Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern. If you like the wok, share with people who may be interested.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate: See online at theadvocate.com/baton_rouge
Our
Views. I agree.
I especially appreciate The Advocate for speaking out
for children---the point of Louisiana’s education system. Children are not the
usual clichés like “the workers we need” (obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-announces-new-proposal-create-jobs-cut-taxes-small-businesses)
or “tomorrow’s adults” (dailyheadlines.com/what-will-anarchist-college-students-be-like-as-tomorrows-adults/).
Perpetually, children may be today’s most promising
persons. The Advocate seems to recognize that better than Gov. Edwards does and
more than many powerful adults admit.
To Dannie Garrett: I'd
sign up so as to learn more, because a civic adult does all he or she can to
help the children.
Today’s thought. Isaiah 55:6. With word
choices, Isiah’s 2800 year-old mystery morphs into Dean’s 2017 certainty. Opinion
that helps those two men be civic is good for them.
My
experience is that in my most heartfelt personal need, prayer was answered: “Help
yourself.” When I prayed for others, sometimes the situation improved. When it
did, I could not tell whether the person had helped themselves, medical-service-persons
helped them, or my action effected results.
I do
not trust men’s authority, including mine. Therefore, I trust and commit to
the-objective-truth of which most is undiscovered and some is comprehended,
understood, and used to humankind’s advantages.
As
for other people, real-no-harm hope and comfort are good for personal privacy,
but let’s work together to establish broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security---so
that every real-no-harm person may dedicate private life to the personal reward
they perceive.
Letters
Volunteering for lawyers (Berry) I scratch my head
each time a writer steps forward to say, “Let me speak a word to advance the
lawyers’-take from the people.”
Some writers don't seem to
realize there's risk in striving against a civic people, where “civic” implies working
for each other’s lives rather than for the government or social morality.
The
march toward civic morality is unstoppable. (See Abraham Lincoln’s 1st
inaugural for the kernel of my opinion.)
Police need help
(Manual)
I have worried about vigilantism since I faced it in 1967, when my Persian
passenger and I had a car breakdown in Oxford, MS---two vulnerable, college-kid-strangers.
Manuel’s appeal helped
me perceive a possibility: Public appeal to help police fight crime unintentionally
influences affected people to withhold information. If my notion is correct,
appeals like Manual should not be expressed without the larger issue:
vigilantism.
While in 1964-5 I perceived
relief at last from racism in America and interpreted MLK, Jr.’s dream speech
as inclusive rather than exclusive (as I perceive it today), the next five
years took a repressive direction. Black power influenced burning parts of
cities. The demanding debate is expressed in many ways to British reporters in
1969: youtube.com/watch?v=ejQj1CfOR1w. Therein, Muhammad Ali advocates black-isolation
(perhaps not thinking civic collaboration to establish We the People of the
United States using the preamble to the constitution for the USA was intended
for black people).
Collaboration cannot
easily evolve from a political-power-movement (such as 1789’s re-establishment
of factional-Protestantism in the USA as freedom of theism) but can only come
from a willing, civic people, where “civic” refers to people in this place
collaborating for life rather than competing for dominant political opinion or
civil governance.
During 1969-72, three
forces emerged that preserve black vigilantism in opposition to the civic
agreement offered by the preamble. First, ministers met with congressmen to
form what became Congressional Black Caucus (which today works to oppress Asian
Americans in competition for college entry). Second, James H. Cone published “Black
Theology & Black Power.” Third, Saul Alinsky published “Rules for Radicals.”
I refer to the result as Alinsky-Marxist organizing (AMO), and understanding from
Al Capone to Alisky to Barack Obama is expressed by D. L. Adams in newenglishreview.org/DL_Adams/Saul_Alinsky_and_the_Rise_of_Amorality_in_American_Politics/
. Of course, everything that happened before created the possibility for AMO.
Since then, forty-five
years of AMO pressure with neglect of the voluntary civic agreement offered by
the preamble has some of the black community in a vigilante mode that dictates
that anyone who cooperates with the police, even to constrain black on black crime,
is not cooperating with Muhammad Ali’s 1969 assertion that black people must
establish civic morality alone. Even working blacks like the woman taxi driver
from the 1969 British documentary, are outcasts within their own homes if they
help the police.
A civic people may
encourage collaboration by openly discussing the divisive forces “we, the
people” face, such as AMO and raised fists. Perhaps it is not enough for
individuals to appeal for the “public’s help in crime fight.” Perhaps blacks
need to reassure each other that vigilantism is an erroneous private policy,
let alone community policy.
Black-on-black crime
hurts black people and me.
Cal
Thomas column. I agree. President Trump has a winning
personality.
I voted for him because I thought his personal policies are good,
and entering his eighth decade he has broadly defined civic wisdom
because of extensive experiences I cannot imagine.
Before I voted for him, I stated that I felt it would
take him three years to establish himself as a political power. I did not
expect the democrats to be so childish about their losses by their own actions,
so I give President Trump (and my vote) an extension.
I think by then Cal Thomas will be able to say, “You
see, President Trump followed my advice and started selling his policies.”
George
Will column. Goldwater in Arizona. Good to know
goodness lives on. Also, this is the expected Will excellence in writing.
James
Gill column. Let’s recall Edwards and elect Landry.
“Insufficient diligence” is a reminder that honesty is
insufficient: Public servants may deliver integrity or not. Edwards comes up
short before flood victims.
Nero fiddled
while Rome burned: Edwards celebrated Vatican-Edwards-partnership while flood-relief-request
waited.
Philanthropists’
column. Philanthropist have freedom of expression
and freedom of assembly.
However, they are not free to tax the people. Only by
coercive influence can philanthropists gain political favor so as to impose on
the people. Often as not, recruits who are influenced by philanthropists would
have been better off on their own.
Without a doubt, philanthropists like “sanctuary”
people impose danger and expense on citizens in this country. It is one thing
to lend a helping hand, and quite another to break the law under the guise of “rescue.”
That’s only the tip of icebergs of philanthropic harm. For example, is Common
Core really a textbook business?
Federal
judge can’t manage (online). I don't know facts to comment about a particular case.
However, I speculate
that first responders, like the police, are appalled at the protectionism and
public injustice taken for granted by the judiciary and legislators.
The police are in
double jeopardy. A civic people may intervene on both sides.
Concealed
weapon (Page 1B). This is a sickening
aspect of an awful loss.
Angola
suit (Page 1B). This is a lawyer’s and judges cottage
industry at the people’s expense. There must be relief somehow.
AG
suit (Page 3B). This is a lawyer’s and judges cottage
industry at the people’s expense. There must be relief somehow.
Religiously
divided (Page 6d). Her husband is perfect
for family but with one flaw: Contempt for the Catholic Church, because a
priest abused him when he was a child. Lane suggests counselling from the
Survivor’s Network of those Abused by Priests at snapnetwork.org .
Both the wife and Annie Lane are
flawed. Life goes well when people are faithful, both respectively and
collectively to the-objective-truth, to self, to family, to extended families, to
the people, to the nation, to the world, and to the universe. That leaves no
room for church or political regime.
BESE
OKs (Page 1A). Thank goodness. I hope
Gov. Edwards backs off his defense of adult benefits from the huge education
budget and reforms to focus on children.
Russia
protests (Page 9A). The interest in better
service for the people is good and should eventually produce relief for Ukraine
and other countries bordering Russia.
Westinghouse
(Page 10A). Is this an example of what President
Trump refers to as bad deals made by American companies? Are global laws
flawed?
No comments:
Post a Comment