Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth,
which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.
Note 1: I often dash
words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the June 21, 1788 preamble: We the civic citizens of nine of the
thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated
herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and
perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA. Composing
their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive
whether they are willing or dissident toward its principles.
I'm with Shofstahl and Bonin.
The Advocate
writers just can’t resist expressing their liberal-democrat bias or for other
reasons discredit Republicans.
Quoting them, “Still, [Kennedy] is a loyal Trump
supporter.” As though loyalty to the
president negates a Senator’s responsibility to represent the people of his or
her state. Pardon me, writers for The Advocate: I think your loyalty to
liberal-democracy rather than the American republic is mirrored in your daily sentiments.
Furthermore,
The Advocate writers try to duck their opportunity for responsible authority by
abdicating to the American Bar Association. Many readers are aware that the ABA
is almost as disreputable to statutory justice as is the liberal press and the
DNC. The Advocate has the opportunity to tune-in to the public’s integrity.
Lastly, Kennedy
has, for decades been a great example of a citizen who has the honest integrity
to call out errant politicians and be himself as well. The Advocate, in its
folly, equates civic justice to “causing trouble.”
Each time I
express hopes for my hometown newspaper, I leave the page feeling like a
trouble maker. However, I will not give up on the expectation that Baton Rouge
can and will have a free and responsible press, something Benjamin Franklin
imagined but knew not how to secure. The opportunity exists for someone, who
wants statutory justice in Baton Rouge; Louisiana; and the USA, to take the
authority of proving a responsible press.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Psalms 29:11 CJB)
“May ADONAI give strength to his people! May ADONAI bless
his people with shalom!”
Dean says, “Do you need strength and peace? Turn to the Lord
and he will provide.”
I understand that David expressed earnest entreaty for
strength and peace for his tribe. Dean turns that into an egocentric, personal
promise.
It reminds me of presidents from George Washington to Donald
Trump expressing personal hopes for a good outcome for the people while the
Christian right may claim divine authority in the American republic or at least
in select presidents.
Egocentric peace is possible by merely having no humility at
all---“knowing” that you hold the correct opinion in dispute. However, civic
peace is possible only when two parties collaborate to discover the-objective-truth
and make the most of it. What’s civically damning about Christianity is that
two Christians with differing views can start a discussion but reach a point of
disagreement and decide to be civic enemies. For example, consider a Baptist
expressing the joy of Remembrance then hearing a Catholic express the power of
Transubstantiation. They could decide to be civic friends even though they are
not in religious agreement. However, too often one dusts the other off (Mark
6:11). I even had a Sunday school teacher call me a heretic for saying that
civic neighbors should be treated equally regardless of religion.
Not wanting bad influence in my life, I left Sunday school.
Only now, two decades later, I realize I overcame subjugation of my personal
authority to collaborate for civic peace without compromising my trust and commitment
to what is not known by anyone.
Letters
American doom (Hale) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_3e616874-db78-11e7-8d32-f32e3c525201.html)
What we’re
seeing is the American republic terminating five decades of Alinsky-Marxist
organizing (AMO). It’s much like American republicanism overthrowing 1600 years
of Bible support for slavery: reform does not come easy and does not appeal to
all factions. Now, we are experiencing the overthrow of liberal democracy or
collectivist liberation politics; in other words, conflict for chaos.
I think liberal
democrats would do well to consider the possibilities for the human species and
their person’s opportunity to collaborate for civic peace.
Only a person
can decide how to spend his or her energy during his or her brief lifetime. Only
the human has the physical and psychological power to take the authority for
his or her opportunity at life. Only the person may use his or her body and
mind to collaborate to discover the responsibility for freedom. Only the person
can decide to exercise fidelity to actual-reality rather than the opinion that
seeks to dominate in this country at any given time. Only the collection of
civic persons may discover and maintain statutory justice---the rule of just
law---as viewed by every civic person.
Most Americans
may collaborate for private liberty with civic morality starting now.
Relief for flood victims (Kinchen and Shelton)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_b4ba37fe-db95-11e7-b0ce-ef5190868033.html
and theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_9514bc32-db8e-11e7-8aeb-1b3679717b07.html)
I agree
with Kinchen and Shelton. Cassidy has behaved like a citizen who wants to guarantee
the safety net for victims of a 1000 year event.
Also, I hope Kinchen’s expectations
for the tax bill come through: “grow
our economy, create jobs in our communities and let Louisianans keep more of
their hard-earned money.”
Good story and gratitude for service (Hebert)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_ba113682-e1d3-11e7-a7ea-5fd1e78faf89.html)
I don’t visit Mitch Landrieu's New Orleans and probably never
will, but it’s still good to read about one of the Louisiana cities.
Most of
all, it is fun to hear a veteran’s stories. Thank you for everything.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Mayfield’s demise (James Gill)
(theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/james_gill/article_be85ca8c-e4cd-11e7-8cd6-534add34003a.html)
Mayfield could
have developed honest integrity by which to reject Nagin’s political influence.
The preamble to
the constitution for the USA divides citizens into two camps: a civic
people and dissidents. Dissidents range from the ignorant, the stubborn, the
arrogant, the harmful, the criminal, the evil, and beyond. Civic people
collaborate using the agreement that is stated in the preamble (and
the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered) rather than conflict for
dominant opinion. Only the human individual has the physical and psychological
power to develop fidelity.
How anyone can break
the preamble’s agreement, in order to live beyond success---in other words invite
woe, is amazing. Yet it happens all the time. The totality “We the People of
the United States” may be asymptotically approached if most people accept their
personal human power to collaborate for statutory justice and take the
authority to discover and establish civic peace.
The hapless
Mayfield volunteered to provide a modern, extreme example of the woe begged by
not observing the preamble. Priest-politician-partnerships beg woe all the
time, but famous trumpeters, not so much.
A note about
the preamble: unity, as civically moral, works just fine. However, religious
unity, political unity or the partnership begs woe. I prefer integrity as both
understanding and wholeness to unity.
To JT McQuitty: As always, I'm grateful for your
comment and citation.
I wondered,
searched, and found, "We then uncover evidence that the denominational
makeup of a state is related to corruption, with heavily Catholic states having
higher levels of corruption."
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.545.8077&rep=rep1&type=pdf
.
Misplaced fidelity (Rich Lowry)
(message-forum.net/threads/fake-news-what-about-a-fake-magazine-cover.125828/#post-1425729)
I do not envy
Lowry’s pitch for the GOP. The train to restore the American republic and make
American great at last has left the station and Lowry is waving goodbye.
The train was
empowered by people who voted for Donald Trump twice: Once to defeat the GOP and the second time to
defeat Alinsky-Marxist organizers who would use liberation collectivism to
overthrow the ineluctable human march toward authority for responsible freedom;
in other words, statutory justice; in other words, civic peace where human
responsibility prevails.
Renew? (Maxwell Hamilton)
theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/article_26e786c6-e1d9-11e7-b5fd-2b990f626e86.html
The enthusiasm for trade with Cuba
seems like personal interest to me.
I certainly don’t want any more
official tourism on the people’s tab.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts, or actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth
of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic
People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See
online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
Phil Beaver seeks to collaborate on the-objective-truth,
which can only be discovered. The comment box below invites readers to write.Note 1: I often dash words in phrases in order to express and preserve an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error.
Note 2: It is important to note "civic" refers to citizens who collaborate for the people more than for the city.
A personal paraphrase
of the June 21, 1788 preamble: We the civic citizens of nine of the
thirteen United States commit-to and trust-in the purpose and goals stated
herein --- integrity, justice, collaboration, defense, prosperity, liberty, and
perpetuity --- and to cultivate limited services by the USA. Composing
their own paraphrase, citizens may consider the actual preamble and perceive
whether they are willing or dissident toward its principles.
I'm with Shofstahl and Bonin.
The Advocate
writers just can’t resist expressing their liberal-democrat bias or for other
reasons discredit Republicans.
Quoting them, “Still, [Kennedy] is a loyal Trump
supporter.” As though loyalty to the
president negates a Senator’s responsibility to represent the people of his or
her state. Pardon me, writers for The Advocate: I think your loyalty to
liberal-democracy rather than the American republic is mirrored in your daily sentiments.
Furthermore,
The Advocate writers try to duck their opportunity for responsible authority by
abdicating to the American Bar Association. Many readers are aware that the ABA
is almost as disreputable to statutory justice as is the liberal press and the
DNC. The Advocate has the opportunity to tune-in to the public’s integrity.
Lastly, Kennedy
has, for decades been a great example of a citizen who has the honest integrity
to call out errant politicians and be himself as well. The Advocate, in its
folly, equates civic justice to “causing trouble.”
Each time I
express hopes for my hometown newspaper, I leave the page feeling like a
trouble maker. However, I will not give up on the expectation that Baton Rouge
can and will have a free and responsible press, something Benjamin Franklin
imagined but knew not how to secure. The opportunity exists for someone, who
wants statutory justice in Baton Rouge; Louisiana; and the USA, to take the
authority of proving a responsible press.
Today’s thought,
G.E. Dean (Psalms 29:11 CJB)
“May ADONAI give strength to his people! May ADONAI bless
his people with shalom!”
Dean says, “Do you need strength and peace? Turn to the Lord
and he will provide.”
I understand that David expressed earnest entreaty for
strength and peace for his tribe. Dean turns that into an egocentric, personal
promise.
It reminds me of presidents from George Washington to Donald
Trump expressing personal hopes for a good outcome for the people while the
Christian right may claim divine authority in the American republic or at least
in select presidents.
Egocentric peace is possible by merely having no humility at
all---“knowing” that you hold the correct opinion in dispute. However, civic
peace is possible only when two parties collaborate to discover the-objective-truth
and make the most of it. What’s civically damning about Christianity is that
two Christians with differing views can start a discussion but reach a point of
disagreement and decide to be civic enemies. For example, consider a Baptist
expressing the joy of Remembrance then hearing a Catholic express the power of
Transubstantiation. They could decide to be civic friends even though they are
not in religious agreement. However, too often one dusts the other off (Mark
6:11). I even had a Sunday school teacher call me a heretic for saying that
civic neighbors should be treated equally regardless of religion.
