Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when
the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by
listening to other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below
invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with
people who may follow the blog.
Note: I often connect
words in a phrase with dashes in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity
represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible
error. In other words, the writer expresses his “belief,” knowing he could be
in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.
The Advocate: See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge
Our Views. Is
this idea, “Let’s go back to before,” an original with The Advocate, or did it
come from Gov. John Bel Edwards? Everybody knows humans don't go back to before.
The GOP may take charge and drum Edwards out of influence. Solve the state’s budget woes by cutting costs, especially special-interest favors, and deliver the bill to Edwards’ desk. No new taxes.
On a separate front, pass the gas-tax increase and get on with road upgrades with strong DOTD oversight. No more La 1 at Port Allen bridge failures!
The GOP may take charge and drum Edwards out of influence. Solve the state’s budget woes by cutting costs, especially special-interest favors, and deliver the bill to Edwards’ desk. No new taxes.
On a separate front, pass the gas-tax increase and get on with road upgrades with strong DOTD oversight. No more La 1 at Port Allen bridge failures!
Today’s thought, Alvin Plantinga. He’s only a Christian philosopher---not
a god, but I paraphrase Plantinga’s $1.4 million thought: Each human being is
born so psychologically powerful that God allows every person to choose either
good or evil behavior.
This
thought informs us that separation of church from state is essential for civic
justice: Some humans choose evil behavior
and God does not intervene.
Therefore, the people must take charge of civic
justice.
Stephanie Grace
column, “speak up”. “Speak up” prompts “listen up.”
Listen to the preamble
to the constitution for the USA (1787), Abraham Lincoln, and Alvin Plantinga,
for example, to understand the source of justice: The people rather than
theism.
Warned by the CSA to
prepare for war because “public opinion at the North has invested a great
political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief,” Abraham
Lincoln, perhaps drawing from the preamble, responded on March 4, 1861, “Why
should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
Is there any better or equal hope in the world?” Lincoln urged the people to
accept responsibility for justice, but the reality of theism brought war.
On April 25, 2017, RNS
announced that Alvin Plantinga won the Templeton Prize. Some philosophers view
“theistic belief as logically incompatible with the reality of evil.”
Plantinga, a Christian, counters that, “in a world with free creatures, God
cannot determine their behavior, so even an omnipotent God might not be able to
create a world where all creatures will always freely choose to do good.” Thus,
Plantinga supported Lincoln’s 1861 claim: Justice comes from the people rather
than God.
It is alright for
black power and black theology to hope that their God will deliver them to
supremacy--- every city will yield to their demands. It is not alright for
elected officials to ignore the source of justice.
New Orleans,
Louisiana, and the USA, may listen to history and reverse the intent to remove
more monuments.
George Will column (tax reform hard). It will not be easy. However, there must be a first step,
and that is the bright part of each of President Trump’s initiatives. He does
not hesitate to start. It is up to the people to support and finish.
Jeff Sadow column. Sadow, I appreciate the research you
do and want to understand your message, but it is not happening.
In
this case, I think Orleans Defenders Office (ODO) spent $227/filing in 2015
compared to $38 in 1996. I have no idea what OPD did. You talk about so many
different courts. How can I sort your numbers?
I
understand 164 murders in 2015 vs 363 in 1995 and 3736 violent crimes in 2015
vs 10,876 in 1995.
So
crime is drastically down, with ratios 0.34 crime, 0.45 murder and 3.2 cost. Thus,
cost is 7.1 to 9.4 high. With $7 million spent, $1 million seems enough.
What happened to $6 million? Judges and lawyers statutorily ate it?
What happened to $6 million? Judges and lawyers statutorily ate it?
Michael Gerson column (Trump
an imbecile). Gerson, you disappoint me.
Trump
is an administrator, perhaps the best the USA has ever seen. If any of the
other candidates had won the election, the administration might have been
filled with career do-nothing politicians.
You
may begin to understand what is happening by focusing on the accomplishments of
Trump’s cabinet---the USA’s cabinet. Tell us your thoughts on cabinet members’
works and then you might be able to communicate with us, the readers.
Never before has a president so constantly
informed the people. Never before has a president freed the people from the
media and the sociology polls. But the media and pollsters are clueless.
Decision rumors (1B). To Nancy M.
Jeansonne: Behavior The Advocate attributes to “leaders” seem to me to be
Alinsky-Marxist organized (AMO) instigators.
Listen to this 1967
conversation with Alinsky: youtube.com/watch?v=OsfxnaFaHWI .
At 0.67 minutes,
Buckly calls Alinsky the revolutionary of American churches.
At 16 minutes, he
establishes the “constitutional amendment” (my interpretation) that empowers
AMO: after a community
has been burned, they are the people the government must settle with.
At 19:25 he talks
about having no ideology beyond liberal democracy; the people take power and
solve the problems as they arise.
At 23:14, “The right
thing to do.” (Quoting the 2016 Gov. Edwards?)
I do not understand
The Advocate using AMO language to describe the people who met as “leaders”
without the help of Saul Alinsky talking for Saul Alinsky. Is The Advocate an
AMO agent rather than a business opportunist?
And what does John
Delgado know and how does he know?
Sales Tax (1A). Renewal of
any part of the extra sales tax would be sheer negligence by the Legislature
and the administration. Cut special-interest favors.
Pope on Korea (2A). Since when
did the papal-government partnership extend to the far east?
NC College pledge (14A).
There should be some conservative pledges to offset the liberal democrat
pledges.
Selling a home but keeping the mortgage with advice from the
buyer’s lawyer (16A). The church left out the
first of the deadly errors: gullibility.
Readers can’t trust the Associated Press,
and Matt Sedensky did not give enough detail about how the scam works.
Immigrants rallies (17A). I
wonder if Obama’s AMO organization, perhaps OFA (ofa.us) is a sponsor. The
Associated Press could tell us who the sponsors are, but Sophia Tareen and Amy
Taxin did not say.
Big bomb (20A). The media
wants to lessen Trump’s accomplishments, but the US military dropped that bomb.
I understood the Islamic State was their target and would not be interested in
a writer’s second guess.
Same wavelength (21A). Readers
may understand that sociologists start with an idea, create subjective studies
to prove their idea, and get some statistics. They report an idea but know
nothing about discovered-reality or the-objective-truth.
Phil
Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. Phil
trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is
undiscovered and some is understood.
Phil Beaver is agent for A Civic People of the United
States, a Louisiana, education non-profit. See online at
promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment