Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-indisputable-facts-of-reality have not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern. (I read, write, and listen to establish my opinion as I pursue the-objective-truth.)
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. I
encourage The Advocate to be alert to possible reaction to lame word-jumbles
like “medical care can be a victim of success.” When you notice a word
arrangement could seem nonsense, don't publish it.
The caption
is even lamer: “focus on insurance.” I need medical care rather than insurance.
Health begins with behavior: Bad
behavior begets bad health. Health care begins with self-control.
I think The Advocate has been
corrupted by liberal democracy and will continue writing nonsense until the
owner appreciates civic-morality and public-integrity as a good business plan.
I do not know the-objective-truth
but want iterative-collaboration for its discovery and utilization.
Civic-collaboration is achievable.
Today’s
Thought. Human biology and psychology involve appetites.
Each person may be coached to control appetites and follow the coaching. Absent coaching, he or she may experience misery and loss. Also, he or she may observe other
human outcomes. He or she may master the art of neither nourishing nor
whetting appetites unto self-destruction. If practices like prayer or meditation helps a person master
self-control, that’s good.
However, Dean’s promise that a phantasm
(today God, yesterday Jesus, a day before, the Lord) imposes self-control can be ruinous to your person.
Tax
credits (Leit). Federal tax credits are a scheme for taxation
without representation.
I elect metro-councilmen and mayors to oversee local
developments including protection of historical places. However, the federal government
arranges overriding influence based on borrowed money. I’m on the hook for the
mismanaging federal office, the interest and the principle. I’d like to see the
practice ended.
Gill
attacks (Jordan). The Advocate is in control of where to
place the comics. Some readers like comedy, and that’s the way to read Gill
without getting upset. He’s there for certain readers.
Abortion
business (Glynn). I like, “I can certainly understand why our
government would like to stay out of the [abortion business],” but prefer the
statement by MWW: “I oppose abortion for fun.”
Froma
Harrop column. “Bannon harbors fantasies
of world domination, even taking on the pope.” I question the implication that
the pope dominates the world. He’s just another clergyman people “frolic with at
home.”
Richard
Cohen column. In my state, I opposed
David Vitter from 2006 on, because he favored the populism of Christian prayer
over constitutionalism: separation of
church and state.
I thought infidelity to his wife and children was evidence that many
Catholics do not understand fidelity to the-discovered-facts. That includes
vows to self, family, the people, the nation, and the world. I gave Vitter the benefit of
the doubt, since his wife knows him better than I do, but could not avoid concern for the children.
Then, John Bel Edwards
campaign-team reported evidence that Vitter was phoning a madam when he
should have been voting as Senator for Louisiana. I voted against Vitter or for
Edwards, knowing Edwards would not improve separation of church and state.
Yet I am one of
the people who went on record as intending to vote for Trump all through the
evidence that he did not find it necessary to exercise the propriety of
conventional politics. Within politics, accepted lying-protocol must be followed. Otherwise, it’ll be the unforgivable case of liar
belittling liar. How can the voters choose?
I cheered
each time Trump confronted dishonesty with dishonesty. One of my favorite speeches
is Trump at the Al Smith dinner, Oct 21, 2016. See nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000004721603/trump-speaks-at-al-smith-dinner.html
. I thought Trump's election would convince the liars that the people preferred Trump and provide reform for continuity of the American republic.
Believing
that Trump aspires to integrity rather than conventional-political-propriety, I
imagined it would take him about three years to learn how to govern in
political settings. Thus, my trust in Trump’s integrity was and is tentative.
I always
shun hate, so it is easy to oppose Richard Cohen’s ease at loathing. After the
desperate viciousness in “As president, not a man, but a boy,” The Advocate,
February 11, 2017, I will never forget Cohen’s immoral-hubris. Also, I will
recall, “[Richard Cohen’s an] idea of a boy.”
Edward Pratt column. What are the “spoils after this devastating loss?” If it’s Hillary Clinton, one is constrained to ask, “What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make?”
It is past time to collaborate for public-integrity according to the-objective-truth.
Social
service center (Page 1B). I hope the Department of Public
Safety and Corrections selects programs for public-integrity rather than
faith-based-programs. History shows that religions promote particular people
rather than civic-morality.
According to your reference, the GEO
Group is not the right choice, though.
IMO the state may make good choices
with the money they already get rather than pressuring the people for more.
Council
members (Page 2B). I would not sign the pledge of respect without revisions to
the nine items.
As an agent for A Civic People of the
United States, a Louisiana education non-profit for willing citizens, I
contacted Jill Garner to collaborate. I think our efforts could be
complimentary.
She was delighted with my interest
in the preamble to the constitution for the USA but lost interest when I said I
oppose the Louisiana Family Forum. I appealed to the opportunity to respect my
forthrightness rather than create brick walls. She agreed to take my number and
resume the conversation after a scheduled meeting. I look forward to the call.
I dislike two of nine items in the
pledge and without further understanding don’t see how I could sign, especially
one element. Perhaps Garner could, through iterative collaboration, either
change my mind or alter the items I oppose. According to my understanding, I
could sign six of nine elements in the pledge.
I encourage citizens not to sign the
pledge of respect without due regard for personal fidelity.
Love (Page 4D, Yonat Shimron, RNS). If ever there was a strange phrase
it is “faith-based social entrepreneurship.” It is aptly followed by “Our
dignity propels us to keep going.”
“Live in
such a way that if someone spoke badly of you, no one would believe it.” But
here’s the most amazing thought of all: “Civic organizers have marveled at the
willingness of these young persons to engage.”
First, the
term “civic organizers” intrigues me, because “organizers” in 2017 American
invokes Saul Alinsky and Marxism. See D. L. Adams’s review article, “Saul
Alinsky and the rise of Amorality in American Politics,” online at newenglishreview.org/DL_Adams/Saul_Alinsky_and_the_Rise_of_Amorality_in_American_Politics/
.
Whether Marxist
or not, social morality does not equate to civic morality, and civic morality
is for the willing and therefore has only one locus of commonality:
broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security. Thereby, each parson may enjoy
private-liberty-with-civic-morality.
It is
fitting that on the same page, Christopher Simon writes, “God favors the bold.”
I struggle to place some truth to those four words. My nomination is: Bold
fidelity to the-objective-truth empowers success. (I often do not know the-objective-truth.)
3 agencies (Page 1A). Best of luck to Mayor Broome and
citizens. It’s hard to imagine how the Office of Community Development could
spend $2.2 million distributing grants. It reminds citizens of the $60 million
entrusted to the Redevelopment Authority. It seems the idea came from only one
of the mayor’s advisors.
Somali
refuge (Page 3A). If this incident the result of
activists in charge of immigration apply to Somali’s Trump order respecting
seven Arab countries?
Voter fraud (Page 3A). That kind of fraud seems feasible,
IMO. Also, there’s the case of people in malls enlisting first time voters then
telling them how to vote or even busing them to the poles with instructions on
the way.
Trump integrity? (Page 6A). It seemed clear during the campaign
that Trump would favor Israel. However, we now see that, as President, he is
being influenced to deeper consideration of the-objective-truth. It seems clear
to me that in an issue that originated with international action, settlement of
disputed land should involve international agreement. Without collaboration
rather than taking there can be no peace. If that is Trump’s thinking, I grow
more confident in my support for him and hope for the vote I cast.
Singed by Trump (Page 9A). Anyone who enjoyed benefits from
dealing with Barack Obama may be singed in encounters with President Trump. It
won’t be easy, but slowly, nations that have honesty will recognize that with
Trump only integrity will suffice. The Associated Press, Scott Pelley, and many
other celebrity media relish expressing disagreement with Trump, but to no
avail.
In
negotiating with individual national leaders, Trump appeals to their integrity toward
each other as well as with the USA. From the experience, the civic nations of
the world may learn to appreciate each other.
Teacher protests (Page 9A). IMO, “protests” is a politically
correct term for anarchy. It is barbaric that union-teachers permit representation
as people who physically block Secretary DeVos from entering a school.
Teacher protests (Page 10A). IMO, “angry voters” is a politically
correct term for anarchists. It is barbaric that people won’t let their elected
representative speak.
People may read about Saul Alinsky and realize that
organizations abuse recruits. See, for example, newenglishreview.org/DL_Adams/Saul_Alinsky_and_the_Rise_of_Amorality_in_American_Politics/
.
No comments:
Post a Comment