Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern. If you like the wok, share with people who may be interested.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. It
is difficult to imagine my hometown newspaper, The Advocate, so willing to
present the evidence that they misrepresent the facts: "Trump . . . has
been wobbly on the importance to the United States of . . . the NATO defense
alliance."
When NATO is failing itself by the
EU countries not contributing their 2% of GDP, Trump puts them on notice that
the USA will join their absence at the altar of commitment. Germany and others
say they will be forthcoming but are reluctant to reimburse the USA for past
failures to pay. Mike Pence met with them to reiterate the USA’s position.
Shame on The Advocate. Perhaps
consider this journalism principle appreciating integrity: Privately harbor
fake news or publish and remove all doubt. There is freedom of the press but
there are consequences for faking journalism.
Today’s thought. Never, never,
never, give up on the people. There is no other hope for civic justice.
Jim
Gill column. I agree, and it holds true in all public
service. Anyone who proposes weakening ethics oversight is suspect.
Mark
Ballard column. The paragraph about gold and sliver is
annoying.
Havard’s suggestion of settling for 10 cents is political
grandstanding, IMO.
George
Will column. “Walt
Whitman neglected to say . . .” is more annoying than most cute tricks.
I agree. The NEA may end without harming a civic culture.
Eight
charters (Page 1B). I’m impressed with the smallness of
these schools: grow to 900; start with 38 . . . grow to 140; 134; start with
150; eventually 540; start with 180 . . . grow to 550; ultimately 424. Is the
current average enrollment in EBRP charter schools 500/school? Statewide, the
enrollment seems to be 537/school. See louisianabelieves.com/docs/default-source/school-choice/2015-2016-charter-annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=9
.
Is tailoring the school to the child or parent the
right approach? Consider Plato’s cave: faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm
. Protected opinion seems hazardous to the person, but one opinion seems clear:
Excellent education is essential to human living.
Imagine the unknown era today’s children face. Consider
Gibran’s thoughts in “On Children,” katsandogz.com/onchildren.html . I prefer
to ignore Gibran’s theism, beautiful as it is, so as to focus on the civic
morality, where “civic” refers to parents, teachers and administrators
appreciating the person the child may discover (has the potential to develop).
Gibran asserts that a parent may morally try to mimic the child’s person but
must not impose the parent’s psychology on the child. Perhaps the child should
be entrusted with his or her learning, with schools serving to coach for
authentic human living more than impose extant knowledge.
EBRP schools has 42,618 students in 90 schools; 474
students/school and 90 principals under one school board rather than one board
per school or a few. It’s no wonder that charter schools divert money from childhood
learning to adult employment. Public schools may reform so as not to enhance
the market for charter schools: may compete.
Education
head and governor (Page 3B). Many public schools fail
students. I think that is because of an adult shell game that creates new
markets for new curricula, books, tests, and higher adult revenues.
With education reform, public schools may place its
trust in the children as persons. Reduce school board objectives to the
continuing basics: discipline and security; reading with comprehension; writing
with understanding; fidelity in human bonding, history, civics, and fine arts;
and STEM to instill ever renewed personal curiosity. I omitted somethings, so
please add them, but let’s fix them and create, for example in EBRP, ninety
grade-A schools in time for today’s persons who are children.
Film
tax (Page 1A). When a tax is good for
nothing it should end.
Medicaid
(Page 1A). The fed is pushing this
dilemma onto the states, where balance between human self-discipline and
medical care is more evident. Louisiana is about to go into legislative
session, and Medicaid as solely a state responsibility may be discussed.
30-foot
wall (Page 2A). Whatever it takes, philanthropy
and drug traffic that brings so much misery and loss to the USA may stop. See “Family
of dead teen settles for $1 million.” I don’t even want to know the claim; just
build the wall.
Tillerson
(Page 2A). Evidence for potential
global collaboration is beginning.
Orly
Airport (Page 2A). Keep people who want to die for
mysteries away from the USA.
Appeals
court (Page 2A). That’s good. Why do courts oppose immigration
reform? How is that going to play out?
Gorsuch
(Page 3A). No matter what happens
next week, we won’t know what the future holds in the contest for dominant
opinion.
What does neutrality of law mean? I
mimic a definition for nations, from lectlaw.com/def2/n050.htm:
“The state of a court which takes no
part between two or more other litigants at war with each other. Neutrality
consists in the observance of a strict and honest impartiality, so as not to
afford advantage in the war to either party; and particularly in so far
restraining its trade to the accustomed course which is held in time of peace,
as not to render assistance to one of the belligerents in escaping the effects
of the other's hostilities Even a loan of money to one of the belligerent
parties is considered a violation of neutrality. A fraudulent neutrality is
considered as no neutrality.”
Justice Kennedy is a self-appointed
lord of dignity and equality. By what authority does he establish impartiality?
For example, a child is a person. Same-sex partners contract with other adults
to procreate a child for the partners to parent. The child has competing fathers rather than a father
and a mother and could reasonably fall in love with one of the fathers causing a divorce.. Kennedy, in his lordship, says it’s a neutral contract. May the
child disagree? If so, who can override Kennedy’s neutrality?
And Justice Thomas asserts that the
constitution for the USA fulfills the Declaration of Independence. Is his opinion
neutral to the constitution? No. Is his opinion neutral to the aims and purpose
stated in the preamble or thus to a civic people? No.
And the court says I am niggling to object to legislative prayer. The court is wrong to so accuse me.
Regardless,
I do not trust the Associated Press, in this case, Nancy Benac and Mark
Sherman, who used the phrase ‘neutrality’ of law with no explanation.
Top
economies yield (Page 3A). President
Trump is being heard and leaders are responding. We’ll see how it turns out.
Republicans at
odds. (Page 7A) and repetitiously still fighting (14A). Is
there one American who is not at odds? I especially mistrust the Associated
Press and its writers, including Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar.
Germany to pay the
US. (Page 10A). Hard for Germany to feel obligated for
the recent past?
Hawaii judge.
(Page 10A). I’m just glad my emotional side can be
kept private.
Young Americans
(Page 10A). Young or old, most Americans do not
understand the civic agreement stated by the preamble to the constitution for
the USA. Yet, most mature adults practice it.
Opinionated rather
than physical bathroom use (Page 15A). Some bills must
be rejected and some wars must be won. Cost is not a concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment