Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. We appreciate The Advocate’s attention to a continuing
anxiety and would like to turn the focus from adults to the children and thus
to achievable promising-Louisiana-future.
It’s not only the economy. Louisiana ranks 50th
among states in a country that ranks perhaps 25th in resident
satisfaction. If I recall the math correctly, that equates statistically to
1250th world ranking. I bet that’s an exaggerated yet directionally
correct view.
We want Louisiana to squeeze the $30 billion/yr Gov.
Edwards plans so as to spend $1 billion/yr making two statements to every
6-month old infant. First, you are a person of vital importance to the Great
State of Louisiana. Second we want to coach and encourage you to take charge of
your transition from feral infant to civic young adult with the understanding
and intent to live a full life. That means perhaps 40 years collaborating for civic
justice with people in this place for such time as your unique body and mind
supports. Increase the coaching and incentives at major steps in the person’s successful
journey.
A draft-proposal is available for your improvement.
Please search using [phil beaver+child incentives brief] to read the draft, perhaps
improve the proposal, and encourage your state representatives to develop the
necessary, better legislation for a better future Louisiana.
With 1 million students in Louisiana, this proposal
involves only $1,000/yr per student, a relatively small sum spent directly on
the children as civic persons rather than the education system.
Today’s thought. Flannery O’Connor
wrote, “St. Thomas called art ‘reason in making.’ The artist uses his reason to
discover an answering reason in everything he sees. For him, to be reasonable
is to find [in something] the spirit which makes it itself. It is to intrude
upon the timeless, and that is only done by the violence of a single minded
respect for the truth.” (Mystery and Manners, Page 81).
I
mimic O'Connor's idea: A civic person constrains personal passion so as to discover and utilize
the-objective-truth.
James
Gill column, “Did Saints find Jim Crow across the
Atlantic?” Gill makes the case that London imagines predators on the prowl. Seems
to me a case of when visiting London, know the customs.
I was escorting a visitor to New Orleans and called
about dress code. They did not mention that a lady at noon could not wear
shorts. When we arrived but were not admitted, we just went to another great
restaurant. If I wanted to return, my guest would wear a skirt.
Jeff
Sadow column, “The regents dodge tough college issues.”
Since the Legislature is obligated to the people, and the Regents show no
appreciation lessening Regent-responsibilities seems in order.
Michael
Gerson column, “The great American ideal will not be disrupted.”
IMO Gerson and others miss the point. Thirteen self-styled states declared independence from the
world in order to fulfill the people in each independent state. Those people later
authorized a nation of states with aims and goals stated in the preamble to the constitution
for the USA, the people retaining what they did not authoize. Those goals do not include conforming to the world.
It seems and I
hope President Trump has the vision the signers of the draft constitution had
on September 17, 1787. They were only 2/3 of representatives for the states,
and the 1/3 who were in dissent have morphed yet remain in about the same
proportion.
George
Will column, “New OMB chief tackles Rubik’s cube of
federal budget.” Seems like Muvlaney needs to squeeze trillions out of billions,
but I am glad someone is willing to try. I will never forget how hard the
Democratic Party is making it for America’s republican government to function
in this presidential election cycle. They are trying to keep my vote from
counting.
School
board (Page 1B). It’s really crazy to spar over imaginary
new cities.
Embryos
suit (Page 1B). Adult contracts regarding possible future
persons seem immoral.
Lone
democrat (Page 1A). Only the GOP could have
engineered it.
Trump
on wiretapping (Page 1A). Is
this a case of fighting BS with BS . . . or is there really something there? We
can’t learn the-objective-truth by reading the Associated Press.
Broome
(Page 1A). Thank you for the
reminder of nothing.
DOTD
(Page 2A). Is input from the Water Institute
of the Gulf, Louisiana Water Resources Institute, water suppliers such as Baton
Rouge Water Co., and perhaps others being sought?
Police
agencies (Page 7A). Police agencies are the people’s
first responders and need all the support they can get.
Trump
listening on Russia (Page 11A). The sooner the Democrats
seat President Trump’s administration the sooner the people will be served. So
far, it seems my vote for a person who has never served in elected capacity is
paying off and career grandstanders are making their marks against the people,
IMO.
Recusal
(Page 11A). I happen to agree with the opinion, but
this article is pseudo-news and belongs on an opinion page. This is one
opportunity for the people to create federal legislation that holds the media
responsible. Create stiff fines for articles that belong on opinion pages.
There are lots of them.
GOP
health push (Page 15A). The DNC should
have the courage to jump in there and compete to be the forerunner in helping
the people rather than special interest groups, but alas, they seem to be
slaves to the past seven years.
Special
by Mariano Hinojosa (Page 2D), “increasingly uncivil,” informs
us that thought is often constrained by words. We think human beings are too
psychologically powerful to accept the idea that another person’s civic
impositions should be accepted, whether the other person is ancient or modern.
The insistence on a specific civilization to socialize all peoples is false.
The statement, “And hope that eventually we will find
our way back to a more civilized society,” or conformity to an ideology, has
been the unintended quest of our work since June 21, 2014, the first annual
ratification day at EBRP libraries. However, we seek Security, as described
below.
We propose public-integrity rather than civilization and
a civic culture rather than society. We want civic morality rather than either civil
morality or social morality. So far, the civil/social response to our proposal
is stonewalling.
I found Hinojosa is part of inspirelouisiana.com/about/ ,
a Christian media outlet. Christians seem among the most determined stone-wallers
against public-integrity. Their resistance to public-integrity is
erroneous---mistaken—a sin---factious. Other groups are also stubborn.
Self-styled freethinkers seem stone-wallers.
Back to releasing thought by considering new word
usage, “civic” refers to mutually acceptable connections and transactions by
people living in this place. In a civic culture, persons iteratively
collaborate for public-integrity, which is synonymous with private-liberty-with-civic-morality.
Statutory law is determined by discovery and acceptance of the-objective-truth
rather than imposition of dominant-opinion. The consequence is
broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security, hereafter Security, with private pursuits
of personal hopes and dreams. It takes very little effort to understand these
terms.
Establishing
a civilization founded on Security seems impossible, based on this country’s
failure of its aims and purpose, expressed in the preamble to the constitution
for the USA for 230 years or bout twelve generations. They have left it to us
to establish a civic culture rather than a “civilized society.”
No comments:
Post a Comment