Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening to other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with people who may follow the blog.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with dashes in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, the writer expresses his “belief,” knowing he could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
The Advocate: See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge
Our Views. Both The Advocate and Edwards employ a tactic
mastered by Barack Obama: Create wrongful objectives then accuse legislators of
not offering a solution. Rather than use his administration to solve problems,
Obama sewed conflict begging chaos. He is out and his AMO tactics are outed.
The Advocate may wake
up to creating the good rather than proposing the bad. Perhaps Edwards would
get fired up on reading a reformed The Advocate.
Probably not going to
happen.
BTW, the Bible
condones slavery and a lot of other bad ideas. Why do we tolerate the Bible in
civic debate, after 228 years neglecting civic justice? The Bible is about
saving mysteries rather than securing lives.
There’s no place for
Bible-mystery in collaboration for public-integrity.
Today’s
thought, Jeremiah 23:23-24. I
thought it over and conclude that the influence I follow expects me to perfect
my unique person. My plans and intentions don’t suffice: What is required is
results.
Therefore, I work to understand
the-objective-truth, use what has been discovered, and respect the bountiful
unknowns. I behave this way for my hope and comfort and do not wish to impose
my acceptance-that-I-do-not-know on other peaceful people.
Let every peaceful person maintain
their own inspiration.
Letters
Crisis
(Mayer). Random thoughts.
I think the chief problem is that
peaceful citizens don’t appreciate each other. Rather than celebrate mutual
civic-safety-&-security, many strive to change the other person’s private-motives-&-inspiration.
Women
state-leaders (Mahoney). The
Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlaws discrimination based on race, color,
religion, sex, or national origin.
A government act that is grounded in the-objective-truth ought
to nudge the people toward civic justice. Recall in my usage “civic” refers to
mutual appreciation in public connections with another person more than
cooperation with the city’s goals. The words race, color, religion, sex, and
national origin are explicit. However, “discrimination” is controversial.
Without standards, it is impossible to prevent discrimination in public connections and transactions. This country was founded on resistance to Blackstone---or English common law, or Parliamentary rule---with the right to choose Protestant Christian faction rather than the king’s church. Independence was declared in order to secure rights: life, liberty, and property (assets in 2017).
Without standards, it is impossible to prevent discrimination in public connections and transactions. This country was founded on resistance to Blackstone---or English common law, or Parliamentary rule---with the right to choose Protestant Christian faction rather than the king’s church. Independence was declared in order to secure rights: life, liberty, and property (assets in 2017).
From there, through the wonder of immigration, freedom of
religion emerges a false bemusement even though the federal branches have not
yet caught on: Civic justice comes from elsewhere.
In government, the standard that can assimilate the
civil-rights-issues is broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security, hereafter,
civic-security. Civic-security both protects and requires the right to think,
from which the personal preference for a religion or none may emerge. Pursuit
of happiness becomes personal quest rather than “the overall good” beyond
civic-security.
Civic-security is derived from the-objective-truth rather than
dominant-opinion. Politics becomes voluntary iterative-collaboration for
public-integrity rather than for arbitrary-power. But not everyone participates:
There will always be dissidents for reasons the unwilling may or may not
understand.
In a civic culture, people do not lie to each other so that
responses are not based on a lie---so that the parties can communicate. The
liars cannot communicate and thus isolate themselves. This culture exists now,
but the participants are divided by race, color, religion, sex, and national
origin. This division may be lessened by open-minded civic-individualism to
establish public-integrity.
A better way of living may be established in the Louisiana
legislature merely because the idea exists here: public-integrity is achievable.
Rich
Lowry column. “Donald Trump’s statements
about Russia during the past year and a half have often been stupid and
shameful.”
Trump was negotiating appeal to Russia’s nobler motives. It was
plain then, and is even more explicit now that Russia did not take the
invitation.
Trump treats writers for the media the same way: Trump offers
both honest and integrity. When the media respond with lies, Trump imagines
alternate lies and proposes them to naïve writers. The process keeps the media
bemused with lies about lies, while Trump works on his objective:
civic-security in my words, safety & security in his words.
Voters in 84% of US counties were incredulous as Obama exposed “his
own naiveté and weakness.” But make no mistake. He is working his AMO tactics
more than ever. Be on guard.
James
Gill column. Jeff Parish Sheriff Newell Normand, 84% of murders solved; FBI
reports nationwide homicide clearance rates 60%; New Orleans in 2015, 35 %; New
Orleans under Lt. Jimmie Turner, 19%.
Miriam Waltzer guest column. Waltzer seems to be unaware that the male body typically
completes the wisdom-building portions of the brain at age 25.
Thus, her
suggestion that reform might be discernable in the late 30s makes sense for a
person who was a criminal at 15. I’d call a person of that age “adolescent.”
However, criminal possibility exists for children; criminality at age 5 begs
parole after 30 years rather than 20.
One other point. Especially because the Supreme Court left
options for the rarest cases, this seems like a decision that should stand indefinitely,
especially if we reform our education system so as to help children transition
to civic young adult rather than leave their future to chance. However, to
change the language to “our judicial branch has spoken,” seems wrongful. Much
of the judicial branch follows neither the preamble to the constitution for the
USA, the articles of the constitution, nor the body of Supreme Court opinions.
George Will column. That Randolph Bourne quote is objectionable for a civic
culture---one wherein the people voluntarily collaborate for justice in public connections
and transactions rather than to conform to a civilization designed by the
state.
I appreciate
Will’s attention to Bourne: “. . . educational
theorist John Dewey. Bourne was a student of Dewey at Columbia, but he rejected Dewey's idea of using the war to spread
democracy.”
“Bourne
was greatly influenced by Horace Kallen's 1915 essay "Democracy Versus the Melting-Pot"
and argued, like Kallen, that Americanism ought not to be associated with Anglo-Saxonism. In his 1916 article "Trans-National America,"
Bourne argued that the US should accommodate immigrant cultures into a
"cosmopolitan America," instead of forcing immigrants to assimilate
to Anglophilic culture.” (Wikipedia)
I tend to agree with this little bit by Bourne and want to read Kallen.
TOPS limits on college duration (Page 3B). With such common sense ideas, it is amazing
that Board of Regents is so dysfunctional.
I think they could
reform if their goal was to coach adolescents unto open-minded
civic-independence rather than subjects of ivory-tower-liberal-democracy.
Liberal professors
can't stand public-integrity. One recently, publicly chastised me to take some sociology courses, then tried to interrupt a civic conversation I was in after the meeting. It's really amazing how clouds affect white-tower people.
Flood recovery concerns (Page 1A). Why wasn’t the Larry
Bankston affair discussed. We still don’t know who will manage the money and
how much they graft from the federal allocation.
Metro-Council (Page 1A). The
contrast could not be more explicit. Metro Councilwoman Barbara Freiberg says, “I
am concerned about the audit and the action plan that comes from the audit.”
(Thank you.)
The black legislative caucus urges approval now, regardless of a
history of local financial abuse by a nationally affiliated non-profit. It’s
almost like black-caucus feels entitled
to abuse the people.
One
possibility is to call in federal election officials to recommend rules to 1)
prevent a council from approving a tax vote on behalf of a non-profit with
questionable operations, 2) prevent the tax plan from being biased against a
civic faction such as home-owners, and 3) prevent a national non-profit group
from interfering in local elections.
There are
many civically-moral Democrats, and I resent reading “Democrat” to represent
the seeming Alinsky-Marxist organized (AMO) council members who terminated the
meeting. AMO uses civic disruptions that may escalate to violence, property
damage, injury, even deaths. There ought to be a consequence when elected
officials exemplify or incite AMO tactics for the moment, for the future, or
for a movement. AMO purpose is conflict for the sake of power in chaos. Lastly,
if the Democrats emerge the stronger party for public-integrity, I will gladly
switch to Democrat, because I am not happy with the GOP; thank goodness
President Trump defeated their presidential nominees.
I continually
write to the Metro Council members and have written to the Mayor and some of
her advisors that Baton Rouge can establish public-integrity, but that cannot
happen when the leadership does not demonstrate integrity as both wholeness and
civic-understanding.
One other point: The COA-supportive-crowd’s claim to be “taxpayers”
is probably false. First, to legitimize that claim the COA taxation should be
from sales-taxes rather than solely property tax.
The COA offers nothing for me
in my eight decade, and there is no moral justification for me to carry the
load with no contribution by other citizens. Compare
BREC and EBRP libraries, both with excellent services that do not exclude me.
Then there’s CATS with strong bias against me, primarily due to poor management.
Second, presenting the conflict as Metro Council vs taxpayer is false. COA
civic immorality affects every citizen, including Metro Council members and the direct recipients of COA
services.
Can’t trust the Associated Press (Page 1A). Vivian
Salama and Josh Lederman spin this a Trump changing his mind rather than Russia
deciding to rebuke Trump’s overtures to civic integrity.
Also, they
press the mysterious Russian collusion with no evidence beyond the DNC’s
failures to protect their information. And they invent new construct about Trump’s negotiating
posture.
Maybe the
Associated Press’s ability to fabricate and pursue their phantasms “is coming to
an end.”
Despite the
Associated Press’s pretense---gloom and doom, Tillerson and the Russians planned working
meetings to resolve disputes.
Maybe the Associated Press will find a reliable
medium from which to learn the news.
Can’t trust TNS (Page 4A). Brian
Bennett spins Trump’s meeting with NATO as Trump reversal rather than NATO
reform.
Post-flood aid plan (Page 6A). Of
$11.1 million from the federal Dept of Housing and Urban Dev in 2016, Mayor
Broome’s Office of Community Development’s Monika Gerhart says $5.2 million
will go to the rental business, $3.5 to EBRP first time homeowners and $2.4
million, 21.6 % somewhere.
Wonder why Steve Hardy and The Advocate
did not report on the $2.4 million.
Fearful lawmakers (Page 10A). I wouldn’t label it “fear.” It’s more
like confronting AMO and their disruptive tactics.
Spicer apologies (Page 10A). It
seems good to apologize for bad statements. Spicer must have a photographic
memory without instant atrocity-relativity check. Atrocities ought not be
happening.
Phil
Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. Phil
trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is
undiscovered and some is understood.
Phil Beaver is agent for A Civic People of the United
States, a Louisiana, education non-profit. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment