Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-indisputable-facts-of-reality have not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern. (I read, write, and listen to establish my opinion as I pursue the-objective-truth.)
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. Gov.
John Bell Edwards strains to spend $26 billion when $18 billion is needed! Damn
the people, “the governor---to his credit---wants to raise the taxes to pay the
bills,” boasts The Advocate.
I'm no economist, but LSU Professor
Jim Richardson and Steve Winham have my opposition in "the increase in
state spending over the past 14 years has . . . trailed the expansion of the
state's economy." Their message is: If the economy increases, government
should increase--a falsehood. If the state gets a windfall, it should save for
the next disaster, whether natural or legislative.
It's true that if you make more you
can spend more, and politicians tend to help themselves and their favored
groups to all the money they can, even at the expense of emergency funds.
Louisiana population grew at
0.06%/yr over the 5 years since 2010. If state services should expand with
population growth that’s $108 million increase per year. Assuming reasonable
growth we’d be at $18 billion from the 16.8 billion pre-Katrina budget.
Today’s thought. No matter how you
comfort yourself and nourish hopes, if behavior is bad you know it and may
either reform or risk misery and loss. Fidelity is the key to “Delight
yourself.” Shame on The Advocate for continuously publishing the mysteries of
G. E. Dean and no opposing views.
Incarceration
(Johnson). I have yet to see anyone address 1966 march icon James
Meredith’s 2016 claim: The black race ignored the duty and responsibility part
of citizenship. I celebrated the civil and voting rights acts of 1965-6 and
collaborated for reform. Meanwhile, I witnessed increases in illegal alien
employment because blacks did not want to work.
We advocate collaboration for
broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security. In other words, civic-morality. In
another phrase, public-integrity. The parts of “broadly-defined” that apply for
a civic citizen begin with taking charge of personal education, acquiring the
understanding to be able and intent to live a full life, and collaborating for
civic justice.
American free-enterprise is not great
and never was. Collaborating for justice requires reform: The system may 1)
convince the worker who has no assets to prepare for employment that pays
reasonable living plus save & invest so as to build enough wealth for
sufficient retirement plus emergency reserves, 2) assure that every production
or service function the civic culture needs is paid at wages necessary for the
first provision and 3) help someone who cannot work gain the ability to work,
no matter how long possible achievement takes. Meanwhile, dissidents---people
who are ignorant, contrary, criminal, evil or otherwise alien---must be
constrained by just-statutory-law and law enforcement.
I’d like to see Ernest Johnson and
others working to establish a civic culture. In the USA, civic-morality or
public-integrity can start with understanding and committing to the civic
agreement stated in the preamble to the constitution for the USA.
(People who ignore the preamble or oppose it as "secular" or obsolete are neglecting America's promise of greatness and exceptionalism.)
To Fanaafi Fauese Mapuna Chapman: I agree. In fact, most people are annoyed
with my work.
However, iterative collaboration for
broadly-defined-civic-safety-and-security is what 2/3 of inhabitants want.
Yet about 77% of inhabitants are---divided---willing to stake their lives on their theology. But theology should address what happens in a person's afterdeath, that vast time after body, mind and person stopped functioning. A person's afterdeath has no importance to the next person's life, and no person would negotiate their beliefs in a civic forum, say to provide better statutory law and law enforcement.
Yet about 77% of inhabitants are---divided---willing to stake their lives on their theology. But theology should address what happens in a person's afterdeath, that vast time after body, mind and person stopped functioning. A person's afterdeath has no importance to the next person's life, and no person would negotiate their beliefs in a civic forum, say to provide better statutory law and law enforcement.
Diversion
canal (Babin). Wasting $113 million is immoral. The request for $125
million needs support. I will write my representatives.
Electric
car tax (Giangrosso).
I agree with Giangrosso, and if taxing
electricity to cars is not already done, it should be---should not depend on
increased gas tax. This is the future. Germany legislated the end of the
combustion driven car, I believe by 2035.
George
Will column. On a rare, perhaps throwback, day I mostly agree with Will.
First, Trump’s profusion of dishonesty to confront
dishonesty won the election, made me nervous then, and unnerves me now. I gave
him three years to start succeeding as president before he blew right by as
candidate, with 57 % of the Electoral College and 84% of US counties. Both Will
and I are concerned, yet I do not consider myself wiser than Trump. He is in a
USA of enemies more than any person in history who carried the will of We the
Civic People of the United States.
I trust that when Trump looks into it, he’ll oppose civil forfeiture. That this sentence is last does not diminish its importance: I clearly agree with Will.
I trust that when Trump looks into it, he’ll oppose civil forfeiture. That this sentence is last does not diminish its importance: I clearly agree with Will.
E.
J. Dionne column. Dionne has a strange sense of the human
quest for personal perfection.
First, he wants Coretta King’s 1986 opinion to
be prominent in 2017. Heck; in 2016, 1966 march icon James Meredith said the black race has failed the duty and responsibility part of citizenship. Second, Dionne wants the 1986 Senate rejection of Sessions to
hold in 2017. Third, he wants Elizabeth Warren’s senatorial arrogance to hold
against all odds and the people.
Dionne presents himself as an arrogant demigod. Maybe he is. Beyond her
skill at lying, Hillary Clinton ruined her chances with personal arrogance. I
expect the same doom for Warren: Arrogance may ruin her chances.
James
Gill column. I
thought shock was Gill’s specialty and think he shirked his duty to readers. Gill, please write
the truth about Chris Roberts’ letter, salacious as the phrase may be.
Michael
Gerson column. IMO,
Gerson brags about his speech-writing skill but overlooks brilliant thought. It
seems that Gerson credits himself for both written words on September 14, 2001
and spontaneity later that day.
However, Gerson misses his own brilliance in the
phrase “aggressive authenticity” to describe Donald Trump’s openness to the
people. Tragically, Gerson bets on Trump’s failure. The election proved that a
civic people saw through Trump’s shtick and recognized his core decency. Consequently,
he is President of the United States and will overcome the negative media as
well as the AMO democrats in federal roles that by law answer to the people.
The Alinsky-Marxist organizers (AMO) have recognized
that their methods are widely known and are now claiming they are using
Tea-Party tactics. See slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/12/the_tea_party_taught_us_how_to_resist_donald_trump.html
. It’s a chicken-and-egg question. Tea-party folks were using Alinsky rules,
described in newenglishreview.org/DL_Adams/Saul_Alinsky_and_the_Rise_of_Amorality_in_American_Politics/
.
Broome:
fatal shootings (Page 1B). Broome, with her church and
dialogues on race, is a new entry in the problem. The liberal
democracy that is promoted by the media and Mass Communications schools and
other liberal academia is not good public policy. Statutory law must be upheld
and the civil rights of first responders---police, sheriffs, firemen, EMS, investigators,
and DA’s---must be supported by civil administrators, legislators, lawyers, and
judges.
Rehabilitation
(Page 1B). I think rehabilitation should focus on
civic morality instead of social morality or religious morality. Persons who
understand and practice civic morality contribute to public-integrity, which is
“so hard to find” (Joel).
Trump
slams (Page 1A). See 7B, where Michael Gerson expresses an opinion that predicts
America’s failure yet brilliantly expresses Trump’s character as “aggressive
authenticity.” Who could ask for anything more?
NATO
notice (Page 2A). It’s a notice every liberal democrat
should consider: We the Civic People of the United States “cannot care more for
your children’s future than you do.” We, the people may consider that preamble to the
constitution for the USA and understand that “posterity” means your children’s
future.
Protester
terrorists (Page 3A). Passion-incited violence, damage, injury,
and death during intentional disruption is the heart of Alinsky-Marxist
organization (AMO), now in its sixth decade. Chief extant AMO leaders include
Jeremiah Wright and his parishioner, Barack Obama. AMO recruits are now trying
to obfuscate their terror under the guise of “Tea-Party” tactics.
Gun
ban (Page 3A). Progressives have the hubris to stereotype
people.
Illegal
immigrants (Page 3A). Remove “Dreamers” quickly when they
have criminal behavior.
One
state: Isreal (Page 5A). Trump’s statements about
Israel were authentic, and so were Netanyahu’s. Reminded me of January 20,
2017, President Donald Trump: “Together,
we will determine the course of America and the world for years to come. We
will face challenges. We will confront hardships. But we will get the job done.”
You won’t get that reminder from the media, I’m guessing.
FBI disparity
(Page 7A).
Is it time for the Democrats to jail Hillary Clinton for blatant failure?
Other dialogues:
Devlin Barrett and Carol E. Lee, “Flynn Probed by FBI
Over Calls,” Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2017.
The events described seem like an indictment of the
FBI and other federal authorities for not making timely transition from the
Obama regime to the Trump regime.
Liberal democrats in official authority are
so sorry their opinion did not prevail in the election they are insubordinate
after the election. The renegades if not traitors may eventually answer to
statutory law and law enforcement.
AG Sally Yates seems egregiously offensive
for harboring harmless information to be used to fabricate a media-spin about administrative-risk
to the people.
Judges who allow resentment of President Trump's executive orders inspire unconstitutional actions may find themselves removed. I hope so.
No comments:
Post a Comment