Thursday, April 20, 2017

April 20, 2017



Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by listening to other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites readers to express facts, opinion, or concern, perhaps to share with people who may follow the blog.
Note:  I often connect words in a phrase with dashes in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth despite possible error. In other words, the writer expresses his “belief,” knowing he could be in error. People may collaboratively approach the-objective-truth.

The Advocate:  See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge

Our Views.
 

To William Bonin: that's right: It's a shell game with the expenses for rehabilitation being pushed into the future.
 
I am not encouraged by The Advocate's editorial-report.
  
Louisiana needs to emphasize behavior for personal success, which entails fidelity to the-objective-truth rather than whetting and satisfying adult appetites and abuses.
 
Civic justice comes from the people rather than from Christianity, faith leaders, and judicial leniency.
 
Other states may be reforming to save money on prison costs, but they are probably funding the rehabilitation programs and other adult-educations needed to help criminals who want to reform and discern those who are dissidents for life.
 
Maybe this session will serve to bring this kind of balance to the discussion. For example, fund a mental-health facility for this area, so that mental patients are not housed in jail.



Today’s thought, 1 Timothy 6:6-7. It seems clear that Paul, in this passage, perhaps influenced 1765 Great Britain to persuade American colonists to accept taxation of the colonies for England's benefit. Consider the complete text in 1-10:


All [colonists] who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters [in Great Britain] worthy of full respect, so that God’s name and our teaching may not be slandered. Those who have believing masters should not show them disrespect just because they are fellow believers. Instead, they should serve them even better because their masters are dear to them as fellow believers and are devoted to the welfare[a] of their slaves. These are the things you are to teach and insist on. If anyone teaches otherwise and does not agree to the sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ and to godly teaching, they are conceited and understand nothing. They have an unhealthy interest in controversies and quarrels about words that result in envy, strife, malicious talk, evil suspicions and constant friction between people of corrupt mind, who have been robbed of the truth and who think that godliness is a means to financial gain.
But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it. But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that. Those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.
Anyone can choose verses to express personal opinion, and I am convinced that's G.E. Dean's honest practice. However, honesty is insufficient: the-objective-truth demands integrity. Dean says, "Godliness . . . lasts forever."

I counter: Just as I trust my origins, I conduct my person with integrity: I trust my destiny, whatever it is.

 
Letters

Oil exploration victims (Guillory). Remember all victims of oil exploration. We benefit from their loss and each family's misery.
 
Higher education (Boland). I like your passion but think it is misplaced. 

LSU acts like an ivory tower of liberal democracy. Education has regressed in the last five decades and needs to reform to representative republicanism before public support may be resumed.
 
Rich Lowry column. Trump's views inchoate? Are you kidding yourself? 
 
Trump won the votes in 84% of US counties by having American opinions rather than liberal democrat opinions. Perhaps he did not realize how difficult representative republicanism is.
  
Your conclusion that Trump is no Jacksonian seems easily correct: You might try to compare Jackson to Trump, but there has been no president like Trump.

Maybe that's because he started his eighth decade before election to political office---as president. Ronald Reagan was almost as old, as elected president, but he had served a governor beforehand.
  
Michael Gerson column. At last Gerson explicitly expresses emotional-global-liberal-democracy.

The USA cannot be nanny for the dissidents to voluntary civic-integrity in this representative-republic. Good grief! The country is over-run with liberal democrats and has fabricated $20 trillion in debt trying to help adults whet and satisfy adult appetites at the expense of their children and beyond.

And you, Gerson, claim responsibility for social services in foreign lands? You seem insane. 

Dana Milbank column (Trump destroying healthy health care system). Milbank honestly cannot recognize integrity. 

Alexander and Broome (Page 1A).
 
Perhaps Mr. Alexander refers to his 2016 symposium "Moment or Movement?".

Would you say Ms. Broome and Mr. Alexander invite civic discourse leading to voluntary public-integrity? I would say they are stonewalling; power playing (Alexander in the wrong field); un-American. I don’t know but think integrity admits that the city is split, but on theology-power rather than race.

There are many black citizens in Baton Rouge who do not think God has skin, much less a skin-color. I doubt any human image can be imposed on God. I don’t doubt Broome, but am not confident that Alexander can address such issues. Perhaps his views are too superficial.
 
“Moment or Movement?” was the title of LSU’s Presidential Symposium on October 3-4, 2016 (hosted by Alexander). It seemed to come from Raymond Jetson.
 
It does not hurt my voluntary public-integrity to accept, with warmth, anyone's hope for their God, as long as the hope does not interfere with their personal civic-morality, but I do not intend to civically collaborate about my God: the-objective-truth whatever it is.

I attended the symposium, and my first Q&A suggestion, in the session, “Journalism and Social Justice,” drew incredulity from all but one panelist. I stated that the title “Social Justice” excluded my topic, “civic justice” and asked for comment. I defined “civic” as connections between people who intend to preserve civic justice in their transactions. The panelist who chose to respond said, “I agree” and explained control of radio-conversations using selective phrasing. As the symposium progressed my raised-hand was ignored for reasons I do not know.

My views on Alexander’s 2016 event are at cipbr.blogspot.com/2016/10/lsu-moment-or-movement.html .

To Phillip Ehlers: The petition is more American and less African-European than either LSU, Alexander, or Mayor Broome's advisors admit:  We certainly don’t live in Alexander-Broome Jetsonville.

  
The loyal English colonists, during the years 1720-1765, gradually realized that England intended to enslave them and debated the issue on both sides of the Atlantic. The colonists appealed to their English friends still in Great Britain to influence Parliament to grant them the freedom to practice the liberty to pursue private happiness as they had learned as colonists. They knew that England could not externally provide internal justice. But their English friends and families did not live in the colonies and therefore could not relate to freedom from oppression that unlocks the liberty to pursue private happiness. In 1774, they changed their style from colonies to states and wrote state-constitutions.
 
[BTW, the colonists likewise did not recognize that what they had experienced was the liberty to pursue private-happiness-with-civic-morality rather than the overall good according to religion (factional-Protestantism in 18th century America).]
 
In resisting their own enslavement, by declaring independence and going to revolutionary war, they also knew that they would eventually assume charge of African slaves who had been a commodity between Africa and the colonizers. They knew that the freedom they demanded for themselves would have to be extended to the African slaves. But they had not the means to simultaneously win freedom and provide emancipation.

 
Once freedom from England had been won, thirteen states accepted the independence the king admitted in 1783. But in only four years, 1787, states realized that to survive, they must form a nation. The negotiation of the constitution led to a viable and amendable USA, with 8 slave-states and 5 non-slave states, a plan to end African slave-trade in 20 years, partial representation for enslaved-inhabitants, and commitment and trust that emancipation would come when it was feasible. I imagine some slaves did not know how to accept freedom or deal with the consequences---did not want to be literally free.
  
Over 70 years later, the slave-states ratio had declined to 15:19, and ministers in the South encouraged legislators to count on Bible interpretation that slavery is an institution of the Christian God. The Declaration of Secession lists grievances and concludes that the North is influenced by "more erroneous religious beliefs." Fool-heartedly, 7 slave states engaged the military-power of 27 states in the USA. Soon, 13 states had joined the folly. It was South-white-Christian-church against North-white-Christian-church in order to settle Bible interpretation. Emancipation was accomplished in 1865, but civil rights remained challenged.
 
A century later, the struggle for America's freedom from slavery became a civil-rights movement organized in black church. The moral successes in the 1964-5 anti-discrimination and voting acts had the potential to unlock liberty to pursue personal happiness, but Alinsky-Marxist organization (AMO) created 5 decades of regression.
 
I do not know enough to label black church "Christian," because it seems to me the very nature of God is challenged by black church. I cannot alone discern "black-power-and-liberation-theology," as Christian. However, civic-justice comes from the people and the-objective-truth.
 
Rather than stonewalling, iterative collaboration to reach civic-morality can establish voluntary public-integrity. Explicit extension from the above history of the American quest for freedom from slavery can begin in Baton Rouge today.
  
Federal aid (Page 1A). Flood victims must be grateful to the Louisiana Senators Cassidy and Kennedy.
 
However, the news that the flood-housing portion of the second $2 billion would be only $1 billion disappoints me for the flood victims.

Earth day (Page 1A). To Mark Perkins: I think security against wrongful gun carriers and AMO disturbances might be better at the zoo and like that aspect of the decision. Let’s see how it goes.

Edwards hurts flood victims again (Page 1A). On the same day we learn that the second $2 billion requested from Congress has only $1 billion for flooded homes the grandstanding Gov. Edwards declares land loss an emergency!

It took 7,000 years for sediment from the Mississippi River to deposit that land, preventing the observation of countering subsidence due to plate tectonics. But after levee building after the 1927 flooding, jettisoning the sediment into the Gulf of Mississippi has accelerated both subsidence and erosion. Seven millennia of buildup has been significantly attacked by 90 years of global-engineering.
 
We don’t need more haste for future engineering fiascoes, but flood victims without a home lives are ticking by.

Somebody please awaken Gov. Edwards from egocentric stupor: pride. The best defense is humility, or silence rather than prayer.

Broome’s director (April 17). To Glen Miller: I'm not as certain as you that Ms. Newman's point about Mayor Broome's skin color can be generalized as "Mr. Bell's race." Readers may consider Mr. Bell's groove---past crime reports and employment records---to catch Newman's point.
  
Many black people have more voluntary public-integrity than the average white person. Public-integrity is grounded in fidelity to the-objective-truth, to self, to family, to extended family, to the people, to the nation, to the world, and to the universe, both respectively and collectively.
 
Voluntary public-integrity cannot come from Mayor Broome’s subjects---dialogues on racism and church.
 
Each human has the possibility to perfect his or her fidelity, by not repeating human mistakes---misery and loss---that inevitably come. However, when people continually invite woe, woe eventually stays.

Georgia house (Page 2A). Readers can’t trust the Associated Press. 
 
Bill Barrow and Erica Werner reported Handel was a distant second to Gassoff. The vote was 48.1% D and 19.8% Handel. The D was motivated to win in the primary, and making up a 28.3% spread with 51.9% of the available vote does not seem “distant” for the runoff.

Also, recognition is growing that Trump the amazing politician (with 84% of US counties voting for him) may be an amazing president. The people of Georgia want a republican form of government rather than liberal-democracy.

Israel (Page 2A). Readers can’t trust the Associated Press.

Josef Federman expresses personal opinion in the statement, “Israel welcomed the strike on its northern neighbor.”

Everyone likes rebuke of poisoning citizens, but that does not translate to aggression against a neighbor.

Nepotism rule (Page 3A). An exclusion for this unique circumstance could be granted as an executive order.

State Rep. Jack McFarland must have something else in mind. I agree with Rafael Goyeneche and Metropolitan Crime Commission.

I wish The Advocate had told readers the bill number.

ExxonMobil to Texas (Page 8A). I doubt $6 million in state incentives made the difference. 
 
But what did Texas offer that Louisiana cannot? Louisiana rated 50th state by US News and World Report?

With voluntary public-integrity we can rise to No. 1:  The idea and developed theory exist right here in Baton Rouge.
 
However, the complete theory, ready for collaboration, is expressed in the essay, “Voluntary public-integrity,” available world-wide at promothepreamble.blogspot.com.

Foreign favor in the past (Page 3A). Some voluntary public-integrity may exist even in the Associated Press. 
 
Paul Wiseman describes Trump’s “Buy American” order data finding respecting potential enforcement of existing US laws. The-objective-truth is what is required to make good civic decisions, and President Trump has ordered collection of the data.

Legislative leaders give to themselves (Page 3A). I want that $9 million to go to ethics oversight, the Legislative Auditor, and the Attorney General.

Racketeering debate (Page 9A). N.O. D.A. Leon Cannizzaro must have been magnificent in his bid to add armed robbery to the list of 1984 crimes that could be considered gang related and add to penalties.

However, the Louisiana Legislature does not like good ideas coming from outside. Cannizzaro kindly said, “It showed me how serious they’re taking their roles.”

BESE timeout (Page 9A). At least the chance remains to stop promoting an aggressive game in high schools. I just watched a visceral collage of fist-fighting by EBR teenagers taken from last year’s Earth Day.

Iran deal a failure (Page 10A). Rex Tillerson expresses his own excellence.

N. Korea: don’t start a fight (Page 10A). Nikki Haley expresses her own excellence.

Other forums
 
Gullibility.
The cure is humility.
1 View · Answer requested by Mary Flynn

Phil Beaver does not “know” the-indisputable-facts. Phil trusts and is committed to the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is understood.
Phil Beaver is agent for A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana, education non-profit. See online at promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment