Ending 2017 and progressing into 2018, the awareness that humankind has the physical and psychological power---and therefore the responsibility, going forward, the people will be able to collaborate for civic freedom so that each person may pursue the happiness they perceive rather than what some religious or government institution deems best for the person.

You state, “The Bible really does not suggest to prevent responsible civic freedom. The word "responsible" is important in that statement.” (As though you are informing me about my previous statement.)

I respond, “Six thousand years of cultural evolution has influenced people to seek authority. Rose Wilder Lane's book, "The Discovery of Freedom," asserts, in my interpretation, that evolution informs humankind that only one species---the human species---has the physical and psychological power to establish responsible freedom: Civic justice comes only from people and only those who collaborate for responsible freedom. The others are dissidents to justice.”

Then you pretend, “All this talk of civic collaboration and civic this and civic that has no real meaning and it is doubtful anyone even understands what you are really trying to say here. Is civic freedom different than freedom? Is civic peace different than peace? Is civic justice different than justice? It sounds like "civic" is the only concept you want to talk about here.”

You are so arrogant that you tacitly pretend that freedom to kill is civic freedom; a sociopath’s personal peace is civic peace; a terrorist’s justice is civic justice. I suppose you wish to force “civic”--- meaning voluntary mutual justice in public connections rather than cooperation or subjugation to a government or religious institution’s doctrine---into a Bible idea. Consider the Bible’s passages that condone the slave-master relationship in public connections. I do not care to revise the Bible, but I do want to put to rest its citation in civic debate. The Bible is not civically moral, as 1700 years of history have shown, and the Bible’s conflicts with the-objective-truth were never more obvious then in 2017.

In that statement I do not claim that a Christian cannot achieve salvation by reading the Bible. However, the Christian with a secure hereafter yet may choose to collaborate for justice during his or her lifetime. (By now, you should realize that “justice” is civic justice, rather than either errant civil justice or impertinent religious justice.)

So far, you divide yourself from collaboration for responsible liberty by personal arrogance toward justice. You are not alone as a dissident; nor am I as a civic citizen. A civic citizen works for justice during his or her entire life and is able to recognize other civic citizens by their refusal to lie---simply because they want to communicate.

You write, “Real arrogance and folly is believing that you are above the word of God, and also when you think that people who do believe in God and Jesus Christ are arrogant.”

There you go, pretending again. You are unable to assimilate the statement I quoted at the beginning of this post:  I hope a Christian’s knowledge of the hereafter is so, but in the meantime, I do not accept the imposition of those hopes in the public arena. Together, you and I have shown that the most adamant Christian voice in this forum must retreat to the Church when confronted with the hypocrisy of personal Bible interpretation. At stake here is not God, but the Bible as the word of God: gleaning the word of God from the Bible is as difficult as a Camel passing through the eye of the needle.  

Then you kick in propaganda: “The people who started the USA believed in God and in the laws of Nature. The real problem with the USA today is that people are getting away from both God and from Mother Nature, which in time will lead to the destruction of the USA.”

You hide the fact that “Nature and Nature’s God” is 1776 deism rather than Christianity. The 1787 draft Constitution for the USA made such references obsolete. The signers, only 2/3 of the delegates provide (our generation) the opportunity to adopt human responsible freedom. And 2/3 of delegates to 2/3 of the state constitutional conventions approved the defining sentence, the preamble, and the articles that follow it, establishing the USA on June 21, 1788. Four dissenting states then had the opportunity to join the USA. One did, and the USA began operation with ten states on March 4, 1789. Arrogantly, the First Congress re-established the English Church tradition that legislators are ordained by God by hiring Congressional chaplains at the people’s expense. But the congressional chaplains were factional-Protestants to avoid Church of England dominance. The people have suffered American theism ever since. However, the reform, after 228 years of lost opportunity, is underway. The era of civic morality or justice has arrived. The people may and can collaborate to discover the-objective-truth.

I do not know the-objective-truth. However, collaboration for its discovery may lead to justice in only a few years. Bible interpretation will forever divide believers, but its civic functionality has ended. From perhaps 1996 on, civic citizens are beginning to collaborate for human, responsible freedom. 

Christians may choose to get on board.

Today’s thought, G.E. Dean (Psalms 28:7 CJB)

“Adonai is my strength and shield; in him my heart trusted, and I have been helped. Therefore my heart is filled with joy, and I will sing praises to him.  Adonai is strength for [his people], a stronghold of salvation to his anointed. Save your people! Bless your heritage! Shepherd them, and carry them forever!”

Dean says, “Trust God. You will be glad you did.”

The Bible fails trust and commitment, but the-objective-truth prevails. Whether there is a controller or not has yet to be discovered. Therefore, it is alright for a person to know he or she will be saved in the afterdeath, but during life, justice comes only from civic people rather than government or religious institutions such as Bible interpretors.

  

Columns. (The fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)

  

Unintelligence (Byron York) (washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-former-top-spy-rethinks-maybe-we-shouldnt-have-attacked-a-new-president/article/2643208)

Michael Morell’s candid admission that he exercised the folly of politics compromise his intelligence professionalism is disheartening for civic citizens---those who collaborate for justice and for the rule of statutory law rather than dominant party. It is also disheartening that so many so called “departmental professionals” are actually liberal democrats and socialists.

Michael Morell, Michael Hayden, and Michael Vickers seem to be like James Comey---nanny state products who honestly never encountered integrity.

I appreciate York’s reporting and focus.

  

Abuse task force (theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/politics/article_9072fc30-e204-11e7-b643-af373eb26e89.html)

Under the duty described as “Research and identify the specific conduct that should be prohibited by sexual harassment and discrimination policies,” I hope the committee will examine leading edge civic morality such as considerations developed in EBRP library meetings and other discussions since 2014:

            Evolution informs humankind that the human species, emerging over the past 3 million years is the only species known to have the physical and psychological power to take the responsibility to establish and maintain freedom through statutory justice.

            Statutory justice is necessary only because the world is not a utopia, and it seems there will always be dissidents to civic peace, where “civic” refers to mutually just connections between individuals and groups more than conformity to a municipality or a doctrine.

            While maintaining the records of discovery of civic morality as statutory justice is a government function, the responsibility for personal responsible freedom is private. Every citizen is responsible for his or her personal freedom.

            History shows that fidelity empowers private development of personal freedom. Fidelity by the newborn is within the immediate family. Soon, the child may acquire fidelity to the-objective-truth, fidelity to self, and fidelity to loved ones, usually the family. With more knowledge and with coaching to develop, the child may develop fidelity to extended family and friends, the people (nation), the world, and the universe. With successful development, the young adult has the understanding and intent to live a full life in the human responsibility for civic freedom.

            If the person also develops an expectation for his or her afterdeath, that commitment is maintained in privacy, because arbitrary breech of the responsibility for civic freedom is infidelity.

            A human starts as an ovum that is generated in a woman’s body. The ovum has a small chance, perhaps 1%, to be activated by a man’s spermatozoon to form a single-celled conception. That single cell has perhaps 6% chance of success in cell division, implantation, gestation, delivery, and neo-natal survival. The transition from newborn to young adult with understanding and intent to live a full human life is an amazing feat.

            An authentic woman understands that during her fertile years she may generate some 400 viable ova. In responsible freedom, she understands that any conception will need her physical and psychological nourishment. Thus, she perceives collaborative association with her viable ova. She envisions that each of her ova could become an appreciated person, and that part of her personal appreciation is to make certain the ova are protected from wanton men. Therefore, the friendships she develops are with responsible men. The confidences she develops are with proven men. The intimacies she entertains are with committed men. The bond she forms is with the authentic man of her life. This fantastic progression leads to monogamy for life, the basis of fidelity.

            With the above considerations, the committee considers abuse in the work place a dissident human behavior. Any indication that an employee is not aware of the human obligations to ova leads to training in the human responsibility for freedom, including human reproduction processes and statistics of ova survival.

It is preposterous for a chemical engineer to author a legitimate guideline to the-objective-truth about abuse, whether a consequence of past library meetings or not. However, the above list of concerns could serve as a recipe for qualified professionals in the right fields to consult for the committee. It’s up to the committee to call in such experts.

Look at it this way: Gov. Edwards merely screamed “I have a problem,” and outlined a task. It’s up to the people assigned to the task to take responsibility for human freedom in regards to their task force.

Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts, or actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.