Not wanting bad influence in my life, I left Sunday school.
Only now, two decades later, I realize I overcame subjugation of my personal
authority to collaborate for civic peace without compromising my trust and commitment
to what is not known by anyone.
Letters
American doom (Hale) (theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_3e616874-db78-11e7-8d32-f32e3c525201.html)
What we’re
seeing is the American republic terminating five decades of Alinsky-Marxist
organizing (AMO). It’s much like American republicanism overthrowing 1600 years
of Bible support for slavery: reform does not come easy and does not appeal to
all factions. Now, we are experiencing the overthrow of liberal democracy or
collectivist liberation politics; in other words, conflict for chaos.
I think liberal
democrats would do well to consider the possibilities for the human species and
their person’s opportunity to collaborate for civic peace.
Only a person
can decide how to spend his or her energy during his or her brief lifetime. Only
the human has the physical and psychological power to take the authority for
his or her opportunity at life. Only the person may use his or her body and
mind to collaborate to discover the responsibility for freedom. Only the person
can decide to exercise fidelity to actual-reality rather than the opinion that
seeks to dominate in this country at any given time. Only the collection of
civic persons may discover and maintain statutory justice---the rule of just
law---as viewed by every civic person.
Most Americans
may collaborate for private liberty with civic morality starting now.
Relief for flood victims (Kinchen and Shelton)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_b4ba37fe-db95-11e7-b0ce-ef5190868033.html
and theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_9514bc32-db8e-11e7-8aeb-1b3679717b07.html)
I agree
with Kinchen and Shelton. Cassidy has behaved like a citizen who wants to guarantee
the safety net for victims of a 1000 year event.
Also, I hope Kinchen’s expectations
for the tax bill come through: “grow
our economy, create jobs in our communities and let Louisianans keep more of
their hard-earned money.”
Good story and gratitude for service (Hebert)
(theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_ba113682-e1d3-11e7-a7ea-5fd1e78faf89.html)
I don’t visit Mitch Landrieu's New Orleans and probably never
will, but it’s still good to read about one of the Louisiana cities.
Most of
all, it is fun to hear a veteran’s stories. Thank you for everything.
Columns. (The
fiction/non-fiction comments gallery for readers)
Mayfield’s demise (James Gill)
(theadvocate.com/new_orleans/opinion/james_gill/article_be85ca8c-e4cd-11e7-8cd6-534add34003a.html)
Mayfield could
have developed honest integrity by which to reject Nagin’s political influence.
The preamble to
the constitution for the USA divides citizens into two camps: a civic
people and dissidents. Dissidents range from the ignorant, the stubborn, the
arrogant, the harmful, the criminal, the evil, and beyond. Civic people
collaborate using the agreement that is stated in the preamble (and
the-objective-truth, which can only be discovered) rather than conflict for
dominant opinion. Only the human individual has the physical and psychological
power to develop fidelity.
How anyone can break
the preamble’s agreement, in order to live beyond success---in other words invite
woe, is amazing. Yet it happens all the time. The totality “We the People of
the United States” may be asymptotically approached if most people accept their
personal human power to collaborate for statutory justice and take the
authority to discover and establish civic peace.
The hapless
Mayfield volunteered to provide a modern, extreme example of the woe begged by
not observing the preamble. Priest-politician-partnerships beg woe all the
time, but famous trumpeters, not so much.
A note about
the preamble: unity, as civically moral, works just fine. However, religious
unity, political unity or the partnership begs woe. I prefer integrity as both
understanding and wholeness to unity.
To JT McQuitty: As always, I'm grateful for your
comment and citation.
I wondered,
searched, and found, "We then uncover evidence that the denominational
makeup of a state is related to corruption, with heavily Catholic states having
higher levels of corruption."
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.545.8077&rep=rep1&type=pdf
.
Misplaced fidelity (Rich Lowry)
(message-forum.net/threads/fake-news-what-about-a-fake-magazine-cover.125828/#post-1425729)
I do not envy
Lowry’s pitch for the GOP. The train to restore the American republic and make
American great at last has left the station and Lowry is waving goodbye.
The train was
empowered by people who voted for Donald Trump twice: Once to defeat the GOP and the second time to
defeat Alinsky-Marxist organizers who would use liberation collectivism to
overthrow the ineluctable human march toward authority for responsible freedom;
in other words, statutory justice; in other words, civic peace where human
responsibility prevails.
Renew? (Maxwell Hamilton)
theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/article_26e786c6-e1d9-11e7-b5fd-2b990f626e86.html
The enthusiasm for trade with Cuba
seems like personal interest to me.
I certainly don’t want any more
official tourism on the people’s tab.
Phil Beaver does not “know”
the-indisputable-facts, or actual-reality. He trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth
of which most is undiscovered and some is understood. He is agent for A Civic
People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit corporation. See
online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment