Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. Forward New Orleans (FNO)
seems an enterprise that complements The Advocate’s business plan---a partner
of sorts. But FNO seems like a special-interest coalition. For Louisiana
citizens, it seems better to be personally informed and vote for the candidate
you want in elected office for your private reasons rather than an organization’s
reasons or a political party's reasons. In other words, vote for your choice,
not theirs.
The phrases “civic platform” and “civic life,” commonly referring to the overall good for the city or community, made me wonder of FNO is similar to A Civic People of the United States, an education corporation which meets at libraries in Baton Rouge.
Our use of “civic” is uncharacteristic in that it refers to citizens who practice the aims and purpose stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA, yet “a civic people” is general in that persons worldwide may iteratively collaborate for public-integrity during their brief lifetime. However, so far, we feel civic morality (civic justice) expresses our opposition to social morality (classism) or civil morality (judgmentalism).
I feel informed respecting the people’s rather than the business-coalition’s interests by one comment about the scorecard: “To declare “good progress” on any front when it comes to crime, Forward New Orleans shows it’s desperately in need of lessons in basic math and logic.” See neworleanscitybusiness.com/blog/tag/forward-new-orleans/ . (The media in general are in desperate need to recognize that a civic people know math and logic.) I found the complete scorecard at ://forwardneworleans.com/.../2013/06/FINAL-REPORT-1.pdf . An affiliate: cbno.org/programs/collaborations/forward-new-orleans/.
A brief search on the Internet gave some background about FNO. “Forward New Orleans — based on a similar coalition focused on the mayor and City Council — was formed ahead of School Board elections in 2012. It is led by the New Orleans Business Council.” See ://theadvocate.com/.../article_560f5c61-ae89-53d3-bd8d..., May 28, 2015. For schools, ://schools.forwardneworleans.com/.../Forward_New-Orleans... .
A Civic People of the United States, like the preamble, is for citizens who voluntarily, iteratively collaborate for public-integrity. Our meetings are open to the public, and the next one is our fourth annual ratification day celebration, June 21, 2017, 7:00 PM at Goodwood library. June 21 is the actual day the USA came into being by the acts of the people's representatives in nine independent states, leaving four of the orignial thirteen states with the choice of joining the USA or remaining free states.
June 21, 1788 is more important to mutual freedom for the liberty to act according to a personal dreams than any other date IMO. What happened on July 4, 1776 through September 17, 1787 would have been for naught without ratification by the people in those nine states.
The phrases “civic platform” and “civic life,” commonly referring to the overall good for the city or community, made me wonder of FNO is similar to A Civic People of the United States, an education corporation which meets at libraries in Baton Rouge.
Our use of “civic” is uncharacteristic in that it refers to citizens who practice the aims and purpose stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA, yet “a civic people” is general in that persons worldwide may iteratively collaborate for public-integrity during their brief lifetime. However, so far, we feel civic morality (civic justice) expresses our opposition to social morality (classism) or civil morality (judgmentalism).
I feel informed respecting the people’s rather than the business-coalition’s interests by one comment about the scorecard: “To declare “good progress” on any front when it comes to crime, Forward New Orleans shows it’s desperately in need of lessons in basic math and logic.” See neworleanscitybusiness.com/blog/tag/forward-new-orleans/ . (The media in general are in desperate need to recognize that a civic people know math and logic.) I found the complete scorecard at ://forwardneworleans.com/.../2013/06/FINAL-REPORT-1.pdf . An affiliate: cbno.org/programs/collaborations/forward-new-orleans/.
A brief search on the Internet gave some background about FNO. “Forward New Orleans — based on a similar coalition focused on the mayor and City Council — was formed ahead of School Board elections in 2012. It is led by the New Orleans Business Council.” See ://theadvocate.com/.../article_560f5c61-ae89-53d3-bd8d..., May 28, 2015. For schools, ://schools.forwardneworleans.com/.../Forward_New-Orleans... .
A Civic People of the United States, like the preamble, is for citizens who voluntarily, iteratively collaborate for public-integrity. Our meetings are open to the public, and the next one is our fourth annual ratification day celebration, June 21, 2017, 7:00 PM at Goodwood library. June 21 is the actual day the USA came into being by the acts of the people's representatives in nine independent states, leaving four of the orignial thirteen states with the choice of joining the USA or remaining free states.
June 21, 1788 is more important to mutual freedom for the liberty to act according to a personal dreams than any other date IMO. What happened on July 4, 1776 through September 17, 1787 would have been for naught without ratification by the people in those nine states.
Today’s thought. Galatians 5:8-10.
Paul used metaphors that often obfuscate meaning. In this case, the message I
get is that a singular experience may sustain a journey of fidelity to
the-objective-truth.
I
don’t know why Dean turns to the negative, but his point is valid, too. For
example, nursing human appetites can ruin a person’s life, as we often observe
or experience.
Letters:
Today’s writers express opinions that did not instruct
me.
Froma
Harrop column. The caption does not seem accurate.
However, “the House bill seems destined for an early demise,” seems accurate
and just, IMO.
Dana
Milbank column. I like the opinions that oppose the house
bill re Obmacare, and think Milbank makes a better case than Harrop. Was there
no opposing opinion The Advocate thought worthy of balancing Milbank? Why ask
the reader to suffer Harrop?
Bernard
Goldberg column. I
appreciate the news (to me) that Professor Allison Stranger was the person
injured and that Alinsky-Marxist organizers (AMO) pulled her hair and twisted
her neck enough for her to wear a brace. Also, I was not aware of how elite the
Middlebury College students are. People may think that AMO is a movement by the
poor, but it is not so. It is for and by intellectuals who have lost any
respect for duty and responsibility that has been expressed by classical republicanism.
One AMO intellectual was so overconfident that he apologized for “bullying me,”
never accepting that I was not on-board until he finally terminated our
dialogue. He never answered my question, “Are you an AMO priest?”
And there is no doubt that opposing AMO strongly
influenced my early decision to vote for Donald Trump, based on his ability to
keep another traditional GOP candidate from being nominated. Opposition to AMO
sustained my determination through negative-attention that would normally turn
me away, such as Trump’s debate statement I viewed unkind, “Hillary does not
have the stamina to run for president.” Only after my vote did I learn of Trump’s
twenty-hour days on the campaign trails.
Judge
White (Page 1A). The suggestion that
White is responding to action by the Judiciary Commission is reassuring, and
everyone who is contrite deserves a chance to reform. Best wishes to Judge
White.
However, in future, a civic people
would appreciate immediate action by the Judiciary Commission when election
offenses such as Judge White apologized for are perpetrated. The election
should not have been allowed.
I’m not certain a civic people would
extend the exemption from justice the Judiciary Commission extended, because I have
neither the judicial rules nor the-objective-truth needed to make the decision.
From a public-integrity viewpoint, it does not seem civic justices is
operating.
Jail
reforms (Page 1A). Services for mental
patients should be part of this reform.
Conservatives
(Page 2A). I don’t trust Associated
Press writers. I’m a fiscal conservative and civic liberal (public-integrity)
but think “conservative” is often used to report about the Christian right, a
faction that predominantly affiliates with the GOP. The GOP bill is shockingly
poor.
Equal
pay (Page 3A). This is a popular but
wrongful movement. The woman is naturally powerful according to the-objective-truth,
and if she dedicates her life to a career, she should be paid for
accomplishments rather than her gender. And if she changes her mind to
partially dedicate her life to conceiving and rearing children, she cannot be
paid for the accomplishments her employer needs and is not getting.
Only liberal democrats would try to use
emotionalism to refute the-objective-truth. The USA must continue its support
of the family and the roles of mother and father, the two people who supplied
the ovum and sperm to conceive the child, according to the-objective-truth.
Ethics
quandary (Page 3A). If ethics gets in the way, change
the legislation: that’s often the Louisiana way.
Police
panel (Page 3A). Disgusting to watch a meeting.
Democratic
AG’s (Page 4A). Some of these people can
be unelected.
Palestinian
leader (Page 4A). While the media belabor Obama-Clinton
falsehoods, President Trump proceeds to pursue the art of the possible when
history says it can’t happen. Yeah for the world!
Sessions
not following Obama’s way (Page 9A). So
far, people in official capacity who should have accepted the results of the
presidential election have done everything they can to hope by some miracle
Hillary Clinton is actually president of the USA. The sooner such people are
incapacitated the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment