Phil Beaver works to establish opinion when the-objective-truth has not been discovered. He seeks to refine his opinion by learning other people’s experiences and observations. The comment box below invites sharing facts, opinion, or concern.
Note: I often connect words in a phrase with the dash in order to represent an idea. For example, frank-objectivity represents the idea of candidly expressing the-objective-truth without addressing possible error or attempting to balance the expression.
The Advocate:
Our
Views. Urging
“the new president” to partner with DOTD is a little crazy . . . and arrogant.
I guess liberal-democrat writers
don’t expect readers to respond to “President Barack Obama,” vs “the new
president.” The Advocate foolishly discounts the people who voted for relief
from Obama's organization-for-conflict-unto-eternity. Perhaps The Advocate
partners with Obama’s OFA, headquartered in Chicago. Ahh Chicago; the city that
gave us Al Capone, Saul Alinsky, and Barack Obama: brutality, violence, and
audacity, respectively.
I’m reminded of Gov. Edwards
partnering with the pope during President Trump’s inauguration. How can
Louisiana’s No. 1 expect favor from The Advocate’s and Louisiana's “Trump”?
It is good to see The Advocate suggesting
that DOTD consider partnering over several years, but I suggest DOTD partner
with President Donald Trump.
One problem is that Louisiana
officials respond to special interest politics and thereby squander public
funds. I want the 20 cent gas tax, if and only if pain and misery suffered by
Louisiana’s No. 1, the people, would be lessened very soon.
Respecting the Loyola Streetcar line
after two years’ operation, “So far, the streetcar expansion has proven a boon
for economic development, yet has not and will not achieve a high-quality
transit service as designed.” See
http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/politics/article_928b253f-3a9e-5adc-9a8a-e1b51690e717.html
. “The $53 million project was partially funded by a Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery grant.” See
http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/article_dbef6c7a-2926-5235-a539-7baa126b62c0.html
. I could not find data on the “boon for economic development.” A streetcar
from LSU to downtown would be nostalgic and probably help BRAF. Money from
Louisiana’s No. 1 should benefit the people.
The I-10 FastLane grant of $60 M for
two new lanes from Lafayette to Henderson is expected to cost roughly $300
million. Politicians touted that the state would now have money for “a new Washington
Street I-10 exit in Baton Rouge.” See
theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/article_2c4e311e-59a9-11e6-a624-2bdd0bf7e8eb.html
.
Actually seeing these two projects
started would lend Gov. John Bel Edwards a touch of much needed civic
credibility.
Today’s thought. Psalms 51:17. In this case,
both David and Dean address “the Lord” as “God.” That’s a leap of
interpretation I would not take.
IMO,
be faithful to: perseverance, self-reliance, and humility. My Scots-Irish
ancestors taught, “Better people faced worse events.”
Town
meetings (McIlwraith). Ms McIlwraith, IMO, citizens may
collaborate for civic safety and security rather than claim “We all know . . .”
I think Powerpoint can be a very powerful communications tool.
The presenter
must be explicit and the listener must be attentive, thoughtful, open-minded,
and ready to share related personal experience and observations. The presenter
asks, “Are there questions or comments?” The listener clarifies comprehension
of the issue and the presenter’s solution. Then, the listener becomes speaker
and the Town-Hall host becomes listener. He or she either benefits from the
former listener’s experiences and observations or receives approval of the
solution offered. If the former listener has suggested a better statement of
the problem or a better solution, the host commits to further action on the
better ideas. That is a process I call iterative-collaboration, which I
advocate for a possible better future.
I am glad you took time to “speak truth, or at least
our truths.” For a better future, citizens may iteratively collaborate to
discover the-objective-truth. That is not a casual, three-word phrase collapsed
to one idea by the dashed connections. Every modifier I’ve ever seen—your, my,
our, absolute, ultimate, nature’s, the people’s, God’s---none of those
modifiers impacts the-objective-truth. For a soft example, people who lie to
each other cannot communicate. For a hard example, the earth is like a globe
rather than like a plate. For a brutish example, conceiving a child with no
intent to care for him or her is immoral. Again, bringing it to the Powerpoint
presentation, health care to support uncontrolled adult appetites is
unsustainable.
Anyone who wants dialogue may talk. Some politicians
demand “respect,” but I think elected officials should earn appreciation
without thought of respect. But the same is true of citizens: a citizen may
earn appreciation by iteratively collaborating for the-objective-truth.
Obama organizations, instigated and supported by OFA
in Chicago and Washington do not seek appreciation: they seek conflict unto
eternity, as promoted by Saul Alinsky, d. 1972.
Alinsky learned from Al Capone,
also in Chicago. See nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/02/obamas_activist_group_ofa_left.html,
thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html
, ofa.us , facebook.com/OFA.LA/ , en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizing_for_Action
.
Clown (Gacharna). To T. Steven Bell. Obama was an
organizer, took an audacious breather as president, and has returned to
organizing. He's encountering rebuke from some democrats. See
nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/02/obamas_activist_group_ofa_left.html .
President Trump is an administrator
who offers integrity and ether gets integrity or not. We saw that when Michael
Flynn lied to Vice-President Pence, when NATO committed to getting up to date
on their 2% of GDP contributions, and when Russia failed to convince the administration
that they will back off their European and other aggressions, so Russian
sanctions are still in force.
That’s a
clown I’ll vote for again if I get the chance.
Byron
York column. Mainstream media spun Pence apologizing
for Trump. York quotes NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, “I expect all
allies to make good on the promise that we made in 2014 to increase defense
spending and to make sure to have a fairer burden of sharing.” and “. . . we
agree that the alliance can, and should do more, in the fight against terrorism.”
Mainstream media obfuscates the truth. Obfuscating the
truth is lying.
Melinda
Deslatte column. I do not know if the spin is coming from
Deslatte, but it seems so. If so, she may be expressing social morality when
what the people need is civic morality. Deslatte writes of “tax reform,”
whereas what Louisiana needs is spending reform. I tentatively question
Deslatte’s integrity.
Clarence
Page column. Either Page suffers a liberal-democrat
mind or he cannot recognize a lie when he writes it. “In fact, if the leaks are
real, the news is real, too.” Real leaks are often lies, and Page either knows
that or . . . you tell me. I can’t read Page’s mind. (BTW, he claims to read
President Trump’s mind.) Page long-since forsook integrity.
David
Ignatius column. Russia did not convince President Trump
that they would back off their aggression, so sanctions are still in place.
Ignatius spins that for the pseudo-news of Michael Flynn’s conversations rather
than President Trump’s fidelity to the people in firing Flynn for lying. I
suspect Ignatius’s integrity.
Jeff
Sadow column (Feb 26). To Matthew White: First you call me a donkey when I'm a bygone elephant. Then you
speak of "citizens of Louisiana starving" and witness for "most
people," notwithstanding the obesity facts: ://nola.com/.../2016/09/louisiana_obese_adults_diabete.html
. At least you left me out of "most people" so I can utilize the
facts.
You write like a flailing-liberal-democrat. But that’s OK. I write like I voted for President Trump and wish you and me well notwithstanding the GOP.
You write like a flailing-liberal-democrat. But that’s OK. I write like I voted for President Trump and wish you and me well notwithstanding the GOP.
Judge
Pitcher (Page ID, Feb 25).
Each time I read about “the Rev. Fred Jeff Smith, pastor of
Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church,” I am reminded of liberation theology, dating
from the 1960s in Latin America.
See theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/entertainment_life/faith/article_5c93d0f8-e271-11e6-a2d3-f3a78dd096a1.html . Smith said:
See theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/entertainment_life/faith/article_5c93d0f8-e271-11e6-a2d3-f3a78dd096a1.html . Smith said:
Historically,
our (black people) view of Jesus is from the perspective of the oppressed.
We have a history of oppression in this country. We have people trying to use
the Bible to continue and to justify that oppression. Our theological view is
primarily one of liberation.
[Luke 4:8,]
"The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim
good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and
recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free" [supports] the
liberation theology position.
That's the
position that Jesus took. And, if we are disciples of Christ, that's the
position we should take, not for ourselves but for all people. Anyone that is
oppressed, Jesus saw it as a ministry to relieve them of that oppression. It's that
position in general that African-Americans have historically had in their
approach to Jesus. (White people) don't have that history. They don't
have that connection with historical oppression in this country — nor in their
religion. Therefore, their approach to Jesus is from the standpoint of the
oppressor.
I
have no problem with Smith’s beliefs for Smith, but hold them in error relative
to public-integrity.
Regardless
of liberation theology or any other Christian opinion, I think it is immoral to
apply religious morals in civic courtrooms. Civic morality should be judged
according to statutory law and statutory law enforcement. If statutory law
needs reform, let’s get the job done. I appreciate officials who practice
public-integrity.
Coastal
restoration (Page 1B). To Tom Ledet: It’s been only a week
since we learned this program got fast tracked. The dolphin news foretells
serious delay, but I am glad to know of it now. I wonder how many dolphins are
at risk.
Building levees seemed essential, but my goodness what
unintended consequences. I wonder if coastal restoration is the right approach
and scanned this information: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_River_Delta#History_and_growth_of_the_Mississippi_River_Delta
and thelensnola.org/2017/01/03/latest-coastal-restoration-plan-says-thousands-of-homes-may-have-to-be-elevated-or-bought-out/
. Again, if I lived in proximity to the coastline, I'd move rather than count
on government wisdom and timing.
I suppose the state has considered drawing a line on
the coast with levees to keep the land in, giving up the land outside the
levees, but have no idea if my assumption is correct.
New
bridge (Page 1A). Locate the new bridge for efficient truck traffic to/from
New Orleans, IMO, close to I-10, west of the current I-10 bridge.
If tolls are involved, toll both the
new and the old bridges.
Regardless, these parish president
debates are old pseudo-news.
Federal
dollar loss (Page 1A). Federal dollars
confuse Gov. John Bel Edwards. If these dollars can be lost, he’ll lose them.
Chicago
seminar (Page 2A). Do I smell Obama’s Organizing
for Action (OFA), headquartered in Chicago?
Christians
flee in Egypt (Page 2A). There’s no
evidence that Christians in the USA are at risk, the “nice guys” tell us “brutes.”
ACA
fallout (Page 5A). The Associated Press is
way out of date. There were adverse side effects when ACA was signed on March
23, 2010. Constraining the misery
and loss has begun.
New
Dem Party (Page 7A). “ . . . opposing President Donald
Trump’s policies,” without considering each policy relative to
the-objective-truth, evaluating how they might help both the “nice guys” and “the
brutes,” considering possible alternatives, offering any better policies for
Trump to consider, and continuing iterative collaboration until the USA is
pursuing the-objective-truth is civically immoral.
Ungodly
abuse (Page 8A). With 43 witnessing to the abuse, I do not
understand why Jane Whaley and her husband are not behind bars. The first
notion that comes to mind is that it would start and ungodly statutory control
of the clergy leading to mayhem in the religion-government-partnerships that
prevail in the USA.
Other dialogues:
Nikki
Haley (politico). I had not read anything
recently about our UN work.
I very much like the consideration to drop out of
the Human Rights Council. It has been out of control for years. See politico.eu/article/us-considers-quitting-un-human-rights-council-donald-trump-united-nations-nikki-haley-rex-tillerson-foreign-policy/
. It is a very serious consideration, because when a party stonewalls the
opposition, they cannot communicate. However, if the opposition is merely
negotiating for you to agree, planning to renege at their convenience,
stonewalling is an option. Trump understands negotiations, and he chose Haley.
My presidential vote is looking good.
No comments:
Post a Comment