Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening to other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with people who may follow the blog.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with dashes in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, the writer expresses his “belief,” knowing he could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
The Advocate: See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge
Our Views. “This editorial, with slight
modifications, has appeared on previous Good Fridays.”
I
recall Socrates said something like: the unexamined civic editorial is not
worthy of publishing: “Good Friday is a
day to remember the human capacity not only to endure suffering, but to
transcend it.” This sentence invokes “grin and bear” tyranny when civic-appreciation
is possible. (Herein, "civic" refers to mutual justice in public connections & transactions between strangers.) "Suffering" also invokes victimization theory, which is of great interest
to American citizens---victims of slavery and threats of personal slavery that
inspired loyal British subjects in 1774 to declare colonies were states then in 1788 ratify
nine states as a nation.
Is
The Advocate aware of liberation philosophy? See Mendieta,
Eduardo, "Philosophy of Liberation", The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward
N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/liberation/>. “The
debate . . . at Valladolid in 1550 marks the clear emergence of a liberation
discourse and consciousness.”
Liberation
philosophy indicts the Catholic Church’s doctrine of discovery, which claimed
that, first Portugal then Spain, was authorized to “discover” land that was not
previously claimed by a Christian and take it for God, enslaving the natives
found there (and worse). The Church also authorized importing Africa’s global
commodity, African slaves, to assist in the colonization of “discovered” lands.
Later, factional Protestant kings competed with the Church and added Jesus as
authority for the doctrine of discovery. I have no desire to diminish churches
or lessen what they do for peaceful believers.
In our great
city, our own Mayor Broome babbles incoherent support for an errant Council on
Aging. The Metro Council is dysfunctional over an ongoing audit regarding COA
taxation without representation that should never have gone to the polls. At
the heart of the psychological disconnect is the struggle over black power and
black liberation theology vs statutory law: a silent war. Talk of this psychosocial
war is forbidden in this city, except within the church doors and other doors. Broome stonewalls civic-immorality as church and dialogues on racism, but I doubt she admits Israel's collaboration for civic-security.
Some theologians
posit that God first operated in Africa, the mother continent; the The Word
came from Africa; God is black; his chosen people are black; European countries
victimized African-slave-commodities and employed Bible-interpretations to
justify atrocities. Thus, white Church is Satan. For what Africa and some
European countries did before the USA existed, the USA must pay retribution.
African-Americans must cash a check. Black God for believers is no problem for me as long as the believers contribute to civic-security.
These issues,
which are happily constrained by both civic justice and statutory law, can be resolved
by civic collaboration. Even though theology is at the heart of the inspiration
and motivation for change, it cannot dictate the change. For example, the
notion that God has skin much less a specific skin-color cannot be the basis
for civic law. However, stonewalling a 1700 year-old fallacy and the
consequential civic-immorality is dysfunctional.
It’s no burden
to me for a person to think God is black as long as the person could care less
that I do not and will not speculate about God. However, I deserve
public-integrity: both statutory criminal law and statutory civil law based on
the-objective-truth rather than dominant-opinion. Amending existing civic
injustices will take time, but let’s get started in Baton Rouge. Our lives
cannot wait for the state, the nation, or the world to reform. There will always
be dissidents to civic-morality.
Readers may say,
“But Phil, this is a global issue.”
My response is: Baton
Rouge can have public-integrity now, because the proposal exists here. Let’s
get started with candid collaboration for civic-morality using
the-objective-truth. Let black church, white church, other peaceful assemblies
and no church---the people---civically flourish in privacy. Let the people be
civic for each other rather than civil for an institution. For example, spouses work for each other's psychological growth and civic-security, and the family is enriched. In technical terms, spouses collaborate for the-objective-truth in inter-personal civic connections & transactions rather than compete for dominant-opinion regarding civil family-leadership.
The Advocate may
lead by civic awareness of psychological and physical realities in our great
city. Dysfunction at the Metro Council and in the Mayor’s office can be
addressed, but not by stonewalling.
Today’s
thought, 1 Timothy 4:8. Typically bad
advice from Paul as well as Dean.
I spend about 90 minutes each day on
bodily exercise, and if I did not, I could barely walk and would resume the perception that I am in
the process of dying.
Letters
Medical
equipment tax (Salles). “. . .
unintentionally removed.”
That’s the first time I’ve seen it
expressed that way. Past commenters claimed that’s how Gov. Edwards offset the
initial cost of Medicaid expansion.
One of the realities of
public-integrity is that a civic people don’t lie to each other. Therefore,
liars are easily detected.
Fish
act (Cresson). I agree that fishing is far
more worthy of my worry than legislation to control earth’s atmosphere, but I
am not moved to write my congressman.
Drastic insurance (Abadie). The
increase certainly gives citizens a personal stake in asking drivers not to
text, drink, smoke, and other distractions while driving.3
Stephanie
Grace column. The LSU school of Mass Communication brags that public
polls determine public policy. However, they are nothing more than political
propaganda, designed by subjective questioning with subjective answers and
subjective evaluations. It's called "social science," but statistics
is a study-tool rather than science, itself a study that often does not
represent the-objective-truth.
According to polls, Hillary Clinton did not need to campaign for president.
Propaganda hurts not only taxpayers but all the people who are adversely affected by the consequence. Let's hope this poll does not hurt the people.
I do not agree with Grace's explanation of Edwards' angst. The handwriting is on the wall: the federal government is going to move its expenses onto the states, where they belong---closer to the people. Louisiana needs to prepare, but Edwards has that liberal-democrat nanny-state belief that once he's into momma, momma has to fork over. It does not work that way.
Edwards
has hurt flood victims with his attitude toward federal disaster coverage, and
the extent of the Edwards-damage is not yet known.
Froma
Harrop column. Tesla, with net losses, has
market capital based on expectations.
Harrop uses hopes for clean energy to justify the claim that the
free-market that will provide for the future should be instead
social-engineered. Her liberal-democrat mind assesses President Trump as
leading “a vision for a country that wants to lose.”
Liberal democrats think somebody else will pay for what they
want and will deliver it now! Life is just one conflicting demand after
another.
Michael Gerson column.
“. . . is . . . using nerve agent against civilians more heinous
than killing them with forced starvation or barrel bombs?” It is if you say it
is and enforce your claim.
“Our current president will find . . .” I guess we can assume
hubris has paid Gerson in the past.
Stephanie Grace column. Nungesser has “taken it upon himself to
ask President Donald Trump to intercede in Landrieu's attempt to take down
Confederate-era monuments on public property in New Orleans.”
As the person
responsible for state monuments, and with a governor who cares about his
political party rather than the people of Louisiana, Nungesser is acting for
the civic people of Louisiana.
The history of slavery is at least 4000 years
old. Slavery was condoned by the Church 1700 years ago. Trade with African
enslavers was “authorized” by the Church 562 years ago. The USA was ratified by
nine states for operation 229 years ago. Eight of thirteen states had slavery.
We are all either victims of the past or persons with the opportunity to establish
public-integrity.
Nungesser is courageous to carry the torch for
public-integrity regarding the monuments. Every person in the state may benefit
from public-integrity.
To Julius Dooley: LSU informed me that public opinion determines public policy.
This was during a presentation on computer programming for sociology and
political polls.
Polls are subjectively
designed, pose subjective questions, are attractive to opinionated people who
are willing to subject their opinions to robo-questions, and respond
subjectively. The pollster subjectively comments on the resulting statistics.
According to polls, Hillary
Clinton did not need to campaign for president. Donald Trump won in 84% of US
counties.
Broome on CAO (Page 1A). To Gene P. Smith: “In an interview Thursday, [Mayor Broome] said
the nonprofit agency does not need more oversight from city-parish government
through the cooperative endeavor agreement. Whatever policies we have in
place for our partnerships with other people should be the universal standard.”
However, “The Council on Aging has a rare level
of autonomy from city-parish government, especially for an agency with a
dedicated tax. The mayor and Metro Council usually have the ability to appoint
board members for agencies in Baton Rouge. For example, the mayor appoints or
the Metro Council votes on some if not all board members for agencies such as
BREC, the library system, the Capital Area Transit System and the Downtown
Development District.”
Broome knows
“intelligent, insightful people on the board from various walks of life.”
Are they some
predators focused on “our seniors . . . gems in our community”?
Broome seems
to stonewall the evidence.
To Phillip Ehlers:
I appreciate your
phrase "taxpayers and constituents." AMO disruptions hurt everyone.
Last week, the Plummer
family members complained that they are African-Americans being victimized by
African-American public officials (as though white officials are predators). The
family expresses tacit indictment of legislative black caucuses.
So what does the Metro
Council's black caucus and the Mayor do? Ignore/rebuke the African-American
victims! Damn the abuses, get on with the graft! It's past time for Americans to recognize
that assuming the label "African-American," is voluntary, personal
enslavement to someone else's cause, traditional as the cause may seem.
Americans have the
freedom to practice the private liberty of pursuing the happiness they perceive
rather than the overall good for an institution, perhaps the city or the
church. Freedom may be accepted by the person who wants the liberty to pursue
private dreams.
To Honor Lincoln: Since the COA promoted the 51% vote in inept pretense
as external solicitor, kill the property tax and come back with a vote based on
a sales tax.
U.S. hits IS (Page 1A). President
Trump is working on another couple campaign promises: 1) destroy IS and 2)
never reveal US plans.
Nungesser (Page 1A). I
voted for Nungesser and want the board to get off his back.
IEM contract (Page 4A). I
have always been proud of my vote, but John Bel Edwards taught me a lesson
during my eighth decade.
Sometimes, not voting is the best option.
That way, you are certain to not regret your vote. I understand that the
consequence can be worse, but I do not like regretting my vote.
I could not possibly vote for Vitter and
would not this very minute.
Monuments (Page 5A). The Civil War was instigated by a
handful of people, like John C. Calhoun, and promoted among the people by
factional Christian ministers who preached slavery as an institution of the
Christian God despite physics of slavery---whips, chains, guns, brutality and
rape to slaves with psychological and physical burdens to masters.
Woe
was begged by a few but came to many: perhaps 750,000 American casualties,
equivalent to 8 million with today’s population. How much misery and loss has
Mitch Landrieu begged? If he should call it off, would he have the courage?
Edwards may: Does he have the courage?
My concerns about woe
may be hyperbole, but woe does not conform to men’s plans. It comes unannounced and with its own fury.
I commend Louisiana to
stop begging woe.
Can’t trust the Associated Press (Page
13A).
Joe Mandak would have us think that coal miners don’t have a
better future now that Barack Obama is gone.
Sorry. We just can’t trust the
Associate Press.
Also, we can’t trust many of the officials who worked for Obama
and still have jobs. I guess they’ll all have to be fired to get their
attention: majority voters in 84% of the nation’s counties prevented Hillary from continuing Obama's ruinations.
Family planning (Page 13A). OK’d excepting
abortion for adult satisfactions.
Phil
Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. Phil
trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is
undiscovered and some is understood.
Phil Beaver is agent for A Civic People of the United
States, a Louisiana, education non-profit. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment